A New Tool For Measuring Detector Performance in ATLAS ● Arno Straessner – TU Dresden Matthias Schott – CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Advertisements

Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb -1 Chris Hays 1, Ashutosh Kotwal 2, Ye Li 3, Oliver Stelzer-Chilton 1 1 Oxford University.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
ATLAS Analysis Model. Introduction On Feb 11, 2008 the Analysis Model Forum published a report (D. Costanzo, I. Hinchliffe, S. Menke, ATL- GEN-INT )
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
A simulation study of the rapidity distributions of leptons from W boson decays at ATLAS Laura Gilbert.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ATLAS Computing Planning ATLAS Software Workshop August 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.
Event Metadata Records as a Testbed for Scalable Data Mining David Malon, Peter van Gemmeren (Argonne National Laboratory) At a data rate of 200 hertz,
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Alignment Strategy for ATLAS: Detector Description and Database Issues
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
Unfolding jet multiplicity and leading jet p T spectra in jet production in association with W and Z Bosons Christos Lazaridis University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Event Data Model in ATLAS Edward Moyse (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration CHEP 2004, Interlaken.
David N. Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Representing the BaBar Collaboration The BaBar Mini  BaBar  BaBar’s Data Formats  Design of the Mini 
Databases E. Leonardi, P. Valente. Conditions DB Conditions=Dynamic parameters non-event time-varying Conditions database (CondDB) General definition:
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
A few slides to summarise what Alessandro and I were up to for March 24th video meeting Taking for granted that W+/- are good measurements to make- are.
R jets measurement. Outline Motivation for a R jets measurement –What is this measurement? –Why is it interesting? –Other R jets measurement within ATLAS.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
LHC France 2013, 3 rd April ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair production cross section in dilepton channel Frédéric Derue, LPNHE Paris Rencontres.
Vertex finding and B-Tagging for the ATLAS Inner Detector A.H. Wildauer Universität Innsbruck CERN ATLAS Computing Group on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
Integration of the ATLAS Tag Database with Data Management and Analysis Components Caitriana Nicholson University of Glasgow 3 rd September 2007 CHEP,
1 EvtGen and  b Spin Studies in ATLAS First North American ATLAS Physics Workshop December 19-21, 2004 Michela Biglietti, Jacob Bourjaily, Homer A. Neal,
23/2/2000Status of GAUDI 1 P. Mato / CERN Computing meeting, LHCb Week 23 February 2000.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
The “Comparator” Atlfast vs. Full Reco Automated Comparison Chris Collins-Tooth 19 th February 2006.
1 Offline Week, October 28 th 2009 PWG3-Muon: Analysis Status From ESD to AOD:  inclusion of MC branch in the AOD  standard AOD creation for PDC09 files.
TAGS in the Analysis Model Jack Cranshaw, Argonne National Lab September 10, 2009.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
20 October 2005 LCG Generator Services monthly meeting, CERN Validation of GENSER & News on GENSER Alexander Toropin LCG Generator Services monthly meeting.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
Model Independent Measurements Jon Butterworth University College London MCnet school Spa, Belgium September 2015.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Analysis Tools interface - configuration Wouter Verkerke Wouter Verkerke, NIKHEF 1.
ATLAS Distributed Computing Tutorial Tags: What, Why, When, Where and How? Mike Kenyon University of Glasgow.
Zvi Citron Correlations Between Neutral Bosons and Jets in Pb+Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS Detector Zvi Citron for the ATLAS Collaboration.
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
Developments of the PWG3 muon analysis code
Overview: high-energy computing
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
W Charge Asymmetry at CDF
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

A New Tool For Measuring Detector Performance in ATLAS ● Arno Straessner – TU Dresden Matthias Schott – CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics Prague March 21-27, 2009

Outline The Physics: Detector Performance An Infrastructure For Performance Data Current Implementation in ATLAS Outlook ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner2

The Physics: Detector Performance Complex detector with main subsystems: Inner tracking Calorimetry Muon tracking 2500 physicists perform analyses All need detailed information about detector performance General performance Trigger, reconstruction and identification efficiencies Resolutions of energy, momenta, angles, … Energy and momentum scales Time-dependent performance ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner3 detector response

Detector Performance Tool Commonly applied method to measure performance in data: → Tag & Probe Example: measure muon trigger efficiency in Z→µµ events Identify triggered and well measured muon: → Tag Use Z decay kinematics to find the 2 nd muon: → Probe Check if 2 nd muon was triggered → efficiency Many more examples: Z→ ee, J/psi → ee, Z+jets for tau fake rates, … Common infrastructure to Implement the object tag and event selection Store the collection of probe objects Analyse the probes → efficiencies and detector response Store matrices with efficiency, resolution and scale information ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner4 Clients: Performance groups Fast Monte Carlo simulation Individual Physicists

Application: Performance Groups Early version of the package was used in ATLAS physics book Estimation of muon identification and trigger efficiencies: Performance Tool is the ATLAS solution for: Direct use in Standard Model physics → closely related to performance groups Benchmark comparisons for reconstructed objects used in searches etc. ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner5

The Procedure ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner6 ATLAS data storage Event Summary Data (ESD) Analysis Object Data (AOD) Derived Physics Data (DPD) 1 st step: Signal selection and object tag Input: ESD, AOD, DPD Grid task → Performance-DPD with probe objects 2 nd step: Performance determination Executed on local cluster Overall fits might be necessary (background shape, …) → Performance database

