A. Introduction to FELs A.1 Photon Science A.2 X-ray light sources A.2.1 First and second generation A.2.2 Third generation A.2.3 Fourth generation: FELs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Optimal focusing lattice for XFEL undulators: Numerical simulations Vitali Khachatryan, Artur Tarloyan CANDLE, DESY/MPY
Advertisements

ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Tessa Charles Australian Synchrotron / Monash University 1 Bunch Compression Schemes for X-band FELs.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
Performance Analysis Using Genesis 1.3 Sven Reiche LCLS Undulator Parameter Workshop Argonne National Laboratory 10/24/03.
Overview of Proposed Parameter Changes Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator.
UCLA The X-ray Free-electron Laser: Exploring Matter at the angstrom- femtosecond Space and Time Scales C. Pellegrini UCLA/SLAC 2C. Pellegrini, August.
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Undulator Specifications Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring David L. Rubin December 22, 2011.
The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.
Introduction to RF undulators
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
+ SwissFEL Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Bolko Beutner, Sven Reiche
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
Free Electron Lasers (I)
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
FLASH Operation at DESY From a Test Accelerator to a User Facility Michael Bieler FLASH Operation at DESY WAO2012, SLAC, Aug. 8, 2012.
Undulator parameters choice/wish based on a simplified XFEL cost model Jürgen Pfingstner 29 st of July 2015.
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
and Accelerator Physics
Beam Modulation due to Longitudinal Space Charge Zhirong Huang, SLAC Berlin S2E Workshop 8/18/2003.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
A. Introduction to FELs A.1 Photon Science A.2 X-ray light sources A.2.1 First and second generation A.2.2 Third generation A.2.3 Fourth generation: FELs.
External Seeding Approaches: S2E studies for LCLS-II Gregg Penn, LBNL CBP Erik Hemsing, SLAC August 7, 2014.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee MeetingLCLS February 26, 2001 J. Hastings Brookhaven National Laboratory LCLS Scientific Program X-Ray Laser Physics:
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
The Microbunching Instability in the LCLS-II Linac LCLS-II Planning Meeting October 23, 2013 A. Marinelli and Z. Huang.
FEL Simulations: Undulator Modeling Sven Reiche Start-end Workshop DESY-Zeuthen 08/20/03.
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
Prebunching electron beam and its smearing due to ISR-induced energy diffusion Nikolai Yampolsky Los Alamos National Laboratory Fermilab; February 24,
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
X-band Based FEL proposal
E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov FEL Seminar, DESY April 26, 2016 Reverse undulator tapering for polarization control at X-ray FELs.
Simulations of X-ray production for different undulator options 19 th of March 2015 Juergen Pfingstner.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Sven Reiche UCLA ICFA-Workshop - Sardinia 07/02
Paul Scherrer Institut
EEHG 101: The Basics of Echo-7
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
Jim Clarke ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory March 2006
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
First results of micro-bunching and COTR experiments at FLASH
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
SuperKEKB required (e+ / e-)
Presentation transcript:

A. Introduction to FELs A.1 Photon Science A.2 X-ray light sources A.2.1 First and second generation A.2.2 Third generation A.2.3 Fourth generation: FELs A.3 FEL basics A.3.1 Low- and high-gain FELs A.3.2 High-gain FEL facilities

X-ray wavelength Beam wiggles with undulator wavelength λ u : Due to relativistic Doppler shift (next page), the X-ray wavelength λ l is compressed longitudinally Due to the wiggle motion. Using the correct expression for (see exercise) leads to the famous formula with Parameter choice: 1.K has to be around 1 for undulator radiation 2.λ u as small as technology allows. 3.Beam energy γ as high as necessary to reach targeted X-ray wavelength λ l.

