William Edson SUNY at Albany.  New Results for Fit:  Signal Fraction: 0.664442±0.0418289  Chi2: 29.953  Meas. Used: 31  σ : 170.884±10.7578  New.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

William Edson SUNY at Albany Anirvan Sircar Louisiana Tech University.

Advertisements

Barbara Sciascia – LNF 1 K  semileptonic BR measurement B. Sciascia 4 may 2006 KpmKSL joint meeting.

1 Data Analysis II Beate Heinemann UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hadron Collider Physics Summer School, Fermilab, August 2008.

Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.

Effect of b-tagging Scale Factors on M bb invariant mass distribution Ricardo Gonçalo.

Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.

Jet Veto Scale Factor for ZZ Analysis Haijun Yang, Lailin Xu, Bing Zhou ATLAS SM ZZ  Meeting February 2, 2012.

1 Measurements at 8 TeV of TTbar events with additional particles in the final state Boris Mangano (ETH Zürich) on behalf of the CMS collaboration Boris.

William Edson SUNY at Albany.  New Results for Fit:  Signal Fraction: ±  Chi2:  Meas. Used: 31  σ : ±  New.

Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.

Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University

Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.

Update on Pileup Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei, Mario Aletti (U. Arizona)

M. Gallinaro, `` RunII Diffractive Results: Blessing'' - QCD meeting, March 7, Blessing of Run II Diffractive Results Introduction Data Selection.

T-CHANNEL MODELING UNCERTAINTIES AND FURTHER QUESTIONS TO TH AND NEW FIDUCIAL MEASUREMENTS Julien Donini, Jose E. Garcia, Dominic Hirschbuehl, Luca Lista,

4/10/12 Contribution in ATLAS Collaboration 1 Talk “Multi-jet balance for high pT jet calibration” presented on ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop 2011(SLAC.

Lei Zhang on behalf of HSG5 1 st July 2013 Unblinding approval for VH(bb) 1.

Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,

The Physics of Generations (Update) 11-Dec-03 Don Lincoln f.

Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.

William P. Edson, Teeba Rashid, Dr. Sajjad Alam 1 Dr. Dick Greenwood, Anirvan Sircar 2 Dr. Patrick Skubic, Dr. Muhammad Saleem, Dr. Brad Abbot, Dr. Phil.

A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University.

N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.

W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:

August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.

Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.

Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)

Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.

1 Hgg Cut based Analysis update Jim Branson, Chris Palmer, Marco Pieri, Matteo Sani, Sean Simon.

QCD and Top backgrounds in W+jets and Rjets Alessandro Tricoli (CERN) on behalf of W+jets and Rjets groups 3 rd May 2013 W+jets and Rjets EB Meeting.

Timescale The nominal dates for SM approvals for EPS are June 30 and July 7 for the Plenary meetings, with availability of a draft supporting note to the.

Search for the Higgs boson in H  ZZ (*) decay modes on ATLAS German D Carrillo Montoya, Lashkar Kashif University of Wisconsin-Madison On behalf of the.

Slides for EB3. Left Problems from EB2 1. Why muon triggers are not used in e  channel? 2. Add backgrounds estimation for signal search region 3. Add.

Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.

QCD Background Estimation From Data Rob Duxfield, Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.

1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.

1 The comparisons between with and without JES uncertainty. jet with pt > 30 GeV, |eta| 40. Jet Y is calculated by 0.5*log[(E+pz)/(E-pz)] CMS Data.

Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.

Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.

Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.

Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.

Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.

EPS Manchester Daniela Bortoletto Associated Production for the Standard Model Higgs at CDF D. Bortoletto Purdue University Outline: Higgs at the.

Bc → J/   Lifetime measurement Use 6.7 fb -1 and try two independent approaches Selection 1: no dependence of selection on decay time Fit fixes bkgd.

The Univ. of Tokyo Dept. of Physics 1 New MT method to remove SUSY contaminations CSC Note 1&2 : 27 Aug 2007 Ginga Akimoto, Y. Kataoka, S. Asai The University.

