Mark J. Schultz, P.E. Chief, Environmental Assessment and Contaminant Control Branch Dust Division Mine Safety and Health Administration Pittsburgh Safety.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An innovative tool for the review of health and safety work practices and the implementation of effective controls of particulate exposures.
Advertisements

Investigation of Coal Dust Mitigation Strategies
MSHA - Revised Policies and Procedures for the Prevention of Coal Dust Explosions April 1, 2013.
Exposure Assessment: A Statistical Validation of Mercury Exposures in the Workplace An Analysis of Potential Workplace Exposure to Mercury from Broken.
District 7 Informational Meeting Rock Dusting. Why Rock Dust?
Passive Seismic Imaging for Determination of the Longwall Rear Abutment Location E. Westman, J. Kerr, K. Luxbacher, and S. Schafrik Mining and Minerals.
OVERVIEW AUSTRALIAN BLACK COAL MINING OPERATIONS Ken Cram Project Manager Coal Services Pty Limited.
Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS). RCS What is it? Why should we be concerned about it? Where might we be exposed to it? What can we do about it? –Best.
Booster fan applications for sections in longwall and room-and-pillar mining Christopher Pritchard MS PE Acting Team Lead Ventilation Group Fires and Explosions.
MSHA Criteria for Citations Flagrant Violations As Required by the Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Design Optimization of Longwall Chain Pillars
Part 2 - Dilution Ventilation (General Ventilation)
Dust Division Pittsburgh Safety and Health Technology Center Mark Schultz Senior Mining Engineer.
Confined Space Ventilation Are We Really Moving Air, or Just Making Ourselves Feel Good?
1 2 Outline Airflow Measurements –How to take air readings –Measuring areas –Mean Entry Velocity Principals of Airflow When and Where to take Air Measurements.
PROPOSED DUST RULES DEPARTMENT of LABOR Mine Safety & Health Administration Coal Mine Safety & Health DEPARTMENT of LABOR Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Control of Airborne Respirable Dust Hazards: A Training Program for Underground Coal Miners The Penn State Miner Training Program University Park, PA
Technical Study Panel on the Utilization of Belt Air and the Composition and Fire Retardant Properties of Belt Materials in Underground Coal Mining FINAL.
Control of Airborne Respirable Dust Hazards: A Training Program for Underground Coal Miners The Penn State Miner Training Program University Park, PA
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE – METHODS OF CONTROL
Belt Air Federal Advisory Committee Briefing Ronald Reagan Building Washington, DC January 9-10, 2007.
Indoor Firing Ranges Training Education Recommended Practices.
Control of Airborne Respirable Dust Hazards: A Training Program for Underground Coal Miners The Penn State Miner Training Program University Park, PA
Eliminating and Controlling Dust & Noise Hazards July 2002.
You will work in groups All groups play…In turn…Out of turn Scoring (In Turn)…Right – 4 chips Wrong – loss 2 chips Help…50/ chips… Ask the Group.
This presentation is for illustrative and general educational purposes only and is not intended to substitute for the official MSHA Investigation Report.
Occupational Health & Industrial Hygiene Programs.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment Summary from CSM on Human Action And Intrusion.
Using Belt Air to Ventilate Active Working Areas.
Choking Pressure Ratio Guidelines for Small Critical Flow Venturis
Prevention through Design (PtD) for Hazards in Construction
Chapter 4. Subsurface Ventilation Systems Mine Ventilation and Safety Jiangxi University of Science and Technology 1 Review for Last Classes 
Occupational Health (North America) 18 th International Lead Conference June 2013 Robert Steinwurtzel and Thomas Hogan
Preventing Silicosis in the Mining Environment. 1.Prevention of Silicosis to Improve Mine Workers Health and Quality of Life. 2. Compliance with MSHA.
Contestant Briefing Hello I am ______and this is ________. You are to conduct a Pre-shift examination of the Bee No. 1 head gate section, for the oncoming.
RESPONSIBLE PERSON TRAINING. Review of § Emergency Evacuations.
DIRECTIONAL LIFELINES Kenneth A. Sproul MSHA Approval & Certification Center Mine Escape Planning and Emergency Shelters Workshop April 18, 2006.
AMERICAN COAL MINE SAFETY
SOME CRITICAL ISSUES OF THE INDIAN COAL MINING INDUSTRY PREPARED BY : KALYANI JHA.
1 Hiearchy of Controls Benefitting Safety, Health & Environment.
Division of Teacher and Leader Excellence TESTS FOR STATE-ISSUED HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMAS Peter Shulman, Chief Talent Officer Robert Higgins, Director, Office.
Control of Airborne Respirable Dust Hazards: A Training Program for Underground Coal Miners The Penn State Miner Training Program University Park, PA
Control of Airborne Respirable Dust Hazards: A Training Program for Underground Coal Miners The Penn State Miner Training Program University Park, PA
On-Shift Examination Scenario Continuous Miner Section What you will need: Pencil and paper to take notes or perform calculations Calculator to calculate.
Acceptable Exposure Limits …extrapolation of toxicological data to recommendations for limits for occupational exposures.
Dust Control Training Program for Underground Personnel
Penn State The Penn State Miner Training Program
Black Lung February, 2009 WV Coal Association Charleston, WV TMTM The findings and conclusions in this poster have not been formally disseminated by NIOSH.
Effects of Breathing on an Interferometer Susan Gosse Daniel Freno Junior Lab II.
Belt Air Federal Advisory Committee Briefing Ronald Reagan Building Washington, DC January 9-10, 2007.
Mine Emergency Preparedness Training Mine Recovery.
Pre-Shift Examination Scenario Continuous Miner Section What you will need to complete this exercise: Pencil and paper to take notes or perform calculations.
MSHA 2008 Six Final Rules Sealing of Abandoned Areas Mine Rescue Teams Mine Rescue Team Equipment Fire Extinguishers in UG Coal Mines Asbestos Exposure.
Control of Airborne Respirable Dust Hazards: A Training Program for Underground Coal Miners The Penn State Miner Training Program University Park, PA
Lead Pipe Disposal. Overview Background and Project Requirements Top 5 Designs Detailed Final Design Social and Environmental Factors Testing of Design.
This presentation is for illustrative and general educational purposes only and is not intended to substitute for the official MSHA Investigation Report.
OSHA Final Rule: Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica OSHA has amended its existing standards for occupational exposure to respirable.
Excavation & Trenching Awareness Plus
You will work in groups All groups play…In turn…Out of turn Scoring (In Turn)…Right – 4 chips Wrong – loss 2 chips Help…50/ chips… Ask the Group.
Measurement of Transport in the PME EPA03 Task 2.B
Who Wants to be a Miner? Sample Question You will work in groups
Workplace Examinations
Penn State The Penn State Miner Training Program
West Gate Tunnel – Air quality expert evidence
Ventilating The Face Area
Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment
Penn State The Penn State Miner Training Program
Contributions to total changes in emissions of ozone precursors
Wyoming Mining Association
M. Wang, J. Wood, J. Hale, L. Petsonk, and M. Attfield
Presentation transcript:

