Best Practices for OAI: A Status Report Kat Hagedorn Sarah Shreeves DLF Spring Forum San Diego, CA April 14 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OAI from 50,000 Feet OAI develops and promotes interoperability solutions that aim to facilitate the efficient dissemination of content. Begun in 1999.
Advertisements

White Paper on Establishing an Infrastructure for Open Language Archiving Steven Bird and Gary Simons.
February Harvesting RDF metadata Building digital library portals with harvested metadata workshop EU-DL All Projects concertation meeting DELOS.
Y.T. a brief history of the OAI 0 Kaynak: Herbert van de Sompel.
Harvesting Metadata Using OAI-PMH Roy Tennant California Digital Library.
ComPADRE Experiences developing an OAI server over an existing database repository Resources for Physics and Astronomy Education Lyle Barbato American.
Breakout Session 5: Collaboration Between DPs and SPs Protocol simple, providing a service more difficult… …because of lack of networking among DPs and.
Furthering Collaboration Among OAI Data Providers and Service Providers Kat Hagedorn University of Michigan Libraries Digital Library Production Service.
Merrilee Proffitt e(X)literature / Digital Cultures Project April 2003 News from the Digital Library The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard; the.
Best Practices for OAI: A Status Report Kat Hagedorn Sarah Shreeves DLF Spring Forum San Diego, CA April
National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Core Infrastructure Metadata Repository (“union catalog”) Naomi Dushay Cornell University.
And now for something completely different… informal collaboration Kat Hagedorn University of Michigan University of Michigan11/8/2005.
University of Michigan’s OAI Metadata Harvesting Project Kat Hagedorn OAIster Librarian, UM April 16, 2002.
University of Michigan’s OAI Metadata Harvesting Project Kat Hagedorn OAIster Librarian, UM May 12, 2002.
IMLS Grant: University of Michigan’s Role Kat Hagedorn
Aquifer Portal at U of Michigan Kat Hagedorn and Perry Willett University of Michigan DLF Spring Forum, Austin TX April 11, 2006.
OAI-PMH at Yale Report on the DLF OAI Training Session November 10, 2005 Charlottesville, VA.
Basic Concepts Architecture Topology Protocols Basic Concepts Open e-Print Archive Open Archive -- generalization of e-print Data Provider and Service.
METS Intro & Overview Mets Opening Day Germany May 7, 2007 Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Stanford University Libraries.
Teaching Metadata and Networked Information Organization & Retrieval The UNT SLIS Experience William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences.
METS-Based Cataloging Toolkit for Digital Library Management System Dong, Li Tsinghua University Library
IMLS NLG Collection Registry & Item-Level Metadata Repository at the University of Illinois Timothy W. Cole Mathematics Librarian &
Metadata Harvesting The Hague, 13 & 14 January 2009 Julie Verleyen Scientific Coordinator, Europeana Office EuropeanaLocal Knowledge Sharing Workshop.
Creating rich shareable metadata: The DLF Aquifer MODS implementation guidelines Sarah L. Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ALA Annual.
1 Guidelines For The Future Sharing Best Practice For National Bibliographies In The Digital Era Neil Wilson Information Coordinator IFLA Bibliography.
The Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) NISO Metadata Workshop May 20, 2004 Rebecca Guenther Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library.
An Introduction to METS Morgan Cundiff Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of Congress Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard.
Semantics and Syntax of Dublin Core Usage in Open Archives Initiative Data Providers of Cultural Heritage Materials Arwen Hutt, University of Tennessee.
What does this record describe? identifier: X0802]1004_112 publisher: Museum of Zoology, Fish Field Notes format:jpeg.
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects September 11, 2002 Major archival and digital library metadata schemes.
November 10, 2005DLF OAI Training Interoperability, OAI, and Shareable Metadata Sarah Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign OAI Best Practices.
2009 NDIIPP Partner Meeting Washington, D.C..  Multi-year project to explore methods of preserving and providing enhanced online access to legislative.
Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) Phil Barker, March © Heriot-Watt University. You may reproduce all or any part.
Open Archive Initiative – Protocol for metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) Surinder Kumar Technical Director NIC, New Delhi
Slavic Digital Text Workshop 2006 The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting: an Opportunity for Sharing Content in a Distributed Environment.
Digitization Training and Metadata The View from Two UIUC Projects Sarah L. Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Truth and Consequences.
OAI Overview DLESE OAI Workshop April 29-30, 2002 John Weatherley
Integrating Access to Digital Content Sarah Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Visual Resources Association 23 rd Annual Conference Miami.
Bitter Harvest Metadata Harvesting Issues, Problems, and Possible Solutions Roy Tennant California Digital Library.
Search Interoperability, OAI, and Metadata Sarah Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Basics and Beyond Grainger Engineering Library April.
Metadata and OAI DLESE OAI Workshop April 29-30, 2002 Katy Ginger Presentation available at:
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
Metadata and OAI DLESE OAI Workshop June 29 to July 2, 2002 Katy Ginger Presentation available at:
Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting.
Shareable Metadata in the Museum Community Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian Indiana University Digital Library Program.
Sharing Digital Scores: Will the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting Provide the Key? Constance Mayer, Harvard University Peter Munstedt,
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Functional Requirements Eprints Application Profile Working.
Search Interoperability, OAI, and Metadata An Introduction to the OAI Protocol for Metadata Harvesting Sarah Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
NSDL & the Open Archives Initiative A Brief Introduction to OAI Timothy W. Cole Mathematics Librarian & Professor of Library Administration.
A Training Program for Shareable Metadata Metadata for You & Me is a collaboration between the University of Illinois Library and Indiana University. This.
Santi Thompson - Metadata Coordinator Annie Wu - Head, Metadata and Bibliographic Services 2013 TCDL Conference Austin, TX.
DLF Fall Forum The Distributed Library: OAI for Digital Library Aggregation UIUC’s Role: Registry of OAI Data Providers
DLESE Metadata Frameworks March Talk Organizer Terminology DLESE metadata history (DC/IMS to DLESE- IMS to ADN) ADN Collection News-opps Object.
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
The NSDL, OAI and Your Metadata Core Infrastructure Metadata Repository (“union catalog”) Naomi Dushay Cornell University.
Do Real Archivists Use OAI? Mid-Atlantic Regional Archives Conference Gettysburg, PA October 31, 2003 Chris Prom Assistant University Archivist University.
1 Annotation Framework March Terminology CV - abbreviation for controlled vocabulary CRS - Community Review System (a collection within DLESE)
Metadata & Repositories Jackie Knowles RSP Support Officer.
OAI metadata: why and how Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian Indiana University.
International Planetary Data Alliance Registry Project Update September 16, 2011.
Lifecycle …of OAI …of DPs and SPs
Interoperability, OAI, and Shareable Metadata
Metadata for Special Collections
Jenn Riley – Indiana University
IDEALS at the University Of Illinois: A Case Study of Integration Between an IR and Library Discovery Systems Sarah L. Shreeves University of Illinois.
Open Archive Initiative
Technical Issues in Sustainability
Shareable Metadata: Why and How
IMLS Grant: University of Michigan’s Role
Presentation transcript:

