D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt1 Quality flags in Virgo Data Base D. Verkindt, LAPP On behalf of the Virgo « data quality task force »

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making the System Operational
Advertisements

Alternative FILE formats
For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
1 Databases in ALICE L.Betev LCG Database Deployment and Persistency Workshop Geneva, October 17, 2005.
E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.
VSR1 summary - post VSR1 Commissioning plans E. Tournefier (LAPP-CNRS) LSC-Virgo meeting Oct 22 nd, 2007.
Making Tablet Friendly E-Filings Judge David Nuffer District of Utah This PowerPoint presentation and the accompanying handout are both found at
Introduction to the workshop LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest 22 nd & 23 rd November 2012 LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest.
Glitch Group S5 Activities LSC LSU, Baton Rouge August 15, 2006 G Z L. Blackburn, L. Cadonati, S. Chatterji, J. Dalrymple, S. Desai,
Burst noise investigation for cryogenic GW detector TITECH NAOJ Daisuke TATSUMI 2nd Symposium ‐ New Development in Astrophysics through Multi-messenger.
D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1 Status of Data Quality in Virgo D. Verkindt, LAPP-CNRS on behalf of the Virgo DQ team (M. Bizouard, L. Bosi, S. Chatterji,
SSD Status P. Christakoglou (NIKHEF-UU) for the SSD collaboration Thanks to: Marco vL, Enrico, Mino, Marek and Massimo.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Multi-agent Research Tool (MART) A proposal for MSE project Madhukar Kumar.
LinkWare LinkWare is a web-enabled, open platform for generation and distribution of electronic technical documentation and e–catalogues. The LinkWare.
Jeff LandgrafSTAR Trigger Workshop: Oct 21, 2002 Trigger Accounting for 2002.
3 May 2011 VESF DA schoolD. Verkindt 1 Didier Verkindt Virgo-LAPP CNRS - Université de Savoie VESF Data Analysis School Data Quality and vetos.
Status of stochastic background’s joint data analysis by Virgo and INFN resonant bars G. Cella (INFN Pisa) For Auriga-ROG-Virgo collaborations Prepared.
Introduction to HTML Part 3 Chapter 2. Learning Outcomes Identify how to design frames. Explain frames’ attributes. Describe the method on designing forms.
6-10 Oct 2002GREX 2002, Pisa D. Verkindt, LAPP 1 Virgo Data Acquisition D. Verkindt, LAPP DAQ Purpose DAQ Architecture Data Acquisition examples Connection.
Detector Diagnostics Calibration Analysis Ped/LED/Laser RadDam Analysis Detector Optimization Lumi Detector Performance Monitoring DQM On/Offline Prompt.
OFFLINE TRIGGER MONITORING TDAQ Training 5 th November 2010 Ricardo Gonçalo On behalf of the Trigger Offline Monitoring Experts team.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
Clara Gaspar, March 2005 LHCb Online & the Conditions DB.
GRBs & VIRGO C7 run Alessandra Corsi & E. Cuoco, F. Ricci.
Practicalities and Technical Implementation of a Synchronised Call Christian Listabarth.
GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 1 “Data quality studies for burst analysis of Virgo data acquired during.
Analysis trains – Status & experience from operation Mihaela Gheata.
LSC glitch group report Shourov K. Chatterji for the LSC glitch group LSC/Virgo meeting 2007 October 24 Hannover, Germany LIGO-G Z.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
HCAL DPG Status1 Olga Kodolova / Frank Chlebana HCAL DPG Status Olga Kodolova for the HCAL DPG October 20, 2011.
Cluster Consistency Monitor. Why use a cluster consistency monitoring tool? A Cluster is by definition a setup of configurations to maintain the operation.
RPC DQM status Cimmino, M. Maggi, P. Noli, D. Lomidze, P. Paolucci, G. Roselli, C. Carillo.
M. Mantovani, ILIAS Meeting 7 April 2005 Hannover Linear Alignment System for the VIRGO Interferometer M. Mantovani, A. Freise, J. Marque, G. Vajente.
Prompt Calibration Loop 11 February Overview Prompt calibration loop in SCT –Provides ATLAS with conditions data used for the bulk reconstruction.
Joshua Smith, Elba, Italy Elba, Italy Joshua Smith for the GEO 600 team Picture of GEO in stormy weather?? Or pics of tractors with.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
Status of Virgo GWDAW12 Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec Leone B. Bosi INFN and University of Perugia (Italy) On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Software Tools K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions.
Results From the Low Threshold, Early S5, All-Sky Burst Search Laura Cadonati for the Burst Group LSC MIT November 5, 2006 G Z.
Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.
Level 1-2 Trigger Data Base development Current status and overview Myron Campbell, Alexei Varganov, Stephen Miller University of Michigan August 17, 2000.
GROUP PresentsPresents. WEB CRAWLER A visualization of links in the World Wide Web Software Engineering C Semester Two Massey University - Palmerston.
Thomas Ruf, CERN EP Experience with C++ and ROOT used in the VX Beam Test Thomas Ruf, CERN, EP  Why? Event structure for VX-data rather complex: raw hits.
JRA1 Meeting – 09/02/ Software Configuration Management and Integration EGEE is proposed as a project funded by the European Union under contract.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
 Project Team: Suzana Vaserman David Fleish Moran Zafir Tzvika Stein  Academic adviser: Dr. Mayer Goldberg  Technical adviser: Mr. Guy Wiener.
1 Detector Monitoring requirements ( V.Dattilo for the EGO Operations Group ) ( with the collaboration of S.Braccini)  Short history  Current status.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester Sep14, 2015.
Edwige Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration The status of Virgo.
All The future of DC work. GEO DC workshop June Restructuring of DC and Detector Work for many reasons the DC work was not very efficient in the.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
THIS MORNING (Start an) informal discussion to -Clearly identify all open issues, categorize them and build an action plan -Possibly identify (new) contributing.
KAGRA Detector Characterization
CMS High Level Trigger Configuration Management
Trigger sources in ODIN (new firmware)
Advanced Virgo Detector Monitoring and Data Quality
Methods and Milestones
Virgo Status Detector Status Computing Data Analysis status and Plans
Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec 13-16
OPSE 301: Lab13 Data Analysis – Fitting Data to Arbitrary Functions
مفاهیم بهره وري.
Advanced Virgo Finesse Input File
ESS VIP ICT Project Task Force Meeting 5-6 March 2013.
with coherent WaveBurst pipeline
ATLAS DC2 & Continuous production
Manage Sourcing - Supplier
Presentation transcript:

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt1 Quality flags in Virgo Data Base D. Verkindt, LAPP On behalf of the Virgo « data quality task force »

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt2 Purpose We produced during VSR1 a set of online quality flags We are starting to produce VSR1 offline quality flags Both are useful to define the data segments for data analysis Needs: To manage those quality flags To have common definitions To have common naming conventions To have ONE repository for the quality flags segments lists (VDB) A « task force » has raised some weeks ago to: Produce a reference ScienceMode segments list Setup quality flags definitions Setup tools for quality flags management Produce quality flags segments list to be uploaded into VDB

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt3 Quality flags / VDB task force Current team M. Bizouard L. Bosi S. Chatterji G. Hemming N. Leroy D. Verkindt VDB developed by L. Bosi and G. Hemming Based on MySQL Current location:

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt4 Quality flags / VDB task force

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt5 VDB Documentation

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt6 ScienceMode segments definition

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt7 Quality flag segments definition

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt8 Operator or Automationh Reconstruction Quality flags  VDB Qc_Moni_ScienceMode Alp_Main_LOCK_STEP_STATUS Trend data Hrec_veto_xxx Virgo Data Base Detector Monitoring Qc_Suspensions_xxx_flag Qc_Detection_xxx_flag Qc_Injection_xxx_flag … Manual upload ASCII files Manual upload Offline investigations Related to GW searches and to flag problems discovered after the data taking H reprocessing Online

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt9 Offline quality flags from burst group Migration of quality flag segments in VDB

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt10 Reference Cavity piezo  noise non stationarity PZT modification Piezo used by the Reference Cavity Alignment actuation system “Dirty” voltage applied on Piezos induced micro seismic motion of the suspended Injection Bench. This induces phase noise inside the Input Mode Cleaner cavity. PZT modification

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt11 Reference cavity piezo voltage fixing (Sep. 19 th 2007) before after before after Qonline results A quality flag will be developed to veto the events previous to Sep. 19th

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt12 Quality flags upload to VDB 1 - Create a text file containing, for each segment, the start GPS, stop GPS and flag value (0 if flag does not apply, 1 if flag applies) ATTENTION: flag applies = segment is excluded from analysis 2 - Upload the file content into VDB using the VDB toolkit developed by L. Bosi Procedure and Rules: Anyone can upload a data quality segments list The uploaded list is tagged as “unstable” For any quality flag segments list uploaded, a html document should be provided that explains how the quality flag has been determined (what is the dead time, what triggered this flag, which channel has been used, threshold, additional seconds put before and after, etc…)  see examples in Then, the “VDB Quality flags” responsible validates the uploaded list and puts a version number (this is done according to a validation process to be defined).

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt13 Quality flags information

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt14 Quality flag validation process 1.Study with triggers list (burst, CB, …) if this quality flag suppresses “loud” events 2.Provide figures of merits (efficiency for the loudest events, etc… ) 3.Propose a category for the flag: I = flag to be applied before data analysis II, III… = flag to be applied after the data analysis The previous three points are the duty of the person who proposes the quality flag but can be done by several people, sharing the work and making some cross checks… 1.Final step: - either the flag is interesting and segments list in VDB is tagged as “stable”, - or the flag is removed from VDB

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt15 Quality flags download from VDB Download with web interface or using the VDB toolkit developed by L. Bosi Result is a text file containing by default “data OK for analysis”’ segments with, for each segment: segment number start GPS (inclusive) stop GPS (exclusive) duration flag value

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt16 ScienceMode download from VDB

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt17 ITF_SCIENCEMODE and ITF_LOCK flags information

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt18 Quality flags download from VDB

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt19 Quality flags information

D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt20 More informations