Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Advertisements

Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Presentation Outline What is a Healthy Neighborhood? Planning Trends and Impacts on Health Planning Tools for Healthy Communities.
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY PLAN - An Introduction Presentation to Planning and Development Committee – February 16,
© 2001 Joint Venture : Silicon Valley Network. “Silicon Valley is at an important evolutionary stage... Our region needs to decide what kind of place.
Introduction/Site Analysis Branford Landfill – Sun Valley Branford Landfill – Sun Valley Abandoned and idle for 40 years Abandoned and idle for 40 years.
Module 1 BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES AROUND TRANSIT 1.
 Awarded Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Grant for integrated land use and transportation planning efforts ( )  Consultant.
Capital Bikeshare Expansion to Montgomery County Public Meeting 11/29/11.
Twinbrook Sector Plan A New Community in the Technology Corridor
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit Oriented Development Plan ABAG/MTC/ULI Workshop September 29, 2006.
The Transit Metropolis. What is a Transit Metropolis? Transit metropolis is a region where a ‘workable fit’ exists between transit services and urban.
1 Think Big – Build Small Presented to White Flint Sector Plan Advisory Committee Nov, 2007 Presented by Natalie Goldberg.
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Community Opportunities The values associated with Smart Growth communities encourage affordable, mixed income housing; higher density; and a vibrant,
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan
Multimodal Concurrency: Response to 2005 Legislative Session Briefing for House Local Government Committee November 30, 2006 King Cushman Puget Sound Regional.
Walking and cycling routes Local facilities Streets Open space Public transport Supporting infrastructure Creating ‘commons’ Local planning.
Developing Analytical Processes and Tools to Evaluate Transit-Oriented Developments Scott Holcomb, PE, Gannett Fleming, Inc. Mark Radovic, Gannett Fleming,
GEOG 442 Day 19: Commercial and Retail Analysis, and Community Facilities.
The Freight Village What it is What it does Feasibility in NYMTC region Howie Mann, Project Manager, NYMTC Presentation to December 15, 2010Talking Freight.
LEED ND Rating System of Green Business Council – Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design One of many GBC systems – Building Design & Construction.
SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL STATION AREA PLANNING City of Seattle Station Area Planning in Seattle SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL STATION AREA PLANNING.
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
August 2004 Hickory by Choice Linking Land Use and Air Quality Planning.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester May 21, 2012.
Official Plan Review - Phase II CITIZEN REFERENCE PANEL.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Richmond Highway Transit Center Feasibility Study Briefing with the Fairfax County Transportation.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
GROUP MEMBERS: Ramos Ivett # Lugo Valmore #
2030 Mobility Plan City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department January 2011.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
1.Identify regional strategic areas for infill and investment 2.Develop “complete communities” 3.Develop nodes on a corridor 4.Plan for a changing demand.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
A New TOD Policy for Regional Transit Expansions Steve Heminger Executive Director March 11, 2005.
EPA’s Development, Community and Environment Division: T ools for Evaluating Smart Growth and Climate Change February 28, 2002 Ilana Preuss.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Saint John. ATSJ VISION A City that supports a high quality of life where calm and friendly streets encourage the connection between.
Urban Sprawl Government notices problems in the 1980s –Urban sprawl –Car ownership rising (1960: 113/ : 422/1000) –Little housing for low income.
Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.
1/14 Next Steps for Participating Economies to Develop EE Urban Passenger Transportation 5 March, 2012 APERC Workshop, Kuala Lumpur Bing-Chwen Yang Team.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
Atlanta Regional Commission Tom Weyandt, Department Director Comprehensive Planning May 2008.
1. 2 Which attributes make a community successful?
Railroad Ave eBART Station Area Specific Plan TOD MarketPlace, September 29, 2006 C I T Y O F P I T T S B U R G.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
TOD 101 BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES AROUND TRANSIT 1.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
Smart Growth and Air Quality: Design Concepts to Protect Human Health David B. Goldstein, Ph.D. Natural Resources Defense Council San Francisco, CA
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Potential Neighborhood Development Strategies 158 acres Close.
What are Complete Streets?. Complete Streets place an emphasis on alternative modes of transportation being incorporated into the streetscape and design.
Urban Design and Livability Bruce Monighan AIA Urban Design Manager, City of Sacramento City of Sacramento Planning Academy March 16, 2016.
Planning Healthy Neighbourhoods Presenter: Stephanie Knox.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
MODULE 4, LESSON 2 Fundamentals of Transit Service and Networks.
Photo credit: Wu Wenbin
The City of Colorado Springs Recognized a Unique and Powerful Window of Opportunity: Linking Expansion of its Knowledge and Innovation Capacity (UCCS)
Guiding principles Balance portfolio of transit projects using multiple transportation modes. Increase mobility for workers to and from major job centers.
Presentation transcript:

Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities

Community Service Integration ► Thinking of transportation as more than travel  Remember, transportation is a derived good  Integrating opportunities to accomplish many tasks other than commuting ► Child Care ► Retail services ► Employment opportunities ► Opportunities for mode transfers

Community Service Integration

Successful Design Principles ► Stations as Community Hubs ► Tapering of Densities from Stations ► Presence of a Major Public Amenity ► Mixed Land Uses ► Intermodalism ► Accent on Livability ► Parking Management

Successful Design Principles ► Stations as Community Hubs  The center of the neighborhood  Hub has a visual focus  Hub has a functional focus

Successful Design Principles ► Tapering Densities from Stations  Concentration of activities (the functional focus of the station)  Supply of transportation proximate to demand  “ Livable ” areas further removed from majority of traffic and congestion

Successful Design Principles ► Presence of Major Public Amenity  The “ Visual Focus ”  Public Square or Park  Administrative Center  Harkening back to the Agora  Public Space = Public Use, Public Involvement

Successful Design Principles ► Mixed Land Uses  Provision of “ All-Day, All-Week ” Trip Generators  Promotion of Travel Efficiencies  Creation of a Vibrant Neighborhood (aside from transportation issues)

Successful Design Principles ► Intermodalism  Seamless Connectivity  Multimodal

Successful Design Principles ► Accent on Livability  Landscaping  Public Amenities  Public Art  Public Furniture  Shade

Successful Design Principles ► Parking Management  Pricing ► Make cost of auto use more visible  Siting ► Balancing “ seamless transfer ” with access to non- transport activity

Considerations for Design ► Density ► Land Use Composition ► Public Environment ► Urban TOD or Neighborhood TOD?

Density ► Density accomplishes a number of things  Shortens trips  Encourages non-motorized travel  Increases private and public mode occupancy ► Increased Density = Decrease in VMT  Vehicle Miles Travelled

Density ► Rules of Thumb:  7 units / acre supports basic bus service  15 units / acre supports premium bus service  units / acre supports light rail

Densities ► Type of density matters  Employment Density ► ~ 25 jobs per acre (bus) ► ~ 15,000 jobs within a half mile  Residential Density

Land Use ► Goal is to internalize trip making  Analogous to internalizing costs of trips ► Reduce feeling of being stranded ► Shared parking reduces demand for land

Land Use

Design Quality ► Makes you want to be there ► Pedestrian Friendly

Design Quality

► Create Pedestrian Streets ► Orient Buildings to the streets ► Set minimum FARs  Minimizes dead space .35  2 ► Grids are good ► Traffic Calming

► Short Blocks ► Continuous sidewalk network ► Safety ► Landscaping Design Quality