Wuppertal ttbar strategy meeting 16 August 2012, T. Cornelissen 1 Sebastian, Thijs Status of JetElectron QCD fit in resonance analysis.

SEARCH FOR DIRECT PRODUCTION OF SUPERSYMMETRIC PAIRS OF TOP QUARKS AT √ S = 8 TEV, WITH ONE LEPTON IN THE FINAL STATE. Juan Pablo Gómez Cardona PhD Candidate.

I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.

Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.

1 RA1 Analysis Exclusive n-jet + MET search Overview and Status Report Tanja Rommerskirchen on behalf of the RA1 group Universitaet Zuerich SUSY Workshop;

R. Croft, Exclusive Diffractive Higgs Signal at L1, Jan 2005 Diffractive Higgs Events in the L1 Trigger ( Work in progress ) Richard Croft, University.

Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.

H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.

Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.

Investigation on CDF Top Physics Group Ye Li Graduate Student UW - Madison.

QCD estimate with the matrix method Alexander D. with the help of many…

Supersymmetry searches in ATLAS and CMS in hadronic final states Sascha Caron (Nikhef and Radboud University Nijmegen)

1 QCD fits via TFractionFitter ● I took another look at the QCD fit problem: ● A fraction of the fits hangs in an infinite loop ● A (smaller) fraction.

Estimating QCD background in single muon channel Alexander D.

2nd lepton veto, in the one-lepton SUSY analysis

Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008

ttbar τ + jets: Update on QCD Estimation

CDS comments on supporting note

Uncertainties on top quark mass due to modeling

2vtx tagged dijets mass resolution study

Observation and measurement of HW+W-

Dilepton Mass. Progress report.

Northern Illinois University / NICADD

Presentation transcript:

William Edson SUNY at Albany

 New Results for Fit:  Signal Fraction: ±  Chi2:  Meas. Used: 31  σ : ±  New Corrected Results:  Signal Fraction: ±  σ : ±  Correction Systematic: ±

SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute)Unc (%) Nominal JER JRE JES up JES down Error determined during running caused by missing input ntuple sample JVF up JVF down BSF up BSF down MET up MET down Tau trig up Tau trig down TES up TES down Tau Eveto SF up Tau Eveto SF down Error determined during running caused by missing input ntuple sample

SampleFractionCor. Fraction σ Unc (absolute) Unc (%) Nominal Range Range Range Range Range Range Bins Bins Bins Bins Range increases/decreases in steps of 20GeV Bin amount increases/decreases in steps of 5