Probe Object Data Probe objects are usually: tracks, reconstructed leptons, jets Only parameters necessary for further analysis are stored → can be freely defined Example for electron calorimeter identification efficiency: Map with string tags in meta-data → flexible, user-friendly structure Small data size: ~ 0.33 kB per event in DPD file ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner7 Electron reconstruction category Electron quality cut Electron trigger information Reconstructed Z mass from tag+probe electron Z boson p T Angular difference (∆R) to next jet Jet multiplicity Sum of jet p T Max of jet p T Electron isolation variables Matching angle to generator truth electron To calculate number of trials and successes for efficiency Interesting variables for differential efficiencies Optional for Monte Carlo verification of the method

Performance Database Objects stored: N-dimensional matrices to map detector areas and physics Typically 4-dimensional, not larger because of → data statistics per matrix entry → storage space Matrix defined by N axes objects with free binning Matrix entries: For “simple” efficiency calculations: Number of trial and success counts With side-band subtraction of background: Data and background histograms Pre-defined fitting functions Background subtraction assuming predicted S/B ratio ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner8 η φ pTpT

Performance Database Matrix entries for detector response: Resolution/scale histogram for Monte Carlo → data reference Smearing functions for generator level → fully simulated Monte Carlo Once ATLAS data is available: Smearing functions for generator level → data projections To be used in fast detector simulations Matrix entries for resolution and scaling: ROOT Histograms → in future: RooWorkspace of RooFit ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner9

Matrix Objects Methods to calculate efficiency and resolution from stored data Classical and Bayesian efficiencies and uncertainties Efficiencies and detector response using fits to data and background Caching: fit result is stored and then directly accessed All matrix entry objects are additive: Distributed analysis Averaging over different run periods Projections to any number of axes is supported: Projections in form of matrices Projections into histograms Slices of matrices → cuts Not trivial for resolutions Hide complexity from user ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner10 + ε + + …

Implementation in ATHENA ATHENA = ATLAS software framework “Algorithm” is executed at each event Uses “Tool” to perform signal selection Intermediate data is stored in DPD Transient memory “Storegate” Performance determination Output to ATLAS official conditions database: LCG product: COOL database With Interval-Of-Validity (IOV) ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner11

Supported Database Structures ATLAS official conditions database: LCG Pool/COOL → for collaborative use Plain ROOT file → for online Tier-0 applications, development, debugging and individual use Unique database identifier: ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner12 Database IDDescriptionExamples ObjectPhysics ParameterMuon, Electron, Tau, Jet, …. TypePerformance ParameterEfficiency, Scale/Resolution, Fake- Rate ChannelPhysics ChannelZ→µµ, J/psi→ee, tt, … AuthorAuthor’s nameMuonPerformanceGroup, PJenni, … RecoSWVSoftware version (ATLAS Metadata Interface tag) IOVInterval of validity (runs), For MC: simulation software release Run

Database Object Structure ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner13 Matrix Payload: Vectors of integers and floats Data vectors Matrix entries Info vectors Matrix dimensions and axes definitions Unique ID Database ID Pool / COOL / ROOT

Application: Fast Monte Carlo Simulation Fast Monte Carlo simulation Correction of the generated 4-vectors Smearing and efficiency correction Ideal place for input from performance tool → currently “hand-made” input tables Communication via COOL database → to be implemented → A better Monte Carlo simulation → Reference numbers from data for systematic detector studies → towards a “realistic” Monte Carlo: possibility to map on run-time effects ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner14 4-vectors Muons Electrons Taus Jets Missing E T ATLFAST AOD ATLFAST AOD Performance COOL DB AOD to AOD

File Sizes Probe DPD files are much smaller than typical AOD: 200 kB/event in AOD → kB/event in DPD DPD files produced on grid and collected on local storage Matrix files eventually stored in COOL Depends on number of dimensions Potentially large – for a database – if full histograms are stored For 2x50 bin histograms in 20x20x20 matrix ~ 3 MB ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner15

Current Status ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner16 All underlying functionalities are implemented Tagging framework DPD creation Matrix representations and operations COOL and ROOT database operations → converters Working use-cases: Electron reconstruction and identification efficiency Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency Muon trigger efficiency Inner detector tracking efficiency with Z and J/psi tags

Summary and Outlook Performance tool provides useful and standardized service to the collaboration Performance data can be distributed via ATLAS central database Interesting use cases: Individual physics analysis Performance groups Realistic Monte Carlo simulation Full working analyses planned to be available in a month’s time “Online” exercise on Tier-0 center to be done Many more performance analyses to be integrated Currently evaluating structures for dealing with systematic uncertainties ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner17

Backup 18ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner

Backup 19ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner

Current Analysis Structure ATLAS Detector Performance Tool - Arno Straessner20 Baseline Representation: efficiency matrix efficiency matrix entry resolution matrix resolution matrix entry Pool/COOL Interface: converters Performance Analyses: tag & probe Tools: probe collector trigger association fills get stored projections 1D and 2D histograms as histogram (Tier 0): converters Intermediate Analysis DPD probe collection