Hydrodynamic Models of Heavy-Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano RIKEN BNL Research Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
Advertisements

Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep , 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.
Supported by DOE 11/22/2011 QGP viscosity at RHIC and LHC energies 1 Huichao Song 宋慧超 Seminar at the Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC.
Effects of Bulk Viscosity on p T -Spectra and Elliptic Flow Parameter Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Japan Collaborator:
Hadronic Rescattering Effects after Hadronization of QGP Fluids Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo Workshop “Hadronization” in.
Hadronic dissipative effects on transverse dynamics at RHIC Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo QM2008, Feb. 4-10, 2008 TH, U.Heinz, D.Kharzeev,
In relativistic heavy ion collisions a high energy density matter Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) may be formed. Various signals have been proposed which probe.
First Results From a Hydro + Boltzmann Hybrid Approach DPG-Tagung, Darmstadt, , Hannah Petersen, Universität Frankfurt.
Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Recent Results from RHIC David Hardtke LBNL.
03/14/2006WWND2006 at La Jolla1 Identified baryon and meson spectra at intermediate and high p T in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Outline: Motivation Intermediate.
Hydrodynamic Approaches to Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano RIKEN BNL Research Center.
What can we learn from hydrodynamic analysis at RHIC? Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, Columbia Univ. Workshop on Quark-Gluon-Plasma Thermalization August.
Centrality-dependent pt spectra of Direct photons at RHIC F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner.
Collective Flow Effects and Energy Loss in ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Zhe Xu USTC, Hefei, July 11, 2008 with A. El, O. Fochler, C. Greiner.
Space time evolution of QCD matter Parton cascade with stochastic algorithm Transport rates and momentum isotropization Thermalization of gluons due to.
WWND, San Diego1 Scaling Characteristics of Azimuthal Anisotropy at RHIC Michael Issah SUNY Stony Brook for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Radial flow fluctuations:
Effects of Bulk Viscosity at Freezeout Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Collaborator: Tetsufumi Hirano Nagoya Mini-Workshop.
Toward understanding of Quark-Gluon Plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The University of Tokyo.
S C O T T PRATPRAT MICHIGANMICHIGAN S T T E UNIVRSITYUNIVRSITY T H BTBT PUZZLE PUZZLE Z A N D E X T E N D I N G HYRODYNAMICS HYRODYNAMICS.
Hydrodynamical Simulation of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Strongly Coupled Plasmas: Electromagnetic, Nuclear and Atomic.
Viscous hydrodynamics DPF 2009 Huichao Song The Ohio State University Supported by DOE 07/30/2009 July 27-July 31, Detroit, MI with shear and bulk viscosity.
Nonequilibrium Dynamics in Astrophysics and Material Science YITP, Kyoto, Japan, Oct. 31-Nov. 3, 2011 Tetsufumi Hirano Sophia Univ./the Univ. of Tokyo.
Jets at RHIC Jiangyong Jia
Steffen A. RHIC #1 Steffen A. Bass Duke University & RIKEN-BNL Research Center The Protons Puzzle at RHIC - the demise of pQCD? Recombination.
Hydrodynamic Approach: Open Issues Tetsufumi Hirano Special thanks to Nu Xu, Miklos Gyulassy and Denes Molnar The Berkeley School, LBNL, CA, May 27, 2005.
Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model LongGang Pang 1, Victor Roy 1,, Guang-You Qin 1, & Xin-Nian.
The effects of viscosity on hydrodynamical evolution of QGP 苏中乾 大连理工大学 Dalian University of Technology.
Open data table of hydrodynamic simulations for jet quenching calculations Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo Original work: TH,
Workshop for Particle Correlations and Femtoscopy 2011
What can we learn from hydrodynamic analysis of elliptic flow? Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, Columbia Univ. T.H. and M.Gyulassy, nucl-th/ T.H.,
Jaipur February 2008 Quark Matter 2008 Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev (with participation.
Dynamical Modeling of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Workshop at RCNP, Nov 4, 2004 Work in partly collaboration with Y.Nara (Frankfurt),
Relativistic Ideal and Viscous Hydrodynamics Tetsufumi Hirano Department of Physics The University of Tokyo The University of Tokyo Intensive Lecture YITP,
Dynamical Modeling of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions
Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Collaborator: Tetsufumi Hirano V iscous Hydrodynamic Expansion of the Quark- Gluon Plasma.
