TSG-S Project Coordination Recommendations Nick Yamasaki TSG-S Chair ABSTRACT: This document presents TSG-S recommendations for improved coordination of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use cases for Device Binding 3GPP2 TSG-S WG4 S Source: Qualcomm Incorporated Contact(s): Anand Palanigounder,
Advertisements

Title: eDRVCC requirement and method Source: China Telecom Abstract:
IP Connectivity for E911 in HRPD/PDS Networks Page 1 IP Connectivity for Emergency Calls in HRPD/PDS Networks 3GPP2 Meeting, 1/07 IP Connectivity for Emergency.
XHRPD Example Scenario for MSS Masa Shirota Qualcomm Inc. July 15, GPP2 Dalian Meeting Recommendation: FYI Notice QUALCOMM Incorporated grants a.
3GPP2 A r0 3GPP2 C xxxr0 TSG-A WG3 and TSG-C WG2 Title: HRPD Redirect on EPC Unavailable Source: Mike DolanAlcatel-Lucent Dave.
SOURCE:Chair, Editor CONTACT: Alex Gogic – TSG-S WG1 Mike Dolan – ABSTRACT: This contribution.
1 Title: TDF support in cdma2000 1x and HRPD Networks Sources: China Telecom, ZTE, Huawei Contact: CT: Heng Nie ( ), Congjie Mao(
1 Title: Need for the Message Integrity of User traffic Abstract: From both: competitive and security standpoints, UMB standard should add the option of.
1 May 14, 2007 Zhibi Wang, Simon Mizikovsky – Alcatel-Lucent Vidya Narayanan, Anand Palanigounder – QUALCOMM ABSTRACT: Access authentication architecture.
ABSTRACT: This contribution proposes the HRPD-WiMAX handoff solution. TITLE: HRPD-WiMAX Handoff TSG-A WG4 RECOMMENDATION: Review and Adopt Samsung Electronics.
1 cdma2000® Data Service Transition to NULL Support Jun Wang Ravi Patwardhan June 5, 2003 Recommendation -
© Alcatel-Lucent | M2M Numbering | April 12, GPP2 M2M TITLE Numbering in 3GPP2 for M2MSOURCE Mike Dolan, Alcatel-Lucent, Mike.
Broadcast Area Based Management for BCMCS Quanzhong Gao Weidong Wu 04/05/2005.
Security Framework for (e)HRPD 1 S GPP2 TSG-S WG4 Source: QUALCOMM Incorporated Contact(s): Anand Palanigounder
SCFAH Title: Draft Baseline Ad-Hoc Recommendation to SC on 3GPP2 Future Source: J. Brownley, Ad-Hoc Chair Abstract: This is a proposed draft.
SCFAH r1 Title: Working Draft “Ad-Hoc Recommendation to SC on 3GPP2 Future” Source: 3GPP2 Future Ad Hoc Abstract: This is the draft baseline.
The contributing companies grant a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organizational Partners to incorporate text or other copyrightable.
ABSTRACT: This contribution offers some suggestions for the support of Femto Devices in 3GPP2 standards. TITLE: Femto Device Support TSG-A WG4 RECOMMENDATION:
Broadcast/Multicast Priority List JUNHYUK SONG SAMSUNG Incorporated grants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organization Partners to incorporate.
X xxx China Telecom Requirements on Accounting at HA/LMA Title: Accounting at HA/LMA for cdma2000 (Work Item # 3GPP ) Sources: China Telecom.
Proposed 1x Device Binding Solution Based on SX & SX GPP2 TSG-SX WG4 SX Source(s): Qualcomm Incorporated.
Proposed Solution for Device Binding 3GPP2 TSG-S WG4 S Source: Qualcomm Incorporated Contact(s): Anand Palanigounder,
May 12, 2008 Alcatel Lucent, Cisco, Motorola, Nortel, Verizon ABSTRACT: Proposed is additional key hierarchy and derivation for EPS access over eHRPD.
1 Authentication and User Profile April 24, 2007 Jun Wang QUALCOMM Inc. Notice Contributors grant a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organization.
3GPP2 SX r0 TSG-SX WG3 - PDS Title: Overview of the 3GPP TFT change and Possible Solutions Source: TSG-SX WG3 Chair and Vice Chair Abstract:
ABSTRACT: This contribution introduces the inter-RAT fast handover solution. TITLE: Inter-Radio Access Technology Fast Handover TSG-A WG4 RECOMMENDATION:
HRPD Network Load Balance ZTE grants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organizational Partners to incorporate text or other copyrightable material.
SCFAH Title: Draft Baseline Ad-Hoc Recommendation to SC on 3GPP2 Future ver2 Source: J. Brownley, Ad-Hoc Chair Abstract: This is a proposed.
SOURCE: Du Yunqi ABSTRACT: This contribution provides some information of Galileo system to clarify some questions based on.
