1 Review of Teaching and Assessment Practices of Ontario English, Ontario French, and Quebec French teachers on PIRLS and SAIP Principal Researchers: Renée.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Classroom Factors PISA/PIRLS Task Force International Reading Association January 2005.
Advertisements

E-asTTle Writing All you ever wanted to know……. “Launched in November 2007, the Revised New Zealand Curriculum sets the direction for teaching and learning.
Lower Primary ( Prep – Year 3).  3 year journey across the lower years (each child will develop at different rates)  The most important goal is to build.
TELPAS Grades K-1 Holistic Rating Training Spring 2010 Hitchcock ISD.
Literacy is taught for at least an hour each day across all year groups In addition to this pupils will also spend time reading and practising spellings.
Language Assessment System (LAS) Links TM Census Test.
Modelling Mathematics Achievement of Ontario’s Francophone Students TIMSS-R 1999 Researchers: Marielle Simon Renée Forgette-Giroux Assistants: Nathalie.
D.A Public School (O & A Levels)
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
Balanced Literacy J McIntyre Belize.
Assessment in Language Teaching: part 2 Today’s # 24.
Teaching English to first generation learners NISA School Leaders Summit, Dec
 First discussion moderators  Follow-up any oral communication from last week  The College and Workplace learner  Developing an Oral Communication.
How we use effective strategies for teaching ESL learners (Whole School) January 27, 2014.
 RTI Effectiveness Model for ELLs University of Colorado at Boulder.
Article Summary – EDU 215 Dr. Megan J. Scranton 1.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Evaluation and Testing course: Exam information 6 th semester.
First Steps Reading Developmental Continuum  Provide a language rich environment with a wide range of reading materials  read to children everyday modelling.
Impact assessment framework
Presented by: Marianne Serratore Principal - Montgomery Elementary School.
4th & 5th Grade Coffee January 27, Levels are determined by benchmarking, MAP testing, anecdotal notes and MCAS. Assessment informs instruction.
Reading Newell-Fonda Ten Instructional Approaches That Matter for Adolescents Create Lessons that Include:Student Experiences: 1.Collaboration Students.
Practical Ideas On Alternative Assessment For ESL Students Jo-Ellen Tannenbaum, Montgomery County Public Schools (MD)
A Community Literacy Partnership: The Museum Without Walls Literacy Project Addie Lafferty and M. Jeanne Wilcox Infant Child Research Programs Arizona.
Room 10 Lisa Wilson. Contact Information   (phones do not ring during the school day)  Check out my.
Room 10 Lisa Wilson. Housekeeping 4 Blocks: Language Arts  Working With Words  Guided Reading  Self Selected Reading  Writing.
High expectations… “To improve teaching and learning throughout the school”
John AndersonTodd Rogers Don Klinger University of VictoriaUniversity of Alberta Queen’s University Charles UngerleiderBarry Anderson Victor Glickman University.
In METRO CENTRAL EDUCATION DISTRICT An Intervention of the Literacy and Numeracy Strategy ( ) By Faith Engel.
Welcome Mrs. Pam LoPilato Masters in Teaching, Special Education English
Measuring Complex Achievement
Educational Behavior Interventions Consultation Teacher/Student Conference Degree or Frequency Level Month Parent/Student Conference Guidance/Pych. / Social.
Welcome Parents! As you come in: Sign up for a conference time (located on by door). Feel free to sign up and volunteer(located on by door). Find your.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
5 th Grade Overview. Curriculum – Setting Goals, Creating a Destination We are all heading toward the same destination; the manner in which each teacher.
July 31, 2014 Dr. Ann-Marie Trammell.  BISD Learning Platform.
Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. Summer  Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning?  Using it effectively to promote further learning?
BEGINNER EAL BEGINNER EAL Beginners are pulled out 6-8 times per week Beginners are pulled out 6-8 times per week Small group instruction and in-class.
Assessment. Workshop Outline Testing and assessment Why assess? Types of tests Types of assessment Some assessment task types Backwash Qualities of a.
Tuesday, October 23, Why Treasures?  Built on a solid foundation of research  Best practices, tools, and strategies  Explicit instruction and.
Scaffolding and Differentiation Stuart Fletcher, ALT, Shizuoka High School Skills Development Conference November 2015 Instead of trying to teach every.
Overview of Reading Workshop for Parents
Transforming lives through learning POLAAR Marion Cochrane, Development Officer for English and Literacy, Dyslexia Conference,
Quick Week 4 Review * Being an English detective.
Tyrone Area Middle School Sixth Grade English & Language Arts.
ƒLiterature Review – 13/16. ƒLiterature Review – 14/16.
GUIDED READING P-12 Loddon Mallee Region.
Parent Workshop Year 2 Assessment without levels January 2016.
English Assessments The Reading Test consists of a single test paper with three unrelated reading texts. Children are given 60 minutes in total,
AssessmentAssessment. Assessment What are some of the components of assessment.
EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF NON- COGNITIVE FACTORS AFFECTING SCHOOL PERFORMANCE Joanna Tomkowicz, CTB (with assistance from Wendi Wright, Statistical Analyst.
 Principles of Teaching Reading in Today’s Classroom.
Monitoring and Assessment Presented by: Wedad Al –Blwi Supervised by: Prof. Antar Abdellah.
Assessment Without Levels. Aims of the Meeting Understand why the changes to assessment have come about Familiarise parents/ carers with changes to assessment.
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
What’s wrong with this picture? ActivityOutcomeModification Students participate in literature circle groups on the theme of friendship. Each group is.
Pierre Brochu, CMEC Welcome to Kindergarten™ Early Years Family and Community Engagement Symposium May 15, 2014 Does Parental Engagement in Early Literacy.
Common Core State Standards in the Elementary Schools in Blue Valley.
Reading Meeting. Our Intentions How you can support your child to develop their reading skills. Explain the new system for changing reading books.
ENGLISH AS AN ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE LEARNERS AT SECONDARY SCHOOL INVOLVING PARENTS.
SATs KS1 – YEAR 2 We all matter.
Parsonage Farm School Curriculum Information Year 2.
Masters in Teaching, Special Education
Florida Standards Assessment for ELA (English Language Arts)
RDG 545 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Links to sample papers:
Sustaining Quality Curriculum
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

