Interspecific Competition Effects on Plants: Growth Rate, Plant Height, Plant Weight, and Plant Densities Amy Salamone Undergraduate Student (Marine Biology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical Techniques I
Advertisements

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
Hypothesis test flow chart frequency data Measurement scale number of variables 1 basic χ 2 test (19.5) Table I χ 2 test for independence (19.9) Table.
12.5 Differences between Means (s’s known)
Hypothesis Testing Comparisons Among Two Samples.
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing II. Chapter Outline  Introduction  Hypothesis Testing with Sample Means (Large Samples)  Hypothesis Testing with Sample.
Constant Dosage day 7 Apigenin Control. Weight Adjusted Dosage Control Apigenin.
Statistical Analysis. Purpose of Statistical Analysis Determines whether the results found in an experiment are meaningful. Answers the question: –Does.
Hypothesis Testing 12/01/2011. Hypothesis-testing is a very important area of statistical inference. It is a procedure which enables us to decide on the.
Chapter 13 – 1 Chapter 12: Testing Hypotheses Overview Research and null hypotheses One and two-tailed tests Errors Testing the difference between two.
Week 9 Chapter 9 - Hypothesis Testing II: The Two-Sample Case.
Hypothesis Testing II The Two-Sample Case.
Copyright © 2012 by Nelson Education Limited. Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing II: The Two-Sample Case 8-1.
Introduction to Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
Statistical Analysis Statistical Analysis
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 13 Linear Correlation and Regression Analysis.
NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS
Chapter 9 Large-Sample Tests of Hypotheses
Affects of Density on Intraspecific Competition in Marigolds Eric Flatt Undergraduate Student (Marine Biology Concentration) Department of Biology Tennessee.
The effects of Intraspecific competition in Trifolium repens L. Brian Roberts Student Education Department Tennessee Tech University Cookeville, Tennessee.
1 CSI5388: Functional Elements of Statistics for Machine Learning Part I.
Effects of Intraspecific Competition on Varying Groups of Marigolds Tiffany Landis Microbiology Major Tennessee Technological University Cookeville, TN.
Chapter 9: Testing Hypotheses
PowerPoint presentations prepared by Lloyd Jaisingh, Morehead State University Statistical Inference: Hypotheses testing for single and two populations.
Section 9.2 Testing the Mean  9.2 / 1. Testing the Mean  When  is Known Let x be the appropriate random variable. Obtain a simple random sample (of.
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200, COMM200, GEOG200, PA200, POL200, or SOC200 Lecture Section 001, Spring 2015 Room 150 Harvill.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 10 Inferences Involving Two Populations.
-Test for one and two means -Test for one and two proportions
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 14 Elements of Nonparametric Statistics.
Exam2 A learning experience….. Scores Raw Scores went from 68 to 147 As percentage of total….40% to 86% Scaled scores went from 60.5 to 100 Some still.
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis. OUTLINE Organizing an ecological study Basic sampling terminology Statistical analysis of data –Why use statistics?
Section 9.3 ~ Hypothesis Tests for Population Proportions Introduction to Probability and Statistics Ms. Young.
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing ©. Chapter 8 - Chapter Outcomes After studying the material in this chapter, you should be able to: 4 Formulate.
Effects of Herbicides on Raphanus sativus Plant Growth Allison Paige Provey Undergraduate Student (Biology, Pre-Pharmacy) Department of Biology Tennessee.
Essential Question:  How do scientists use statistical analyses to draw meaningful conclusions from experimental results?
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Jeopardy Hypothesis Testing t-test Basics t for Indep. Samples Related Samples t— Didn’t cover— Skip for now Ancient History $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400.
Testing Differences in Population Variances
Chapter 9 Three Tests of Significance Winston Jackson and Norine Verberg Methods: Doing Social Research, 4e.
Two-Sample Hypothesis Testing. Suppose you want to know if two populations have the same mean or, equivalently, if the difference between the population.
Slide Slide 1 Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Overview.
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 9-1 σ σ.
Psych 230 Psychological Measurement and Statistics
Testing a Hypothesis about means
The Effects of Intraspecific Competition among Varying Groups of Marigolds Tiffany Landis Undergraduate Student (Microbiology Concentration) Tennessee.
Chapter 9: Testing Hypotheses Overview Research and null hypotheses One and two-tailed tests Type I and II Errors Testing the difference between two means.
Welcome to MM570 Psychological Statistics
Affect of Density on Intraspecific Competition in Marigolds Eric Flatt Undergraduate Student (Marine Biology Concentration) Department of Biology Tennessee.
IntraspecificCompetition inViolatricolor Intraspecific Competition in Viola tricolor. B.R. Bird, Undergrad Student, Department of Biology Tennessee Tech.
The Effects of Miracle Grow Soil versus Ground Soil on Brassica Rapa Cassie Tripp Undergraduate Biology Major Health Science Concentration Cookeville,TN.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill 2004
Formulating the Hypothesis null hypothesis 4 The null hypothesis is a statement about the population value that will be tested. null hypothesis 4 The null.
Inferences Concerning Variances
Practice Does drinking milkshakes affect (alpha =.05) your weight? To see if milkshakes affect a persons weight you collected data from 5 sets of twins.
Effects of temperature on the growth of goldfish (Carassius auratus).
MARIGOLD AND BEAN PLANTS FED WITH ENRICHED WATER VERSUS WATER Author: William C. Threet Biology Department, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville,
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 9 Inferences Based on Two Samples.
Psych 230 Psychological Measurement and Statistics Pedro Wolf October 21, 2009.
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 11 Section 3 – Slide 1 of 27 Chapter 11 Section 3 Inference about Two Population Proportions.
Hypothesis Testing  Test for one and two means  Test for one and two proportions.
Psychology 290 Lab z-tests & t-tests March 5 - 7, 2007 –z-test –One sample t-test –SPSS – Chapter 7.
Hypothesis Tests u Structure of hypothesis tests 1. choose the appropriate test »based on: data characteristics, study objectives »parametric or nonparametric.
CHAPTER 7: TESTING HYPOTHESES Leon-Guerrero and Frankfort-Nachmias, Essentials of Statistics for a Diverse Society.
S519: Evaluation of Information Systems Social Statistics Inferential Statistics Chapter 9: t test.
T-TEST. Outline  Introduction  T Distribution  Example cases  Test of Means-Single population  Test of difference of Means-Independent Samples 
How does varying amounts of Plant food effect the rate of photosynthesis By: Austen Rubenstein Delaney Rubenstein Lars Scheibel Samantha Fox.
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis Organizing an ecological study What is the aim of the study? What is the main question being asked? What are.
When the means of two groups are to be compared (where each group consists of subjects that are not related) then the excel two-sample t-test procedure.
Michael H. Graf, Undergraduate Student
HYPOTHESIS TESTS ABOUT THE MEAN AND PROPORTION
Presentation transcript:

Interspecific Competition Effects on Plants: Growth Rate, Plant Height, Plant Weight, and Plant Densities Amy Salamone Undergraduate Student (Marine Biology Concentration) Department of Biology Tennessee Technological University

Introduction  Interspecific competition can be due to a limited supply of nutrients located in the soil (Day et al., 2003). Day, Hutchings, and John’s work lets us conclude that plants grown under higher nutrient levels have higher yields.  Understanding the means that control plant competition is a vital step in calculating the outcome of interspecific competition (Raynaud and Leadley, 2004).

Introduction Cont’d  Understanding the motivations that cause plants to distribute themselves on local, regional, and global scales is one of the major issues ecologists are faced with (Crain et al., 2004).  Competition affects all organisms that experience it. Competition reduces individual plant growth regardless of whether it is for soil or light (Cahill, 2003).

Objective and Hypothesis  Objective: Find out whether or not interspecific competition has any effect on Alyssum or Marigolds. Find out whether or not interspecific competition has any effect on Alyssum or Marigolds.  Hypothesis: Interspecific competition will have an effect on the growth factors of the Alyssum or the Marigolds. Interspecific competition will have an effect on the growth factors of the Alyssum or the Marigolds. Null Hypothesis: Competition will not have an effect on the growth factors of the plants. Competition will not have an effect on the growth factors of the plants.

Methods and Materials  I had four pots which had the following densities of alyssum and marigolds in each: 4 marigold: 4 alyssum 4 marigold: 24 alyssum 4 marigold: 24 alyssum 24 marigold: 4 alyssum 24 marigold: 4 alyssum 24 marigold: 24 alyssum 24 marigold: 24 alyssum  The plants were watered and measured on a weekly basis.

Methods and Materials Every week I measured the plant height and density of each species. At the end of the 6 th week, when the experiment was over, I removed the plants and weighed them on a covered scale. Alyssum Flowers Marigold Flowers

Data Form Interspecificin milligrams (mg)centimeters (cm)cm per day # SurvTotal WtAvg WtAvg Stem LengthAvg Growth Rate% survival 4M:4AAlly M:4AMari M:24AAlly M:24AMari M:4AAlly M:4AMari M:24AAlly M:24AMari

Results Figure 1: Number of survivors of each species arranged by which density they were planted at. Figure 2: Total weight in milligrams of each species organized by the density they were planted at.

Results Figure 3: Mean growth rate in centimeters per day of each species organized by which density they were planted. Figure 4: Average height in centimeters per species arranged by the density they were planted at.

Results (t-tests) Table 1: t-test showing the variance between the total weights of the marigold and the alyssum. t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances P(T<=t) one-tail t Critical one-tail P(T<=t) two-tail t Critical two-tail Total Weight Table 2: t-test showing the variance between the growth rates of the marigold and the alyssum. t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances P(T<=t) one-tail t Critical one-tail P(T<=t) two-tail t Critical two-tail Growth Rate

Results (t-tests) Table 3: t-test showing the variance between the average heights of the marigold and the alyssum. t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances P(T<=t) one-tail t Critical one-tail P(T<=t) two-tail t Critical two-tail Average Height

Discussion  Figure 1 shows that the number of survivors is directly proportional to the number of seeds planted. When there were a greater number of one species, that species had a higher survival rate.  These results are caused by the fact that when one species has a much higher density than another then the higher one will usually out compete the lower one (Raynaud and Leadley 2004).

Discussion  Figure 2 shows the total weight of Marigolds versus Alyssum. Marigolds always weigh more.  Figure 3 shows that Alyssum have a consistent growth rate while the marigolds seem to have a slightly higher growth rate when they have a higher density.

Discussion  With regard to the t-tests, if P(T<=t) two-tail is greater than 0.05 then there is not enough of a difference between the two variables for them to be significantly different.  As shown in Tables 1-3, the p value was always greater than This means that competition was either not taking place or it was on such a minute level that the plants’ growth did not become affected.

Summary and Conclusions  Competition is always taking place in every environment.  Interspecific competition has an effect, either minute or great, on the growth factors of plants.  Plants may be competing for light, nutrients, or water, depending on where their environment is located.  When density is higher, the plants will have a higher level of competition.

Conclusions  In my particular interspecific competition experiment, the marigold and alyssum were not competing enough for there to be a significant difference in growth factors.