Dynamical equilibration of strongly- interacting ‘infinite’ parton matter Vitalii Ozvenchuk, in collaboration with E.Bratkovskaya, O.Linnyk, M.Gorenstein,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep , 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.
Advertisements

Supported by DOE 11/22/2011 QGP viscosity at RHIC and LHC energies 1 Huichao Song 宋慧超 Seminar at the Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC.
Hard Photon Production in a Chemically Equilibrating QGP at Finite Baryon Density Zejun He Zejun He Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics Research Chinese.
Effects of Bulk Viscosity on p T -Spectra and Elliptic Flow Parameter Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Japan Collaborator:
First Alice Physics Week, Erice, Dec 4  9, Heavy  Flavor (c,b) Collectivity at RHIC and LHC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg A. Dainese,
The speed of sound in a magnetized hot Quark-Gluon-Plasma Based on: Neda Sadooghi Department of Physics Sharif University of Technology Tehran-Iran.
DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.
Wolfgang Cassing CERN, Properties of the sQGP at RHIC and LHC energies.
Freeze-Out in a Hybrid Model Freeze-out Workshop, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Hannah Petersen.
Hagedorn states and Thermalization DM2010, High Density Nuclear Matter, Stellenbosch, South Africa (courtesy L. Ferroni)
Heavy Flavors at FAIR Elena Bratkovskaya , WE-Heraeus-Seminar „Characterization of the Quark Gluon Plasma with Heavy Quarks‘‘, Bad Honnef (Germany)
QCD Equation of State - Impact on elliptic flow and transverse momentum spectra Marcus Bluhm Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf Comparison with lattice.
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
Has the critical temperature of the QCD phase transition been measured ?
Collective Flow Effects and Energy Loss in ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Zhe Xu USTC, Hefei, July 11, 2008 with A. El, O. Fochler, C. Greiner.
QCD thermodynamic on the lattice and the hadron resonance gas Péter Petreczky Physics Department and RIKEN-BNL Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, Ocho.
Space time evolution of QCD matter Parton cascade with stochastic algorithm Transport rates and momentum isotropization Thermalization of gluons due to.
WWND, San Diego1 Scaling Characteristics of Azimuthal Anisotropy at RHIC Michael Issah SUNY Stony Brook for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Generalized Entropy and Transport Coefficients of Hadronic Matter Azwinndini Muronga 1,2 1 Centre for Theoretical Physics & Astrophysics Department of.
Viscous hydrodynamics DPF 2009 Huichao Song The Ohio State University Supported by DOE 07/30/2009 July 27-July 31, Detroit, MI with shear and bulk viscosity.
Marcus Bleicher, CCAST- Workshop 2004 Strangeness Dynamics and Transverse Pressure in HIC Marcus Bleicher Institut für Theoretische Physik Goethe Universität.
M. Beitel, K. Gallmeister, CG, arXiv: in collaboration with: M. Beitel, K. Gallmeister and J. Noronha-Hostler - history of Hagedorn States - nuclear.
Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model LongGang Pang 1, Victor Roy 1,, Guang-You Qin 1, & Xin-Nian.
Longitudinal de-correlation of anisotropic flow in Pb+Pb collisions Victor Roy ITP Goethe University Frankfurt In collaboration with L-G Pang, G-Y Qin,
STRING PERCOLATION AND THE GLASMA C.Pajares Dept Particle Physics and IGFAE University Santiago de Compostela CERN The first heavy ion collisions at the.
Workshop for Particle Correlations and Femtoscopy 2011
Higher moments of net-charge multiplicity distributions at RHIC energies in STAR Nihar R. Sahoo, VECC, India (for the STAR collaboration) 1 Nihar R. Sahoo,
Study of the QCD Phase Structure through High Energy Heavy Ion Collisions Bedanga Mohanty National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER)
Lecture 10 : Statistical thermal model Hadron multiplicities and their correlations and fluctuations (event-by-event) are observables which can provide.
Photon production in heavy-ion collisions Elena Bratkovskaya Institut für Theoretische Physik & FIAS, Uni. Frankfurt EMMI Workshop ‚Ab initio approaches.
Marcus Bleicher, TBS Berkeley 2005 What have we learned from transport models? Marcus Bleicher Institut für Theoretische Physik Goethe Universität Frankfurt.
Shear Viscosity and Viscous Entropy Production in Hot QGP at Finite Density 报告人: 刘 绘 华中师范大学 粒子所.
