Lower Baffle Robert Besuner 26 August 2004. 2Background/Purpose This study follows on to 12 August study of the Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring. —In.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HokieSat Thermal System Michael Belcher Thermal Lead December 11, 2002.
Advertisements

Aug.19, 1999 George T. Roach Integration Mission Design Center NASA- GSFC Code 543 Greenbelt, MD FAX
Delta II –7920 Fitup Study Model TMA-56 f10 optics In-Line configuration Delta II Launch Vehicle 7920 H 10L Composite Fairing.
V. Carassiti - Princeton (USA) 9-13/01/ BABAR IFR UPGRADE DETECTOR ASSEMBLING AND MOUNTING.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Mass Savings and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Preparation for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) 100 gram Case Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold]
Removable truss has 15mm thick gussets, all other gussets on the structure are 10mm thick. The first mode is 246.4Hz Removable truss has 15mm thick gussets,
Thermal Modeling and Model Correlation of the LORRI Telescope
Active Seismic Isolation Systems for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Jeffrey S. Kissel 1 for the LSC 1 Louisiana State University The mechanical system for.
SPP FIELDS V5 Antenna Mechanical Peer Review David Glaser, Paul Turin, Jeremy McCauley, John Bonnell, Dennis Seitz SSL UCB 7/17/13.
Space Frame Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 11/04/04.
1 Mirror subsystem: telescope structure Functions: Functions: Support mirrors subsystem to S/C Support mirrors subsystem to S/C Accommodate cryostat Accommodate.
SAM PDR1 SAM LGS Mechanical Design A. Montane, A. Tokovinin, H. Ochoa SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Telescope Mechanical Design Albert Lin The Aerospace Corporation Mechanical Engineer (310)
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
Determinate Space Frame Telescope Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 7/28/04.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Kelly Leffel 3/0509 Structures and Thermal Lunar Descent Phase Lander Integration Lander Thermal Control Kelly Leffel Structures and.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Section Mechanical Systems X-LAT Assy1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Mechanical.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 5.1 Grid Box Design 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Tomelleri S.r.l. ® Copyright 2007 © ASTRONOMY AND RESEARCH September 19th 2008 VST Meeting1.
SAM PDR1 S OAR Adaptive Module LGS LGSsystem Andrei Tokovinin SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring Robert Besuner 12 August 2004.
Apr 17-22, NAOJ SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.
After considerable pushing and shoving, this configuration show some promise. I have taken some liberties with the geometry and turned mounts inside-out.
WFIRST Telescope Study Preliminary Analysis Renaud Goullioud, Gary Kuan, Jim Moore, Eric Sunada, Juan Villalvazo, Zensheu Chang JPL in collaboration with.
Sept. 2008EFW INST+SOC PDR IDPU Chassis Mechanical Design and Development Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL
CLAS12-RICH Mechanical Design Status-Report CLAS12 RICH Review September 5-6 th 2013 S. Tomassini, D. Orecchini1 D. Orecchini, S. Tomassini.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Effect of Charging on Thermal Noise Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Core Optics and Suspensions Working Groups - March 19, 2004 –
An alternative spectrograph mount Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/14/04.
1 About this model This model employs 3 inverted ‘bipods’ for baffle. Bipods in quotes because legs are not pinned at ends, but are fixed-fixed. No skins.
Main Electronics Package
S-17 Reference Model Status Robin Lafever 21 October 2004.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Section Mechanical Systems Radiator Assy1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Mechanical.
Jeff Bolognese p1 Super Nova/Acceleration Probe 16 November 2001 Structural Analysis Jeff Bolognese 16 November 2001.
1 Using In-situ Cryogenic Radiometers to Measure the Performance of a Large Thermal Vacuum Chamber Michael DiPirro 1, Edgar Canavan 1, James Tuttle 1,
IRMOS Diffraction Grating Integral Tab Design  Performance of an optical system is highly sensitive to the surface distortion of the optics in the system.
Mass Simulator Concepts Robert Besuner 12 October 2005.
NST PRIMARY MIRROR CELL: ANALYSIS AND SOLUTIONS BBSO, 02/05/2004.
SuperNova / Acceleration Probe Thermal System Wes Ousley November 16, 2001.
Fracture and Creep in an All- Tungsten Divertor for ARIES Jake Blanchard University of Wisconsin – Madison August 2012.
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
109-IDPU-Chassis-Donakowski 1 30 Sep – 01 Oct 2009DRAFT RBSP EFW ICDR 109-IDPU-Chassis-Donakowski IDPU Chassis Mechanical Design and Development Bill Donakowski.
WFIRST Large-cell structure concept design Preview Work in progress 3/4/2016Robin Lafever1.
STEREO IMPACT SEP Critical Design Review 2002-Nov-21/22 TvR1 SEP Mechanical Design Sandy Shuman, GSFC ) Tycho.
AMS TRD GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM BOX_S Mechanical Structure Corrado Gargiulo* Robert Becker** *INFN Roma1 **MIT CERN, July AMS TRD GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 535 IDPU Chassis Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL.
DON LYNCH NOVEMBER 6, AGENDA November 4, BABAR Magnet Update Global Design Concept – Update Outer HCal Structural Analysis (2 nd pass) sPHENIX.
Increased Thermal Background for the post-NCS NICMOS TIPS – June 19, 2003 Megan Sosey NICMOS.
JWST ISIM Primary Structure and Kinematic Mount Configuration Jonathan Kuhn, Tim Carnahan NASA/GSFC Code 542 Andrew Bartoszyk, Steve Hendricks, Charles.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Drawing of the Space Infrared Telescope for Cosmology and Astrophysics (SPICA)
Cloudland Instruments Hawkeye Mechanical Design Snapshot Compiled April 8th, 2016.
MAP Assembly Investigation A project summary for discussion during 4/11/2014 meeting.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CDR v1 Telescope Mechanical Design Albert Lin The Aerospace Corporation Mechanical Engineer (310)
SPS High Energy LSS5 Thermal contact & cooling aspects
Wide-Field Imager for Solar PRobe Plus (WISPR)
Telescope - Mechanical
Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL
Point Source Transmission Simulations on the COROT baffle
MECHANICAL DRAWING WORKING DRAWINGS
Thermal Shield Connection Study
By Arsalan Jamialahmadi
Hawkeye Mechanical Design Snapshot
What type of spacecraft is this? What might be its purpose?
Jesper Schou Instrument Scientist
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
1/10 prototype support tube
STO2 Thermal Desktop Model
Another Modular Focal Plane: Part 2 – FP assembly
What type of spacecraft is this? What might be its purpose?
Unit 6 #2.4 Engineering/CAD.
Presentation transcript:

