2015 NCAAHPERD-SM ASW What We Learned in Year One Today’s ppt is available on the Professional Development page of Healthful Living Wiki at Wireless password

Analysis of Student Work What We Learned in Year One

NCDPI ASW Team Arts Education Christie Lynch Ebert Slater Mapp AP/IB Sneha Shah-Coltrane Healthful Living Burt Jenkins World Languages Ann Marie Gunter Coordinator Jen DeNeal

Analysis of Student Work 6 Contribute to Academic Success Beginning in , ASW became the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages. Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process.

ASW Timeline from TimeTask Completed April 1 – May 20, 2015 ASW Reviewer Application Window Applications were reviewed on an ongoing basis with priority deadlines of May 1 st and May 20 th Reviewer applicants selected moved on to training Late May – Early July ASW Reviewer Training Completed Certification Module Passed Over 600 ASW Reviewers June 19, 2015ASW Evidence Collections Uploaded Upload Window OPEN until 5:00 p.m. (extended) Over 6,300 Evidence Collections with 3 Timelapse Artifacts each

Overall ASW Numbers 69 LEA’s + multiple charters 6,415 Teachers Submitted Evidence Collections –Made up of 19,245 Timelapse Artifacts 12,830 Evidence Collections Reviewed (minimum of 2 reviews per collection) 97% reviewed

ASW Timeline from TimeTask Completed JulyASW Review AugustASW Review Ratings and Feedback Comments processed by NCDPI September - October SAS completes Value-Added Analysis for Standard 6 ratings from EOGs, EOCs, NC Final Exams, & K-3 Checkpoints. Early to mid- November All teachers receive Standard 6 ratings from 2014 – 2015 November 12, 2015 Webinar on ASW Results from 2014 – :30 – 5:00 p.m. as GoToWebinar Will be recorded and posted approximately 1 week later

ASW Numbers for Healthful Living 2,344 Healthful Living Teachers Submitted Evidence Collections (over 1/3 of all submissions) Made up of 7,032 Timelapse Artifacts 4,688 Evidence Collections to be reviewed (minimum of 2 reviews per collection)

Healthful Living Reviewers 110 reviewers Top reviewer rated over 100 collections 98.7% reviewed

So When Am I Getting My Rating?

ASW Timeline from TimeTask Completed JulyASW Review AugustASW Review Ratings and Feedback Comments processed by NCDPI September - October SAS completes Value-Added Analysis for Standard 6 ratings from EOGs, EOCs, NC Final Exams, & K-3 Checkpoints. Early to mid- November All teachers receive Standard 6 ratings from 2014 – 2015 November 12, 2015 Webinar on ASW Results from 2014 – :30 – 5:00 p.m. as GoToWebinar Will be recorded and posted approximately 1 week later

Results for Healthful Living ASW Results in late October early to mid November with other EOC/EOG tests.

ASW Timeline from TimeTask Completed JulyASW Review AugustASW Review Ratings and Feedback Comments processed by NCDPI September - October SAS completes Value-Added Analysis for Standard 6 ratings from EOGs, EOCs, NC Final Exams, & K-3 Checkpoints. Early to mid- November All teachers receive Standard 6 ratings from 2014 – 2015 November 12, 2015 Webinar on ASW Results from 2014 – :30 – 5:00 p.m. as GoToWebinar Will be recorded and posted approximately 1 week later

Waiver Policy Waiver Policy is to go before the Board November 4 th and/or 5 th.

ASW Wiki

Reviewers Feedback Comments Feedback Comments available to download on the ASW wiki

Interpreting Results for Healthful Living ASW Each Timelapse Artifact is rated: –Exceeds Expected Growth –Meets Expected Growth –Does Not Meet Expected Growth Reviewer may provide feedback comments on each artifact. TA 3 TA 5 TA 2 TA 4 TA 1

For , an evidence collection will be made up of 5 Timelapse Artifacts. ASW Quality Rubric X X XXXX Timelaspe Artifact #1 X X Timelaspe Artifact #2 X X X X X X Timelaspe Artifact #3 X X X X X X X X XXXX Timelaspe Artifact #4 X X Timelaspe Artifact #5

Interpreting Results for Healthful Living ASW Evidence Collection is rated –Exceeds Expected Growth –Meets Expected Growth –Does Not Meet Expected Growth based on the timelapse artiacts Reviewer may provide feedback comments for the entire collection.

D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth M = Meets Expected Growth E = Exceeds Expected Growth Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below: Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth 1 1 Does Not MeetMeetsExceeds D D D D DM M M M ME E E E E D D D D EM M M M EM E E E E D D D D MD M M M MM M E E E D D D E EM M M E ED E E E E D D D M ED D M M MD M E E E D D D M MD M M M ED D E E E D D M M E D D M E E D M M E E Evidence Collection Rating Form DMEDM TA 1TA 2TA 3TA 4TA 5

An educator receives an Effectiveness Status when he or she has 3 years of data for Standard 6. Effectiveness Status 3 Years of Combined Data for Standard Standard

5 Rating Categories Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Contribute to Academic Success 3 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System

66 Contribute to Academic Success 6 Year Does Not Meet Expected Growth Year Meets Expected Growth Year Meets Expected Growth Standard Ms. NC’s 3 years of growth data: Does Not Meet (Year 1) Meets (Year 2) Meets (Year 3) Ms. NC’s Standard 6 rating for Meets Expected Growth Effectiveness Status LEAs/Charter Schools who took part in ASW in 2014 Best 2 out of 3 years of data

66 Contribute to Academic Success 6 Year Meets Expected Growth Year Does Not Meet Expected Growth Year Meets Expected Growth Standard Mrs. NC’s 3 years of growth data: Meets (Year 1) School Wide Data Does Not Meet (Year 2) Meets (Year 3) Mrs. NC’s Standard 6 rating for Meets Expected Growth Effectiveness Status LEAs/Charter Schools who waived out of ASW in 2014 Best 2 out of 3 years of data School Wide Data

66 Contribute to Academic Success 6 Year Meets Expected Growth Year Meets Expected Growth Year Meets Expected Growth Standard Mr. NC’s 3 years of growth data: Meets (Year 1) Meets (Year 2) Meets (Year 3) Mr. NC’s Standard 6 rating for Meets Expected Growth Effectiveness Status Charter Schools that are part of ASW for the first time in 2015

In Need of Improvement Effective Highly Effective Any rating lower than proficient Proficient or Higher on Standards 1-5 Accomplished or Higher on Standards Demonstrate Leadership 2 Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Standards Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth Effectiveness Status for Contribute to Academic Success (3 yrs. of data)

Effectiveness Status for DevelopingProficientAccomplishedDistinguished Standard 1 Demonstrate leadership Standard 2 Establish Environment Standard 3 Know Content Standard 4 Facilitate Learning Standard 5 Reflect on Practice Standard 6 Three year growth data X X X X X Best 2 out of 3 years of growth data for 2014 – 2017 Meets Expected Growth Effective Principal Role

ASW Wiki

New Resources for The Standard 6 ASW Procedures Manual provides step by step instructions in the compilation of an Evidence Collection.

New Resources for The ASW Timelapse Artifact Template has been developed to assist teachers in Health and Physical Education to plan and implement a single Timelapse Artifact from beginning to end.

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

ASW Timeline for

Teachers are responsible for the items within the red boxes.

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Teaching Context Validate Class Schedule for ASW Courses Screen shot DONE

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Class Selection The online platform selects the classes from which the Student Work Samples will be collected. DONE

Class Selection The teacher reviews the 5 classes selected for ASW Process. DONE

ASW Process: A Quick Guide