G4Beamline Simulated Electron Distribution within the HPRF Cavity 2/15/20121.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.

Advertisements

Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac revised K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV,

Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV, TESLA-type optics for 24MV/m.

Mon. Jan. 26 – Physics Lecture #22 The Electric Field 1. Forces & Fields 2. Superposition 3. Electric Field due to Continuous Charge Distributions.

MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.

SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.

RF Bucket Area Introduction Intense muon beams have many potential applications, including neutrino factories and muon colliders. However, muons are produced.

30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.

Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.

1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.

Beam Loss in the Extraction Line for 2 mrad Crossing Angle A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang.

TJR 10/30/031 MICE Beam rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 10/30/03.

MICE analysis meeting - (21/09/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.

NF Front End Meeting, April 27, 2010 Initial Cooling with HFOFO Snake Y. Alexahin, FNAL APC.

27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.

MERIT Autoradiographs P. Thieberger, BNL (Dec. 21, 2011)

Electrostatics #3 The Electric Field

Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.

Ultra-sensitive HALO monitor N. Vinogradov, A. Dychkant, P. Piot.

Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.

RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.

MICE pencil beam raster scan simulation study Andreas Jansson.

FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.

Steigerwald results reported in SPIN 2000 JLab measurements in June 2012 after 12 years good agreement Results depend on (energy=same, targets=same, TOF.

TJR 01/21/2003Slide 1 Simulations of the Study 2 Cooling Channel with Realistic Absorber Windows Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology.

K. McDonald NFMCC Collaboration Meeting Jan 14, The Capture Solenoid as an Emittance-Reducing Element K. McDonald Princeton U. (Jan. 14, 2010)

1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.

Assessing Single Crystal Diamond Quality

HINS ProtonSource/LEBT Beam Measurement Meeting on HINS Beam Dynamics and Diagnostics March 13, 2009 Salah Chaurize Vic Scarpine Wai-Ming Tam.

1 Advances for a Solenoid/Dipole 6D Cooling Ring X. Ding, UCLA Muon Accelerator Program-Winter Meeting Jefferson Lab 3/1/11.

1 Photogrammetry of TT7. 2 Front view Distribution of all targets All the plots are in the magnet reference system.

Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,

Mass production (Super-K) Setup of jnubeam – 3 horn 250 kA – 30-GeV proton beam of Gaussian distribution (  x,y = cm) – On center, parallel beam.

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.

Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.

Simulation of the interaction of macro- particles with the LHC proton beam Zhao Yang, EPFL

Difference between Roman Pots and VELO Very forward tracking is typically done using detectors located in Roman pots. They are far away from the interaction.

Marco apollonio/J.CobbMICE coll. meeting 16- RAL - (10/10/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of.

Status of New TPC( Ⅱ ) Performance Study Yohei Nakatsugawa LEPS Meeting in Taiwan.

Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.

Electrostatics #3 The Electric Field HW #2, last page of handout.

1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.

Collimation for the Linear Collider, Daresbury.1 Adam Mercer, German Kurevlev, Roger Barlow Simulation of Halo Collimation in BDS.

The Q Weak Experiment Event tracking, luminosity monitors, and backgrounds John Leacock Virginia Tech on behalf of the Q Weak collaboration Hall C Users.

Location of the LW detector- Simulation of the LW signals Lawrence Deacon RHUL ATF2 meeting August 23 rd 2006 KEK.

RF background, update on analysis Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Analysis phone conference, October 30, 2007.

The BoNuS Detector: A Radial Time Projection Chamber for tracking Spectator Protons Howard Fenker, Jefferson Lab This work was partially supported by DOE.

Ring finding efficiencies and RICH event display Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration.

Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.

MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.

Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.

Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,

Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.

A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.

Progress of Bunched Beam Electron Cooling Demo L.J.Mao (IMP), H.Zhang (Jlab) On behalf of colleagues from Jlab, BINP and IMP.

Electrostatic FEA of the Ground Plane Features Bo Yu Sept. 14, 2015.

CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.

Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.

Effect of TCTVB collimator on ZDC A fraction of the spectator neutrons will hit the jaws Two physic parameters/measurements are affected –The energy mean.

R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti

The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ

DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data

Beam-Gas Inelastic scattering in CEPC partial double ring

Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)

PARTICLE FLUX CALCULATION-III

Higgs Factory Backgrounds

I250Y-R: Target Expt –(05/31/2011) Viewer as seen by camera

IR/MDI requirements for the EIC

Presentation transcript:

G4Beamline Simulated Electron Distribution within the HPRF Cavity 2/15/20121

Protons Electrons Beam Collimators Cavity 1000 protons shown (the viewer didn’t like more than that) Stochastics on Tracking protons and electrons Beam originates at vacuum window 4 Detectors (not shown) – 3 in cavity, 1 near origin of beam 6 Detectors (not shown) – 5 in cavity, 1 near origin of beam 2/15/20122

Near Vacuum Window 100,000 protons p= MeV/c σ x =2.5mm, σ y =4.0mm, σ p =100keV Proton X-Y distribution – Top left & right (zoomed in) (mm) Proton momentum distribution – right (MeV/c vs mm) 2/15/20123

Center of the cavity 950psi H2, 30MV/m (peak) X-Y Distribution (mm) Total momentum (MeV/c) vs r (mm) r up to 20mm Radial distribution (mm) 2/15/20124

5mm Upstream of the center of the cavity Total momentum (MeV/c) vs r (mm) r up to 20mm Radial distribution (mm) More electrons produced upstream Slightly higher momentum Roughly same radial RMS at 2cm 2/15/20125

5mm Downstream of the center of the cavity Total momentum (MeV/c) vs r (mm) r up to 20mm Radial distribution (mm) 2/15/20126 Fewer electrons produced downstream Slightly lower momentum Roughly same radial RMS at 2cm

Fitted Distributions – Electrons contained within r 2/15/20127 Top left – Fitted radial electron distribution at the center of the cavity (#e- vs mm) Top right – Fitted normalized radial electron distribution at the center of the cavity (mm) Right – Fitted normalized radial electron distribution for z= -8, -4, 0, 4, 8mm (0=center, - upstream, + downstream) Vertical line drawn at r=20mm (radius of downstream collimator) Horizontal lines at 90 and 95% total e- Fitted with an exponential of the form y(x)=a+b*exp(c*x)

Left – 5 detector planes hits Bottom - #e- contained within (r,z) Strong z dependence can be seen 587/746 e- 8mm upstream of center at r=20mm 231/290 e- 8mm downstream of center at r=20mm 2/15/ D Distribution x y z r r z z Ne Beam

2/15/20129 Conclusions ~80% of electrons fall within the radius of the downstream collimator Electrons more spread out the further downstream you go 90% of all electrons contained within 35mm radius 95% of all electrons contained within 50mm radius