Mark J. Schultz, P.E. Chief, Environmental Assessment and Contaminant Control Branch Dust Division Mine Safety and Health Administration Pittsburgh Safety and Health Technology Center Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA “Field Group”

Health Effects of Utilizing Belt Air in Underground Coal Mines Effects on Dust Concentrations when utilizing belt air to ventilate the working face.

Current Standard – Each operator shall continuously maintain the average concentration of respirable dust in the mine atmosphere during each shift to which each miner in the active workings is exposed at or below 2.0 mg/m 3 of respirable dust.

Mine Ventilation is used to Dilute and Render Harmless All Noxious Gases Dusts!!!!

Dust Concentrations are Inversely Proportional to Air Quantity Double the Air Quantity, Concentration is Cut in Half!!! N X Air Quantity = 1/N Concentration N=2 2 Quantity = ½ Concentration

Dilution is a very powerful tool used in Dust Control!

Background History Early 1990’s, Robert Haney gave a presentation to the belt air advisory committee on the same topic. He issued a paper titled “Effect of Belt Air On Dust Levels In Underground Coal Mines”

In this paper, Mr. Haney states that the Belt Air Advisory Committee concluded that the use of belt air could increase or decrease dust levels; however, the change would not have a significant impact on face worker dust exposures.

The committee further recommended that a designated area with a 1.0 mg/m 3 standard be established when belt air is used to ventilate the face. This designated area would be in the belt entry just outby the section tailpiece

This designated area would enforce the same intake standard mandated in (b) (b) Each operator shall continuously maintain the average concentration of respirable dust within 200 feet outby the working faces of each section in the intake airways at or below 1.0 mg/m3 …. Belt tailpieces are generally located more than 200 feet outby the working face.

Advisory Committee Addressed 3 Specific Health Related Concerns The effect on intake dust levels when belt air is used at the face; The effect on worker exposure when belt air is used at the face; and, The potential entrainment of dust in the belt entry.

SIP Spot Inspection Program From August thru September, 1991, MSHA conducted the SIP Program Purpose of the SIP was to assess actual dust levels and the extent of dust controls in the coal mining industry.

What Effect does Belt Air have on Intake Dust levels when Belt Air is Used to Ventilate the Face?

