Clock Simulation Jenn Transue, Tim Murphy, and Jacob Medinilla 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design with Root Locus Lecture 9.
Advertisements

Automated Control Systems, 8/E by Benjamin C. Kuo and Farid Golnaraghi Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. Inc. All rights reserved. Figure 10-1 (p. 433)
Lect.7 Steady State Error Basil Hamed
Nise/Control Systems Engineering, 3/e
Control Systems Engineering, Fourth Edition by Norman S. Nise Copyright © 2004 by John Wiley & Sons. All rights reserved. Figure 9.1 a. Sample root locus,
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Chapter 7 System Compensation (Linear Control System Design)
A Typical Feedback System
Direct z-Domain Digital Controller Design. OUTLINE Advantages/disadvantages. Design procedures. Direct z-design examples.
Chapter 5 – The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
PD Controller 1.Find the steady-state output due to unit-step r d. 2.Find the steady-state output due to unit-step input (with r d =0)
Chapter 7: The Root Locus Method In the preceding chapters we discussed how the performance of a feedback system can be described in terms of the location.
Lecture 9: Compensator Design in Frequency Domain.
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
Prof. Wahied Gharieb Ali Abdelaal Faculty of Engineering Computer and Systems Engineering Department Master and Diploma Students CSE 502: Control Systems.
Internal Model Controller Design for a Robot arm By Vishal Kumar Advisor: Gary L. Dempsey 5/6/08 Bradley University Department of Computer and Electrical.
LECTURE#11 PID CONTROL AUTOMATION & ROBOTICS
Professor of Electrical Engineering
Chapter 8 Performance of P-only, PI and PID Controllers.
PID Control and Root Locus Method
ME 270 Final Project Presentation Operational Amplifiers.
MODEL REFERENCE ADAPTIVE CONTROL
Chapter 7 Control Systems Design by Root-Locus Method 7.1 Introduction -The primary objective of this chapter is to present procedures for the design and.
Ch. 6 Single Variable Control
Robot Sensors Kevin Watson and Rich Petras. Overview ➲ Sensors ● Micro Switch ● Gyro ● Encoders ➲ Command Sequencing ➲ PID Control.
INC341 Design with Root Locus
Brief Review of Control Theory
Ch. 9 Application to Control. 9.1 Introduction to Control Consider a causal linear time-invariant system with input x(t) and output y(t). Y(s) = Gp(s)X(s)
Distributed Laboratories: Control System Experiments with LabVIEW and the LEGO NXT Platform Greg Droge, Dr. Bonnie Heck Ferri, Jill Auerbach.
INC341 Design Using Graphical Tool (continue)
1 Chap 6 The Compensation of the linear control systems P553.
Feedback Control system
University of Virginia PID Controllers Jack Stankovic University of Virginia Spring 2015.
PID. The proportional term produces an output value that is proportional to the current error value. Kp, called the proportional gain constant.
Modern Control System EKT 308
Control Systems EE 4314 Lecture 12 Fall 2015 Indika Wijayasinghe.
MESB374 System Modeling and Analysis PID Controller Design
PID CONTROLLERS By Harshal Inamdar.
Lec 11. Common Controllers Some commonly used controllers –Proportional Controller –Integration Controller –Derivative Controller Reading: 5-8. TexPoint.
Lecture 17: Introduction to Control (part III)
A Freq. Resp. Example (PID) Wednesday 25 Oct 2013 EE 401: Control Systems Analysis and Design A Radar Tracking System  Design a PID controller  Specs:
Cruise Control 3 RETURN OF THE SPEED CONTROL JEFF FERGUSON, TOM LEICK.
ENTC 395 Lecture 7a. Today 4 PID control –Overview –Definitions –Open loop response 4 Example –SIMULINK implementation.
Modern Control System EKT 308 Root Locus and PID controllers.
Lecture 16: Introduction to Control (Part II)
Chapter 4 A First Analysis of Feedback Feedback Control A Feedback Control seeks to bring the measured quantity to its desired value or set-point (also.
ChE 182 Chemical Process Dynamics and Control
Review. Feedback Terminology In Block diagrams, we use not the time domain variables, but their Laplace Transforms. Always denote Transforms by (s)!
ABL Tracking System PRESENTED BY: SIDNEY JONES AND AJ MARIN.
Exercise 1 (Root Locus) Sketch the root locus for the system shown in Figure K 1 (
Overhead Controller Design Project Name Department and University Date Class Name.
Modern Control Systems (MCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain Assistant Professor URL :
Lecture 9: PID Controller.
Controller design by R.L. Typical setup: C(s)G p (s) Root Locus Based Controller Design Goal: 1.Select poles and zero of C(s) so that R.L. pass through.
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 7. Forced Response Errors Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Laboratory.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
BIRLA VISHWAKARMA MAHAVIDHYALAYA ELECTRONICS & TELECOMUNICATION DEPARTMENT o – ANKUR BUSA o – KHUSHBOO DESAI UNDER THE GUIDENCE.
Lecture 11/12 Analysis and design in the time domain using root locus North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
Vision Lab System VISION SYSTEM Chapter 9. Design via Root Locus Youngjoon Han
ABE425 Engineering Measurement Systems ABE425 Engineering Measurement Systems PID Control Dr. Tony E. Grift Dept. of Agricultural & Biological Engineering.
Exercise 1 Suppose we have a simple mass, spring, and damper problem. Find The modeling equation of this system (F input, x output). The transfer function.
Page : PID Controller Chapter 3 Design of Discrete- Time control systems PID C ontroller.
Dr. Hatem Elaydi Digital Control, EELE 4360 Dec. 16, 2014
PID Controllers Jordan smallwood.
Design via Root Locus (Textbook Ch.9).
Lec 14. PID Controller Design
Basic Design of PID Controller
University of Virginia
Chapter 9 Design via Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Chapter 9 Design via Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Presentation transcript:

Clock Simulation Jenn Transue, Tim Murphy, and Jacob Medinilla 1

Overview  Project Overview  Introduction  Background  Design Specifications  Preliminary Design  Simulation  Conclusion  Project Overview  Introduction  Background  Design Specifications  Preliminary Design  Simulation  Conclusion 2

Project Overview Tim Murphy 3

Introduction  Clock simulation  Closed-loop position  Tracking a stepped input  Clock simulation  Closed-loop position  Tracking a stepped input 4

Background 5

Design Specifications  Time domain specifications:  Settling time: < 0.5 seconds  Percent overshoot: < 10%  Zero steady-state error  Variation of a PID controller  Time domain specifications:  Settling time: < 0.5 seconds  Percent overshoot: < 10%  Zero steady-state error  Variation of a PID controller 6

Preliminary Design Jenn Transue 7

Preliminary Design  Response to a step input  Uncompensated System  Proportional (P) Controller  Proportional Derivative (PD) Controller  Response to a step input  Uncompensated System  Proportional (P) Controller  Proportional Derivative (PD) Controller 8

Preliminary Design – Uncompensated  Uncompensated closed-loop system:  54.6% overshoot  1.01 second settling time  Zero steady-state error  Uncompensated closed-loop system:  54.6% overshoot  1.01 second settling time  Zero steady-state error 9

Preliminary Design – P Controller  Root Locus Analysis:  10% Overshoot  K P =  Root Locus Analysis:  10% Overshoot  K P =

Preliminary Design – P Controller  Compensated closed-loop system:  K p =  9.97% overshoot  0.94 second settling time  Zero steady-state error  Cannot meet settling time specification  Compensated closed-loop system:  K p =  9.97% overshoot  0.94 second settling time  Zero steady-state error  Cannot meet settling time specification 11

Preliminary Design – PD Controller 12

Preliminary Design – PD Controller  Adjusted overshoot specification in calculations  Compensated closed-loop system:  K p =  K d =  10% overshoot  second settling time  Zero steady-state error  Do not need an integral component  Adjusted overshoot specification in calculations  Compensated closed-loop system:  K p =  K d =  10% overshoot  second settling time  Zero steady-state error  Do not need an integral component 13

Simulation Jacob Medinilla 14

Simulation – Pole-Zero Plot  Compensated closed-loop system  Stable  Relatively fast system  Compensated closed-loop system  Stable  Relatively fast system 15

Simulation – Model Compensated System Response to Stepped Input 16

Simulation – Results Compensated System Response to Stepped Input 17

Conclusion – Expected Challenges  Design not validated  Potential for unexpected behavior  Sensitivity to controller tuning  Possibility erroneous values from previous labs  Design not validated  Potential for unexpected behavior  Sensitivity to controller tuning  Possibility erroneous values from previous labs 18

Conclusion – Schematic 19

Summary  Uncompensated System cannot meet specifications  Proportional Controller cannot meet specifications  PD Controller required  K p =  K d =  Will need to adjust gains to achieve specifications in lab  Uncompensated System cannot meet specifications  Proportional Controller cannot meet specifications  PD Controller required  K p =  K d =  Will need to adjust gains to achieve specifications in lab 20

Questions? 21