Salt Lake City – Las Vegas High Speed Rail – Alignment Study Student Engineering Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT Structure Project Management Seminar Bridge Preliminary Design Report.
Advertisements

Project Development Process (PDP) Structures. PDP – Three Project Levels Major Project ~ 14 Steps Major Project ~ 14 Steps Minor Project ~ 10 Steps Minor.
Presentation by: LT Environmental, Inc.. Why Stormwater Matters Water is a precious resource that must be protected. Flood-defensive measures will protect.
Integrated Approach to Area Master Planning in Jubail Industrial City
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
If we don’t use the Quantm system we won’t get the best alignments Queensland Department of Main Roads, Australia.
South Side Red River Bridge Corridor Study Phase III Preliminary Geotechnical Study Phase IV New Alignment Alternatives Evaluation.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Civil Engineering The best kind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
Welcome to Pinal County. Greg Stanley Pinal County Public Works AACE Regional Conference Oct 1-3, 2008 The Three C’s of Hunt Highway.
HOOSIER HEARTLAND HIGHWAY Public Information Meeting – August 27, 2009 STATE ROAD 25, SEGMENT 2 From 0.42 mile east of Tippecanoe/Carroll County line to.
Introduction Transportation System Objectives : Military; Knit together the inhabitants of a territory by providing mutual access and communication; Economic.
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
 Life in communities has changed over the years.  One of those changes is in transportation. Transportation is a way of moving people or things from.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Agency Scoping.
Environmental Assessment Public Information Meeting – September 2010 Realignment of a Portion of a Utah Lake Drainage Basin Water Delivery System (ULS)
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
 Do you have an Interest in Math and Science?  Do you have good problem solving skills?  Do you approach problems in an analytical manner?  Can.
Module 6: Design Process Preliminary Field Review Preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Design Report, including Preliminary NOI Package Alignment and.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
PROJECT SCOPING FOR LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID PROJECTS.
Prepared by Hakam J. AarajQadri H. Shaheen Mutaz H. O’deh Under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Sameer A. Abu-Eisheh “ Moh’d Bin Rashid Al-Maktom Road ” Design.
CE303: Introduction to Construction Blueprint Lab.
Highway Route Surveys And Location
Request for Environmental Services (RES) Missouri Local Programs How to Complete The Request for Environmental Services.
2012 ACEA MEETING ORANGE BEACH Brad Lindsey, P.E. Assistant State County Transportation Engineer – Pre Construction Alabama Department of Transportation.
Mass Highway Department (MHD) Design Process Anticipate possible use of MHD funds Anticipate possible use of MHD funds New Design Guide for Project Development.
IRWA Educational Mini Conference IRWA Educational Mini Conference Chapter 26 Presenter: Richard Diaz, Jr. P.E. September 16-17, 2010  Reading Right-of-Way.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
CE303: Introduction to Construction Blueprint Lab.
Washington Thoroughfare Study Proposed Improvement of Washington Street Hainesville Road to Lake Street Lake County Hainesville Road Lake Street Washington.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Citizens Advisory.
REMOTE SENSING and the CSX RAIL RELOCATION EIS NCRST-E GICAP 2002 Workshop Session 3.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting November 8, 2005?? Item No. xx Supp. Meeting Date:
An Introduction to Contracts and Design Guides Presented by: David Lake, P.E. Roadway Designer Nevada Department of Transportation.
HDR | Presentation Update to Flood Project Working Group Shawn Gooch, P.E. City of Sparks February 27, 2008 North Truckee Drain Relocation Project.
HIGHWAY DESIGN PROCESS & ROUTE LOCATION Spring 2016.
August 19, 2015 Port Bienville Rail EIS Scoping Meeting Presented by: Rhea Vincent Mike McGuire.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
The Project Concept Phase - Concept Report Requirements Presented by the Georgia Department of Transportation Roxana Ene – LCI Coordinator
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
ECNM Meeting October 1, Project Purpose The purpose of the US 53 project is to address the termination of the 1960 easement agreement that affects.
FHWA CMGC Workshop October 23, Project Purpose The purpose of the US 53 project is to address the termination of the 1960 easement agreement that.
December 17,  MnDOT signed a highway easment in 1960 with US Steel  The TH 53 is over a ore deposit with shallow strippings, high iron and low.
The purpose of the US 53 project is to address the termination of the 1960 easement agreement that affects the current highway location in order to continue.
Iron Range Tourism Bureau April 25, 2013 Hwy 53 Update.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
Dave Adamson Design Network launched 2 years ago Had many good ideas Discipline tracks Activity ownership Milestone meetings Promised “Not Static”
Purpose of the Project  Construct surface access (industrial) to the Ambler Mining District  Support exploration and development of mineral resources.
Brookeville Bypass Final Design Presentation Initech May 6, 2004.
Sinclair Wash Stream Restoration Feasibility Study
Transportation Engineering Business Development Workshop Department M
Alternative Study.
NAU International pavilion expansion
Rehabilitation Project
Fordham at Columbia as a Grade-Separated Intersection
Project Management Team Meeting #3
FOR LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID PROJECTS
Importance of Geometric Design
Bridge Planning Why - Purpose Who - Bridge Planner
FOR LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID PROJECTS
Is Engineering for Me?.
Fordham at Columbia as a Grade-Separated Intersection
HIGHWAY DESIGN PROCESS & ROUTE LOCATION
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
White Flint North Entrance Feasibility Study
Presentation transcript:

Salt Lake City – Las Vegas High Speed Rail – Alignment Study Student Engineering Associates

Project Management Project Management Approach Major Milestones Project Scope of Work Cost Management Plan/Cost Baseline

Project Management Approach Staffing Management Plan Communications Management Plan Quality Management Plan

Staffing Management Plan Principal Engineer – Dr. Steven Bartlett Vice President – Byron Foster Project Management Team – 4 Members Alignment Team – 5 Members Drainage Team – 4 Members Environmental Team – 5 Members Geotechnical Team – 4 Members Structural Team – 4 Members Utilities/Transportation Team – 3 Members

Communications Management Plan Meetings Informal Communication Alejandro MedinillaProject Manager Dane JanakProject Manager Danny ThompsonProject Manager Jeff ThomasProject Manager Devin WederAlignment Team Leader Joe BoltonDrainage Team Leader Joseph WellsEnvrionmental Team Leader Krystal HarmanGeotechnical Team Leader Eric SotoStructures Team Leader Karlo VelezUtilities/Traffic Team Leader

Client Principal Engineers Project Managers Team Leaders Staff Engineers Quality Management Plan

Major Milestones MilestoneDescriptionDate Complete Scope of Work Document All general project requirements are to be determined in order to assign work 2/3/2015 Complete Feasibility Study Report and Presentation “Big Picture” items to be generally completed and submitted for presentation 3/13/2015 Complete Final Report and Presentation A detailed look into specific “Big Picture” items to be entirely completed and submitted for presentation 4/30/2015

Scope of Work Alignment Environmental Utilities & Transportation Geotechnical Structures Drainage

Alignment Approach

 Western Union Pacific Railroad Corridor  Eastern I-15 Corridor  Track Layout  Cut & Fill Estimates  Geometric Constraints  Estimate Surface Data  Design of Horizontal Curves  Design of Vertical Curves

Drainage Approach  Storm Drainage  Hydrologic Analysis of Watersheds  Identify Need and Location for Culverts  Irrigation Features  Open Channel Flow Analysis for Existing Channels  Design of Drainage for Rail Line

Environmental Approach  Sensitive Lands  Culturally  Environmentally  Endangered Species  Right-of-Way  Identify Ownership  State  Federal  Private  Environmental Impact Studies

Utilities and Transportation Approach  Identify Potential Utility Interferences  Utilities  Fiber optics  Current Easements  Identify Existing Railroad and Road Interferences  Access Rights  Construction Considerations  Relocation

Geotechnical Approach  Identify Soil/Rock Types  Develop Typical Cross Sections  Identify Slope Stability  Identify Need for Tunnels  Types of Soils  Tunneling Methods  Preliminary Design Work for Structural Foundations  Preliminary Design for Ballast and Sub-Ballast Materials

Structural Approach  Preliminary Design of Grade Separated Track  Bridges  Location  Length  Type  Tunnels  Type of Rock  Methods  Preliminary Design of Typical Pedestrian Crossings

Schedule

Team NameEngineering RateStudent Rate Principle Engineer Oversight$202.5/hr$81/hr Vice President$162/hr$33/hr Project Management$108/hr $22/hr Alignment$81/hr$22/hr Drainage$81/hr$22/hr Environmental$81/hr$22/hr Geotech$81/hr$22/hr Structural$81/hr$22/hr Transportation & Utilities$81/hr$22/hr Total$397,926 $124,622 Cost Management Plan/Cost Baseline

Schedule towards Feasibility Study Task NameCostWork Scope of Work Estimate$397, ,666 hrs Alignment$77, hrs East & West rough draft$7, hrs Horizontal Alignment$9, hrs Vertical Alignment$12, hrs Finalized Alignments$9, hrs Drainage$40, hrs Storm Drainage$6, hrs Irrigation Features$6, hrs Design of Drainage for Rail Line$13, hrs Environmental$27, hrs Right of way research$3, hrs Sensitive Lands research$2, hrs Collection of Data$2, hrs Collaboration$4, hrs Geotech$57, hrs Soil classification & Problematic characteristics$3, hrs Research & Design of tunnels, retaining systems and foundations$4, hrs Calcs & Drafts of cuts, stability analysis, and fill materials$2, hrs Additional issues$4, hrs Project Management$60, hrs Structural$67, hrs Design Criteria$1, hrs Structures count estimate$9, hrs Revised count based on alignment changes$8, hrs Final count and total cost estimate$3, hrs Transportation & Utilities$58, hrs Research possible utility lines$2, hrs Research possible railroad$2, hrs Construction access$1, hrs Preliminary cost estimate of utilities and crossings$2, hrs Feasibility study submit$3, hrs Present cost estimate of relocations for overall plan$2, hrs Principle Advising$8, hrs