August 25, 2008 Alcatel Lucent ABSTRACT: 1x System Reliability is important in the face of major events, such as an earthquake. There are several ways.
Synchronization Drafting Group Schedule Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0379 Date Submitted: Source: Paul Cheng
SOURCE: Ke-Chi Jang Yi Song Wang Neng ABSTRACT: This contribution provide comment/suggestion/question.
Qualcomm 0 Proposal for Unique Base Station (Sector) Identification Source: Peter GaalSuzanne Arcens QUALCOMM, Inc.QUALCOMM, Inc.
X xxx ZTE Discussion on cdma2000 Charging with PCC Title: Inter-RAT RAN information management protocol Stack Sources: NSN Contact: Scott Marin,
Comment to Limited Idle Mode Nortel Networksgrants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organizational Partners to incorporate text or other copyrightable.
1 | Tunneling Method – Inter-tech. HO | August 2007 Title: A Tunneling Method for Inter-Technology Handoff Source: Mike Dolan, Alcatel-Lucent,
1 MAPSUP in eHRPD: Data forwarding Tunnel Sources: ZTE Contact: Bi YiFeng Rajesh Bhalla
X xx CT+ZTE PCC for cdma2000 MS Init Call Flows 1 1 Title: PCC for cdma2000 – MS-Init Call Flow Example Sources: CTC, ZTE Contact: CHINA TELECOM.
SCFAH r2 Title: “Ad-Hoc Recommendation to SC on 3GPP2 Future” – Working Draft Source: 3GPP2 Future Ad Hoc Abstract: This is the draft baseline.
Improved CDMA Mobile Hashing Lucent Technologies grants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organizational Partners to incorporate text or other.
1 Title: Performance of Default Parameters for 1xEV-DO RTCMAC Source: Christopher Lott, QUALCOMM Incorporated , Date: Februrary.
C Title: Next Steps for Femtocells Date: 03 December 2007 Source: Airvana, Alcatel-Lucent, Nortel Abstract:The contribution addresses.
Idle-State Data Buffering and Paging Framework June 04, 2007 Source companies grant a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organizational Partners.
1 3GPP2 A TITLE: TITLE: Energy Saving Mode Architecture ThoughtsSOURCE Scott Marin,
0 软交换应用的探讨 赵慧玲 2004 年 05 月 Dynamically Coverage Management By Caiqin Zhu(Catherine Zhu) China Telecom Apr © GPP2 China Telecom.
1 Subject:Draft Responses to BBF Comments re. cdma2000 MO Preview Date: 25 January 2010 Source: Doug Knisely TSG-X FMOAHG Co-chair, BBF Liaison Contact:
Adding LTE-1x CSFB IOS specification in 3GPP2 Sources: China Telecom, Contact: Li Wenyi ABSTRACT: This contribution is to analyze the.
1 Source:Bob Plunkett TSG Coordination Ad Hoc Chair Copyright Statement The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organizational.
Doc.: IEEE /0197r0 Submission March 2005 Nancy Cam-Winget et alSlide 1 TAP & JIT Merge Process Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
1July 12th, 2002 S00VISION Update of Vision Issues in ITU-R WP 8F Christine Di Lapi Motorola Inc. Global Government Relations PH:
1 MSI (Multiple Service Instances) Ravindra Patwardhan QUALCOMM Incorporated Review and approve for D Notice QUALCOMM.
3GPP2 A r0 3GPP2 C xxxr0 TSG-A WG3 and TSG-C WG2 Title: M2M Congestion Control in the RAN Source: Mike Dolan Dave Rossetti Satish.
Clarifications on Work Split among TSG-X/A for 3GPP2 Network Evolution March 26, 2007 Airvana/Alcatel-Lucent/CTC/Fujitsu/ Hitachi/KDDI/NEC/Qualcomm/ZTE.
Inter-RAT Measurement Control Jungsoo Jung Samsung Electronics Samsung Electronics grants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and.
C R1 1 3GPP2 TSG-C WG3 TITLE : FL BRCH Full Buffer Simulation Results in AWGN for Calibration SOURCE: KDDI Corporation Toshihiko Komine,
Source: Qualcomm Incorporated Contact: Jun Wang, George Cherian March 1, 2010 Page 1 3GPP2 Femtocell Phase II Femto Access Control Enhancement Notice ©
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
January 2010 Joint 11/19/22 TVWS Meeting
ADS Study Group Mid-week Report
Liaison Report From wng
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2007 Month Year
January Opening Report
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
November 2014 Opening Report
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

