Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Demand-Side Management Influence on Reliability NERC Demand-Side Management Task Force (DSMTF) Rick Voytas, Chair November 2007 Presented To The U.S.
Advertisements

2013 Summer Overview Jeffrey S McDonald Power System Operator CUEA San Diego, CA June 6, 2013.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Electricity Markets Overview Lo-Cal seminar, 09/21/2010.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Building the Energy Markets of Tomorrow... Today The Market Value of Demand Response Aaron Breidenbaugh Demand Response Program Coordinator New York Independent.
1 Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
EPSA REGULATORY AFFAIR CONFERENCE 2006 Washington, DC October 25, 2006 Garry Brown Vice President, External Affairs New York ISO.
Main Office Other Locations 540 Broadway 38 High Rock Avenue, #2C767 Third Avenue, btwn 48 th & 49 th 601 Pennsylvania Avenue HQ Hartford, 100 Pearl Street,
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
1 Capacity Markets Investment in Generation Capacity Payments October 31, 2005 J. W. Charlton.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Charles Goldman E. O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Michael Kintner-Meyer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory DOE Office of.
NYISO Demand Side Programs and Issues
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
SM April Peak Week Operations Review Presentation to ISO Business Issues Committee May 22, 2002.
Reliability Demand Response Product February 25, 2011
Demand Side Products in PJM Joseph BowringCornell University January 17, 2011.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response as Capacity in New York National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meetings Washington, DC February 17,
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
The Australian Market Evolution Dr Brian Spalding Chief Operating Officer NEMMCO.
©2005 PJM 1 APEx The Mature PJM Market Kenneth W. Laughlin PJM October 31, 2005 Orlando, FL.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
Demand Response Programs: An Emerging Resource for Competitive Electricity Markets Charles Goldman (510) E. O. Lawrence Berkeley.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Planning for Texas’ Energy Future Select Committee on Electric Generation Capacity and Environmental Effects Bob Kahn President & CEO February 6, 2008.
INTEGRATING WIND ENERGY WITH ELECTRIC SYSTEMS ERIC HIRST Consultant in Electric-Industry Restructuring Bellingham, WA December.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Wind Management at MISO
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Recent Load Reduction Initiatives in New York State
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Benefits of ICAP Reliability Economics
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
December 9, 2005 Allison DiGrande, External Affairs Department, ISO/NE
Demand resource emergency energy measurement and verification
Load Response Products from Constellation NewEnergy
Mike Mumper & Brian Kick Good afternoon
NYS Department of Public Service
Solar Energy Commercialization
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Presentation transcript:

Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates

2 Confidential 30-Nov-04 ISO Demand Response Programs Spot Energy Market Price Real Time Day Ahead Price Following Scheduled Curtailments PJM NYNY NE NYNY PJM Resources 2004 Very low activity in NYISO day-ahead (low prices) More real-time activity, but questions about value

3 Confidential 30-Nov-04 ISO Demand Response Programs Capacity Reliability PJM Spot Forward Emergency Op Reserves ICAP Resource Dispatched Operating Reserves NYNY NYNY NE NYNY PJM Resources 2004 Emergency program heavily marketed in NY, ICAP ICAP increasing in importance Ancillary services market participation is a new initiative

4 Confidential 30-Nov-04 Need for Emergency DR  Operating reserves ensure that the loss of a major transmission line or large generator(s) does not imperil the entire system  If a deficiency is extreme enough, load shedding is undertaken to protect the overall system integrity  Well orchestrated load curtailments help mitigate, or avoid operating reserve deficiencies and their consequences…  Without disrupting spot market price formation  Only the ISO can effectively dispatch such resources – reliability is a social good

