1 ARMADILLO – SHOT II The University of Texas at Austin Post-flight Analysis Travis Imken Shaina Johl Christopher McBryde Travis Sanders July 1 st, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FPGA Process Flowchart Backup. FPGA Configurability Basis of configurability – Nature of transistor based FPGA Physical limitations – Through header on.
Advertisements

Solar Cell Efficiency Flight Readiness Review Teddy Bounds Angela Dunn Joel Sasser.
Page 1 Aalborg University Communication system for the AAUSAT-II Communication System for the AAUSAT-II Kresten K. Sørensen Department.
Comments on this template -Leave time for questions -Leave time for demonstration (at the final LRR) -Use your actual hardware in the presentation -Practice.
Cornell University Space Systems Design Studio AIAA GNC Conference - 8/11/2009 Violet: A High-Agility Nanosatellite for Demonstrating Small Control-Moment.
Gary MKIII Results University of Central Florida Chris Valle, Braden Urban, John Rowe, and Tyler Yoemans.
Aolani “heavenly cloud” University of Hawaii Shantel Hunt, Nick Fisher, Dan Fong, James Ah Heong, Monica Umeda.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium DemoSat-B Colorado State University Matthew Jui, Ian Patterson, Mark Spowart, Todd Wallis June Colorado Space Grant.
Pegasus MSF SatElysium Launch Readiness Review Jordan Burns, Brenden Hogan, Miranda Link, Cody Spiker, Chris Dehoyos, Hemal Semwal November 1 st, 2011.
Cornell University Space Systems Design Studio AIAA GNC Conference - 8/11/2009 Violet: A High-Agility Nanosatellite for Demonstrating Small Control-Moment.
Gary MKIII University of Central Florida Chris Valle, Braden Urban, John Rowe, and Tyler Yoemans.
CASTOR Jr. MIT 2LT Corey Crowell 2LT Matt McCormack Lucas de la Garza Spenser Parra.
University of Kansas EPS of KUTEsat Pathfinder Leon S. Searl April 5, 2006 AE256 Satellite Electrical Power Systems.
Team R3D3 Final Presentation Devon Campbell Greg McQuie Kate Kennedy Henk Wolda Marisa Antuna Nicole Ela Tyler Smith 12/1/11.
1 SHOT II Communication System Experiment University of Minnesota Max Schadegg, Cole Christensen, Ian Macmillen, Steve Haviland June 10 th, 2010 University.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn December 7, 2006.
UHM CanSat Team Members: Chris Ho: Team master, software Tyson Fukuyama: Hardware.
Final Presentation Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani December 5, 2006.
M-SAT Missouri S&T Satellite Team SHOT II Post-Launch Ryan Pahl Matt Campbell Stephanie Evans Austin Ferguson.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Echo  Final Presentation Andrew Berg, Shawn Carroll, Cody Humbargar, Jade Nelson, Jared Russell, Austin Williamson
Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Team Name 1 Team Name 2 Team Name N Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
PHAT-TACO Experiment Pressure Humidity And Temperature Tests And Camera Observations Hannah Gardiner, Bill Freeman, Randy Dupuis, Corey Myers, Andrea Spring.
University at Buffalo GLADOS SHOT II Balloon Payload Presentation June 29, 2012 Andrew Dianetti, Alex Wende, Bryant Carlson, Joe Flannery 1.
Team Victorious Secret Final Presentation Crawford Leeds Jacob Broadway Tanya Hardon Devan Corona Dylan Reed November 29, 2011.
Undergraduate Space Research Symposium University of Colorado Boulder
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
Team Hang 7 Final Presentation Lucas Migliorini, Sierra Williams, Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Becca Lidvall, Abby Caballero, Paul Smith, Nikhil Desai.
GPS(Global Positioning System) -An Introduction. What is the GPS? Orbiting navigational satellites Transmit position and time data Handheld receivers.
Ryan Olin, Austin Granger, R.J. Kakach, Seth Frick, Joey Senkyr AEM /24/09.
MinnRock Design and Canister Layout Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Flight Testing Small Satellites Through High Altitude Ballooning Presented by Zach Henney 18 April 2015.
Cubes, Fun and Satellite Jollity. Covering… Funcube-1 Funcube-2 Funcubes 3, (4) & x SO-50 (Saudisat 1C) ISS.
1 University of Maryland DYMAFLEX SHOT II Pre-Flight Presentation June 29, 2012.
Boston University Daniel TaylorNima Badizadegan R. Terry BlackPantelis Thomadis.
Prox-0.3 Georgia Institute of Technology Kiichiro DeLuca Richard Zappulla Matt Uhlman Ian Chen 1.
Quinn Kostelecky, Vincent Staverosky, Gloria Chen, Roshan Misra, Jacqueline Godina, Raymond Auyeung Fall 2011 Rev C
Prox-0.3 Georgia Institute of Technology Kiichiro DeLuca Richard Zappulla Ian Chen Matt Uhlman 1.
Junk in a Box Final Presentation Frank Becky, Kyle Cummings, Jordan Haines, Villiam Klein, Matt Peoples, Ryan Scott and Aaron Young 4 December 2007.
Argus: SLU Core Bus Operational Test Steve Massey, Tyler Olson, Joe Kirwen, Wesley Gardner SHOT II Post-Launch Presentation July 1st, 2012.
CubeSat for Ions, Neutrals, Electrons and Magnetic Fields PI Robert Lin, SSL Project Manager Thomas Immel, SSL Systems Engineer Chris Pasma, SSL Mechanical.
University at Buffalo GLADOS SHOT II Balloon Launch Results Presentation July 1, 2012 Andrew Dianetti, Alex Wende, Bryant Carlson, Joe Flannery 1.
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
Notes on this template You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information requested in this template. Presentations should.
PACER GAP Science Report May 22, 2008 Herman Neal, Mozella Bell, Matthew Ware.
Scott Luisi, Abe Fark, Trent Quick, Jack Szmanda, Tom Valkenberg AEM 1905, 11/20/2008.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report RocketSat CU Boulder
1 ARMADILLO – SHOT II The University of Texas at Austin Travis Imken Shaina Johl Christopher McBryde Travis Sanders June 29, 2012 Boulder, CO.
SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (
Ozone Sensors Payload and its Applications on
USNA Next Generation Ground Station
Ozone Sensors Payload and its Applications on
8th Grade Weather Balloon TEAM NAME???? LOGO?????? 2016
PROJECT METEOR: RITSAT1 P08102
Launch Readiness Review
NMSU SHOT II WORKSHOP Klipsch School of Electrical and Computer Engineering & Mechanical Engineering Department Jeremy Bruggemann Michelle Chavez Trevenor.
StratoBuoy II Results Matt Voll Brian Mayernik Pat O’Hara.
HA1L High Altitude 1U Laboratory
HA1L High Altitude 1U Laboratory
Daniel Taylor Nima Badizadegan R. Terry Black Pantelis Thomadis
CubeSat vs. Science Instrument Complexity
University of Maryland DYMAFLEX SHOT II Post-Flight Presentation
Starting Student Space Hardware Programs IV
Systems Integration Christopher Bessette Alexander Reich
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