Perfect Fluidity of QGP at RHIC? Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics University of Tokyo Komaba, Tokyo , Japan 平野哲文 东京大学 References: T.Hirano.
Steffen A. BassDynamics of Hadronization #1 Steffen A. Bass Duke University & RIKEN-BNL Research Center The baryon puzzle at RHIC Recombination + Fragmentation.
Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model Victor Roy Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China Collaborators.
Interplay between soft and hard hadronic components at RHIC Tetsufumi Hirano RIKEN BNL Research Center OUTLINE Introduction Hydro+jet model Back-to-back.
Koichi Murase A, Tetsufumi Hirano B The University of Tokyo A, Sophia University B Hydrodynamic fluctuations and dissipation in an integrated dynamical.
Perfect Fluid QGP or CGC? Tetsufumi Hirano* Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo References: T.Hirano and M.Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A 769(2006)71. T.Hirano,
Steffen A. BassModeling of RHIC Collisions #1 Steffen A. Bass Duke University Relativistic Fluid Dynamics Hybrid Macro+Micro Transport flavor dependent.
Peter Kolb, CIPANP03, May 22, 2003what we learn from hydro1 What did we learn, and what will we learn from Hydro CIPANP 2003 New York City, May 22, 2003.
11/18/2003Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)1 Rapidity Dependence of Elliptic Flow from Hydrodynamics Tetsufumi Hirano RIKEN BNL Research Center (Collaboration with.
Perfect Fluid QGP or CGC? Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo References: T.Hirano and M.Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A 769(2006)71. T.Hirano,
Scaling of Elliptic Flow for a fluid at Finite Shear Viscosity V. Greco M. Colonna M. Di Toro G. Ferini From the Coulomb Barrier to the Quark-Gluon Plasma,
Elliptic flow and shear viscosity in a parton cascade approach G. Ferini INFN-LNS, Catania P. Castorina, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, V. Greco.
Perfect Fluid QGP or CGC? Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo References: T.Hirano and M.Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A 769(2006)71. T.Hirano,
John Harris (Yale) LHC Conference, Vienna, Austria, 15 July 2004 Heavy Ions - Phenomenology and Status LHC Introduction to Rel. Heavy Ion Physics The Relativistic.
Heavy-Ion Physics - Hydrodynamic Approach Introduction Hydrodynamic aspect Observables explained Recombination model Summary 전남대 이강석 HIM
R. Lednicky: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia I.P. Lokhtin, A.M. Snigirev, L.V. Malinina: Moscow State University, Institute of Nuclear.
Dynamical Modeling of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano hirano_at_phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Collaborators:
Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook, ISMD, Kromĕříž, Roy A. Lacey What do we learn from Correlation measurements at RHIC.
Spectra and Flow from a Full 3D Hydro+Cascade Model Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo References: T.Hirano and M.Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A.
JET Collaboration Meeting June 17-18, 2014, UC-Davis1/25 Flow and “Temperature” of the Parton Phase from AMPT Zi-Wei Lin Department of Physics East Carolina.
3-D Hydro: present and future Tetsufumi Hirano Columbia University Second RHIC II Science BNL, Probes of EOS.
Flow and Dissipation in Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions September 16 th 2009, ECT* Italy Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of.
3 rd Joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of the APS and the JPS October 15 th 2009, Hawaii USA Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University.
What have we learned from the RHIC experiments so far ? Berndt Mueller (Duke University) KPS Meeting Seoul, 22 April 2005.
Collectivity in a Parton Cascade Zhe Xu BNL, April 30, 2008 with A. El, O. Fochler, C. Greiner and H. Stöcker.
Recent developments in RHIC physics Rudolph C. Hwa University of Oregon IHEP seminar June 14, 2005.
What do the scaling characteristics of elliptic flow reveal about the properties of the matter at RHIC ? Michael Issah Stony Brook University for the PHENIX.
Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Collaborator: Tetsufumi Hirano V iscous Hydrodynamic Evolution with Non-Boost Invariant Flow.
Duke University 野中 千穂 Hadron production in heavy ion collision: Fragmentation and recombination in Collaboration with R. J. Fries (Duke), B. Muller (Duke),
Review of ALICE Experiments
Hydro + Cascade Model at RHIC
Effects of Bulk Viscosity at Freezeout
Outline First of all, there’s too much data!! BRAHMS PHOBOS PHENIX
Effects of Bulk Viscosity on pT Spectra and Elliptic Flow Coefficients
Presentation transcript:

Hydrodynamic Models of Heavy-Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano RIKEN BNL Research Center

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)2 Parallel Talks Based on Hydro Jan. 13 H. Niemi, Photon production from non-equilibriumH. Niemi, Photon production from non-equilibrium QGP in heavy-ion collisions QGP in heavy-ion collisions M. Csanad, Indication for quark deconfinement andM. Csanad, Indication for quark deconfinement and evidence for a Hubble flow in Au+Au collisions at RHIC evidence for a Hubble flow in Au+Au collisions at RHIC Jan. 15 Y. Nara, CGC, hydrodynamics and the partonY. Nara, CGC, hydrodynamics and the parton energy loss energy loss E. Shuryak, Why does the QGP behaves likeE. Shuryak, Why does the QGP behaves like a perfect fluid? a perfect fluid? U. Heinz, Rapidity dependence of momentumU. Heinz, Rapidity dependence of momentum anisotropies in nuclear collisions anisotropies in nuclear collisions D. Teaney, Viscosity and thermalizationD. Teaney, Viscosity and thermalization

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)3 Outline 1.Why hydrodynamics? 2.How hydrodynamics works at RHIC 3.Hybrid models based on hydrodynamics – Information of the inside (jet quenching, EM probe) (jet quenching, EM probe) – Improvement of initial stage 4.Improvement of ideal hydro (viscosity) 5.Summary

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)4 1. Why Hydrodynamics? Static EoS from Lattice QCD Finite T,  field theory Critical phenomena Chiral property of hadron Dynamic Phenomena in HIC Expansion, Flow Space-time evolution of thermodynamic variables Once we accept local thermalization ansatz, life becomes very easy. Caveat: Thermalization in HIC is a tough problem like building the Golden Gate Bridge! Energy-momentum: Conserved number:

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)5 1. Why Hydrodynamics (contd.) TransverseLongitudinal e (GeV/fm 3 ) A full 3D hydrodynamic simulation with a CGC initial condition Talk by Y.Nara Space-time evolution of energy density in sqrt(s NN )=200 GeV Au+Au collision at b=7.2fm space-time rapidity Hydrodynamics provides us a very intuitive and simple description of relativistic heavy ion collisions.

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)6 Outline 1.Why hydrodynamics? 2.How hydrodynamics works at RHIC 3.Hybrid models based on hydrodynamics – Information of the inside (jet quenching, EM probe) (jet quenching, EM probe) – Improvement of initial stage 4.Improvement of ideal hydro (viscosity) 5.Summary

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)7 :P.Kolb(’03), talk by A.Poskanzer 2. How Hydrodynamics Works at RHIC Elliptic flow (J.-Y.Ollitrault (’92)) How does the system respond to initial spatial anisotropy? A.Poskanzer & S.Voloshin (’98) Dense or dilute? If dense, thermalization? If thermalized, EoS?

