And Hate Speech. Dictionary.com defines hate speech as speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yates vs. United States Argued October 8-9, 1956 Decided June 17, 1957.
Advertisements

DO NOW: COPY THE VOCABULARY IN YOUR NOTEBOOK 1.Civil liberties: one's freedom to exercise one's rights as guaranteed under the laws of the country 2.1.
Introduction to First Amendment Law. The First Amendment “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free.
Our First Amendment Rights
First Amendment Rights Ashley Fazenbaker Grade 5.
Our Constitution Delve deeper into our history!. The Preamble “We the People, of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,
Constitution Sydney Werlein, Ali Voss, Brian Jones.
The First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or.
First Amendment. free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, of the press, peaceably assemble, to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Bill of Rights First Amendment: fundamental rights
The Bill of Rights The first 10 amendments to the U. S. Constitution ©2012, TESCCC 10/21/12page 1 of 9.
The First 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution
THE FIRST TEN AMENDMENTS TO THE US CONSTITUTION The Bill of Rights.
Topic: The Constitution Aim: How does the Bill of Rights protect our individual liberties?
GOVERNANCE AND CIVICS Grade 5 Social Studies Online Government.
American Government Fall 2007 Civil Liberties. Freedoms from arbitrary government interference Found in Bill of Rights (first 10 amendments) –Speech –Press.
The First 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights. I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom.
The Bill of Rights The First 10 Amendments December 15, 1791.
SIXTH GRADE WRITING CLASS “FREEDOM OF SPEECH” IN THE.
Chapter 3 A Look at the Constitution The First Amendment Smith
AP GOPO A LESSON ON FREE SPEECH Thanks to Deborah C. Craytor for the awesome power point and activity!
BANNED BOOKS. #1! 2CvlU.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of.
Snyder v. Phelps. March 2006, country. U.S. Marine Matthew Snyder was killed in Iraq while serving his country.
The Bill of Rights. Congress shall make no law The Bill of Rights Congress shall make no law a) respecting an establishment of religion,
Basics of Religious Rights. 1 st Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
The 1 st Amendment “5 “N-word” went to 4 real quick, gang banging 4 “N- word” still hanging”.
Texas vs. Johnson Argued: March 21, 1989 Decided: June 21, 1989 By: Garialdy De Jesus.
The Bill of Rights The first 10 Amendments to the Constitution.
“ Welcome to Seminar 8: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights.
Categories for the BoR Revolution Reactions Laws & Courts Non- Rights.
Civil Liberties: The First Amendment Freedoms Chapter 19.
Good Morning!. Why is the father “stalling”? Intro Activity: October 10.
Amendment a·mend·ment P Pronunciation Key ( -m nd m nt) n. Pronunciation Key 1. The act of changing for the better; improvement:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of.
The Bill of Rights U.S. Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788 ONLY because a “Bill of Rights” was to be added later.
Hustler Magazine Jerry Falwell Presentation By: Rockford Stone.
Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
Snyder vs. Phelps No. 09–751. Argued October 6, 2010—Decided March 2, 2011 Aggressive Communication Hate Speech.
First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom.
Civics. 1 st amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the.
F IRST A MENDMENT : FREEDOM OF SPEECH. First Amendment Text Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free.
Warm Up What does this cartoon suggest about the Rights of Citizens?
Argued: March 19, 2007 Decided: June 25, =2&i= &w=580&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=
By Andrea Cowan Julie Biggs Robyn Popelmayer Derek Jensen.
Brown v. Board Conclusion 9-0 for Brown Racial segregation has a detrimental effect on minority children because it’s often interpreted as inferiority.
ACLU (American civil liberties union) ‘because freedom can’t protect itself’ Ollie Barraclough.
LEA 2 Cours de civilisation américaine J. Kempf Americans and religion 1.Centrality in American life 2.An ambiguous separation of churches and State 3.The.
History of Journalism: How Do Students’ Rights Differ From Those of the Press? By Amy and Suzan.
CONSTITUTION. Preamble We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide.
Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell 485 U.S. 46 (1988) By: Hunter Tuck PLS 211 December 8, 2015.
Why do we study American citizenship…
Freedom of Speech.
The First Amendment.
1st Amendment Court Cases
The Supreme Court Interprets the First Amendment
Objective 2.12 First Amendment KQ- What freedoms are protected by the first Amendment?
The First amendment Speech Press Religion Petition Assembly.
A case about Hate Speech
Limiting Constitutional Rights: A Balancing Act
God vs. America The Bible vs. The Constitution
Americans and religion
The First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom.
The First Amendment!.
Newspaper bhspioneerspirit.
Texas v. johnson (1989) Snyder v. phelps (2011)
Presentation transcript:

And Hate Speech

Dictionary.com defines hate speech as speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It is important to note that hate speech is not a crime and is in fact protected by the 1st Amendment of the Constitution which reads, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The Westboro Baptist Church is an “Old School” Baptist church from Topeka, Kansas that was founded in 1955 by Pastor Fred Phelps. According to their website the church adheres to the teachings of the bible and they preach against all sin. This includes fornication, adultery, divorce, remarriage and sodomy.

The following is directly from their website, “WBC engages in daily peaceful sidewalk demonstrations opposing the homosexual lifestyle of soul-damning, nation-destroying filth. We display large, colorful signs containing Bible words and sentiments, including: GOD HATES FAGS, FAGS HATE GOD, AIDS CURES FAGS, THANK GOD FOR AIDS, FAGS BURN IN HELL, GOD IS NOT MOCKED, FAGS ARE NATURE FREAKS, GOD GAVE FAGS UP, NO SPECIAL LAWS FOR FAGS, FAGS DOOM NATIONS, THANK GOD FOR DEAD SOLDIERS, FAG TROOPS, GOD BLEW UP THE TROOPS, GOD HATES AMERICA, AMERICA IS DOOMED, THE WORLD IS DOOMED, etc.”

Members of the congregation (which are mostly Phelps family members) “picket” or protest at the funerals of US Service men and women who have been killed while on active duty in Iraq.

On March of 2006 the WBC picketed the funeral of Marine Matthew A. Snyder in Maryland. On June of 2006 Albert Snyder, the father of the deceased Marine sued Fred W. Phelps, the Westboro Church, Rebekah Phelps-Davis and Shirley Phelps-Roper for defamation, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

In 2007 a jury awarded Albert Snyder a total of $10,900,000 dollars in damages. In 2009 the case was heard by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals and ruled that WBC’s protests were a form of free speech. Albert Snyder was ordered to pay WBC’s court fee’s which totaled just over $16,000. Albert Snyder took this his case against the WBC directly to the Supreme Court.

The case reached the Supreme Court in March of The three questions that were presented to the court were: 1. Does Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell apply to a private person versus another private person concerning a private matter? 2. Does the First Amendment's freedom of speech tenet trump the First Amendment's freedom of religion and peaceful assembly? 3. Does an individual attending a family member's funeral constitute a captive audience who is entitled to state protection from unwanted communication? (Snyder v. Phelps, 2010)

Those who filed on behalf of the WBC: ACLU Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press National Public Radio The Associated Press The First Amendment Project And many others. The Senate Majority and Minority Leaders The Veterans of Foreign Wars 47 individual states The City of Washington DC And many others Those who filed on behalf of Albert Snyder

Chief Justice Roberts wrote in the Majority’s opinion, “The jury here was instructed that it could hold Westboro liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress based on a finding that Westboro’s picketing was 'outrageous.' 'Outrageousness,' however, is a highly malleable standard with 'an inherent subjectiveness about it which would allow a jury to impose liability on the basis of the jurors' tastes or views, or perhaps on the basis of their dislike of a particular expression.” (Greidner, 2011) The Dissent which came from justice Samuel Alito stated, “Respondents' outrageous conduct caused petitioner great injury, and the Court now compounds that injury by depriving petitioner of a judgment that acknowledges the wrong he suffered”. (Gregory, 2011)

This means that the Constitution protects almost all forms of speech whether we agree with it or not. Snyder v. Phelps helped solidify this even though what the Westboro Baptist Church was doing was horrible in the eyes of most Americans. So what do you think about cases like this? Should the free speech of certain groups or individuals be curtailed just because we find it repulsive and disgusting?

Snyder v. Phelps, (The Supreme Court March 8, 2010). Gregory, S. (2011, March 2011). Why the Supreme Court Ruled for Westboro. Retrieved from Time.com: 13,00.html Greidner, C. (2011, March 2). Supreme Court Upholds Westboro Baptist Church Members' Right to Picket Funerals. Retrieved from Poliglot.com: -court-upholds-westboro.html