NCADS 20001 Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differential Response and Data American Humane 2007 Conference on Differential Response in Child Welfare Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Child Protective Services Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance May 30, 2007.
A POPULATION-LEVEL EXAMINATION OF FAMILIES INVOLVED WITH CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES: ORANGE COUNTY Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Children’s Data Network University.
US Berkeley 2/12/2013 linking population-based data to child welfare records: a public health approach to surveillance Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD University.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Objective 1: Provide an Appropriate Response to Allegations, Based on Risk and Needs Arizona Department of Child Safety Douglas A. Ducey Governor Charles.
California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.
RISK OF RE-REFERRAL AMONG INFANTS WHO REMAIN AT HOME FOLLOWING REPORTED MALTREATMENT Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD James Simon, MSW Joseph Magruder, PhD.
Neglected Adults Eastern Health Community Supports Program.
A Judicial Perspective on Differential Response Anthony Capizzi Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio September.
Early Intervention and Child Abuse & Prevention Act (CAPTA) Marina L. Merrill (ODE) Stephanie Stafford (DHS)
CJ 333 Unit 7. Child abuse is RARELY one incident. It’s usually more then one incident by one or both parents. When one form present, usually other abuse.
A Day in the Life of Adult Protective Services Prepared by County Welfare Directors Association of California,
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
The 17 th Annual Report on the Conditions of Children in Orange County, 2010 Sponsored by the Orange County Children’s Partnership Supervisor Janet Nguyen,
National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement Teleconference Program THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 2006 Rereporting and Recurrence Data:
Disproportionality in Human Services
CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT: AN OVERVIEW Barbara L. Bonner, Ph.D. Center on Child Abuse and Neglect University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
Reunification – Old and New Information Diana J. English PhD Child Welfare League of America May 30, 2007.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Addressing Disproportionality in Texas A Committed Community Collaboration Presented by: Carolyne Rodriguez, Director of Texas State Strategy, Casey Family.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Citizens Review Panels Blake Jones Program Coordinator.
1 ACS 101 An Introduction to the N.Y.C. Administration For Children’s Services.
Collaborative Mental Health Care Pilot Program Bidder’s Conference October 27, 2014.
Safe & Equitable Foster Care Reduction in Multnomah County CCFC Commission Mtg Tuesday, Dec 8 th 2009.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
Cuyahoga County Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) Project: Findings & Implications for Juvenile Justice David L. Hussey, Ph.D. Associate Professor.
Lakota Oyate Wakanyeja Owicakiyapi. The purpose of the LOWO Tiwahe Risk Assessment/Investigation is to protect children from risks of harm and to assess.
Abuse and Neglect Mandatory Reporting The Process of a Report Institutional tips.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Department of Children and Families Autism Services Jan Nisenbaum Deputy Commissioner Clinical and Professional Services.
Child Abuse: Preventive and Reactive Interventions.
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
The Child Welfare System An Introduction Child Welfare in Numbers Nationally, an estimated 896,000 children were determined to be victims of child abuse.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Sangamon County Action Team Sara Sanders Christy Cunningham Chrissy Gosteli.
1 Issues in Preparing and Supporting the Workforce to Implement the Part C Referral Requirements of CAPTA Cordelia C. Robinson, Ph.D., RN Departments of.
Linkages Program Mark Twain Mark Twain.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
Stemming the Tides Minnesota’s Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs Seventh Annual Citizen Review Panel Conference May 22, 2008 Brenda Lockwood, MN Dept.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 2: Juvenile Victims Copyright.
View Club By Weldon Christin Lily Willow Madeline.
Health Insurance and the Uninsured in Kansas April 2009 Kansas Health Institute Chartpack.
Welcome to the … CAPMIS Refresher 1. Name Agency, unit, and primary job function or title, time “on the job” One thing you find helpful about CAPMIS Introductions.
Alternative Response Review Rick Miracola. Background Alternative responses allow child welfare agencies to intervene with families by focusing on assessing.
Administration for Children and Families Children’s Bureau Fostering Connections Implementation Support & Resources CAPTA 2010 – Highlights.
CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICE OF VIOLENCE PREVENTION 2010.
Using Data to Make the Case for Policy Change in Times of Fiscal Crisis National Association of Council for Children Conference October 21, 2010 Jane Burstain,
WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN INC. Non- Profit Agency for Children At Risk 4534 Lovers Lane Suite #378 Plano, TX (972)
A NEW APPROACH TO CHILD PROTECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE SYSTEMS DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE SYSTEMS.
The Prevalence of Children with Disabilities in the Child Welfare System: An Analysis of State Administrative Data Elizabeth Lightfoot, PhD Katharine Hill,
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Child Welfare FCSFC 485 Lecture 7 & 8 1. Overview Child Welfare Services Child maltreatment ▫Statistics ▫Risk and Resilience Child Abuse Prevention and.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families POLICY, PROTOCOLS, PRACTICE + PARTNERSHIPS SUSAN R. SMITH CHIEF OF QUALITY AND PLANNING CHILD FATALITY.
“A half-century of research demonstrates convincingly that children’s well-being builds upon meeting first their primary needs for a stable and lasting.
Diversity of Children in Foster Care Lisa Martinez Patrick Long Juanita Arellano Linda Smith-Dishmon.
Performance and Progress 2012/2013. Why We Do an Annual Data Presentation To assess the Levy’s performance in various categories against goals. To highlight.
CHILD ABUSE WHAT CHILD ABUSE IS: RIGHTS OF CHILDREN: WAYS TO PREVENT:
Lorain County Children Services
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Wake County Child Welfare EOY Report
Overview of Public Facing ODJFS Child Welfare Dashboards
Human Trafficking and Child Welfare Services
Presentation transcript:

NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in The data were collected and analyzed through the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) by the Children's Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth and Families in the Administration of Children and Youth, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

NCADS ANNUAL DATA COLLECTION PROCESS CHILD-LEVEL DATA. States submit a child-specific record for each report alleging child abuse or neglect that received a disposition as a result of an investigation or an assessment during the calendar year. The data fields in include the demographics of children and their perpetrators, types of maltreatment, investigation or assessment dispositions, risk factors, and services provided as a result of the investigation or assessment. A record number of States (34) submitted child-level data for The populations of these States account for more than 75 percent (78.1%) of the child population in the United States and a similar percentage (77.1%) of child victims of maltreatment. 5 5 STATE-LEVEL DATA. The 34 States also reported aggregate- level data for some items that were not obtainable at the child level, such as the number of child protective services workers. The remaining 17 States reported only aggregate statistics.

NCADS Referrals and Reports Each week CPS agencies receive more than 50,000 referrals (also called reports) alleging that children have been abused or neglected. Almost two-thirds of referrals were screened in by CPS agencies because they were deemed appropriate for investigation or assessment. Nationally, 61.7 percent of all referrals (approximately 1,726,000) were screened in and 38.3 percent (approximately 1,070,000) were screened out. Professionals submitted more than half (56.1%) of the screened-in referrals. Nonprofessional report sources, which include family and community members, submitted the remaining 43.9 percent of screened- in referrals.

NCADS Child Maltreatment Victims *Nationally, an estimated 879,000 children were victims of abuse and neglect in In 2000, 62.8 percent of victims suffered neglect (including medical neglect), 19.3 percent were physically abused, and 10.1 percent were sexually abused; 16.6 percent of victims were associated with additional types of maltreatment. Children in the age group of birth to 3 years had the highest victimization rate-15.7 victims per 1,000 children. Victimization rates declined as age increased.

NCADS 20005

6

7

8

9 Rates were similar for male and female victims (11.2 and 12.8 respectively) except for victims of sexual abuse. The rate for sexual abuse was 1.7 victims per 1,000 female children compared to 0.4 victims per 1,000 male children. More than half of all victims were White (50.6%); a quarter (24.7%) were African American; and a sixth (14.2%) were Hispanic. American Indian/Alaska Natives accounted for 1.6 percent of victims, and Asian-Pacific Islanders accounted for 1.4 percent of victims. Children who had been victimized in a prior year were more than three times as likely to experience recurrence compared to children without a history of victimization. SEX AND AGE OF CHILD, AND PRIOR VICTIMIZATION

NCADS * Most States have established time standards for initiating the investigation of reports. The average response time from submission of the report to investigation was 54 hours. * More than a quarter of investigations or assessments resulted in a "Substantiated" (28.0%), "Indicated" (3.4%), or "Alternative Response- Victim"(1.0%) disposition, meaning that at least one child involved in an investigation was determined to be a victim. More than half (58.4%) of investigations led to a finding that the alleged maltreatment was "Unsubstantiated." * The average number of investigations per investigation/assessment worker was 73 per year. INVESTIGATIONS AND SUBSTANTIATION RATES

NCADS Females composed 59.9 percent of all perpetrators, while males composed 40.1 percent. Female perpetrators were typically younger than male perpetrators-41.9 percent of females compared to 31.6 percent of males were younger than 30 years old. The most common pattern of maltreatment was a child victimized by a "Female Parent Acting Alone" (40.0%). 7 At least one parent was the perpetrator for 83.3 percent of victims. A "Female Parent Acting Alone" was most commonly responsible for neglect (46.9%) and physical abuse (32.1%) of victims. A "Male Parent Acting Alone" was responsible for 21.5 percent of sexual abuse victims. 7 PERPETRATORS

NCADS Services CPS agencies provide services to prevent future instances of child abuse and neglect and to remedy conditions that have come to the attention of the child welfare agency. Preventive services are provided to parents whose children are at risk of abuse or neglect. Services are offered to families on a voluntary basis by child welfare agencies or are ordered by the courts to ensure the safety of children.

NCADS *A nationally estimated three million children were recipients of preventive services. *The average time from the start of an investigation to provision of service was 35.8 days. *More than half of the child victims, 55.4 percent (an estimated 478,000), received postinvestigation services, while a fifth of nonvictims, 18.7 percent (an estimated 385,000 children), received postinvestigation services. *About a fifth of victims (20.8%) were removed from their homes as a result of investigations or assessments. In addition, 3.5 percent of nonvictims were placed in foster care. Nationally it is estimated that more than 250,000 children were placed in foster care as a result of child abuse investigations or assessments. *Court actions were initiated for 15.3 percent (an estimated 92,000) of victims. A tenth of victims (11.8%) were reported as having court- appointed representatives

NCADS

NCADS