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)8 Elliptic Flow of Charged Particles T.H.(’01) P.Huovinen(’03) Roughly speaking, ideal hydro gives a good description For improvement of models, talk by U.Heinz Roughly speaking, ideal hydro gives a good description For improvement of models, talk by U.Heinz P.Kolb et al.(’01)

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)9 More on Elliptic Flow See recent excellent reviews, P.Huovinen (QM2002), nucl-th/ ; P.Kolb and U.Heinz, nucl-th/ ; E.Shuryak, hep-ph/ , today’s talk. Hydro: P.Kolb et al.(’99) (Note: Hydro+RQMD gives a better description. D.Teaney et al.(’01)) STAR, PRC66(’02) Hydro: P.Huovinen et al.(’01) PHENIX, PRL91(’03)

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)10 What’s next? Ideal hydro seems to give a good description at RHIC 1. Making the most use of hydro models to study the RHIC physics 2. Checking how robust the current results are when hydro models are improved

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)11 Outline 1.Why hydrodynamics? 2.How hydrodynamics works at RHIC 3.Hybrid models based on hydrodynamics – Information inside fluids (jet quenching, EM probe) (jet quenching, EM probe) – Improvement of initial stage 4.Improvement of ideal hydro (viscosity) 5.Summary

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC) Information inside fluids Jet quenching is a manifestation a manifestation of interaction between matter and partons (Talks by G.Moore and I.Vitev) (Talks by G.Moore and I.Vitev) For quantitative analysis, the information about the space-time evolution the space-time evolution of matter is indispensable! is indispensable!

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC) Hydro as a Tool to Analyze Jet Quenching Color: parton density Plot: mini-jets Au+Au 200AGeV, b=8 fm transverse Fragmentation switched off hydro+jet model Jet quenching analysis taking account of (2+1)D hydro results (M.Gyulassy et al.(’02)) (M.Gyulassy et al.(’02)) Hydro+Jet model (T.H. & Y.Nara (’02)) Parton density  (x) taken from full 3D hydro simulations from full 3D hydro simulations x y GLV 1 st order formula (M.Gyulassy et al.(’00)) Movie and data of  ( x ) are available at

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)14 Interplay between Soft and Hard N SOFT ~N HARD pTpTpTpT (1/p T )(dN/dp T ) Hydrodynamicafterburner Jetquenching Interesting region  Intermediate p T (2<p T <3.5 GeV/c) Pion  hard, Proton  soft It’s the very heavy ion physics! T.H & Y.Nara(’03) Crossing p T moves toward high p T soft hard Au+Au at b=2 fm

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)15 Consequense from hadron species dependent p T,cross Hydro+Jet Talk by R.Fries Recombination +Fragmentation R AA Particle ratio “Scaling v 2 ” Interplay between soft and hard? Recombination mechanism?

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)16 Thermal photon is a penetrating probe of QGP (E.Shuryak(’78)) Hydro as a Tool to Analyze Electromagnetic Radiation T,  uu Production rate Production rate (Number per unit space-time volume) (Number per unit space-time volume) Invariant spectrum of photons Invariant spectrum of photons H.A.Weldon (’83), L.McLerran & T.Toimela (’84) C.Gale & J.Kapusta (’91) Talk by G.Moore D.K.Srivastava & B.Sinha(’94), J.Sollfrank et al.(’97), J.Alam et al.(’01) and a lot of work Importance of temperature profile

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)17 Chemical Non-Equilibrium QGP phase “Gluon Plasma (GP)”  QGP Hadron phase Chemical freezeout Talk by H.Niemi Hydro + rate eq. Smaller d.o.f.  Larger initial T T.H. & K.Tsuda(’02) Hydro( ) Overpopulation of resonance  Rapid cooling T.S.Biro et al.(’93), D.K.Srivastava et al.(’97), A.K.Chaudhuri(’00), D.M.Elliott & D.Rischke(’00) N.Arbex et al.(’01), T.H. & K.Tsuda(’02), D.Teaney(’02), P.Kolb & R.Rapp(’03) Talk by H.Niemi QGP phase Hadron phase Temperature (MeV) 0

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)18 Novel Temperature Evolution Caveat: one has to take account of fugacity  in calculating EM spectra. QGP phase: <1 Hadron phase: >1 Compensation between T and ? Talk by H.Niemi proper time TcTc temperature chemical non-eq. chemical eq.

