Deliverable 10 Contents  Vehicles/engines  Diesel passenger cars  Gasoline (PFI-DISI) passenger cars  Diesel heavy duty vehicles  Diesel heavy duty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effect of Fuel Quality and Engine Technology on Particle Emissions
Advertisements

Report Nr. I-25/10 Haus-Em 07/10/676 from Prof. Dr. Stefan Hausberger.
EU Tire Label. April 2011 Tire Performance Label: A Global TrendTrend 2 EU World wide introduction of a tire label EU-Label for the performance in Rolling.
MASS EMISSION RATES AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PM 2.5 EMISSIONS FROM TWO MOTORCYCLES Deniz Karman and Colin Welburn Department of Civil and Environmental.
27/06/02 Reproduction permitted with due acknowledgement DG TREN Particulates Consortium Lemnos, September 2003 Neville Thompson, Technical Coordinator,
COPERT 4 Training 2. General Methodology.
Wet Granulation Scale-up Experiments. Scale-up Approach with Dimensional Numbers 2 The effect of process parameter (i.e., impeller speed, liquid addition.
PMP: SUB 23 NM MEASUREMENT RECOMMENDATIONS B. Giechaskiel, G. Martini Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre 3 April 2014.
Experimental Evaluation of Various Biofuel-Diesel Blends as Diesel Engine Fuels Georgios Fontaras and Zissis Samaras Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics.
COPERT 4 Training (5. PM) 1 COPERT 4 Training 5. Exhaust and non-exhaust PM.
The DG Tren ” Particulates „ project Zissis Samaras Lab of Applied Thermodynamics Aristotle University Greece.
Kaarle Kupiainen Effect of CO 2 -based car registration tax on traffic PM 2.5 emissions in Finland and future NTMs Kaarle Kupiainen, Niko Karvosenoja,
Heavy-duty vehicle test facility at VTT Excellent tool to determine the effect of traffic environment on emissions and energy use Juhani Laurikko 10 June.
Dr. Jürgen MaguhnWaste & Health, Bologna, 03/07/08, 1 Titel Title Do particle emissions of municipal waste incinerators pose a threat? Jürgen Maguhn, Christian.
VII. How might current analysis methods be enhanced or combined to obtain more information about the nature of OC, EC, and other carbon fractions in filter.
S.T. O’Sullivan D.J. Timoney University College Dublin Ireland On-road measurement of particulate emissions from diesel engined vehicles.
Vehicle pollution control
1 Motor Vehicle Emission Control in Japan Better Air Quality Workshop 2002 ( 16th Dec 2002 ) Environmental Management Bureau, Ministry of the Environment.
K.Hirose OICA/JAMA Geneva 02/02 Hybrid ; Clean and Fuel Saving Technology for the Current and Future Vehicles OICA/JAMA Hirose Katsuhiko/Toyota Motor.
COPERT 4 Training 3. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide.
Butanol as an alternative fuel for Diesel engines Supervisor Co-supervisor Project start Project end Programme Partners Budget Tankai Zhang
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility Contribution to the European Bus and Coach Forum 2011 Huib van Essen, 20 October 2011.
The ARTEMIS tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions Artemis project - EC DG Tren COST346 - Heavy duty vehicles emissions M. André, INRETS,
Instrumented Vehicle BAQ Instrumented In-Use-Vehicles, a Versatile Tool to Measure Emissions BAQ 2004 Agra, India Dec 2004 Instrumented In-Use-Vehicles,
WORKSHOP ON VEHICLE EXHAUST PARTICULATE EMISSION MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY San Diego, 21 Oct 2002 Zissis Samaras Lab of Applied Thermodynamics Aristotle.
Current And Future Diesel Market
