Independent Samples: Comparing Proportions Lecture 37 Section 11.5 Tue, Nov 6, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 10, part D. IV. Inferences about differences between two population proportions You will have two population proportions, p1 and p2. The true.
Advertisements

Two Population Means Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals For Differences in Proportions.
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Proportion Lecture 25 Sections 8.1 – 8.2 Fri, Feb 29, 2008.
Independent Samples: Comparing Proportions Lecture 35 Section 11.5 Mon, Nov 20, 2006.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Statistics for Business and Economics 7 th Edition Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing:
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Hypothesis Testing Using a Single Sample.
Chap 11-1 Statistics for Business and Economics, 6e © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 11 Hypothesis Testing II Statistics for Business and Economics.
Stat 512 – Lecture 12 Two sample comparisons (Ch. 7) Experiments revisited.
1/45 Chapter 11 Hypothesis Testing II EF 507 QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FALL 2008.
COMPARING PROPORTIONS IN LARGE SAMPLES Examples: Compare probability of H on two coins. Compare proportions of republicans in two cities. 2 populations:
Statistical Inference Lab Three. Bernoulli to Normal Through Binomial One flip Fair coin Heads Tails Random Variable: k, # of heads p=0.5 1-p=0.5 For.
Modular 15 Ch 10.1 to 10.2 Part I. Ch 10.1 The Language of Hypothesis Testing Objective A : Set up a Hypothesis Testing Objective B : Type I or Type II.
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion Lecture 29 Sections 9.1 – 9.3 Tue, Oct 23, 2007.
Statistics Pooled Examples.
Confidence Intervals and Two Proportions Presentation 9.4.
Comparing Two Population Means
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Statistics for Business and Economics 8 th Edition Chapter 6 Sampling and Sampling.
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Procedures 11.3 Chi-Square Test for Independence; Homogeneity of Proportions.
381 Hypothesis Testing (Testing with Two Samples-III) QSCI 381 – Lecture 32 (Larson and Farber, Sects 8.3 – 8.4)
Chapter 6 Lecture 3 Sections: 6.4 – 6.5.
AP STATISTICS LESSON COMPARING TWO PROPORTIONS.
Slide Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 11 Inferences for Population Proportions.
Dan Piett STAT West Virginia University Lecture 11.
Bernoulli Trials Two Possible Outcomes –Success, with probability p –Failure, with probability q = 1  p Trials are independent.
Bias and Variability Lecture 38 Section 8.3 Wed, Mar 31, 2004.
Chi-Square Procedures Chi-Square Test for Goodness of Fit, Independence of Variables, and Homogeneity of Proportions.
Chapter 19 Comparing Two Proportions. Outline Two-sample problems: proportions Two-sample problems: proportions The sampling distribution of a difference.
Chapter 22: Comparing Two Proportions. Yet Another Standard Deviation (YASD) Standard deviation of the sampling distribution The variance of the sum or.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Statistics for Business and Economics 8 th Edition Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing:
The Central Limit Theorem for Proportions Lecture 26 Sections 8.1 – 8.2 Mon, Mar 3, 2008.
What is a Confidence Interval?. Sampling Distribution of the Sample Mean The statistic estimates the population mean We want the sampling distribution.
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
Slide 4- 1 Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response.
Chapter 5 Sampling Distributions. Data are summarized by statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, quartiles, correlation, etc..) Data are summarized.
Paired Samples Lecture 39 Section 11.3 Tue, Nov 15, 2005.
Comparing Two Proportions. AP Statistics Chap 13-2 Two Population Proportions The point estimate for the difference is p 1 – p 2 Population proportions.
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 11 Section 3 – Slide 1 of 27 Chapter 11 Section 3 Inference about Two Population Proportions.
Warm Up In May 2006, the Gallup Poll asked 510 randomly sampled adults the question “Generally speaking, do you believe the death penalty is applied fairly.
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Proportion Lecture 28 Sections 8.1 – 8.2 Wed, Mar 7, 2007.
 Confidence Intervals  Around a proportion  Significance Tests  Not Every Difference Counts  Difference in Proportions  Difference in Means.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Chapter Hypothesis Tests Regarding a Parameter 10.
Independent Samples: Comparing Means Lecture 39 Section 11.4 Fri, Apr 1, 2005.
Introduction to Hypothesis Test – Part 2
Lecture #19 Tuesday, October 25, 2016 Textbook: Sections 12.3 to 12.4
Inference for Proportions
Comparing Two Proportions
Section 9.2 – Sample Proportions
Hypothesis Testing II: The Two-sample Case
Module 22: Proportions: One Sample
Inferences About Means from Two Groups
Independent Samples: Comparing Proportions
WARM – UP A company is criticized because only 9 of 43 randomly choosen people in executive-level positions are women. The company explains that although.
Independent Samples: Comparing Means
Independent Samples: Comparing Means
Inference on Categorical Data
Sampling Distributions
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Proportion
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Proportion
The estimate of the proportion (“p-hat”) based on the sample can be a variety of values, and we don’t expect to get the same value every time, but the.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
9.9 Single Sample: Estimating of a Proportion:
Independent Samples: Comparing Proportions
Independent Samples: Comparing Proportions
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Proportion
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Proportion
Warmup Which of the distributions is an unbiased estimator?
Independent Samples: Comparing Means
Presentation transcript:

Independent Samples: Comparing Proportions Lecture 37 Section 11.5 Tue, Nov 6, 2007

Comparing Proportions We wish to compare proportions between two populations. We should compare proportions for the same attribute in order for it to make sense.  For example, we could measure the proportion of NC residents living below the poverty level and the proportion of VA residents living below the poverty level.

Examples The “gender gap” refers to the difference between the proportion of men who vote Republican and the proportion of women who vote Republican. MenWomen

Examples The “gender gap” refers to the difference between the proportion of men who vote Republican and the proportion of women who vote Republican. MenWomen Rep Dem Rep Dem

Examples The “gender gap” refers to the difference between the proportion of men who vote Republican and the proportion of women who vote Republican. MenWomen Rep Dem Rep Dem p1p1 p2p2 p 1 > p 2

Examples Of course, the “gender gap” could be expressed in terms of the population of Democrats vs. the population of Republicans. DemocratsRepublicans Women Men Women Men

Examples The proportion of patients who recovered, given treatment A vs. the proportion of patients who recovered, given treatment B.  p 1 = recovery rate under treatment A.  p 2 = recovery rate under treatment B.

Comparing proportions To estimate the difference between population proportions p 1 and p 2, we need the sample proportions p 1 ^ and p 2 ^. The sample difference p 1 ^ – p 2 ^ is an estimator of the true difference p 1 – p 2.

Case Study 13 City Hall turmoil: Richmond Times- Dispatch poll. City Hall turmoil: Richmond Times- Dispatch poll Test the hypothesis that a higher proportion of men than women believe that Mayor Wilder is doing a good or excellent job as mayor of Richmond.

Case Study 13 Let p 1 = proportion of men who believe that Mayor Wilder is doing a good or excellent job. Let p 2 = proportion of women who believe that Mayor Wilder is doing a good or excellent job.

Case Study 13 What is the data?  500 people surveyed.  48% were male; 52% were female.  41% of men rated Wilder’s performance good or excellent (p 1 ^ = 0.41).  37% of men rated Wilder’s performance good or excellent (p 2 ^ = 0.37).

Hypothesis Testing The hypotheses.  H 0 : p 1 – p 2 = 0 (i.e., p 1 = p 2 )  H 1 : p 1 – p 2 > 0 (i.e., p 1 > p 2 ) The significance level is  = What is the test statistic? That depends on the sampling distribution of p 1 ^ – p 2 ^.

The Sampling Distribution of p 1 ^ – p 2 ^ If the sample sizes are large enough, then p 1 ^ is N(p 1,  1 ), where and p 2 ^ is N(p 2,  2 ), where

The Sampling Distribution of p 1 ^ – p 2 ^ The sample sizes will be large enough if  n 1 p 1  5, and n 1 (1 – p 1 )  5, and  n 2 p 2  5, and n 2 (1 – p 2 )  5.

Statistical Fact #1 For any two random variables X and Y,

Statistical Fact #2 Furthermore, if X and Y are both normal, then X – Y is normal. That is, if X is N(  X,  X ) and Y is N(  Y,  Y ), then

The Sampling Distribution of p 1 ^ – p 2 ^ Therefore, where

The Test Statistic Therefore, the test statistic would be if we knew the values of p 1 and p 2. We will approximate them with p 1 ^ and p 2 ^.