Lower Baffle Robert Besuner 26 August 2004

2Background/Purpose This study follows on to 12 August study of the Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring. —In that study, the ring was assumed to be separate from lower baffle. —Main purpose of that study was to look at how the various components of the observatory might be supported on the ground. Discussions indicate it’s preferable to make the ring be integral with the lower baffle. —More structurally efficient. —Should not require much delta T or thermal isolation from spacecraft. General requirement for lower baffle design: —Should have removable access panels to allow ample access to lower optics bay. —Remaining structure should be spartan, but still able to handle expected ground loads. —Meet launch load requirements with access panels in place. —Closes out the aft end of the telescope (only vaguely addressed here).

3 Lower Baffle, Closeouts in Place Aluminum assembly, except Ti thermal standoffs. Upper and lower rings are nominally 150mm x 75mm x 3mm angle sections. Lower ring is 6mm thick by opening (purple). Columns are 100mm x 75 mm x 3mm box sections, with gussets. Closeouts are 1mm thick. 79.0kg total: 29.7kg lower ring 18.7kg upper ring 19.3kg columns 11.3kg closeouts

4 Lower Baffle, Closeouts Removed Aluminum assembly, except Ti thermal standoffs. Upper and lower rings are nominally 150mm x 75mm x 3mm angle sections. Lower ring is 6mm thick by opening (purple). Columns are 100mm x 75 mm x 3mm box sections, with gussets. Closeouts are 1mm thick. 79.0kg total: 29.7kg lower ring 18.7kg upper ring 19.3kg columns 11.3kg closeouts

5 Lower Baffle, OTA Dummy Aluminum assembly, except Ti thermal standoffs. Upper and lower rings are nominally 150mm x 75mm x 3mm angle sections. Lower ring is 6mm thick by opening (purple). Columns are 100mm x 75 mm x 3mm box sections, with gussets. Closeouts are 1mm thick. 79.0kg total: 29.7kg lower ring 18.7kg upper ring 19.3kg columns 11.3kg closeouts

6 Lower Baffle, OTA, Upper Baffle Aluminum assembly, except Ti thermal standoffs. Upper and lower rings are nominally 150mm x 75mm x 3mm angle sections. Lower ring is 6mm thick by opening (purple). Columns are 100mm x 75 mm x 3mm box sections, with gussets. Closeouts are 1mm thick. 79.0kg total: 29.7kg lower ring 18.7kg upper ring 19.3kg columns 11.3kg closeouts

7 Lower Baffle, OTA, Upper Baffle, Radiator Aluminum assembly, except Ti thermal standoffs. Upper and lower rings are nominally 150mm x 75mm x 3mm angle sections. Lower ring is 6mm thick by opening (purple). Columns are 100mm x 75 mm x 3mm box sections, with gussets. Closeouts are 1mm thick. 79.0kg total: 29.7kg lower ring 18.7kg upper ring 19.3kg columns 11.3kg closeouts

8 Lower Baffle, OTA, Upper Baffle, Radiator Aluminum assembly, except Ti thermal standoffs. Upper and lower rings are nominally 150mm x 75mm x 3mm angle sections. Lower ring is 6mm thick by opening (purple). Columns are 100mm x 75 mm x 3mm box sections, with gussets. Closeouts are 1mm thick. 79.0kg total: 29.7kg lower ring 18.7kg upper ring 19.3kg columns 11.3kg closeouts

9 Lower Baffle Details 3mm thick columns/gussets 6mm thick angle 3mm thick angle 3mm thick gussets 8mm thick mounting/handling surfaces 1.5mm thick Ti thermal standoffs

10 Deformation in 1g held by GSE (baffle displacement~2.6mm)

11 Baffle/OTA Assembly Mode 1, 20Hz

12 Baffle/OTA Assembly Mode 2, 23Hz

13 Material Safety Factors

14Conclusion Lower baffle assembly shown here is mechanically viable. Complete closing out of light needs to be addressed. Thermal performance should be confirmed.