Clarifying Language in Michigan Benchmarks. MI CLiMB is a project of the Michigan Department of Education to improve teaching and learning by clarifying.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the FCAT Explorer
Advertisements

ELibrary Science Product Demonstration Get ready to experience science in a whole new way –eLibrary Science offers targeted science text and tools.
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Elementary. The District Heard Your Concerns In teachers requested that the following three documents be merged into one. Instructional Focus.
Provincial Report Cards Mathematics Grades 1 to 12.
Overview of the FCAT Explorer
Big Ideas, Learning Goals & Success Criteria
Descriptive Feedback Success Criteria Learning Goals
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training Implementing English K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement.
Building an Accurate SBPR RECORD KEEPING ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS SBPR 1.
Quantiles What are they and why should I care?. Workshop Objectives: What is the Quantile Framework? What does a Quantile measure mean? How can it be.
© 2005 Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy 1 Illinois Learning Standards Information from
Using PC SAS Help. You can get information about the Editor, Log, or Output windows by Selecting “Using this Window” under the Help Menu...
Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Department of EDW, Accountability, and School Improvement , PX47521.
English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) for English Language Learners (ELLs) Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau of Teaching Learning and.
Useful Mathematics Resources. VDOE Resources E.S.S. Lesson Plans Search.
Science Standards of Learning: An Overview of Resources Eric M. Rhoades, Science Coordinator Barbara P. Young, Science Specialist.
Reporting to Parents’ Presentation for Primary Schools
Objectives are statements of what we want students to learn as a result of the instruction we provide them. Objectives answer the question “What do we.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
A Guide to Using DEstreaming Digital Resources January 2009.
surveymonkey.com/s/TEALSpost SDK + sample projects located at:
Science Curriculum Topic Study Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Practice.
Strand A In Depth Context and Introduction. Strand A: Instruction Demonstrates your competency in instruction based on your documentation of NM Teacher.
Agenda for New Teacher Induction Brief overview of Formative Assessment Brief Overview of Differentiated Instruction Standards Aligned System-
South African Education Portal
1 Knowledge of Subject Matter OCPS Alternative Certification Program.
Agenda New Teacher Induction
Content Analysis of Common Core State Standards: Initial Findings Webex: September 20, 2010.
Michigan Curriculum Frameworks An Overview Interpretations of Curriculum vary… ä …anything that is taught in school ä …a set of subjects ä …content ä.
Science Academic Content Standards and Standards-Based Education.
Curriculum Mapping: its MANY benefits of investing time and effort.
Reporting progress and achievement: Creating informative and manageable technology reports Selena Hinchco.
Processes Development Department Of Education June 6 th, 2008.
Bringing Math Students into the Formative Assessment Equation: Tools and Strategies for the Middle Grades © Education Development Center, Inc. Learning.
OVERVIEW OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS. Instructional Materials In Classrooms, ‘Instructional Materials’ refers to: Curriculum Curricular Units Instructional.
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE Assessing the Mathematics Knowledge of Teachers William S. Bush University of Louisville North Carolina Association of Mathematics.
Northwest Florida State College Programs of Study: Elementary Education Middle Grades Mathematics Middle Grades General Science 1.
Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.
CORE STANDARDS Striving for High Standards in Education in Indiana Presented by Donna McLeish IMI Staff.
FLE 4333 Week Two. Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) Purposefully-organized groups that work together on projects and other such tasks over a period.
Florida’s Sunshine State Standards Matthew C. Robinson, Summer B 2006.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Introduction to Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Presentation: Introduce SEC to Educators [Enter place and date]
Developing a Teaching Portfolio
High-Stake State Mathematics Assessment: CRs and BCRs…The Secrets Revealed Beth Schefelker, Teaching Specialist Milwaukee Public Schools
2. Planning for Teaching and Learning Long Term (Course) Planning.
Eric M. Roubion EDLD 871. Online Teacher Professional Development Standard F.
Groups 2 and 3.  The three lesson plans we chose came from the website educationworld.com  Lesson One – The Bird Can Blog: Online Writing with a Twist.
Standards-Based Education
Creating a School-Wide Literacy Plan Richmond Public Schools Assistant Principals Meeting September 28, 2011.
1 BUILDING QUALITY LEARNING USING PERIODIC ASSESSMENTS Session Outcomes: Use diagnostic Periodic Assessments as instructional tools for quality enhancement.
1 Michigan School Improvement Framework. 2 In Support of the State Board of Education’s Vision Statement State Board of Education’s Vision Statement The.
Florida Social Studies Sunshine State Standards Grade Level Expectations FLStandards.org.
1 Handout #3 Part III. The Standards Toolkit  Performance Indicator Progression  Scope and Sequence  Language Arts Framework  Instructional Guide.
The MI Learns Online (MLO) Portal Supported by the REMC Association of Michigan.
Teacher Academy 2012 Steps to Completing On-Line GAP Analysis, Excel GAP Analysis, and LearnPort Presented by Zena Lowe Michigan Department of Education.
CmapTools Facilitates Alignment of Local Curriculum with State Standards: A Case Study Jane Heinze-Fry, Ph.D. Fran Ludwig, M.S.
 I am familiar with the six elements of a standards aligned system.  I can list and define the six elements of a standards aligned system.  I can navigate.
How can I use a digital library to support my teaching? Find good resources to enhance existing curriculum  Search special collections aimed at your interests.
PDE SAS: An Overview of the 2016 Updates
October 2010 Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education
Using the Michigan Focal Points to Guide Instruction and Assessment
its MANY benefits of investing time and effort
Using Teach 21 For Professional Development
Whole group instruction
Chapter 8 End of School Year.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Overview Comments, announcements, questions?
Presentation transcript:

Clarifying Language in Michigan Benchmarks

MI CLiMB is a project of the Michigan Department of Education to improve teaching and learning by clarifying the language in the benchmarks of the Michigan Curriculum Framework.

Why do we need MI CLiMB? If we are to improve achievement in Michigan, every teacher must understand the meaning of each benchmark for which they are responsible.

Why is difficult language in the benchmarks? The language of the standards and benchmarks in the Michigan Curriculum Framework is precise language used by teachers and specialists of each subject. The precision of this specialized language accurately communicates the ideas and concepts of that subject.

MI CLiMB provides: An explanation of each benchmark in plain language An example of a teaching strategy An example of a classroom assessment strategy A selection of resources to support the benchmark

MI CLiMB is available for free on CD-ROM or online at

MI-CLiMB Online

Keyword - Users can search for topics within content areas, grade levels or curriculum areas by means of a keyword.

MI-CLiMB Online Content Outline Window - Similar to a table of contents, this left-hand window displays an expandable index of the tool's content by title. Click on the arrows next to content titles to expand the outline.

MI-CLiMB Online Strand - A Strand, the highest level of the hierarchy, is a MI CLiMB content classification which groups related Benchmarks and content.Benchmarks Content Standard - A description of what all students should know and be able to do in each of the Subject Areas.Subject Areas Benchmark - Statements which indicate what students should know and be able to do at various developmental levels (i.e. early/later elementary school, middle school and high school).

MI-CLiMB Online

Benchmark Clarification - A further description of the intent behind the Benchmark, developed by teachers for teachers in each subject area and grade level.Benchmark Instructional Example - These are concrete ideas for teaching to the Benchmark. Educators from around the state have contributed instructional examples for each benchmark based on their expertise in specific subject areas.Benchmark

MI-CLiMB Online

Assessment Example - Based on the Instructional Example, this provides a way to assess students' performance against the intent of the Benchmark.Instructional ExampleBenchmark Resources - Repositories of information which will further help to clarify the Benchmark. These include references, Web-based resources, and many other types of recommended resources.Benchmark

MI-CLiMB Online

Remember that MI-CLiMB is not a complete curriculum to follow, but is meant to be a guide for initiating your own curriculum development.