Introduction to the Biosafety Clearing-House. footer What is the role of the BCH? Under Art 20, the CPB established the BCH. The Protocol sets out two.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Living Modified Organisms under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Ryan Hill and Cyrie Sendashonga Secretariat.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Identification & Documentation of Shipments of Living Modified Organisms Le Protocole de Cartagena : LIdentification et.
The Biosafety Clearing-House of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Tutorial on Finding information.
The Biosafety Clearing-House of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Tutorial – BCH Resources.
The Role of Customs Officers in Implementing the Protocol GRULAC Regional Training of Trainers Workshop on the Identification and Documentation of LMOs.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Erie Tamale Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
European Clearing-House Mechanism Portal Toolkit Expert Group Meeting
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
Model Act: Proposed Provisions for a Transparent, Effective and Workable Biosafety Regulatory Framework Stanley H. Abramson, Esq. Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin.
Overview of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and it's Proposed Programme of Work on Public Awareness, Education and Participation Erie Tamale Secretariat.
Suzanne Davis Senior Research Officer – Jamaica Clearing-House Mechanism Natural History Division Institute of Jamaica.
Access and Benefit Sharing and the Nagoya Protocol Nashina Shariff Manager Environmental Stewardship Branch November 2014.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
1 Roles of UNEP, GEF & CBD in the Environment 2 nd Training Workshop for BCH Regional Advisors May 2006 Bangkok, Thailand.
Managing Global Environmental Challenges: The Role of Trade-Related Measures in Multilateral Environmental Agreements The Role of Trade-Related Measures.
Understanding Biosafety
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Drew L. Kershen University of Oklahoma College of Law Earl Sneed Centennial Professor of Law Copyright 2005, all rights.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety:
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
Cartagena protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity and the International debates (COP- MOP) Stakeholders’ workshop on the Biosafety.
1 Inter-linkages: BCH, Parties, Capacity Building, Compliance and RA Concept Sustainability Biosafety Programme - Secretariat of the Convention on Biological.
Overview of the Rotterdam Convention. Sub-regional Consultation for DNAs 2 Overview of the Rotterdam Convention Structure of the presentation Part 1 -Introduction.
Training Workshop for Regional Advisors Bangkok, Thailand 15 – 27 May 2006.
The African CDM Training Workshop and Preparatory UNFCCC COP9 Meeting Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, October 20 – 21, 2003 INSTITUTIONAL SET-UP FOR CDM Dr Youba.
1 Agenda 21 and the Information Society Geneva, Switzerland Jyoti Mathur-Filipp Project Manager.
Potential trade implications of CBD and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety MEA – UNEP meeting on Enhancing MEA and WTO Information Exchange 11 November,
An Introduction to CPB and Importance of BCH to CPB Obligations.
Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context Workshop on “Making Aarhus work in international forums” Geneva, 23 February.
Introduction to the Obligations of the Party to the Biosafety Clearing-House Manoranjan Hota.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
Biosafety Clearing House Training Workshop for Regional Advisors May 2006 Bangkok, Thailand.
Legal aspects - Overview Ad hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform (ADP) New agreement: - form - substance Design features & legal techniques.
THE BIOSAFETY BILL, 2007 JACARANDA HOTEL, 26 TH JULY 2007.
NEGOTIATING TRADE FACILITATION Kennedy Mbekeani UNDP, RSC.
1 Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal Brief background The Convention Implementation actors.
Options for National Participation Biosafety Clearing-House - Training Workshop Montreal, May 2005 Philippe Leblond Secretariat of the Convention.
1 Proposal To Extend the Application of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Biosafety Protocol to the Hong Kong SAR.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY NDA- DEAT BILATERAL MEETING 1 August 2003 Presenter : M. Mbengashe.
1 CITES Compliance Mechanism CITES Secretariat. 2 Compliance mechanism After much deliberation in a inter-sessional working group, the Parties adopted.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
Legal and institutional foundation of economic statistics Overview of international experience Regional Workshop for African Countries on Compilation of.
ISO Environmental Management Systems 1 ISO LEGAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety And India’s Obligations By Desh Deepak Verma Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and.
Biosafety Clearing House Training Workshop Date Location.
Biosafety Clearing House Training Workshop date place.
STDF WORKSHOP ON SPS CAPACITY EVALUATION TOOLS 31 March 2008 Erie Tamale, Programme Officer Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Biosafety Clearing House Training Workshop date place.
1 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Clearing-house Mechanism for Information on POPs. Role of Regional Centres.
1 DEAT PERSPECTIVE ON GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 31 JULY 2007.
The Egyptian Biosafety Clearing House Dr. Ossama Abdel-Kawy.
IPCC Key challenges facing communities, and approaches to solutions that enhance resilience: through NAPs Climate and Health Summit 2014 Investing.
Capacity Building for the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety by the German Development Co-operation: German Federal Ministry for Economic.
T RAINING W ORKSHOP ON B IOSAFETY C LEARING -H OUSE FOR T HAILAND December 2008 Bangkok, Thailand.
LMO RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER THE IPPC AND THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY Velia Arriagada Rios Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Chile.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Jebunnesa Chowdhury.
Rules for data release Background documents. Decision 1998/4 on guidelines and procedures for data release 1.The objective of the effect-oriented activities.
IPP Training, IAPSC & IPPC/FAO/FAORAF
CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Jerzy Jendrośka Transboundary procedures
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY
Basic information on NROs 7-8 September 2018, Moscow, Russia
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
The Aarhus Convention and Biosafety
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
Introduction to the Obligations of the Party to the Biosafety Clearing-House Manoranjan Hota.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the Biosafety Clearing-House

