The central purposes of education standards are to identify the learning that we want for all of our students and to drive improvement in the system that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Advertisements

School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Curriculum Maps Public Release: February 10, 2014
Orientation to the English Language Arts K to 7 IRP (2006)
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Taking a Walk with the Model Cornerstone Assessments (MCAs) Dr. Robert Sabol Purdue University
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
National Core Arts Standards: A Framework for PreK-Arts Learning
Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (SRCL) SRCL is a comprehensive literacy development education program to advance literacy skills for students.
More than 380 individuals applied to serve on five art discipline standards writing teams NCCAS ’ s professional organizations.
FINAL PUBLIC REVIEW OF DRAFT NATIONAL CORE ARTS STANDARDS What you should know and be able to do!
What do the new national core arts standards mean for PA educators? Cory Wilkerson Project Manager, State Education Agency Directors of Arts Education.
Up-Date on Science and SS February 2015 Faculty Meeting.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 2: Matching Clusters of Standards to Critical Areas in one.
Curriculum Transformation Moving towards the Reality.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
Adapted from: PARCC Model Content Frameworks English Language Arts/Literacy October 2011.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Oregon State Board of Education January 19, 2012.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Agenda Pedagogy Presentations Break INTASC standards.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration –Initiated in 2003 –Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Common Core Standard Implementation Our Students... Prepared for success after high school Our Promise... Leadership, Advocacy, & Support Our Future… Strong.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: What You’ll Need to Know 2008 Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 4-6, 2008.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards State Board of Education October 22, 2009.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
What is a 21st Century Learner?
+ 1 Episode 2 Diving in Deeper: A closer look at the Media Arts Standards October 16, 2014 Host, ASN Executive Director, Kristy Callaway.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Learning4Life or Lifelong learning? Warren Goetzel, PhD GaETC – CTO Clinic Atlanta, GA 2013.
FINDING THE PATH AND STAYING ON IT Sue Howell August 12 & 13, 2010.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
New Beginnings 2015 Florida Standards: Secondary ELA Anjanette McGregor August 11, 2015 Tavares Middle School.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
1.21 st Century Learning Skills 2.College and career readiness 3.Helps close the achievement gap 4.Emotional & social learning 5.Prepared to succeed in.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
MU Core Revision Proposal The Atom Visual Structure Please read information provided in each slide as well as the notes under each slide.
Introduction of Outcomes-based Curricula Ministry of Education Fall 2008.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
Implementing the ASCA National Model The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 7 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom use.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Standards, Assessment and Understanding by Design: Exploring the Model Cornerstone Assessments (MCAs)
Measuring Course Quality: Development of a Micro-Analysis Tool
Developing 21st Century Classrooms: Connecting the Dots IV
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
Presentation transcript:

The central purposes of education standards are to identify the learning that we want for all of our students and to drive improvement in the system that delivers that learning. “CORE” Cyber home

The National Coalition for Core Arts Standards is a partnership of organizations and states that lead the revision of the 1994 National Standards for Arts Education in order to help guide curriculum designers, teacher training programs, and federal and state policy makers in arts education. Originally created in 1994….

…the National Arts Standards were completely revised to emphasize that collaboration and communication are the key components of the 21 st century skill set desired by employers and higher education.

……….. The new arts standards are designed to help arts educators provide the high-quality curriculum, instruction, and assessment that students need to succeed in today’s schools and tomorrow’s careers.

The new standards incorporate Media Arts in each of the art forms …

And included it as a discreet fifth arts discipline with a separate set of performance standards. For information on the rationale and research behind this decision, see Media Arts position paper & FAQ’s available at

Media Arts are time-related art works. Where this kind of artwork is being produced in our school art programs, it is the Visual Art certified teachers facilitating instruction. Media Arts are rooted in the fundamental principles and concepts of the visual arts; Therefore, NYSATA leadership is exploring the inclusion of Media Arts as a component of NYS Visual Arts standards and curriculum.