Effects of bulk viscosity in causal viscous hydrodynamics Jianwei Li, Yugang Ma and Guoliang Ma Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, CAS 1. Motivation.
Wolfgang Cassing Erice Parton dynamics and hadronization from the sQGP.
Lattice2014T. Umeda (Hiroshima) Thermodynamics in the fixed scale approach with the shifted boundary conditions Takashi Umeda (Hiroshima Univ.) Lattice2014,
Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model Victor Roy Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China Collaborators.
Olena Linnyk Charm dynamics from transport calculations Symposium and 10th CBM Collaboration Meeting September 25 – 28, 2007.
Parton-Hadron-String-Dynamics at NICA energies Elena Bratkovskaya Institut für Theoretische Physik, Uni. Frankfurt Round Table Discussion IV: Round Table.
Electromagnetic and strong probes of compressed baryonic matter at SIS100 energies Elena Bratkovskaya Institut für Theoretische Physik, Uni. Frankfurt.
Does HBT interferometry probe thermalization? Clément Gombeaud, Tuomas Lappi and J-Y Ollitrault IPhT Saclay WPCF 2009, CERN, October 16, 2009.
Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL
Robert Pak (BNL) 2012 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting 0 Energy Ro Robert Pak for PHENIX Collaboration.
Scaling of Elliptic Flow for a fluid at Finite Shear Viscosity V. Greco M. Colonna M. Di Toro G. Ferini From the Coulomb Barrier to the Quark-Gluon Plasma,
Elliptic flow and shear viscosity in a parton cascade approach G. Ferini INFN-LNS, Catania P. Castorina, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, V. Greco.
Shear and Bulk Viscosities of Hot Dense Matter Joe Kapusta University of Minnesota New Results from LHC and RHIC, INT, 25 May 2010.
Heavy-Ion Physics - Hydrodynamic Approach Introduction Hydrodynamic aspect Observables explained Recombination model Summary 전남대 이강석 HIM
School of Collective Dynamics in High-Energy CollisionsLevente Molnar, Purdue University 1 Effect of resonance decays on the extracted kinetic freeze-out.
Olena Linnyk Charmonium in heavy ion collisions 16 July 2007.
Budapest, 4-9 August 2005Quark Matter 2005 HBT search for new states of matter in A+A collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev Based on the paper S.V. Akkelin,
JET Collaboration Meeting June 17-18, 2014, UC-Davis1/25 Flow and “Temperature” of the Parton Phase from AMPT Zi-Wei Lin Department of Physics East Carolina.
QGP-Meet’06, VECC, Kolkata. 6 th Feb-2006 RAGHUNATH SAHOO, INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, BHUBANESWAR TRANSVERSE ENERGY PRODUCTION AT RHIC OUTLINE: Introduction.
PHENIX Results from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan Brett Fadem for the PHENIX Collaboration Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics 2016.
Shear Viscosity and Collective Flow in Heavy Ion Collisions within Parton Cascade Calculations Zhe Xu, Carsten Greiner Trento, Sept. 17, 2009 Institut.
Olena Linnyk Probing hot QCD matter with dileptons using PHSD aproach Thermal Radiation Workshop.
Olena Linnyk Parton-hadron matter in and out of equilibrium.
Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Collaborator: Tetsufumi Hirano V iscous Hydrodynamic Evolution with Non-Boost Invariant Flow.
Deconfinement and chiral transition in finite temperature lattice QCD Péter Petreczky Deconfinement and chiral symmetry restoration are expected to happen.
1 QCD and Heavy-Ion Collisions Elena Bratkovskaya Institut für Theoretische Physik & FIAS, Uni. Frankfurt The international workshop 'Monte Carlo methods.
Dynamics of Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at CBM energies Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies Elena Bratkovskaya , CBM Workshop „ The Physics.
Elliptic flow from initial states of fast nuclei. A.B. Kaidalov ITEP, Moscow (based on papers with K.Boreskov and O.Kancheli) K.Boreskov and O.Kancheli)
Workshop on Modeling of the Parton-Hadron Phase Transition The Summary
Tomography of the Quark-Gluon-Plasma by Charm Quarks
Effects of Bulk Viscosity at Freezeout
Charmed hadron signals of partonic medium
Charmonium dynamics in heavy ion collisions
Effect of equilibrium phase transition on multiphase transport in relativistic heavy ion collisions 喻 梅 凌 华中师范大学粒子物理研究所 2019/2/24 第十届全国粒子物理大会 桂林.
Production of Multi-Strange Hyperons at FAIR Energies.
Strong Magnetic Fields in HIC
Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica, Bari (Italy)
A possible approach to the CEP location
Presentation transcript:

Dynamical equilibration of strongly- interacting ‘infinite’ parton matter Vitalii Ozvenchuk, in collaboration with E.Bratkovskaya, O.Linnyk, M.Gorenstein, W.Cassing NeD Symposium, 26 June 2012 Hersonissos, Crete, Greece 1

From hadrons to partons In order to study of the phase transition from hadronic to partonic matter – Quark-Gluon-Plasma – we need a consistent non-equilibrium (transport) model with  explicit parton-parton interactions (i.e. between quarks and gluons) beyond strings!  explicit phase transition from hadronic to partonic degrees of freedom  lQCD EoS for partonic phase Parton-Hadron-String-Dynamics (PHSD) QGP phase described by Dynamical QuasiParticle Model DQPM Dynamical QuasiParticle Model (DQPM) Transport theory: off-shell Kadanoff-Baym equations for the Green- functions S < h (x,p) in phase-space representation for the partonic and hadronic phase A. Peshier, W. Cassing, PRL 94 (2005) ; A. Peshier, W. Cassing, PRL 94 (2005) ; Cassing, NPA 791 (2007) 365: NPA 793 (2007) Cassing, NPA 791 (2007) 365: NPA 793 (2007) W. Cassing, E. Bratkovskaya, PRC 78 (2008) ; NPA831 (2009) 215; W. Cassing, EPJ ST 168 (2009) 3 2

The Dynamical QuasiParticle Model (DQPM) Peshier, Cassing, PRL 94 (2005) ; Cassing, NPA 791 (2007) 365: NPA 793 (2007) Peshier, Cassing, PRL 94 (2005) ; Cassing, NPA 791 (2007) 365: NPA 793 (2007)  Quasiparticle properties: large width and mass for gluons and quarks large width and mass for gluons and quarks DQPM matches well lattice QCD DQPM matches well lattice QCD DQPM provides mean-fields (1PI) for gluons and quarks DQPM provides mean-fields (1PI) for gluons and quarks as well as effective 2-body interactions (2PI) DQPM gives transition rates for the formation of hadrons  PHSD DQPM gives transition rates for the formation of hadrons  PHSD Basic idea: Interacting quasiparticles - massive quarks and gluons (g, q, q bar ) with spectral functions - massive quarks and gluons (g, q, q bar ) with spectral functions  fit to lattice (lQCD) results (e.g. entropy density) 3

DQPM thermodynamics (N f =3) entropy  pressure P energy density: interaction measure: DQPM gives a good description of lQCD results ! DQPM gives a good description of lQCD results ! lQCD: Wuppertal-Budapest group Y. Aoki et al., JHEP 0906 (2009) 088. T C =160 MeV e C =0.5 GeV/fm 3 4

PHSD in a box  study of the dynamical equilibration of strongly- interacting parton matter within the PHSD Goal Realization  a cubic box with periodic boundary conditions  various values for quark chemical potential and energy density  the size of the box is fixed to 9 3 fm 3 5

Initialization  light(u,d) and strange quarks, antiquarks and gluons  ratios between the different quark flavors are e.g.  random space positions of partons 6

Initial momentum distributions and abundancies  the initial momentum distributions and abundancies of partons are given by a ‘thermal’ distribution: where - spectral function - Bose and Fermi distributions  four-momenta are distributed according to the distribution by Monte Carlo simulations  initial number of partons is given  initial parameters:, which define the total energy 7

8 Elastic cross sections  cross sections at high energy density are in the order of 2-3 mb but become large close to the critical energy density Partonic interactions in PHSD Inelastic channels     Breit-Wigner cross section

9 Detailed balance  The reactions rates are practically constant and obey detailed balance for  The elastic collisions lead to the thermalization of all pacticle species (e.g. u, d, s quarks and antiquarks and gluons)  The numbers of partons dynamically reach their equilibrium values through the inelastic collisions  gluon splitting  quark + antiquark fusion              