Results of the SIP When Utilizing Belt Air Intake dust concentrations –Intake dust concentrations were 0.18 mg/m 3 higher on continuous miner sections when using belt air to ventilate the faces –Intake dust concentrations were 0.12 mg/m 3 higher on longwall sections when using belt air to ventilate the faces

Longwall Intake Dust Concentrations (6 Longwalls surveyed) all used belt air to ventilate the face Intake Dust concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 0.4 mg/m 3 Belt Intake Air concentrations ranged from 0.4 to 1.2 mg/m 3 Combined Intake concentrations ranged form 0.1 to 0.5 mg/m 3 Belt Air contributed 0.1 to 0.3 mg/m 3 to face dust levels. –Belt Air Quantities were significantly lower than Intake Entry Air Quantities

Longwall Face Dust Concentrations Sources 6 mines surveyed Intake Air 0.1 to 0.4 mg/m 3 Belt Air 0.1 to 0.3 mg/m 3 Combined Intake 0.1 to 0.5 mg/m 3 Crusher/Stageloader0.5 to 1.3 mg/m 3 Face Contributions1.8 to 11.3 mg/m 3 –Committee’s conclusion – belt air was not a significant dust source on the longwall compared to other face dust sources

Recent NIOSH Publication Dust Control on Longwalls – assessment of the state-of-the-art J.P. Rider & J.F. Colinett Studied 8 longwalls –4 used belt air as intake air and 4 ventilated belt air to the return

Results Survey Results showed –Intake Belt Air Intake 0.18 mg/m 3 Belt 0.40 mg/m 3 -Return Belt Air Highest 0.34 mg/m 3 Most below 0.20 mg/m 3

Paper concluded – “Although the average dust levels in the belt entry are relatively low, the belt entry has the potential to add to face dust levels. However, according to past research studies (Potts and Jankowski, 1992) potential increases in face dust levels seemed to be negated by the potential for increased dilution with the additional air reaching the face.’

Effect on Worker Dust Exposure when Belt Air is used to Ventilate the Face SIP - Designated Occupations –Designated occupation dust concentration on continuous miner sections were 0.64 mg/m 3 lower. –Designated occupation dust concentrations on longwall sections were 0.33 mg/m 3 lower. Although the intake dust concentrations increased when using belt air to ventilate the faces, the additional air helped to dilute the Designated Operator’s dust exposures!

Entrainment and Reentrainment of Dust in Belt Entries Entrainment of dust occurs during the cutting, crushing and breaking of material. Reentrainment occurs when dust that has initially been suspended settles and then becomes airborne dust again. Longwall belt was chosen to look at this because it represents a worse case scenario. –Higher tonnages and higher belt speeds!

Entrainment/ Reentrainment Study SIP - 2 longwall belts studied Looked at inby and outby dust concentrations along a belt line Belts were approximately 2000 feet long Relative velocities of 750 to 940 ft/min –Belt speed (825 fpm) added to air velocities ( fpm)

Results Concluded 0.1 to 0.2 mg/m 3 increase in dust Outby dust sources were much higher contributors to dust 0.8 to 1.0 mg/m 3 –Belt Transfer Studies indicated that belt air dust sources were primarily due to outby transfer points Reentrainment was not significant dust source

Advisory Summary The use of belt air will generally cause the combined intake dust level to increase. If the belt air concentration is greater than the intake air concentration, the combined intake will increase. This increase, however, should not have a significant impact on a mine’s ability to meet the 1.0 mg/m 3 dust standard.

Advisory Summary - continued The use of belt air could increase or decrease the exposure at the face depending on the specific section's dust control and ventilation configuration. Any increase would not exceed the increase in the combined intake dust concentration.

Advisory Summary - continued The air velocities that will result when belt air is used to ventilate the face will typically not be high enough to cause entrainment of dust in the belt entry. Additionally, the removal of box checks would remove restrictions that cause localized high velocities. This should reduce the amount of dust entrainment taking place in the belt entry.

Advisory Summary - continued If increased entry velocity is caused by restriction, dust levels as a result of entrainment can increase. If increased entry velocity results from an increase in air quantity, dilution compensates for entrainment and dust levels will not significantly change. The added air flow could then provide additional dilution of dust generated in the face area.

Any Changes since these Summaries? Higher Tonnages –Belt are hauling more coal Belt Speeds have increased Belt Lines are longer Higher Air Quantities in belts –Increased panel lengths –Controlling methane

Recent Field Experience Field group looks mostly at mines experiencing dust problems –Most of the mines have experienced repeated non-complinace 22 mines have reports –2 mines used belt air at the face (1 LW & 1CM)

Results Mines that do not use belt air (20 Mines) –Avg. DO Conc mg/m 3 –Avg. Intake Conc.0.08 mg/m 3

Results – Using Belt Air Mines using Belt Air (2 Mines) 1 Longwall –LW DO Conc mg/m 3 –LW Intake Conc.0.03 mg/m 3 –LW Belt Conc.0.14 mg/m 3 –LW Combined Intake0.06 mg/m 3 1 CM Section (Reverse Scrubber) –CM DO Conc mg/m 3 –CM Intake Conc.0.63 mg/m 3 –CM Belt Conc.0.65 mg/m 3 –CM Combined Intake0.63 mg/m 3

Summary Agree with Previous Advisory’s Findings Belt dust control technologies exist that can control and reduce dust concentrations in belt entries Additional air to a working face can help to dilute dust that is generated and to lower personal dust exposures Designated Area helps to assure belt line dust concentrations are controlled