TSG-S Project Coordination Recommendations Nick Yamasaki TSG-S Chair ABSTRACT: This document presents TSG-S recommendations for improved coordination of 3GPP2 specification development activities. RECOMMENDATIONS: Remand to all TSGs for review and comment by the next SC meeting. It is the intent of the contributors that these recommendations, as modified by TSG comments, would be considered for approval at that time. The TSGs may decide to voluntarily implement these recommendations (or modifications thereof) prior to that time. Notice: KDDI grants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organizational Partners to incorporate text or other copyrightable material contained in the contribution and any modifications thereof in the creation of 3GPP2 publications; to copyright and sell in Organizational Partner's name any Organizational Partner's standards publication even though it may include all or portions of this contribution; and at the Organizational Partner's sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part such contribution or the resulting Organizational Partner's standards publication. KDDI is also willing to grant licenses under such contributor copyrights to third parties on reasonable, non- discriminatory terms and conditions for purpose of practicing an Organizational Partner's standard which incorporates this contribution. This document has been prepared by KDDI to assist the development of specifications by 3GPP2. It is proposed to the Committee as a basis for discussion and is not to be construed as a binding proposal on KDDI. KDDI specifically reserves the right to amend or modify the material contained herein and to any intellectual property of KDDI other than provided in the copyright statement above.

9 January Contents Introduction TSG-S Performance Assessment Summary of Project Coordination Issues of Concern Project Coordination Recommendations

9 January Introduction The TSG-S recently assessed TSG-S functional operations with respect to our approved scope and charter. Our primary interest is overall efficiency and effectiveness of 3GPP2. TSG-S believes that a major area for performance improvement in 3GPP2 is the coordination of inter-TSG specification development activities in light of new challenges in this area. This contribution presents preliminary recommendations to improve coordination of 3GPP2 specification development activities.

9 January TSG-S Performance Assessment Work Item (WI) Development and Inter-TSG Coordination –The evolution activities in 3GPP2 have presented new challenges and has driven the need for improved coordination of TSG specification development activities. –This increased coordination of development activities necessitates improved visibility of specification development work across TSG boundaries. –PMT activities in individual TSGs have strong benefits in improving efficiency and effectiveness of that TSG. Moreover, the anticipation of and preparation for cross TSG impacts would benefit from targeted improvements. –The TSG-S PMT has noted some problems with misunderstandings of the cross-TSG impacts and the exchange of inter-TSG technical information during the review and approval of WIs. –Face-to-face cross-TSG participation in TSG-S PMT WI discussions have historically improved timely exchange of information.