footer What is the role of the BCH? Under Art 20, the CPB established the BCH. The Protocol sets out two functions for the BCH: –To facilitate the exchange of scientific, technical, environmental and legal information on, and experience with, LMOs; and –To assist Parties to implement the Protocol.

footer While all Parties have obligations under the Protocol to make information available through the BCH, they also have benefits from using the BCH. For example, they can: –access information about the national laws, regulations and guidelines of other Parties; and information about the decisions and assessments of other countries relating to specific LMOs; –ensure, by posting up-to-date information on the BCH, that all potential exporters of LMOs to their country, or those who wish to transport LMOs across their territory, are aware of their national regulatory requirements; –access information about capacity-building and other assistance available to support implementation of the Protocol; and –ensure that the relevant authorities in other countries can quickly find out who to inform in the event of an accidental movement of LMOs into their territory. How Parties and non-Parties can benefit from the BCH?

footer What are the obligations of Parties regarding Posting and Updating information on the BCH? Parties have obligations under the Protocol to make some information available through the BCH. Art 20 of the CPB lists specific information that Parties must provide to the BCH;specific information In addition, COP-MOP may adopt decisions in the future regarding operational and technical aspects of the BCH, including additional information that should be made available through the BCH; Hence, Parties will have to monitor future decisions.

footer What are the Types of Information Parties Need to make available? Some information should be available on the BCH as soon as the Protocol enters into effect for a country (i.e. as soon as it becomes a “Party” to the Protocol), e.g –The Party should inform the Secretariat of its competent national authority (or authorities). This information will then be placed on the BCH; Information on the competent national authority(ies) of many countries is already available on the BCH; –The Party should make available through the BCH information on existing laws, regulations or guidelines relevant to LMOs.

footer What are the Types of Information Parties Need to make available? (cont) Some information must be made available to the BCH when a country take certain steps, e.g. –If a Party enters into a bilateral, regional or multilateral agreement or arrangement regarding the transboundary movement of LMOs; or –If the Party adopts or amends laws, regulations or guidelines relevant to LMOs.

footer What are the Types of Information Parties Need to make available? (cont) Some information must be made available on the BCH when a country takes certain decisions, e.g. –If a Party takes a final decision on the importation or release of LMOs (e.g. under the AIA procedure); or –If the Party takes a final decision regarding domestic use, including placing on the market, of an LMO that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use and food or feed, or for processing.

footer What are the Types of Information Parties Need to make available? (cont) Some information must only be made available only if certain events occur, e.g. –Information concerning cases of illegal transboundary movement of LMOs; or –Notification of an occurrence under the Party’s jurisdiction resulting in a release that leads to, or may lead to, an unintentional transboundary movement of an LMO.

footer Guided by the principles of inclusiveness, transparency and equity, and open to all Governments; Makes use of metadata about each record (i.e., descriptive identifiers such as name, date, author, etc.), to facilitate the submissions, searching, location and retrieval of information;metadata Makes use of common formats to report information, such as decision information, laws and regulations, and national contact details, using a modular data structure where possible;common formats What are the Characteristics of the Biosafety Clearing- House

footer Making use, where appropriate, of a controlled vocabulary to describe records, which can be translated into the official United Nations languages, to facilitate the ability to search for records in all languages;controlled vocabulary Making use of existing unique identification systems for living modified organisms, as appropriate, to facilitate searching and retrieval of information.unique identification Characteristics of the Biosafety Clearing-House

footer In order to fully participate in the BCH, Governments need to put in place lines of communication and information exchange to ensure that information that should be made available through the BCH is placed on the BCH; To assist Parties in doing so, the governing body has established some basic principles for the operation of the BCH. What is the functioning of the BCH?

footer Parties must nominate National focal points for the BCH (or institutional focal points), who will:National focal points –Clear, for publishing, information registered on the BCH, including validation at a national level of records to make them publicly available through the central portal of the BCH; –Liaison with the Secretariat regarding the technical aspects of national participation in the BCH; –Liaison with the Secretariat regarding issues of relevance to the development and implementation of the BCH. What is the functioning of the BCH? (cont) BCH Focal Point

footer Information in the BCH is open and accessible to all users; Since the information on the BCH is meant to be accessible to all, confidential information should NOT be posted on the BCH.confidential information Who can access the BCH?

