Protezione diplomatica

ILC Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection Article 1 Definition and scope For the purposes of the present draft articles, diplomatic protection consists of the invocation by a State, through diplomatic action or other means of peaceful settlement, of the responsibility of another State for an injury caused by an internationally wrongful act of that State to a natural or legal person that is a national of the former State with a view to the implementation of such responsibility.

traduzione “… la protezione diplomatica consiste nell’invocazione da parte di uno Stato, mediante una azione diplomatica od altri mezzi di regolamento pacifico, della responsabilità di un altro Stato per un pregiudizio causato da un fatto internazionalmente illecito del detto Stato ad una persona fisica o morale in possesso della nazionalità del primo Stato ai fini di far valere tale responsabilità”. (C.D.I., Articolo 1 del “Progetto di articoli sulla protezione diplomatica adottato dalla Commissione in seconda lettura”).

ICJ caso Diallo 2007 Par. 39 Owing to the substantive development of international law over recent decades in respect of the rights it accords to individuals, the scope ratione materiae of diplomatic protection, originally limited to alleged violations of the minimum standard of treatment of aliens, has subsequently widened to include, inter alia, internationally guaranteed human rights.

Titolarità del diritto Art. 2 Right to exercise diplomatic protection A State has the right to exercise diplomatic protection in accordance with the present draft articles. Commentary: A State has the right to exercise diplomatic protection on behalf of a national. It is under no duty or obligation to do so. The internal law of a State may oblige a State to extend diplomatic protection to a national, but international law imposes no such obligation.

International Court of Justice in the Barcelona Traction case: “… within the limits prescribed by international law, a State may exercise diplomatic protection by whatever means and to whatever extent it thinks fit, for it is its own right that the State is asserting. Should the natural or legal person on whose behalf it is acting consider that their rights are not adequately protected, they have no remedy in international law. All they can do is resort to municipal law, if means are available, with a view to furthering their cause or obtaining redress … The State must be viewed as the sole judge to decide whether its protection will be granted, to what extent it is granted, and when it will cease. It retains in this respect a discretionary power the exercise of which may be determined by considerations of a political or other nature, unrelated to the particular case”.

ILC Draft Articles Article 19 Recommended practice A State entitled to exercise diplomatic protection according to the present draft articles, should: (a) Give due consideration to the possibility of exercising diplomatic protection, especially when a significant injury has occurred; (b) Take into account, wherever feasible, the views of injured persons with regard to resort to diplomatic protection and the reparation to be sought; and (c) Transfer to the injured person any compensation obtained for the injury from the responsible State subject to any reasonable deductions.

Stato del diritto consuetudinario Art. 19 Commentary There are certain practices on the part of States in the field of diplomatic protection which have not yet acquired the status of customary rules and which are not susceptible to transformation into rules of law in the exercise of progressive development of the law. Nevertheless they are desirable practices, constituting necessary features of diplomatic protection, that add strength to diplomatic protection as a means for the protection of human rights and foreign investment.

Diritto alla riparazione? ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility (2001) Art. 48, par. 2, lett. b) Legittimazione degli Stati in risposta a violazioni erga omnes: Ogni Stato può reclamare … «b) l’adempimento dell’obbligo di riparazione in conformità con gli articoli precedenti, nell’interesse dello Stato offeso o dei beneficiari dell’obbligo violato»

CIG sentenza Germania c. Italia Par. 94 «against the background of a century of practice in which almost every peace treaty or post-war settlement has involved either a decision not to require the payment of reparations or the use of lump sum settlements and set-offs, it is difficult to see that international law contains a rule requiring the payment of full compensation to each and every individual victim as a rule accepted by the international community of States as a whole as one from which no derogation is permitted».

ICJ Germania c. Italia Par. 102 Where the State receiving funds as part of what was intended as a comprehensive settlement in the aftermath of an armed conflict has elected to use those funds to rebuild its national economy and infrastructure, rather than distributing them to individual victims amongst its nationals, it is difficult to see why the fact that those individuals had not received a share in the money should be a reason for entitling them to claim against the State that had transferred money to their State of nationality.

ICJ sentenza nel caso Diallo 2012 Par. 57. The Court recalls that the sum awarded to Guinea in the exercise of diplomatic protection of Mr. Diallo is intended to provide reparation for the latter’s injury.

Corte edu Cipro c. Turchia (2014) Equa soddisfazione (art. 41 CEDU) anche nel caso di ricorsi Statali Par. 58 …The aforementioned sums are to be distributed by the applicant Government to the individual victims of the violations found in the principal judgment under these two heads (see, mutatis mutandis, the judgment of the International Court of Justice in the case of Diallo (Compensation), …

Previo esaurimento dei ricorsi interni Article 14 Exhaustion of local remedies 1. A State may not present an international claim in respect of an injury to a national or other person referred to in draft article 8 before the injured person has, subject to draft article 15, exhausted all local remedies. 2. “Local remedies” means legal remedies which are open to the injured person before the judicial or administrative courts or bodies, whether ordinary or special, of the State alleged to be responsible for causing the injury. (…)

segue Commentary Draft article 14 seeks to codify the rule of customary international law requiring the exhaustion of local remedies as a prerequisite for the exercise of diplomatic protection. This rule was recognized by the International Court of Justice in the Interhandel case as “a well-established rule of customary international law”

Nazionalità delle persone fisiche Article 4 State of nationality of a natural person For the purposes of the diplomatic protection of a natural person, a State of nationality means a State whose nationality that person has acquired, in accordance with the law of that State, by birth, descent, naturalization, succession of States, or in any other manner, not inconsistent with international law.

Nazionalità delle persone giuridiche Article 9 State of nationality of a corporation For the purposes of the diplomatic protection of a corporation, the State of nationality means the State under whose law the corporation was incorporated. However, when the corporation is controlled by nationals of another State or States and has no substantial business activities in the State of incorporation, and the seat of management and the financial control of the corporation are both located in another State, that State shall be regarded as the State of nationality.