9 January TSG-S Performance Assessment (continued) Requirements Development Activity Concerns –Multiple TSGs are involved in developing overlapping and/or duplicate Stage 1 documents. As a result: Overall coordination of requirements documents is diminished. In some cases, the developed documents suffer from loss of the ‘big picture’ – documents focus on requirements of a specific TSG instead of focusing on overall service level requirement across all TSGs (e.g., MMD Policy and MMD Roaming and their impact on the 3GPP2 Evolved Network_. Duplication of work concerns are less likely to be caught without improved coordination. Sequential (e.g., air interface  IOS  core network or vice-versa) development is perpetuated when overall coordination is diminished. The use of the TSG-S Document Status Table is helpful but does not achieve enough coordination of system requirements. Cross-TSG participation in TSG-S WG1 discussions has been limited in some key cases (e.g., S.R v1.0 Multimedia Priority Service (MMPS) for MMD-based Networks - Stage 1 Requirements ). –All specification development activities, especially cross-TSG activities, must be driven by requirements even when the requirements are “aggressively” specified and are not intended to be met in the near-term by Stage 2 & 3 development.

9 January Summary of Project Coordination Issues of Concern Improved coordination of specification development activities across TSG boundaries starting with WI review and approval. Improved coordination of requirements development activities Improved assurance that specifications are driven by the developed requirements

9 January Project Coordination Recommendation 1 PMT Project Coordination Sessions –Regularly scheduled for Tuesday 8-10 AM at all super-meetings to recognize and coordinate the work progress and the related issues. –Hosted by TSG-S WG3 and chaired by TSG-S PMT Chair. –Mandatory attendance by all TSG PMT Chairs or their delegates to expedite cross- TSG coordination. –Agenda Review of all new WI proposals in part to determine cross-TSG impacts and whether or not a requirements document is required. Schedule detailed WI discussions for the current week as convenient for applicable TSG representatives Schedule and determine moderator for cross-TSG WI technical discussions for current month and next month. Serve as forum for cross-TSG WI issues that can be discussed in this limited time frame. –NOTE: All TSG WIs are processed as 3GPP2 WIs even if no cross-TSG impacts are anticipated.

9 January Project Coordination Recommendation 2 Requirements Development Coordination Session –Regularly scheduled for Tuesday AM at all super-meetings. –Hosted by TSG-S WG1 and chaired by the TSG-S WG1 Chair. –Mandatory attendance by all Chairs of TSG requirements teams or their delegates and applicable subject matter experts. –Agenda Review of all new requirements document proposals to determine: –Cross-TSG impacts –Coordination and consistency with plan for requirements documents in development and existing requirements documents –Justification and approval by TSG-S WG 1 if the document needs to be developed outside TSG-S Review summary of current week detailed discussions for requirements documents in development. Schedule detailed discussions for requirements documents in development for the next super-meeting as convenient for applicable TSG representatives. NOTE: Cross-TSG evening sessions will usually be targeted for Tuesday evenings. Serve as forum for cross-TSG issues related to requirements that can be discussed in this limited time frame.

9 January Project Coordination Recommendation 3 Consistency-assurance that developed specifications are driven by the approved requirements –Cross-TSG specification development efforts can only be successful if they are consistent with the service level requirements documents that are developed to drive those development efforts. –PROBLEMS TSG-S does not have the resources or the charter for such “policing activities” Some requirements documents are intentionally developed with aggressive performance requirements that are not intended to be met on the current specification release. Requirements verification on developed specifications is both time and resource consuming. –RECOMMENDATIONS: Each TSG, and more specifically the TSG Chairs and the participating member companies, must accept and execute the responsibility of ensuring that the requirements that have been agreed are honored to the extent permitted by the developed technology, the development schedule, and possible adjustments to any changes in market conditions during the course of specification development. Each TSG is also strongly encouraged to feedback actual problems or mistakes in the requirements document to TSG-S so that the requirements document can be corrected.