Repeatability and Reproducibility Analysis of the Round Robin Results.
REGENERATION ISSUES Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre B. Giechaskiel, J. Andersson, G. Martini 3 April 2014.
Laboratories included in the database  AVL  EMPA  MTC  TUG  Volvo  VTT  LAT  Shell  IFP  FFA.
Igor Trpevski University of St. Cyril and Methodius Skopje,
3rd International Conference LUBRICANTS RUSSIA Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration Strategy and its Influence on Engine Oil Characteristics Luca.
Concawe Nanoparticles from road vehicle exhaust: an artefact or a reality? Diane Hall BP/CONCAWE Lemnos Meeting: Round Table Discussion 11 th September.
Volvo Technology AB / Volvo Technology Corporation Dept / UW / 25/10/2015 / page 1 Particulates, Brussels, January 2003 PARTICULATES Major Scientific.
Volvo Technology Corporation Dept / AMR / 01/11/2015 / page 1 Particulates.
Martin Mohr, PARTICULATES WP 500 EMPA contribution –WP 550 Investigation of sub-zero cold start effects.
Volvo Technology AB / Volvo Technology Corporation Dept / UW / 03/11/2015 / page 1 Particulates, Lemnos, 2003 Deliverable 13 Effects on particulate.
7th International ETH Conference on Combustion Generated Particles Zurich Zissis Samaras Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics Aristotle University.
PMP: SUB 23 NM REVIEW B. Giechaskiel, G. Martini Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre 8 January 2014 GRPE-PMP
OICA presentation of ACEA PM-3 programme Caroline Hosier, Pilot, ACEA Task-Force Particulates (TF-PM) Ford Motor Company Preliminary results PMP: 1 st.
Comparison of PM exhaust emissions measured at a chassis dynamometer and on-road chasing Rainer Vogt, Volker Scheer, Roberto Casati Ford Forschungszentrum.
Data Files Structure LAT Volvo/LAT Lab Is there an additional level of data necessary (Volvo proposal)?
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Timetable  Submission of draft Reports to LAT  The reports must be simple and straightforward (see proposal of contents)  We do not deal.
29/02/2016 Reproduction permitted with due acknowledgement DG TREN – WP500 CONCAWE LD Vehicle Testing.
OICA CO 2 Impact through Weight Variation on Light duty Vehicles WLTP DTP6, Geneva OICA, Volkswagen WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-076.
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Alternative fuels Presentation by Charlotte Sandström-Dahl AVL & AVL MTC.
Submitted by the expert from Japan the secretariat
Task 3 results and Conclusions 15/10/2014
4. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide
Laboratories included in the database
PMP Heavy Duty Validation Exercise
Particle Measurement Programme - Report
COPERT 4 Training 3. General Methodology.
COPERT 4 Training 6. Exhaust and non-exhaust PM
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
PARTICULATES PROGRAM WP500
وحید فیروزمند موضوع: ارائه دهنده:
Zissis Samaras Professor
Imad Khalek, Ph.D., Sr. Program Manager,
Pems route and parameters
Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions
Thessaloniki, 15 November 2012
Lemnos 11/9/03 Comparison of PM exhaust emissions measured at a chassis dynamometer and on-road chasing on a test track.
Report Nr. I-25/10 Haus-Em 07/10/676 from
Test Fuel Properties FT Diesel fuel Diesel fuel Properties (8/19)
Emissions of a EURO 5A gasoline car with three test cycles
Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.
Calculations: Overall scheme
Emissions testing with PEMS versus random laboratory driving cycles
Presentation transcript:

Deliverable 10 Contents  Vehicles/engines  Diesel passenger cars  Gasoline (PFI-DISI) passenger cars  Diesel heavy duty vehicles  Diesel heavy duty engines  Fuels  Diesel: D2  Gasoline: G1  Technologies  Euro I  Euro II  Euro III

Diesel Light Duty Vehicles

Diesel Light Duty Vehicles Regulated PM for different cycles  Euro 1- Euro 3 are below the Euro III limit of 0.05 g/km. Euro 3 found at 55-75% of the emission standard.  In Artemis Motorway vehicle particularities are more important than emission standard. The vehicles measured at MTC shows increases beyond Euro I.  DGI results showed in general the same behavior with the regulated PM mass, even though DGI results do not reveal the actual emission level of the vehicles, at least in transient cycle tests. Also, the variability of DGI results was of the same level with conventional PM mass.

Diesel Light Duty Vehicles PM – DGI comparison at 50 km/h  Steady state tests were mainly performed in order to obtain SMPS scans and cross-check DGI results with PM ones. All labs have performed tests at 50 km/h. There is a fair agreement between DGI and PM and a similar variability.  The significantly higher DGI results obtained in the 90 km/h tests of the VW Golf measured in MTC, was accompanied with a great variability (also accompanied by other particle properties so requires investigation)

Diesel Light Duty Vehicles Mass-weighted size distribution for two different cycles  Particle mass below 0.2 μm at the NEDC was 65 % for the Euro 1 vehicle, % for the Euro 2 ones and 80 – 90 % for the Euro 3 vehicles.  There has been no particular mass collected in the stages above 1  m (artefacts, re-entrained material, etc.).  In the aggressive Artemis Motorway, share of Stage 2 increases for Euro III vehicles (and MTC Euro II)

Diesel Light Duty Vehicles Information from the ‘wet’ branch  Total particle number and active surface decrease with technology improvement for the NEDC (4 E14 to 1 E14 km-1 and from 2 E5 to 0.8 E5 cm2/km)  Oxidation catalyst decreases particle emissions (little but consistently over all cycles except Artemis Motorway)  Vehicle performance over the Artemis motorway is opposite to the rest cycles (nucleation effects)

Diesel Light Duty Vehicles SMPS Distributions  Dg for Euro III were nm at 50 km/h and 90 km/h tests and ~20 nm at 120 km/h tests indicating a significant formation of nanoparticles at 120 km/h tests  Dg for Euro I – II vehicles varied in the range nm.  The effect of the oxidation catalyst is not visible over steady states.  There seems to be a problem with SMPS level at Shell

Diesel Light Duty Vehicles ‘Dry’ Branch information  There is no obvious effect of vehicle technology over the cold NEDC (behaviour is vehicle specific)  There is a substantial solid particle number in the filter stage only for MTC Euro 2 (Shell results calculated differently than the rest)  If we don’t take filter stage into account, dg for different technologies are: Euro I 63nm, Euro II nm, Euro III nm (results are vehicle specific)

Gasoline Light Duty Vehicles

Gasoline Light Duty Vehicles Regulated PM for different cycles  The regulated PM results were lower than 5 mg/km for all conventional vehicles, in almost all driving cycle tests (2 mg/km over NEDC). An increase was observed in Artemis Motorway for the ULEV vehicle (17 mg/km).  The DISI measured at Shell gave 8.5 mg/km. This increase was also revealed in other particle properties.  The Euro I vehicle measured at LAT emitted higher particulate mass from the Euro III in all driving cycles.  The DGI results showed the same trends with the regulated PM ones (but not a substantial ULEV increase over Motorway). ULEV DISI

Gasoline Light Duty Vehicles Wet-branch information  Active surface over the NEDC ranged from 0.6 E3 cm2/km (LAT Euro III) to 30 E3 cm2/km (for DISI Euro III). (Diesels E3)  Total particle number(1/km) over NEDC E14 (ULEV) to 0.25 E14 (DISI). Diesels E14.  It seems that, the particle emissions of the ULEV vehicle depend strongly on the driving conditions. The lowest particle emissions for the particular vehicle were observed in Hot UDC tests (7 E10 #/km – 5 cm2/km) and the highest in Artemis Motorway tests (5.5 E12 #/km – 9*104 cm2/km).

Gasoline Light Duty Vehicles SMPS distributions  Euro III at LAT at SMPS noise level.  There were indications of nucleation mode formation for the Euro I (50 km/h) and the DISI (120 km/h).  Mean dg at 50 km/h 35 nm, at 120 km/h nm

Gasoline Light Duty Vehicles Dry branch (losses corrected only for LAT)  Emission levels at cold NEDC (St1-7) are: Euro I E14, Euro III E14, ULEV E14 +40%, DISI 0.17 E14 +40%)  No large effect of the driving cycle except of the ULEV (2-3 orders of magnitude!)  Most of the particle size in the filter stage and then stage 1. (DISI calculated with different algorithm)

Heavy Duties

Heavy Duty Vehicles Regulated PM and DGI PM  Euro 2 from VTT appears as a lower emitter compared to the Euro 3 over the ETC, verified by both CVS and DGI results  Over ESC, Euro 2 from VTT is at the same levels with Euro 3 from the other labs  55-60% of the total mass is collected in Stage 1 of the DGI (for PCs 65-90% was classified in St.1)

Heavy Duty Vehicles Information from ‘wet’ branch  Active surface from Euro III is found generally above Euro II except Motorway  Number concentration from Euro II is constantly higher. Hence, Euro II develops higher nucleation mode  AVL shows the same number concentration in all driving cycles (probably CPC saturation)

Heavy Duty Vehicles SMPS Distributions (possible mis- allocation of conditions) ECE R49/2 ESC Mode 5 ESC Mode 12 Load 25%, Speed A-10%

Heavy Duty Vehicles Information from the ‘wet’ branch