The Jim and Pedro example and Utilitarianism By David Kelsey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
More objections to Utilitarianism
Advertisements

Utilitarianism Maximize good.
Presenting Options. Hopefully the lesson on Futures helped you in getting to understand the concept. Having finished the lesson on Futures now lets look.
Dolch Words.
Simplifying Call Option – By Prof. Simply Simple TM I hope the last lesson on ‘Options’ helped you in getting to understand the concept. In continuation.
What is a normative theory?
Milano – Verona – Firenze – Roma – Palermo
Making Ethical Decisions Objectives Give the definition of Ethics and discuss the the importance of ethical decision making Describe three kinds of decision.
Jeremy Bentham ( CE) John Stuart Mill ( CE) Goodness/rightness and badness/wrongness are located in the consequences an act (consequentialism).
Utilitarianism.
 When customers are unhappy with service they have two options:  They can say something (talkers)  Or they can walk away (walkers) © Jacqui Knight.
Justice In orienting oneself to the concept of justice, three perspectives must be examined: the individual perspective concerned primarily with personal.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 11 Utilitarianism By David Kelsey.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 13 Utilitarianism Chapter 7.
INTRODUCTION euthanasia. definitions Euthanasia is the act of deliberately bringing about a death for humane reasons. Voluntary euthanasia is euthanasia.
1 By David Lazar, Sam Fiscu, Joe Fort, Andre, and Austin Angelus Utilitarianism.
How Does Society Achieve Happiness?. If you had all power over the laws of a society, which three laws would you enact to create a place of happiness?
Heinz Steals the Drug In Europe, a woman was near death from a special kind of cancer. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It.
Utilitarian Approach. Utilitarianism The founder of classical utilitarianism is Jeremy Bentham. According to Bentham human beings always try to avoid.
Introduction to Ethical Theory I Last session: “our focus will be on normative medical ethics, i.e., how people should behave in medical situations” –
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues
CONSEQUENTIALISM.
A Defense of Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism. Our Everyday Ethical Choices Consider the last ethical choice you had to make in the most general terms, what were you thinking about?
Rule utilitarianism Michael Lacewing
Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.
Introduction to Simulation Modelling Chapter1. Models as convenient worlds  Our lives, as individuals or families or workers in an organization, are.
 The benefits of embryo research come mainly from stem cell usage  it is hoped that stem cells can be stimulated to develop any tissue or organ of the.
1 Consequentialism vs. Deontology Consequentialism: –the view that an act is right if and only if it will maximize (or is likely to maximize) good consequences.
Consequentialism Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill ( ) Principle of Utility: actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness,
History of Philosophy Lecture 18 John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism
Daniel 1:8-16. To Eat or Not to Eat  “But Daniel resolved that he would not defile himself with the king’s food, or with the wine that he drank. Therefore.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 17 Ethics #3: Kant By David Kelsey.
Ethical Theories Unit 9 Ethical Awareness. What Are Ethical Theories? - Explain what makes an action right or wrong - Have an overview of major ethical.
Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism Learning Objectives:- (long term) 1. To understand the ‘greatest happiness principle’. 2. To understand the similarities.
Utilitarianism is a kind of consequentialism
A trolley is speeding down a track and cannot be stopped. In its path are five people who have been tied to the track. You have the option to flip a switch.
Review: How Nielsen argues his CASES 1. In the “Magistrate & Mob” scapegoat case a Utilitarian could argue that Utilitarianism doesn’t require the death.
Philosophy 360: Business Ethics Chapter 3. Consequentialism: Is part of a theory about what makes certain actions right or wrong. In a nutshell: Actions.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 17 Ethics #3: Kant
Sight Words.
Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives:- (long term) 1. To understand the ‘greatest happiness principle’. 2. To understand the similarities and differences.
UTILITARIANISM A teleological ethical theory founded by Jeremy Bentham.
Introduction to Ethics: Is Anything really Right or Wrong? By David Kelsey.
An act is moral if it brings more good consequences than bad ones. What is the action to be evaluated? What would be the good consequences? How certain.
Utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 17 Ethics #3: Kant
Utilitarianism: objections Michael Lacewing
A Critique of Utilitarianism Bernard Williams. Two Examples (see 613): George and the CBW lab Is a Chemist Must support his family Job available at CBW.
Aim: How do we formulate a persuasive argument? Do Now: Begin reading the handout.
Gospel Reading Luke 18:1-8.
Jan 29, 10 Ashley Tao. Tues 8-10pm Dundas Town Hall
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 16 Ethics #2: Utilitarianism By David Kelsey.
Moral Dilemmas What would you do when faced with a difficult moral choice?
1.Administrative / Review 2.Clicker Quiz 3.Williams.
Consequentialism v. Deontology. Ticking Bomb Scenario.
Simplifying Call Option – By Prof. Simply Simple TM
OPTION IN THE REAL MARKET – PUT OPTION
Bernard Williams: A Critique of Utilitarianism Phil 240, Introduction to Ethical Theory, W6L5 Benjamin Visscher Hole IV.
Errors in Reasoning.
On your whiteboard: What is teleology? What is hedonism?
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
Act utilitarianism, partiality and integrity
Bentham’s Utilitarianism
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 16 Ethics #2: Kant
Moral Theories: Utilitarianism
Functions of a moral theory
Utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham
Presentation transcript:

The Jim and Pedro example and Utilitarianism By David Kelsey

Jim and Pedro Jim and Pedro: – “Jim finds himself in the central square of a small South American town. Tied up against the wall are a row of twenty Indians, most terrified, a few defiant, in front of them several armed men in uniform. A heavy man in a sweat-stained khaki shirt turns out to be the captain in charge and, after a good deal of questioning of Jim which establishes that he got there by accident while on a botanical expedition, explains that the Indians are a random group of the inhabitants who, after recent acts of protest against the government, are just about to be killed to remind other possible protestors of the advantages of not protesting. However, since Jim is an honoured visitor from another land, the captain is happy to offer him a guest’s privilege of killing one of the Indians himself. If Jim accepts, then as a special mark of the occasion, the other Indians will be let off. Of course, if Jim refuses, then there is no special occasion, and Pedro here will do what he was about to do when Jim arrived, and kill them all. Jim, with some desperate recollection of schoolboy fiction, wonders whether if he got hold of a gun, he could hold the captain, Pedro and the rest of the soldiers to threat, but it is quite clear from the set- up that nothing of that kind is going to work: any attempt at that sort of thing will mean that all the Indians will be killed, and himself. The men against the wall, and the other villagers, understand the situation, and are obviously begging him to accept. What should he do?” (Taken from Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against)

Jim’s options Jim gets to choose between these actions: – A. Killing one of the villagers himself. – B. Not killing anyone. Their consequences: – A. One villager gets killed (by Jim) and the rest of the villagers go free. – B. Twenty villagers get killed (by Pedro). What should Jim do? What would you do?

Utilitarianism and the dilemma Utilitarianism would tell you to kill the Indian. Utilitarianism and the greatest happiness principle – Actions are Right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness and wrong as they tend to produce unhappiness – Killing the Indian would result in the greatest happiness…

Consequentialism and Hedonism Utilitarianism is a composition of Consequentialism and Hedonism – Consequentialism To determine whether or not an act is Right we look at its consequences Between two actions perform the action with the better consequences Tells us the end justifies the means – Hedonism Defines a better or worse consequence Says what makes something good is the amount of happiness it produces Says happiness is the only non-derivatively good thing

Defining the Good then the Right Utilitarianism defines the Good then the Right – First defines what you are out to produce – What is right is whatever maximizes that good

What the dilemma shows us “It is absurd to demand of such a man…that he should just step aside from his own project and decision and acknowledge the decision which the utilitarian calculation requires. It is to alienate him in a real sense from his actions and the source of his action in his own convictions…this is to neglect the extent to which his actions and his decisions have to be seen as the actions and decisions which flow from the projects and attitudes with which he is most closely identified. It is thus, in the most literal sense, an attack on his integrity.” (taken from Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against)