10 Chemical equilibrium  A sign of chemical equilibrium is the stabilization of the numbers of partons of the different species in time  The final abundancies vary with energy density

Chemical equilibration of strange partons  the slow increase of the total number of strange quarks and antiquarks reflects long equilibration time through inelastic processes involving strange partons  the initial rate for is suppressed by a factor of 9 11

12 Dynamical phase transition & different intializations  the transition from partonic to hadronic degrees-of-freedom is complete after about 9 fm/c  a small non-vanishing fraction of partons – local fluctuations of energy density from cell to cell  the equilibrium values of the parton numbers do not depend on the initial flavor ratios  our calculations are stable with respect to the different initializations

13 Thermal equilibration  DQPM predictions can be evaluated:

14 Spectral function  the dynamical spectral function is well described by the DQPM form in the fermionic sector for time-like partons

15 Deviation in the gluonic sector  the inelastic collisions are more important at higher parton energies  the elastic scattering rate of gluons is lower than that of quarks  the inelastic interaction of partons generates a mass-dependent width for the gluon spectral function in contrast to the DQPM assumption of the constant width

16 Equation of state  the equation of state implemented in PHSD is well in agreement with the DQPM and the lQCD results and includes the potential energy density from the DQPM lQCD data from S. Borsanyi et al., JHEP 1009, 073 (2010); JHEP 1011, 077 (2010)

17  scaled variance:  the scaled variances reach a plateau in time for all observables  due to the initially lower abundance of strange quarks the respective scaled variance is initially larger Scaled variance ω

18 Scaled variance ω  scaled variance:  the scaled variances reach a plateau in time for all observables  due to the initially lower abundance of strange quarks the respective scaled variance is initially larger

19 Fractions of the total energy  a larger energy fraction is stored in all charged particles than in gluons  the difference decreases with the energy due to the higher relative fraction of gluon energy

20 Cell dependence of scaled variance ω  the impact of total energy conservation in the box volume V is relaxed in the sub-volume V n.  for all scaled variances for large number of cells due to the fluctuations of the energy in the sub-volume V n.

21 Shear viscosity The Kubo formula for the shear viscosity is The expression for the shear tensor is The shear tensor in PHSD can be calculated:

22 Shear viscosity to entropy density

23 Summary  Partonic systems at energy densities, which are above the critical energy density achieve kinetic and chemical equilibrium in time  For all observables the equilibration time is found to be shorter for the scaled variances than for the average values  The scaled variances for the fluctuations in the number of different partons in the box show an influence of the total energy conservation  The scaled variances for all observables approach the Poissonian limit when the cell volume is much smaller than that of the box  The procedure of extracting of the shear viscosity from the microscopic simulations as well as the ratio of the shear viscosity to the entropy density are presented

Back up 24

25 Equilibration times  fit the explicit time dependence of the abundances and scaled variances ω by  for all particles species and energy densities, the equilibration time is shorter for the scaled variance than for the average values

PHSD: Transverse mass spectra Central Pb + Pb at SPS energies 26  PHSD gives harder m T spectra and works better than HSD at high energies – RHIC, SPS (and top FAIR, NICA) – RHIC, SPS (and top FAIR, NICA)  however, at low SPS (and low FAIR, NICA) energies the effect of the partonic phase decreases due to the decrease of the partonic fraction Central Au+Au at RHIC W. Cassing & E. Bratkovskaya, NPA 831 (2009) 215 E. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing, V. Konchakovski, O. Linnyk, NPA856 (2011)

Partonic phase at SPS/FAIR/NICA energies partonic energy fraction vs centrality and energy Dramatic decrease of partonic phase with decreasing energy and/or centrality ! Cassing & Bratkovskaya, NPA 831 (2009) all y

Elliptic flow scaling at RHIC 28 The scaling of v 2 with the number of constituent quarks n q is roughly in line with the data E. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing, V. Konchakovski, O. Linnyk, NPA856 (2011) 162

29 Finite quark chemical potentials  the phase transition happens at the same critical energy ε c for all μ q  in the present version the DQPM and PHSD treat the quark-hadron transition as a smooth crossover at all μ q

30 Finite quark chemical potentials  the phase transition happens at the same critical energy ε c for all μ q  in the present version the DQPM and PHSD treat the quark-hadron transition as a smooth crossover at all μ q