1 Review of Teaching and Assessment Practices of Ontario English, Ontario French, and Quebec French teachers on PIRLS and SAIP Principal Researchers: Renée Forgette-Giroux, PhD Marielle Simon, PhD Research Assistants: Catherine Turcotte, PhD student Tracy Ferne, MA student Hyeran Choi, statistical analyst CESC–SSHRC Symposium 2006

2 Research Questions 1.According to the PIRLS 2001 and SAIP 2002 responses to the teacher questionnaire, what is the nature and frequency of use of the classroom teaching and assessment practices used by Ontario English, Ontario French, and Quebec French teachers? 2.Are there significant differences in teaching and assessment practices among these three groups of teachers? 3.What classroom teaching and assessment practices have a significant link with student achievement in reading and writing among the three populations?

3 Methodology: Data Sources Ontario English Sample size Ontario French Sample size Quebec French Sample size student2774student1530student2229 teacher 114teacher 79teacher 99 PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study) teacher questionnaire administered in 2001

4 Methodology: Data Sources Ontario English Sample size 13 yr 16 yr Ontario French Sample size 13 yr 16 yr Quebec French Sample size 13 yr 16 yr student student student teacher school teacher school teacher school SAIP (School Achievement Indicators Program) teacher questionnaire administered in 2002

5 Methodology: Statistical Analysis  Descriptive analyses (focus of this presentation)  Exploratory factor analyses  Measure of association using Cramer’s V  Multiple correspondence analyses  Hierarchical linear modelling

6 Research Question 2 (focus of this presentation) Are there significant differences in teaching and assessment practices among the three groups? Measure of Association using Cramer’s V  Teaching practices: 20/42 items significant (PIRLS)  Assessment practices: 9/14 items significant (PIRLS)  Teaching and assessment practices and beliefs: 22/62 items significant (SAIP) Cramer’s V of are considered weak; those between.20 and.40 moderate (Rea and Parker, 1992).