1 ARMADILLO – SHOT II The University of Texas at Austin Post-flight Analysis Travis Imken Shaina Johl Christopher McBryde Travis Sanders July 1 st, 2012 Boulder, CO

Mission Overview The ARMADILLO SHOT II payload will verify the systems-level functionality of multiple subsystems on ARMADILLO 1.CDH computer boots and interfaces with subsystems 2.Flight software executes and stores data to SD card 3.COM uplinks and downlinks 4.EPS provides constant and steady power 5.GPS collects data and calculates position 6.NVS (camera) collects pictures of the flight 7.Magnetometer measures Earth’s magnetic field 8.Pressure/temperature sensor collects flight data 2

Expected Results 3 From the mission objectives: 1.CDH computer boots in 120 seconds with automatic interface to subsystems 2.Flight software executes all code and data is recorded 3.COM internally indicates downlink *(ground radio deaf) 4.EPS provides power for whole flight 5.GPS has a position fix and records all visible satellites 6.Camera takes pretty pictures 7.Plausible magnetic field measurements 8.Relevant pressure and temperature measurements

Quick Recap 4 ARMADILLO systems integration flight was a mixed success: Four complete successes (and the pressure sensor too) Two partial successes and one failure, all with understanding Many ARMADILLO lessons learned… and we’re still smiling!

