Uncertainty in the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
System Analysis Advisory Committee Futures, Monte Carlo Simulation, and CB Assumption Cells Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday, September 27, 2011.
Advertisements

1 V. Simplifying the Portfolio Process. 2 Simplifying the Portfolio Process Estimating correlations Single Index Models Multiple Index Models Average.
Ad Hoc West-wide Resource Assessment Team (WRAT) : Assessment of Western System Adequacy in the Short-term Jeff King Northwest Power Planning Council Presentation.
Designing a Risk Model Michael Schilmoeller Thursday, December 2, 2010 SAAC.
Capacity Valuation.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Effects of Alternative Scenarios on Sixth Power Plan Northwest Power and Conservation Council Whitefish, MT June.
Regional Portfolio Model Redevelopment Presentation to System Analysis Advisory Committee August 23, 2013.
The Cost-Effectiveness Premium for Conservation Michael Schilmoeller Thursday May 19, 2011 SAAC.
Forecasting.
INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENTS AND ASSET ALLOCATION ISSUES
Breakeven Analysis for Profit Planning
Coleman Crook, Jessica Crumpton, Ashton Davis, Sarah Ellens, Kevin Levesque. Industry Analysis Chapter 2.
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
1 Understanding Project Cost Elements Lecture No. 22 Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Engineering Economics Copyright © 2008.
Big Sandy Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
Avoided Costs of Generation
1 Regional Portfolio Model and Direct Use of Gas Assessment Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council for the Regional Technical Forum Tuesday,
Planning Demand and Supply in a Supply Chain
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Tuesday, April 29, 2003 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
SAAC Review Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday February 2, 2011 SAAC.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
The Council’s Risk Model and The Requirements of the Act Michael Schilmoeller Thursday, December 2, 2010 SAAC.
Wholesale Power Price Forecast 01/28/03 Current Trends Update March 11, 2003.
Discussion of Resource Plans Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Wednesday, June 10, 2009.
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
The Primary Sources of Risk and a New Metric Michael Schilmoeller Thursday May 19, 2011 SAAC.
Long-Term Electricity Report 1 Susan Gray September 27, 2010.
Preliminary Results with the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS September 14, 2011.
Adequacy Assessment for the 2017 Pacific Northwest Power Supply Steering Committee Meeting October 26, 2012 Portland, Oregon 1.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Reviewing the Fifth Power Plan Energy Price Assumptions Natural Gas Advisory Committee December 5, 2006.
Aggregate Planning.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
The Council’s Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory Committee Thursday,
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
1 Introduction to the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council Thursday, June 10, 2010.
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Thursday, December 19, 2002 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk and Capital Budgeting 13.
December 9, 2008 Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Integrated Coal-fired Gasification Plant Resource Assessment Jeff King Northwest Power.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Proposed Wind Plant Capital Cost Assumption Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council Portland,
Wholesale Electricity Price Forecast Draft Current Trends Forecast Jeff King Conservation Resource Advisory Committee September 30, 2002.
How the RPM Meets the Requirements for a Risk Model Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday, February 2, 2011 SAAC.
System Analysis Advisory Committee Assumptions for the Seventh Power Plan Michael Schilmoeller Friday, January 25, 2013.
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Thursday, June 5, 2003 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
Northwest Power Planning Council, January 2001 Electricity Price Forecast Sensitivity Analysis Jeff King Regional Technical Forum January 9, 2001.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Overview of Draft Sixth Power Plan Council Meeting Whitefish, MT June 9-11, 2009.
Winter Power Supply Adequacy/Reliability Analysis Power Committee Briefing October 17, 2001.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Law of Variable Proportions
© 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 9-1 Chapter 9 Planning Supply and Demand in a Supply Chain: Managing Predictable Variability Supply Chain Management (2nd Edition)
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003 Generation Additions Strawman.
1 Proposed Input Assumptions to RTF Cost-Effectiveness Determinations February 2, 2010.
1 Domestic Heating Fuel Choice Study (aka The Direct Use of Gas) Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council presentation for the presentation.
Future Expectations of TEPPC: Products, Users, and Values Maury Galbraith Presentation to TEPPC Review Task Force January 11,
1 Domestic Heating Fuel Choice Study (aka The Direct Use of Gas) Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council web presentation for the web presentation.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Proposed Revisions to Council’s Fuel Price Forecasts Natural Gas Advisory Committee June 27, 2007.
Greenhouse Gas Policy and CO 2 Cost Assumptions GRAC Meeting January 22, 2009.
15ELP044: Energy System Investment and Risk Management Unit 2B: Energy Economics and Markets Paul Rowley 1, Simon Watson 1 and Andy Williams 2 1 CREST.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
Challenges, Issues, and Future Direction of the SAAC
13 Aggregate Planning.
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Progress on Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2017
System Analysis Advisory Committee Conclusions of the RPM Review Panel
Presentation transcript:

Uncertainty in the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory Committee Thursday, January 22, 2009

2 Overview  Construction Costs  Electricity Price Uncertainty  Economic Retirement  Variable Capacity for Existing Units

3 Attributes of Cost Futures  Generation Resource Advisory Committee (GRAC) at their December 18, 2008 meeting suggested futures should reflect  Expectations about cost trends  Greater uncertainty associated with technology that is immature or carries more political baggage  Correlation among costs, due to common elements such as steel, switches, labor, and concrete  Distinctions due to unique elements, likely reliance on sources outside the United States and associated exchange rate uncertainty, and so forth