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC) Improvement of Initial Condition -Toward an unified model in HIC- GroupHydro Initial condition M.Gyulassy et al. SHASTA (2+1D, Bjorken) HIJING, event-by-event C.Nonaka et al. Lagrangian hydro (full 3D) URASiMA, event average B.Schlei et al. HYLANDER (2+1D) VNI, event average C.E.Aguiar et al. SPheRIO (full 3D) NeXus, event-by-event L.P.Csernai et al. Particle-in-cell (full 3D) String ropes, flux tubes, classical YM K.Eskola et al. SHASTA (2+1D, Bjorken) pQCD + final state saturation T.H. & Y.Nara  coordinate (full 3D) CGC,  (k T 2,x) a la Kharzeev & Levin ………

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC) SPheRIO* Main features: “Particle” method (a kind of Lagrangian hydro) “Particle” method (a kind of Lagrangian hydro) Numerical cost cheaper than conventional finite grids method (Even in 3+1 D, any geometry) Numerical cost cheaper than conventional finite grids method (Even in 3+1 D, any geometry) Event-by-event physics (NeXus + SPheRIO=NeXSPheRIO) Event-by-event physics (NeXus + SPheRIO=NeXSPheRIO) (NeXus: parton based Gribov-Regge theory) (NeXus: parton based Gribov-Regge theory) *Smoothed Particle hydrodynamical evolution of Relativistic heavy IOn collisions (Sao Paulo & Rio de Janeiro) C.E.Aguiar, R.Andrade, F.Grassi, Y.Hama, T.Kodama, T.Osada, O.Socolowski Jr…. Poster by F.Grassi Energy density of single event Spectra from Energy density of single event Spectra from Conventional approachSPheRIO Similar approach based on HIJING: M.Gyulassy et al.(’97)

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)21 Initial Conditions in NeXSPheRIO Single event (b=0fm) Average over 30 events (b=0fm) Energy density in the transverse plane (z=0) Bumpy!

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)22 Results from NeXSPheRIO Pb+Pb 17.3A GeV Multiplicity is reduced by ~10%! :(event average) Effect of initial energy density fluctuation (simple EoS case): Negative! p T slope is not affected largely.  v 2 (p T ) and its fluctuation? Now the hydro simulation becomes close to experimental situations like event-generators!

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC) CGC+Hydro+Jet Model T.H. & Y.Nara Talk by Y.Nara Dense Medium These three physics closely related with each other! Talk by J.Jalilian-Marian Talk by I.Vitev

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)24 CGC+Hydro+Jet Model (contd.) Full 3D hydro evolution pQCDpartondilute time momentum scale gg  g 2222 CGC small x dense collinear factorization k T factorization Parton energy loss Initial condition of energy density from CGC Au+Au 200AGeV b=7.2fm,    =0.6fm transverselongitudinal

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)25 Results from CGC+hydro+jet Au+Au sqrt(s NN ) = 200 GeV For details, talk by Y.Nara CGC initial condition works very well! (Energy, rapidity, centrality dependences)

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)26 Outline 1.Why hydrodynamics? 2.How hydrodynamics works at RHIC 3.Hybrid models based on hydrodynamics – Information of the inside (jet quenching, EM probe) (jet quenching, EM probe) – Improvement of initial stage 4.Improvement of ideal hydro (viscosity) 5.Summary

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)27 4. Viscosity Change not only the equations of motion but the local thermal distribution function A.Dumitru(’02), D.Teaney(’03) Blast wave model + dist. fn. with viscous correction Talks by E.Shuryak and D.Teaney 1 st order correction to dist. fn.: :Sound attenuation length :Tensor part of thermodynamic force Reynolds number in Bjorken flow Nearly ideal hydro !? D.Teaney(’03)

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)28 Break Down of Naive Navier-Stokes Eq. and a Relaxation Method Non-relativistic case (Based on discussion by Cattaneo (1948))   0: Fourier’s law  : “relaxation time” Parabolic equation (heat equation) ACAUSAL!! Finite  Hyperbolic equation (telegraph equation) Balance eq.: Constitutive eq.: Talk by D.Teaney See also, A.Muronga (’02)