The philosophical foundations and lifelong goals establish the basis for the new standards and illuminate artistic literacy by expressing the overarching common values and expectations for learning in arts education across the five arts disciplines. This Foundational work: what we value in arts education, is outlined in the Conceptual Framework at

The new Core Arts Standards are based around 4 non- linear, recursive artistic processes: Creating, Performing/Producing/Presenting, Responding, and Connecting. These processes are common to all 5 arts disciplines.

These processes are articulated in 11 Anchor Standards that are also common across art forms. Anchor Standards are overarching standards statements of what students should know and do in all of the arts as a result of their PreK-12 education. Let’s look at each process & its anchor standards:

The 11 Anchor standards are not necessarily sequential. Numbered merely for coding purposes. 3 in Creating…

In the Visual Arts we are using Presenting as our second Artistic Process (more about this in a minute)

3 in Presenting …

3 in Responding…

And 2 in Connecting.

Artistic Processes & Anchor Standards are parallel across arts disciplines & grade levels. On your handout, I have circled Presenting as the Visual Arts process. I know from our last survey that many were concerned about the new emphasis on Presenting, not wanting to give so much time to it – the writers felt that it was important to get student artwork out in public for many reasons:... This comes back to driving improvements in the system that delivers arts learning.

The Core Arts Standards include two levels of standards: Anchor Standards and Performance Standards. Anchor Standards are overarching standards statements of what students should know and do in all of the arts as a result of their PreK-12 education. A performance standard is a statement of what students should know and be able to do in a particular artistic discipline by the end of a specific grade or level. The performance standards translate the anchor standards into specific, measurable learning goals.

The Visual Arts Standards provide learning progressions from Pre k-12. The H S area of the standards is broken into 3 levels of standards building on the PreK-8 standards in that discipline, and increasing in complexity.

The 2014 Standards provide a variety of materials to support implementation, including Model Cornerstone Assessments. These assessment tools are being piloted in classrooms across the U.S. & will be revised by teachers in future years, eventually generating student work that will be posted on the NCAS website as “benchmarks” to illustrate the expectations of the standards. Teachers may adopt, adapt, or create their own MCAs as appropriate for their particular students and classrooms. MCA’s : Are performance tasks that are completed over time rather than on demand. May be used both as rich learning activities and assessment instruments. Evaluate performance with established rubrics. Provide content for a student’s portfolio so that they graduate with a resume of demonstrated accomplishments, rather than simply a transcript of courses taken.

Enduring Understandings and Essential Questions have been embedded into the standards as a support resource. Many of you will be familiar with “EUs” and “EQs” as ways to map out and organize curriculum. For those of you who aren’t, the intent is to help keep instruction and learning focused on the big ideas of arts learning. EU’s complement the lifelong goals for our student arts learners, and the Essential Questions are those prompts we ask our students to wrestle with when experiencing and making art.

Let’s see if we can tour the website …

In Summary, the new Arts Standards: Seek to instill arts literacy, emphasizing conceptual understanding, which is a departure from the previous emphasis on knowledge and skills. Are designed to guide the delivery of arts education in the classroom with new ways of thinking, learning, and creating. Reflect the actual processes in which artists engage.

As the NCAS were released this summer, the NYS arts professional associations and NYSED created a survey for arts teachers for their feedback concerning the new standards in relation to the New York State Learning Standards for the Arts. Then a Statewide Strategic Plan for the Arts was drafted to guide the development & implementation of new standards. This plan will soon be released for input from a wider range of stakeholders.

This Plan will serve as a planning and implementation guide to support the advancement and adoption of new NYS Arts Learning Standards. The strategic plan begins with mission and vision statements, consists of Four critical components – Standards, Professional Development (in Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment), Materials and Resource Support, and Administrative and Community Support, each augmented by a single goal -- Each goal is supported by a number of objectives, which are achieved by successfully completing both integrated and discrete activities. Critical Component One is Standards and the goal is to adopt new NYS Arts standards. One of the 1 st activities is to survey the field on this Plan. Look for it on the NYSED Arts Page in January.

There are lots of resources to help you examine and learn about the new standards. You can explore standards in custom views on the national arts standards website at Learn about the history and context of the standards by exploring the archives at Or dive deep into the rich resources on the Nat’l websites The new arts standards inspire and support the ways in which art educators keep their teaching fresh and dynamic.