Relativistic Doppler shift Electron emits one wavefront F each wiggler period. In wiggler period N, F N is emitted. In wiggler period N+1, F N+1 is emitted. But light has moved only a little bit faster than beam and F N is spatially very closely emitted to F N+1. Time light and particle need for λ u Time difference between wavefronts corresponds to a wave length via

X-ray power Small gain regime High gain regimeSaturation regime …Power gain length: length for X-ray power increase by e. … FEL parameter: allows estimates for many important properties: P sat, Δω/ω 0, η e

Two types of FELs FEL oscillators Produced light is trapped between mirrors (in pulsed form). At every beam passage, light is amplified Part of the light is coupled out through a semi-permeable mirror. Very weak micro-bunching (small gain regime). Single pass FEL Light is produced in one long undulator. Strong micro-bunching (high-gain regime). L SAT has to be small to be able to build undulator short enough (beam quality).

FEL oscillators (FELO) Saturation power: In each passage the light power P is amplified by a small amount G << 1 Light reaches after some time a high power between the mirrors. The light power reaches saturation when Advantages: Very high spectral purity High repetition rate High average power Energy efficiency several beam passages Application: Can be driven by beam from synchrotron, energy recovery linac, or linac. Used wherever possible, but … There are only mirrors available below the X-ray regime (IR, optical, UV). XFELO (not achieved): In the X-ray regime, normal mirrors cannot withstand the photon power. Crystals, e.g. diamond, are tested as Bragg reflectors (crystal lattice). Reflection only at certain angles.

Single pass FELs (high-gain FELs) For X-rays, light has to be created in a single pass. Since FEL power grows exponentially, the goal is to reach saturation. Hence, the main design goals for a single-pass FEL are (typical values for hard X-ray facilities) Small X-ray wavelength λ l (0.1nm) High P SAT (< 1GW) Small saturation length L SAT ≈ 22 L g ( m) Also short beams are advantageous for the photon science. 1.X-ray wavelength: Given by the undulator parameters K, λ u and the beam energy γ. – The undulator with the smallest possible λ u (about 1.5cm) is chosen that still has a large enough K≈1. – Then the beam energy (typically 6-15GeV) is chosen to reach λ l as

Electron beam and undulator parameter choice for a single-pass FEL 2. Saturation power: mainly determined by the beam current (order of 1-5 kA) 3.Saturation length: The basic gain length (1D gain length L g0 ) is fixed by the already determined parameters and cannot be reduced (order of (50-100m)/22 ≈ 2-4m). But it is at least possible to increase L g0 not too much if also the effects of beam emittances ε x, ε y and energy spread σ η are taken into account (3D gain length L g ). This implies very small values for ε (< 1μm) and σ η (order of ) Linac vs storage ring: The necessary high beam current I and the low emittances correspond to a high beam brilliance The needed values for B e cannot be achieved in a storage ring, but in a linac.

A. Introduction to FELs A.1 Photon Science A.2 X-ray light sources A.2.1 First and second generation A.2.2 Third generation A.2.3 Fourth generation: FELs A.3 FEL basics A.3.1 Low- and high-gain FELs A.3.2 High-gain FEL facilities

Typical high-gain FEL layout Electron Gun creates low ε x, ε y beam. Relatively high charge. Bunch compressors Reduce bunch length. Increase of I 0. Shortening of X-ray pulse. Linac Bring beam to γ r. Preserve ε and σ η. Photon beam lines Transport and focusing. Steering to different experiments Undulators Creation of X-ray pulses. Dogleg to distribute to several undualators. Experiment Several experimental rooms to house photon science.

Electron gun Cathodes: – Thermal cathodes: Heating of metallic cathode increases energy if unbound electrons. Part of the electrons can escape cathode into vacuum due to their thermal energy. – Photo cathodes: Short laser shot on cathode. Electrons are ejected from cathode due to photo-electric effect. Higher beam brightness compared to thermal cathodes. Acceleration: – Beam has to be accelerated as fast as possible, since SC effects reduce with increasing γ. – Guns with RF acceleration field produce higher gradients than DC guns. – Transverse focusing with solenoid magnets. Goal: beam of highest brightness: -High charge and low ε. -Two counteracting wishes, since high charge creates high space charge fields which increase the emittance.