4 Cost Components More Consistent Source: Forecasting construction costs.xls, worksheet MJS 2 (See also range “CERA Commodity Inputs” on wks MJS 3

5 Expectations Source: Random Variable 02.xls, worksheet “Graphs of Futures”

6 Cost Matrices Source: 2008 Nov 17 CCAF Power Tabular Data _ MJS.xls, worksheet “Table 2”

7 Input-Driven Behavior based on CERA Scenarios

8 Influences in Plant Cost correlations stochastic GBM wmr plant cost escalators steel cost growth expections stochastic GBM wmr stochastic GBM wmr auxillary equipment major equipment I/O matrix … … plant costs current overnight costs stochastic uncertainty in growth correlations with other plant costs stochastic growth

9 Individual Futures Source: Random Variable 02.xls, worksheet “Graphs of Futures”

10 Cost Deciles Source: Random Variable 01.xls, worksheet “Statistics”

11 Cost Deciles Source: Random Variable 01.xls, worksheet “Statistics”

12 Cost Deciles Source: Random Variable 01.xls, worksheet “Statistics”

13 Cost Deciles Source: Random Variable 01.xls, worksheet “Statistics”

14 Cost Deciles Source: Random Variable 01.xls, worksheet “Statistics”

15 Cost Deciles Source: Random Variable 01.xls, worksheet “Statistics”

16 Cost Deciles Source: Random Variable 01.xls, worksheet “Statistics”

17 Cost Deciles Source: Random Variable 01.xls, worksheet “Statistics”

18 Overview  Construction Costs  Electricity Price Uncertainty  Economic Retirement  Variable Capacity for Existing Units

19 Current Electricity Price Forecast  Interim, created Monday 1/5/2009  PNW prices east of the Cascades  Average hydrogeneration conditions  Most recent (12/20/2008) frozen efficiency electricity requirements forecast  Most recent (11/28/2008) natural gas price forecast  To be updated:  CO2 penalty assumptions  RPS resource development assumptions  cost and availability of new resources

20 Current Electricity Price Forecast Source: chart “MONTHLY PRICES”, wkb “AO_6P_ _ABL_HD MONTHLY POWER PRICE FORECAST.XLS”

21 Current Electricity Price Forecast Source: chart “MONTHLY PRICES2”, wkb “AO_6P_ _ABL_HD MONTHLY POWER PRICE FORECAST.XLS”

22 Current Conditions (ICE) Source: chart “Chart 1”, wkb “ICE MONTHLY AVERAGE XLS”

23 Current Electricity Price Forecast On- and Off-Peak Average Source: wks “Electricity Price Futures”, wkb “Illustrations and graphs from L805 after extraction.xls”

24 Current Electricity Price Futures Source: wks “Electricity Price Futures”, wkb “Illustrations and graphs from L805 after extraction.xls”

25 Deciles for Electricity Price Source: wks “EP Deciles”, wkb “Illustrations and graphs from L805 after extraction.xls”

26 Close-Up on Deciles Source: wks “EP Deciles”, wkb “Illustrations and graphs from L805 after extraction.xls”

27 Overview  Construction Costs  Electricity Price Uncertainty  Economic Retirement  Variable Capacity for Existing Units

28 Retirement Decision  Prescribed number of evaluation and mothball periods for each plant  If decision criterion, using only forward- going FOM is negative, begin evaluation  Once evaluation period is over, begin mothball state (no generation)  Once mothball periods have passed, decommission and incur cancellation cost  If any period yields a positive decision criterion value, reset all the counters above

29 Issues  What kind of costs, in addition to normal operating costs, would be incurred in each phase?  Is there a better representation of the retirement decision?

30 Overview  Construction Costs  Electricity Price Uncertainty  Economic Retirement  Variable Capacity for Existing Units

31 New Capability  Only for existing plants with a single cohort  Variable capacity could be stochastic  Representing uncertainty about whether anticipated capacity will materialize  Each future’s capacity different  Can increase or decrease during over the study within a future  Capacity would affect only FOM costs  Could be used to model RPS development uncertainty, if restricted to the case of increasing capacity over the study

32 Issues  Are there other aspects of a plant with varying capacity, such as construction cost?

33 End

34 CERA Cost Components Source: 2008 Nov 17 CCAF Power Tabular Data _ MJS.xls, worksheet “Table 2”

35 CERA Cost Components Source: 2008 Nov 17 CCAF Power Tabular Data _ MJS.xls, worksheet “Table 2”

36 Existing Features  Market-Driven Planning  A feature we do not use for our planning: unplanned market additions, at a higher price  Early construction – response to circumstances  Existing decision based on market viability and prospective adequacy of the system  Mothball and cancellation options  Option to incur all expenses in the first period

37 New Features  Overnight construction cost uncertainty  Applies to mothball and cancellation costs as well  Distinct costs if mothballed or cancelled in the first period of early construction  Fixed operations and maintenance (FOM) cost uncertainty  Capacity uncertainty  Decision criterion re-evaluated with revised going-forward cost only

38 New Features  Economic retirements  Based on covering FOM, optionally FOM with uncertainty  Internal, cohort-specific calculation of decision criterion  VOM uncertainty optional  Uncertainty in availability for immature technologies, transmission completion, u.s.w.  Distinct construction cost rates in early and late phases  Cohort-specific stochastic forced outages