Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Evaluation QIM 501- INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND DELIVERY Prepared by: Norsafrina Mansori (S-QM0022/10) Lecturer: Dr. Balakrishnan Muniandy

Dr. Donald L. Kirkpatrick Born 15 March 1924 - Richland Center, USA Education: University of Wisconsin-Madison, B.B.A., 1948, M.B.A., 1949, Ph.D., 1954 Memberships: ASPA, ASTD Career status: Professor Emeritus at University of Wisconsin, Honorary Chairman of Kirkpatrick Partners, Training Director of International Minerals Chemical Corp. & HR Manager of Bendix Products Aerospace Division. Consultant to business & government.

Dr. Donald L. Kirkpatrick (The father of the FOUR LEVELS) Awards: Gordon Bliss & “Lifetime Achievement in Workplace Learning and Performance”. Publications: Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels, which has become the basis for evaluation all over the world. Implementing the Four Levels, Transferring Learning to Behavior, Developing Employees Through Appraisal and Coaching 2nd edition (2006); How To Plan and Conduct Productive Meetings (2006); and Managing Change Effectively (2002).

Overview Donald Kirkpatrick became interested in evaluating training programs in 1952 as he wrote his PhD dissertion--"Evaluating a Human Relations Training Program for Foremen and Supervisors." In a series of articles published in 1959, he described a four-stage model for evaluating training programs. In 1994, Kirkpatrick published Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. He considers this book his main contribution to the field and has published subsequent books and articles about evaluation. Kirkpatrick cites the following reasons for evaluating training programs: To decide whether to continue offering a particular training program To improve future programs To validate the existence and job as a training professional

Kirkpatrick Foundational Principles The end is the beginning Effective training evaluation begins before the program even starts. Kirkpatrick says it best on page 26 of Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (1st Edition, Berrett-Koehler, 1993): “Trainers must begin with desired results and then determine what behavior is needed to accomplish them. Then trainers must determine the attitudes, knowledge, and skills that are necessary to bring about the desired behavior(s). The final challenge is to present the training program in a way that enables the participants not only to learn what they need to know but also to react favorably to the program.” 

Evaluation in Instructional Design Systematic determination of merit, worth, and significance of a learning or training process by using criteria against a set of standards. Instructional design models which were published in the late 1960s and early 1970s, all had an evaluation component. The evaluation phase is ongoing throughout the ISD process and it is performed during the first four phases of the ISD process of Analysis, Design, Development & Implementation Two types of evaluation: Formative – Take place during the development of instruction Summative – Take place after developers have done all that they can to make the instruction as effective as possible

Evaluation in Instructional Design Bramley and Newby (1984) identified five main Purposes of evaluation: Feedback Linking learning outcomes to objectives and providing a form of quality control. Control Making links from training to organizational activities and to consider cost effectiveness. Research Determining the relationships between learning, training, and the transfer of training to the job. Intervention The results of the evaluation influence the context in which it is occurring. Power games Manipulating evaluative data for organizational politics.

Level 1: Reactions Kirkpatrick's Levels of Evaluation Assessment of learners’ reactions or attitudes toward the learning experience The purpose of measuring reaction is to ensure that learners are motivated and interested in learning Questionnaires are the instruments that are used to get honest reactions from the learners Measurement of participants’ reactions or attitudes toward specific components of the program, such as the instructor, topics, presentation style, schedule, audiovisuals, etc Key Questions: What was the learners reaction to the learning environment? Did they like it? Data Sources: - Student surveys - Focus Group - Interviews .

Level 2: Learning Kirkpatrick's Levels of Evaluation Measures the knowledge acquired, skills improved, or attitudes changed as a result of the training. The training instructor should have specific learning objectives, to find clear learning outcomes Learning outcomes can include changes in knowledge, skills or attitudes The evaluation should focus on measuring what was covered in the training event (i.e. the learning objectives). Key Questions: Did the students achieved the desired learning objectives? Did they learn it? Data Sources: - Tests - Assignments - Discussions - Q&A

Level 3: Behaviour Kirkpatrick's Levels of Evaluation Measures the transfer of training or if trainees are applying new knowledge, skills, or attitudes on the job. Behaviour evaluation is the extent to which the trainees applied the learning and changed their behaviour. Key Questions: Are the newly acquired skills, knowledge or attitude being used by the learner after the learning event is completed? Did they use it? Data Sources: - Re-assessments - Employer/Supervisor Surveys - Interviews

Level 4: Results Kirkpatrick's Levels of Evaluation Measures the result of training as it relates to factors such as sales, productivity, profit, costs, employee turnover, and product/service quality. Results evaluation is the effect on the business or environment resulting from the improved performance of the trainee. Key Questions: Did the students achieve the desired outcomes of the programme of study? Did it impact the bottom line? Data Sources: - Employer/Supervisor Surveys - Interviews - Focus groups

Summary

Conclusion Evaluation has always been an essential component of the Intructional design process Kirkpatrick’s four level of evaluation are just as useful to the instructional designer as they are to the training manager Information from all four levels can be used to indicate the current effectiveness of the instruction and how it can be improved

References Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology by Robert A. Reiser and John V. Dempsey, New Jersey, Merill Prentice Hall, 2002 Donald L. Kirkpatrick. (2007). The Four Levels of Evaluation. Evaluating Training Programs 3rd Edition by Donald L. Kirkpatrick and James D. Kirkpatrick, California, Berrett-Koehler, 2006 Bramley, P. & Newby, A. C. (1984). The Evaluation Of Training Part I: Clarifying The Concept. Journal of European & Industrial Training, 8,6, 10-16. Foxon, M. (1989). Evaluation of training and development programs: A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 89-104. http://www.kirkpatrickpartners.com/

Conclusion