footer Information that must go onto the BCH might originate in different governments departments and agencies; Therefore, only information that is validated by the BCH focal point, is posted on the BCH; Depending on the option for national participation chosen by a country, validation from the BCH FP may occur in several different ways. Who can put information on the BCH?

footer The governing body of the Protocol has decided that all information should be submitted to the BCH in an official language of the United Nations (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian or Spanish); However, it is recognised that full information sources and comments that are linked to records in the BCH may be available only in a language of the government submitting the information and not in one of the six UN official languages. Language Requirements for the BCH

footer The MOP encourages Parties and other governments to provide courtesy translations of information in the BCH into one or more languages that are commonly used internationally. Language Requirements for the BCH (cont)

footer What information can be found on the BCH? There are several broad categories of information that are required by the BCH: –Laws and Regulations; –National Contacts; –Decisions and Declarations on LMOs; –Risk Assessments; –Unique Identification; –Capacity Building; –Roster of Experts; –National Reports submitted by Parties.

footer Laws and Regulations Existing national legislation, regulations and guidelines for implementing the Protocol, as well as information required by Parties for the AIA procedure (ongoing obligation); National laws, regulations and guidelines applicable to the import of LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (Article 11(5)) (ongoing requirement); Bilateral, multilateral and regional agreements and arrangements (Article 14) (requirement).

footer National Contacts Contact details for competent national authorities (Article 19) (critical information); Contact details for national focal points (Article 19) (liasing with the Secretariat); BCH national focal points (validation of information).

footer Decisions and Declarations on LMOs Decisions by a Party on regulating the transit of specific LMOs (Article 6(1)); Final decisions regarding the importation or release of LMOs (e.g. approval or prohibition; any conditions attached to approvals; requests for further information; extensions granted; reasons for decision) (Article 10(3)); Information on the application of domestic regulations to specific imports of LMOs (Article 14(4));

footer Decisions and Declarations on LMOs (cont) Final decisions regarding the domestic use of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (Article 11(1)); Final decisions regarding the import of LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing that are taken under domestic regulatory frameworks (Article 11); Declarations regarding the framework to be used for LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (Article 11(6)) ));

footer Decisions and Declarations on LMOs (cont) Review and change of decisions regarding intentional transboundary movements of LMOs (Article 12(1)); LMOs subject to simplified procedures regarding intentional transboundary movement and exempted by a Party from the AIA procedure (Article 13(1)); Occurrence of unintentional transboundary movements that are likely to have significant adverse effects on biological diversity, and related information, including contact point for further information (Article 17); Illegal transboundary movements of LMOs (Article 25(3)).

footer Risk Assessments Summaries of risk assessments or environmental reviews of LMOs generated by regulatory processes and relevant information regarding products thereof, namely, processed materials that are of living modified organism origin, containing detectable novel combinations of replicable genetic material obtained through the use of modern biotechnology (Article 20(3)(c)).LMOsmodern biotechnology

footer Unique Identification The BCH contains a database providing a registry of unique identification classifications as a key to access records in the BCH, such as the OECDs unique identifiers for transgenic plant lines for LMOs-FFP. unique identification

footer Capacity Building Through the BCH, Parties and others can access important information about capacity-building and other assistance for implementation of the Cartagena Protocol; For example, the BCH contains databases of capacity-building opportunities and projects and initiatives; Governments can also register their capacity-building needs and priorities; Eventually, a database on capacity-building outcomes and lessons learned will also be added.

footer Roster of Experts The governing body of the Protocol has decided that access to the roster of experts will be maintained through the BCH; The roster of experts was established by the governing body of the Convention when the Protocol was adopted; Purpose is to provide advice and other support, as appropriate and upon request, to developing country Parties and Parties with economies in transition, –to conduct risk assessment, –make informed decisions, –develop national human resources and –promote institutional strengthening, associated with the transboundary movement of LMOs.

footer Roster of Experts (cont) Parties are encouraged to provide the Secretariat with an evaluation of any advice provided by experts from the roster and results achieved; Evaluations will be made available to the BCH in order to assist other Parties in making decisions about use of the roster of experts; Through the BCH nomination forms for the roster can be accesses to enable Parties to nominate experts; Guidelines for the use of experts from the roster, and information on the voluntary fund can also be accessed through the BCH.

footer Roster of Experts (cont) The expert nominated by a country can be of any nationality.

footer National reports submitted by Parties The Protocol requires each Party to submit a periodic report on its implementation of the Protocol to the Protocol’s governing body; These reports will be made available on the BCH.

footer

For More Information Visit andwww.unep.ch/biosafety/bch.htm In addition, you can send an to