RF acceleration Several RF structures mounted on one module and are powered by one RF station. NC and SC structures in use. Choice impacts e - -bunch structure and RF and linac design. The RF station consists of an klystron (RF source) and its power supply called modulator. Depicted case: power of two klystrons combined with hybrid coupler to power 10 structures. EM waves are transported with waveguides (cooper pipe). RF system of the X-band XFEL collaboration RF bunch compressor shortens and intensifies the RF pulse.

Linac Beam focusing: – Usually FODO lattice. – Quadrupoles in the gaps between RF structure modules. Main target is to preserve the small ε and σ η from gun. Some aspects: – Longitudinal wakefields cause energy chirp. Can be compensated with off- crest acceleration. – Mechanical element offsets can cause the beam oscillations and dispersion. Can be compensated with beam-based alignment (BBA) techniques. Linac of PAL-XFEL (Korea) Many other interesting beam physics topics: -Micro-bunching instability and laser heating. -Transverse wakefields -Sensitivity studies of element parameter.

Bunch compressors Principle (linear dynamics): Acceleration of bunch off-crest to create energy chirp. Chirped beam is send through chicane. Particles in bunch head have less energy and have longer path Particles in particle tail vice versa. This leads to reduction of beam size. Two stage compression is easier for “complications”. Complications (non-linear dynamics and collective effects): Energy chirp is not perfectly linear (sinusoidal RF wave). The magnets of the chicane have non-linear components. In the dipoles, CSR is emitted and can increase projected ε. Small charge variations in combination with long. SC can create energy modulation that can result in unwanted micro-bunching.

Undulator magnets In XFEL facilities permanent magnet (PM) undulators are used (best suited up today). High precision element: – To keep K in tolerances, the mechanical tolerances are very stringent. – In operation, temperature in hall must be constant to about +/- 0.1 degree. – During whole life time, temperature must stay within +/- 1 degree. Otherwise irreversible deformations. – ysFkUg In- and Out- of vacuum undulators: -LCLS vs SACLA -In-vacuum undulator has better performance but causes problems. Fixed and variable gap undulators -No variable gap in-vacuum (too complicated). LCLS undulator

Undulator section Structure Undulators only fabricated to a length of 4-5 m, several undulator modules are added. About modules: 60 to 120m length. Gaps between undulators house: -Quadrupole magnets. -Beam position monitors (BPMs). -Phase shifters. -Beam loss monitors. Beam guidance Beam has to be steered to centres of the undulators: use of BPMs and either steering dipoles or QP movers. The beam is focused with quadrupole magnets that form a strongly focusing FODO lattice. But weak focusing of the undulator has to be taken into account.

Phase shifters Phase shift between beam and X-rays in gaps is unavoidable: 360 o = 1 Å. Phase shifters (magnetic chicane) are used to shifty beam. Sometimes there are individual magnet designs, sometimes they are based on the magnets of the undulators. First and second field integral determine properties of phase shifter. Taken from: “A PERMANENT MAGNET PHASE SHIFTER FOR THE EUROPEAN X-RAY FREE ELECTRON LASER” by H. H. Lu et al.

Photon beam lines and experimental area Only crystal mirrors (Bragg reflection) can be used, but only small angle are possible (1- 3 deg. soft X-rays; 0.1 deg. hard X-rays). This causes long photon beam lines. Still directly after the undulator, the X-ray intensity is too large for any material to withstand it. Therefore the X-ray beam is widened by its natural opening angle. After 50m (SwissFEL), X-rays can be used on first steering mirror. Shortly before experiment there is a second mirror to focus the X-rays again. More complex optics exist for soft X-rays (including monochromator), but more elements reduce X-ray coherence. To supply several (usually 3) experimental rooms, X-rays have to be steered with deflector mirror.