5 Confidential 30-Nov-04 ISO Emergency DR Programs  Emergency DR Programs provide system operators with unique reserves  Resources indigenous to the market  Fully synchronized to the system, Short notice (2 hours)  High availability rate, diverse and reliable  No capacity payment required – pay for performance only NYISO PJM ISO-NE Start Date 2001 May 2001 June / / / ,711 / / / ,231 / / / 249 Reg. Sites / Subscr. MW Source : NERA Dec About the same 2004 About the same Slightly higher

6 Confidential 30-Nov-04 NYISO EDRP Registration Requirements  To participate, customers must:  Register at least 100 kW of load curtailment and/or output from on-site generator  Have an interval meter  Small-customer aggregations HVAC controls, pool pumps, etc. can employ statistical method for determining performance  Program registration options  Load Serving Entity (LSE)  Curtailment Service Provider (CSP)  As a Direct or Limited Customer of the NYISO Currently, almost all participants register through a default service utility

7 Confidential 30-Nov-04 NYISO EDRP Dispatch Rules  NYISO can dispatch EDRP resources at the zonal level, on an as-needed basis  EDRP invoked when In-Day Peak Hour Forecast indicates an 30-Min operating reserve shortage and/or Major Emergency state is declared  Sometimes a non-binding advisory notice is provided a day-ahead  Once operating reserve shortage is verified in-day, curtailment event is declared with at least two (2) hour’s notice of event  Four (4) hour minimum event duration Concession to customers

8 Confidential 30-Nov-04 NYISO EDRP Customer Baseline Load (CBL) Methodology  Uses most recent ten (10) days hourly interval-metered usage values 1. Calculate each day’s total usage during event hours 2. Choose the resulting five (5) highest days 3. Average the interval usage data by hour over those five days to get an hourly CBL value  Optional adjustment for weather can be applied  CBL is adjusted(up & down) relative to conditions 2 hours prior to the start of the event

9 Confidential 30-Nov-04 NYISO EDRP Payment  Participation in any event is voluntary  No requirement to notify the NYISO of their intent to participate in an EDRP event in order to be paid  Payment is for any measured level of curtailment  Payment is the higher of $500/MWh or LBMP  NYISO pays the registration agent, not participants  Unregulated Agents’ contract terms are proprietary  NYPSC requires regulated LSEs pass along at least 90% of payment Price has generally lower

10 Confidential 30-Nov-04 Emergency DR Program Benefits  Reliability Benefits – curtailments reduce the probability of an outage due to operating reserve shortfalls  Value is defined as product of:  Expected Unserved Energy  VOLL  Program is operated to avoid any unintended consequences on on real-time spot market prices  If the DR reserves turn out to be needed, then they can set real-time LBMP, but only if price otherwise is below $500  Adopted because initially the dispatch of large DR resources appeared to cause RT price to crash

11 Confidential 30-Nov-04 NYISO EDRP Historical Program Benefits ,159 6,632 7,734 EDRP Curtailed MWHs Reliability Benefits ($M) Program Payments ($M) ~ 5 ~ 1.5 ~ 9.5 B/C Ratio

12 Confidential 30-Nov-04 EDRP Reliability Benefits during Northeast Blackout of 2003  Recovering System State (August 15)  Change in LOLP=1.0, High VOLL=$5,000/MW, Load At Risk=DR  Recovered System State (August 16)  Change in LOLP=0.2, Low VOLL=$2,500/MW, Load At Risk=Only DR Needed to meet 30-Minute Reserve Margin DateSystem StateBenefitPaymentRatio Aug. 15Recovering$31.6M$3.2M9.5 Aug. 16Recovered$0.7M 1.0 Total$32.3M$3.9M8.3

13 Confidential 30-Nov-04 Some Observations Participation in NYISO grew to over 800 MW in three years Only about 10% of registered resources are DG Diverse participation contributes to availability Constant and reliable curtailment performance Level stable over 5-6 hour events On average, curtailment is about 1/3 of CBL Vital early role for Curtailment Service Providers Vital agency role PSC tariffs and jawboning NYSERDA outreach and technology support