7 Teaching practices (PIRLS reading) (Cramer’s V =.391) Q13c

8 Teaching practices (PIRLS reading) (Cramer’s V =.372) Q14

9 Assessment practices (PIRLS reading) (Cramer’s V =.32) Q27c

10 Assesment practices (PIRLS reading) (Cramer’s V =.31) Q26a

11 PIRLS teaching items differing among three populations Items related to types of textsOnt En Ont Fr Qc Fr Cramer’s V 12a. How often do you use textbooks or a reading series (daily) 29%44%65%.24 12f. How often do you use a variety of children’s books – novels, non-fiction (daily) 56%24%22%.27 13b How often do you have students read other stories – fiction (daily-weekly) 79%13%33%.36 13e How often do you have students read plays (rarely)45%65%91%.29 13f How often do you have students read descriptions or explanations (monthly) 34%56%53%.25 13h How often do you have students read charts, diagrams, graphs (monthly) 36%62%61%.38

12 PIRLS teaching items differing among three populations Items related to ability levelsOnt En Ont Fr Qc Fr Cramer’s V 11a. How often do you teach reading as a whole-class activity (almost always) 21 %45%35%.21 11b. How often do you create same ability groups (never) 10%20%36% Use of different materials with students at different reading levels (see diagram above) 45% 8% 4%.37 Items related to time on readingOnt En Ont Fr Qc Fr Cramer’s V 7a How much time do you spend on language instruction (7 hrs or more a week) 81%58%89%.32 9a Whether planned or not, how much time do you spend on reading instruction (3 hrs or more a week) 90%65%90%.33

13 General conclusions from PIRLS reading Teaching Practices Ontario English teachers tend to use a variety of texts in the classroom, whereas both Ontario French and Quebec French teachers tend to use manuals or sequential texts. Ontario English teachers tend to differentiate their teaching according to the ability levels of students more than do Ontario and Quebec French teachers. Ontario French teachers tend to spend less time on the teaching of reading and reading-related activities.

14 General conclusions from PIRLS reading Assessment Practices Ontario and Quebec French teachers tend to emphasize external and classroom assessments to evaluate students’ reading progress more than Ontario English teachers. Ontario and Quebec French teachers tend to favour listening to students read aloud to assess students’ performance in reading more often than Ontario English teachers. Ontario English teacher tend to rely on oral questioning, teacher conference, and portfolios more often than Ontario and Quebec French teachers to evaluate students’ progress in reading.

15 Teaching and assessment practices ― SAIP Writing (Cramer’s V =.39) Q14w

16 Teaching and assessment practices ― SAIP Writing (Cramer’s V =.37) Q14v

17 SAIP items where French teachers and English teachers differ ItemsOnt En Ont Fr Qc Fr Cramer’s V 14k. How often do students write descriptively (monthly) 58 %77%.30 14e. How often do you hold writing conferences with individuals or small groups (rarely) 25%60%68%.29 18h. How often do you ask questions for general discussion (daily) 44%23%27%.28 14i. How often do students write on demand (monthly) 45%35%36%.25 14s. How often do you work with individual students (monthly) 26%44%40%.23 14f.How often do students work on aspects of grammar and syntax (weekly) 39%49%.20

18 SAIP items where all three populations significantly differ Items Ont En Ont Fr Qc Fr Cramer’s V 14w. How often do students have a choice of forms (rarely) 31%65%88%.39 14v. How often do students have a choice of topics (monthly) 53%64%44%.37 14m. How often do students edit each other’s writing (monthly) 55%43%33%.35 14r. How often do students use workbooks or worksheets (daily) 16%31%47%.28 23c. How often do you assign work on long-term writing projects (monthly) 68%72%54%.28

19 SAIP items where all three populations significantly differ (cont’d) Items Ont En Ont Fr Qc Fr Cramer’s V 13c. Students need to know the basic rules of grammar and syntax (strongly agree) 39%62%73%.24 23d. How often do you assign work in groups on long-term writing projects (rarely) 45%54%74%.21 14a. How often do students write essays (monthly) 57%66%84%.21 14l. How often do students edit their own writing (monthly) 37%54%67%.21 18k. How often do students ask questions requiring responses by other students (daily) 52%41%28%.20

20 General Conclusions from SAIP Writing Ontario and Quebec French teachers tend to emphasize teaching of basic rules of grammar and syntax and to ask students to write short texts on demand with little choice of form and topics. Compared to Ontario and Quebec French, Ontario English teachers tend to more often encourage students to write descriptively, to hold writing conferences, and to work with students individually. The three populations differ significantly in their use of essay questions, long-term projects, oral questioning, and peer assessment practices to assess writing.