 mc11_7TeV T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy.merge.NTUP_TOP.e835_s1272_s1274_r3043_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpgenJimmyttbarlnqqNp0_baseline.merge.NTUP_TOP.e891_s1372_s1370_r3043_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpgenJimmyttbarlnqqNp1_baseline.merge.NTUP_TOP.e891_s1372_s1370_r3043_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpgenJimmyttbarlnqqNp2_baseline.merge.NTUP_TOP.e887_s1372_s1370_r3043_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpgenJimmyttbarlnqqNp3_baseline.merge.NTUP_TOP.e835_s1372_s1370_r3043_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpgenJimmyttbarlnqqNp4_baseline.merge.NTUP_TOP.e835_s1372_s1370_r3043_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpgenJimmyttbarlnqqNp5_baseline.merge.NTUP_TOP.e835_s1372_s1370_r3043_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV TTbar_PowHeg_Pythia_P2011C.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1377_a131_s1353_a139_r2900_p937/  mc11_7TeV TTbar_PowHeg_Jimmy.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1198_a131_s1353_a139_r2900_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpGenPythia_P2011radHi_KTFac05CTEQ5L_ttbarlnqqNp0.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1608_a131_s1353_a 145_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpGenPythia_P2011radHi_KTFac05CTEQ5L_ttbarlnqqNp1.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1608_a131_s1353_a 145_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpGenPythia_P2011radHi_KTFac05CTEQ5L_ttbarlnqqNp2.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1608_a131_s1353_a 145_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpGenPythia_P2011radHi_KTFac05CTEQ5L_ttbarlnqqNp3.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1608_a131_s1353_a 145_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpGenPythia_P2011radHi_KTFac05CTEQ5L_ttbarlnqqNp4INC.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1608_a131_s135 3_a145_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpGenPythia_P2011radLo_KTFac2CTEQ5L_ttbarlnqqNp0.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1608_a131_s1353_a1 45_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpGenPythia_P2011radLo_KTFac2CTEQ5L_ttbarlnqqNp1.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1608_a131_s1353_a1 45_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpGenPythia_P2011radLo_KTFac2CTEQ5L_ttbarlnqqNp2.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1608_a131_s1353_a1 45_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpGenPythia_P2011radLo_KTFac2CTEQ5L_ttbarlnqqNp3.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1608_a131_s1353_a1 45_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV AlpGenPythia_P2011radLo_KTFac2CTEQ5L_ttbarlnqqNp4INC.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1608_a131_s1353 _a145_r2993_p937/  mc11_7TeV TTbar_MT1675_PowHeg_Pythia_P2011C.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1736_s1372_s1370_r3108_r3109_p937/  mc11_7TeV TTbar_MT1700_PowHeg_Pythia_P2011C.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1736_s1372_s1370_r3108_r3109_p937/  mc11_7TeV TTbar_MT1750_PowHeg_Pythia_P2011C.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1736_s1372_s1370_r3108_r3109_p937/  mc11_7TeV TTbar_MT1775_PowHeg_Pythia_P2011C.merge.NTUP_TOP.e1736_s1372_s1370_r3108_r3109_p937/

 Y(0): ±  Slope: ±  Chi2: NDF: 8998

Slope: ± y-intercept: ± Chi2: NDF: 7

Input Fraction Previous Gaussian Mean Output Fraction Unc.Gaussian Mean Output Fraction Unc

RangeFit to MeansFit to All ValuesCorrected σ Y(0)SlopeY(0)Slope 0.1 – – – –

MC Tau Count MC Tau Children pdgIDMC Tau Children Count Leptonic pdgID values: e → 11, μ → 13, τ → 15

Samples Normalized to Own Integrals Samples Normalized to Sum of Integrals

 C0: GRL  C1: Trigger  C2: Primary vertex with ntracks > 4  C3: Electron/muon overlap  C4: Jet cleaning  C5: Lepton Veto  C6: tau n ≥ 1  C7: n jets >= 4 with eta 0.75  C8: MET > 60GeV  C9: M T < 80GeV  C10: >= 1 b jet  C11: Trigger matched tau n ≥ 1 and p T >= 40GeV  C12: MC tau object match

 Equation:  N(x): total number of events of type x for distribution  n(x) i : number of events in bin of type x  frac(Sig): fraction of N(Remain) expected to be Signal  binfrac(x) i : fraction of events in bin of type x expected from MC or template  σ i : uncertainty in bin i

 σ i determined using factors for:  bin error:  data  signal, MC  QCD template  other backgrounds, MC  statistical error:  data: signal region  other backgrounds, MC  signal, MC  QCD template (uncertainty of background region data and all MC background region carried through via default SumW2

 Results for plot:  chi-square:  p-value:  ndf: 14  chi/ndf:

 Results for plot:  chi-square:  p-value:  ndf: 15  chi/ndf:

 Results for plot:  chi-square:  p-value:  ndf: 18  chi/ndf:

 Results for plot:  chi-square:  p-value:  ndf: 12  chi/ndf: 1.323

 Results for plot:  chi-square:  p-value:  ndf: 11  chi/ndf: 1.308

CutSig EvtsFakesSig Eff.Fake Ratio Rej Fact. Sig/ sqrt(Bkgd) Sig/ Sqrt(Sig+ Bkgd) C5 Lep Veto C6 ntaus > C7 njets C8 MET C9 MT C10 bjet C12 Trig match