Results: Success and Failure – 1 1. CDH Computer and Kraken First log file created after 90 seconds (Linux boot complete) and no hardware restarts –Matches flatsat and SDL results Log files created for all interfaced subsystems. Software logs indicate interfaces with COM, NVS, GPS, and magnetometer were established with no errors 2. Flight Software and SD Card Flight software automatically executed on boot launching four separate executables Data streams established with all data collecting subsystems and recorded to SD card SD card data parsed after flight on ground station computer with no errors 5

Results: Success and Failure – 2 3. COM Downlink and Uplink COM software enabled radio and transmitted packets as shown by collected log file No packets were received or transmitted by ground station handheld radio due to handheld hardware failure before SHOT –Tests prior to SHOT departure showed GS radio deaf at 20 feet –UT Austin ground station antenna (200 feet away through building) received packets perfectly. Results as expected, but unable to independently verify success. 4. EPS Power Distribution Power provided for flight and field-sitting – 2.4 hours! Components used a peak of 15 watts (COM transmit) and averaged 10 watts on 3.3 and 5V Voltage drop from 8.04V to 7.33V (~65% power capacity used) and is much better than expected 5V current limit may have been reached (next slide) by EPS protection design EPS heaters were not activated 6

Results: Success and Failure – 3 5. GPS Data and Analysis GPS powered on, interfaced by CDH, and created log files Log files were not populated with data indicating no satellites seen All antenna connections good and GPS still operational Lab tests (on power supply) indicated all hardware functional Failure Analysis – Most Likely Scenario: GPS assembly nominally draws 5V 1.5A but occasionally spikes to 1.7A EPS limits 5V to 2.5A. Sum of other components and GPS likely caused limit to be hit, resetting the GPS and preventing fix from being established ARMADILLO Impact and Lessons Learned Balloon GPS assembly had additional interface boards to process data and communicate with the old CDH interface board. This board consumes an additional 2.5W (0.5A) and is not for flight. ARMADILLO power budgets cycle GPS modes and power to prevent this (Power-current budgets established pre-PDR and kept up-to-date) 7

Results: Success and Failure – 4 6. Camera taking pictures for the presentation NVS operated as expected on in-house software and took 264 pictures, but… Flight pictures looked like this:And should have looked like this: Contrast settings in software made everything white due to sunlight Camera software configured from SDL star tests (lots of black pictures) ARMADILLO Impact and Lessons Learned Easy in-house software fix to make aperture/contrast controllable for using flight camera for star tracking, visual navigation, and pretty images 8 Saturday room picture

Results: Success and Failure – 5 7. Magnetometer Measurements 110 minutes of magnetometer data collected at 10 Hz. Magnetic field magnitude within 3% of expected values from National Geophysical Data Center 9

Results: Success and Failure – 6 7. Magnetometer Measurements Continued Three axis measurements are plausible but will require analysis Appears to have little interference from other electronics. ARMADILLO flight is more isolated and includes shielding. 10

Results: Success and Failure – 7 8. Pressure Measurements Ground pressure measured to be 14.4 psia – very plausible! Max altitude pressure measured to be 0.35 psia – very plausible! Temperatures varied inside: –26C at launch –10.4C minimum inside –Up to 50C in the field – toasty ! Would have been nice to correlate with GPS altitude data from ARMADILLO or EOSS Altitude correlation could be compared to atmospheric pressure and temperature models of the atmosphere ARMADILLO Impact and Lessons Learned Interior was warm with ~50% of the flight hardware in the box CubeSat thermal control is important and iterates the need for analysis (already part of the UNP deliverables!) 11

Results: Success and Failure – 8 12 LAUNCH POWER ON BURST? TOUCHDOWN TEMPERATURE PRESSURE GROUND COOKING

Conclusions 13 The ARMADILLO SHOT II payload was an overall success. All subsystems were operational with mixed data success EPS provided power longer than expected Flight-like software and flight-like CDH hardware configuration performed exactly as planned with no errors All hardware recovered in working order for continued EDU development and PQR preparations Plenty of things to go back to Austin and work on after catching up on sleep!

Actions for ARMADILLO 14 Action Items: Diagnose GPS unit health and performance upon return to UT Perform similar Flatsat test with EPS and monitor current and validate against current budgets Incorporate various software tweaks for camera and flight software Diagnose our handheld ground radio for future testing Continue work on thermal analysis to look at internal heating Impact to UNP-7 ARMADILLO: GPS Investigation – the unit will still fly! –GPS unit flew successfully on sounding rocket earlier in 2012 –No interface boards used in flight; Kraken v2 has SPI interface –Different and better antenna (L1 + L2 frequencies) is used in flight

15 Happy Canada Day