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)29 5. Summary Open our mind ! Hydrodynamics can be used even for “high p T physics in HIC”. Open our mind ! Hydrodynamics can be used even for “high p T physics in HIC”. – Jet tomography – EM probe – (J/  suppression) – … Keep in mind ! Keep in mind ! How robust is the current agreement of hydro?: How robust is the current agreement of hydro?: – Chemical non-eq.? – Initial fluctuation? – Viscosity? – Thermalization? – EoS? – (Freeze-out?) Hydrodynamics is one of the valuable tools at RHIC energies

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)30 Thank you! Special thanks goes to: H.Niemi, D.Teaney, Y.Hama, T.Kodama (SPheRIO collaboration), Y.Nara, and L.McLerran Space-time evolution of energy density in sqrt(s NN )=200 GeV Au+Au collision at b=7.2fm

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)31 Spare Slides

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)32 No Boost Invariant Region at RHIC? Basic assumption 1.Finite Bjorken rod (-  0 <  s <  0 ) 2.Massless pions 3.Thermalization and Boltzmann approximation 2020 Space-time rapidity Not free streaming, but thermal fluctuation!

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)33 Thermalization? Hydro people often used  0 = fm/c at RHIC energies to get large v 2. pQCD +Boltzmann eq. analyses : Elastic (gg  gg) collisions:  eq >6-10 fm/cElastic (gg  gg) collisions:  eq >6-10 fm/c Inelastic (gg  ggg) collisions:  eq =2-3fm/cInelastic (gg  ggg) collisions:  eq =2-3fm/c A.H.Mueller, R.Baier et al., J.Serreau et al., A.Dumitru et al., J.Bjoraker et al. … Thermalization controlled by non-perturbative physics?

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)34 Protons with p T =4 GeV/c in hydro? Proton: p T =4 GeV/c in lab. frame p T ~2.4GeV/c in local rest frame with v T =0.5c No! Lorentz tr. Suppose momentum parallel to flow

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)35 Recombination + Fragmentation? Work in intermediate and high p T Parameterized flow How do we obtain such a large flow (v T ~0.55c) at T=T c ? What happens for high p T v 2 if a realistic density profile is used instead of hard sphere? Work in low and high p T Flow is dynamically obtained. Radial flow in hadron phase is also important. At T=T c, ~0.25c T=100 MeV, ~0.55c Talk by R.Fries T.H. & Y.Nara Hydro + Jet ?

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)36 Hydro + Rate Eq. in QGP phase Including gg  qqbar and gg  ggg Collision term: T.S.Biro et al.,Phys.Rev.C48(’93)1275. Assuming “multiplicative” fugacity, EoS is unchanged.

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)37 Hydro+Jet Model N N 3 4 Fragmentation: Independent Fragmentation Model PYTHIA 3D Hydro PYTHIA hadrons PDF: Collinear: CTEQ5LO k T : Gaussian Parton energy loss pQCD LO: *Initial and final state radiation are included.

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)38 Initial energy density fluctuation Suppose massless free EoS, Multiplicity is proportional to the entropy. The 1 st order term vanishes. In the conventional approach, one uses average initial energy density Multiplicity WITH fluctuation < Multiplicity WITHOUT fluctuation

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)39 dN/d  from a Saturation Model Qs2Qs2  kT2kT2 0 gg  g D. Kharzeev and E. Levin, Phys.Lett.B523,79(2001) Parton-hadron duality  s

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)40 Initial Condition from CGC “CGC + Hydro + Jet model” Saturation scale at a transverse position: Momentum rapidity y  space time rapidity  s Input for hydrodynamics where Unintegrated gluon distribution can be written

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)41 v 2 (  ) from CGC+Hydro

Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)42 2 nd order formula… 14 equations… 1 st order2 nd order How obtain additional equations? In order to ensure the second law of thermodynamics, one can choose Balance eqs. Constitutive eqs.