Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/20071. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Advertisements

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
ASSESSMENT Parkway Academic Assessment: Federal and State Influences on the Parkway School District Curriculum Council Parkway School District January.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Developing a Framework for Ensuring the Validity of State Accountability Systems Council of Chief State School Officers AERA San Diego April 15, 2004.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Using Data to Develop Your School’s Single Plan Parent Institute December 7, 2005 Presenter: Reyna Corral, Categorical Coordinator.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Completed forms may be placed in the box at the back of the room or mailed to C/SAC, Office of Staff Development. Questions? See Dixie at the registration.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
NCLB. Introduction Increased federal mandates and requirements on states Increased federal funding to states by almost 25% from the previous year Movement.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND Adequate Yearly Progress Report August 2009.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/20071

Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean for Parkway?  What does this mean for South High?  Assessment website Assessment 10/16/20072

What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  Adequate Yearly Progress  Test data is reported by economic background, race and ethnicity, English proficiency and disability.  Measuring progress by subgroups will demonstrate not just that overall student performance is improving, but also that achievement gaps are closing between disadvantaged students and other students.  Holding schools accountable for the academic achievement of all subgroups ensures that no child is left behind.  Ed.gov 10/16/20073

To be held accountable, a school must have the following number in each of 9 subgroups taking the test…  All students (30)  American Indian (30)  Asian/Pacific Islanders (30)  African American (30)  Hispanic (30)  White (30)  IEP (50)  LEP (50)  Free/Reduced Lunch (30) 10/16/20074

Must meet the yearly target set by NCLB  Communication Arts  2005: 26.6  2006: 34.7  2007: 42.9  Math  2005: 17.5  2006: 26.6  2007: 35.8  AYP = meeting both content areas, all subgroups held accountable for. 10/16/20075

Must meet the yearly target set by NCLB: South High 2007 is accountable for SIX groups in 11 th grade Comm. Arts Comm. Arts Target All KidsAsian/ Pacific Islander BlackWhiteFRLIEP (CI) (CI)21.4  AYP = meeting both content areas, all subgroups held accountable for 10/16/20076

Must meet the yearly target set by NCLB: South High 2007 is accountable for FIVE groups in 10 th grade Math Math TargetAll KidsBlackWhiteFRLIEP  AYP = meeting both content areas, all subgroups held accountable for 10/16/20077

Why is Parkway in District Improvement?  We have not made ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS for two consecutive years:  (did not meet 4 groups out of 16—2 comarts, 2 math)  African American  Free Reduced Lunch  (did not meet 7 out of 16—4 comarts, 3 math*)  African American  Free Reduced Lunch  IEP *  LEP 10/16/20078

What does this mean for Parkway?  PARKWAY is accountable for ALL subgroups.  We have enough students in each cell.  Any school district receiving Title 1 funds must meet certain requirements, identified by NCLB.  Requirements differ by years in DI.  District Improvement: 10/16/20079

Can exit DI if…  We must remain in DI for two years.  We meet AYP in the content or indicator that caused the initial DI for two consecutive years  NO other content or indicator NOT making AYP 10/16/200710

Consequences of DI, Year 1  Letter to all parents  Develop or revise the district CSIP within 3 months of identificationCSIP  Include scientifically based strategies  Identify actions that have the greatest likelihood of addressing achievement  Addressing PD 10/16/200711

Also…  Parent involvement  After school involvement  Summer school  Specify responsibilities of DESE 10/16/200712

The biggie…. Include specific, measurable targets for each of the groups in the disaggregated data 10/16/200713

What does this mean for South High School?  Your school goals must be tweaked to include:  A goal for Communication Arts  A goal for Mathematics  Both measured by MAP  Include specific, measurable targets for each of the groups in the disaggregated data Our school made AYP, why are we part of District Improvement? 10/16/200714

Achievement Goal: Can be current CSIP goal, or an additional goal. Must address: Comm Arts & Math MAP scores and label a quantifiable target for proficiency. StrategyStrategy #1Strategy #2Strategy #3 10/16/200715

What next?  Data analysis!  PARS Level 1 and II for Administrators  PARS for Counselors  PLAN results to arrive in November  PARS III in planning stages: IBD information with Coordinators  CSIP revisions due by November 24 th.  CSIP revisions presented to Board December 15 th and sent to state. 10/16/200716

10/16/200717

10/16/200718

Action Steps  The smaller, explicit steps to accomplish a strategy.  Include:  Person Responsible  Data to be collected  Target Date  Funding Source Back 10/16/200719

STRATEGY  How are we going to meet the measureable objective?  Your achievement goal will most likely have multiple strategies but one should include the targets by subgroup.  Example: ABC School will raise the achievement levels of the 4 subgroups represented to the following levels: African American to 55.7%, IEP to 46.9 %, Asian Pacific Islander to 69.8 %, LEP to 33.4 %.  Back Back 10/16/200720

Example: ABC School will raise the proficiency level of all students as measured by The Communication Arts portion of the MAP test to the a level of 66.7%. (this number may be the Safe Harbor target) FAQ: What if our safe harbor target is above the federal target? ANSWER Back 10/16/200721

10/16/200722

10/16/200723

10/16/200724

Continue to use the safe harbor number provided even though It is higher than the federal benchmark. We don’t want to show regression. Back 10/16/200725

The number of students in your schools subgroups all contribute to the total Parkway number of students in each subgroup. Back 10/16/200726