Best Practices for OAI: A Status Report Kat Hagedorn Sarah Shreeves DLF Spring Forum San Diego, CA April

Outline Purpose History and background Process Snippets of Best Practices Open issues Next steps

Why? OAI has lots of options – need guidelines Critical time in development of OAI Implemented by many communities Included in content management systems Service providers have battle scars Wild, wild west of metadata Not a shared understanding of shareable metadata OAI can’t be the last stage in a digital project

Purpose To establish best practices for OAI data and service provider implementations and for shareable metadata. To facilitate communication between OAI data and service provider To identify tools needed for the OAI community. DLF / NSDL current focus but meant for the wider OAI community

History of Effort Part of a DLF grant proposal to IMLS Interest in / need for best practices so high, given go-ahead by DLF First met in July 2004 in Oakland to hash out all potential issues and develop a plan and timeline

Participants from… California Digital Library Cornell University DSpace Emory University Indiana University Library of Congress National Science Digital Library OCLC Princeton University University of Illinois University of Michigan University of Tennessee University of Southern California University of Washington Representatives from both data and service provider communities

Service / Data Providers Cognizant of the balance between service and data providers Part of effort is establishing and encouraging a culture of communication between data and service providers True for both data and service providers

How we work A listserv A wiki - Conference calls Meetings at the DLF Forums

Developing the BPs Result of meeting: Word document Transcribed to a wiki Categorized into major issue areas Focus on the two areas most essential Metadata content DP implementation Chairs appointed to encourage work

Wiki Workspace, not a document Work in concert with conference calls Issues: Familiarity with working in a wiki Updating notification Noting differing opinions

Example wiki page

Difficulties… Getting things done without formal deadlines IMLS and BP groups haven’t worked together…yet Differing methodologies / interpretations among participants Outstanding questions no one can / has time to tackle

Implementing a DP Besides administrative issues, i.e., support, time, money… Which software (off-the-shelf / build)? Does it do everything it’s supposed to? (does it follow the OAI protocol) (does it follow the spirit of the OAI protocol) Vendor support

Set practices MYTH: SPs / harvesters don’t use sets TRUTH: SPs do selective harvesting Set structure Open Questions: Set description Communicating structure to SPs

Deleted records Three levels (none, persistent, transient) Best Practice = persistent No deleted record status SP still serves up deleted records Periodic full harvests necessary = SP time drain

resumptionTokens Best practice is to implement resumption tokens Method for splitting up OAI responses Eliminate huge HTTP responses Allow timeout recovery Open Question Goldilocks problem (what size?)

About containers For documenting provenance, rights, branding, descriptive info Rights info is about metadata record, not resource described Rights specification in beta

Repository lifecycle Registration (2 places) Maintenance Communication with SP re: changes, status (defunct? temporarily down?)

A Taste of Best Practices for Shareable Metadata What is shareable metadata? Proper context / Self-explanatory Consistency Use of standard vocabularies More than DC please!

Appropriate Metadata What is appropriate for your content? What is useful for the service provider? A view of your metadata

Recommendations for classes of data elements Titles Names Dates Subjects / Topics Language Geographic Places Identifiers Rights for resources Bibliographic Citation

Other Metadata Issues Granularity Describing versions and reproductions Appropriate links Technical issues Schemas and Namespaces Character Encoding

Open issues Documentation What? Where? Repository descriptive information What? Where? Static repositories and gateways Talking to the vendor community

Future Work Continue development Review and feedback from wider community New areas of focus: service provider implementations, communication between SP and DPs; tool sets; extending the OAI protocol Incorporation of best practices into the IMLS funded training

Questions and Comments? Kat Hagedorn Sarah Shreeves Wiki: Birds of a Feather Session 4:30-6:00 Harbor B – 3 rd Level