Co-sponsorship Process Briefing to Technical Activities Committee 1 September 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report on Independent Review Schedule Update on GNSO Improvement Process December 2006 Denise Michel Vice President, Policy Development.
Advertisements

Tips and Resources IASC Cluster/Sector Leadership Training
Starting Planning for the 2010 Policy Key Issues Notes for the TAC Executive Committee April 8, 2009 Phil Hattis, AIAA VP for Public Policy.
AIAA Task Force on Earth Observations 2 October 2009 AIAA HQ Reston VA.
TAC Position Paper Process Mark Melanson 5 August 2009 Tom Duerr Karen Harwell Mark Melanson Jim Neidhoefer.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
School Community Councils Tuesday, March 23, 2010.
Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Education Strategic Plan Initiative Jul 10 Neal Barlow Jane Hansen VP EducationSAC, K-12 POC.
Young Professionals Report to TAC August 2014 Greg Johnston – YPC TAC Liaison Kim Hicks – YPC Chair.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
NPSS AdCom 15 November 2014 Seattle President’s Report Janet Barth 1.
RSAC Ad Hoc “Why Membership Matters” Summary for RSAC Meeting Jan 2014 Karen Copper.
Human Resources Committee Presentation Kigali, Rwanda 28 th May
1 Chapter Officer Roles & Responsibilities. 2 Chapter Officers/Leadership Team Serving on the Chapter Leadership Team is a privilege as well as a responsibility.
Recognition at the Local Level - Introduction L. Jane Hansen Western Region Director 8 August2014.
Corporate Services Grants Programme 2013 – August 2012.
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology Technical Group Presentation to the ANS Board of Directors Leo Bobek, ANST Chair Atlanta, GAJune 17, 2009.
Strategic Planning Larry Potterfield Founder and CEO.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
INS BOARD DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER, 2010 Review / Summary.
Partnerships for the Future Implementing a sustainable framework of partnership working with service users and other partners Thursday 2 May 2013 Giving.
THE HR APPRENTICERICHMOND THE HR APPRENTICE RICHMOND Marvelous Membership Mavericks.
Congress Voting Review Board Presentation Congress Voting Review Group.
Governance & Leadership Structure Influence Build Connect.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
IEEE Communications Society Meetings & Conferences Department Chapter Support for Local Conferences & Workshops Chih-Lin I, Director of Meetings & Conferences.
Strategic Communications: From the Plan to the Public September 27, 2006 Atlanta, GA.
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
1. 2 “Recognizing outstanding achievement is one of the primary responsibilities of the Institute” Recognition:  Membership Upgrades  Honors & Awards.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
IEEE Robotics and Automation Society: Meetings & Conferences Report T. J. Tarn IEEE RAS Vice-President for Conferences October 2005 IEEE RAS.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
Report on the review of ACG structure The Exchange of Information Task Force October 7-9, 2009 The 13th ACG General Meeting in Hanoi.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Professional Member Education Committee (PMEC) Report to TAC Jim Dieudonne (for Steve Gorrell) January 10, 2008 Reno, NV.
New Event Model Summary. AIAA’s Goals in New Event Model Ensure our Institute is relevant to aerospace professionals Ensure our conferences integrate.
Update about Forums and Other Events Briefing to Technical Activities Committee 1 September 2015.
TAC Strategic Advisory Group Status Report for TAC Tom Duerr, Deputy VP Technical Activities,
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
AIAA’s New Event Model August 2013 Briefing to Regional Leadership Conference Basil Hassan, AIAA Vice President-Technical Activities.
Section 4.9 Review Report Request for MAC Approval December 1, 2015.
AIAA Governance Q&A January Constitution is restrictive; no flexibility The Constitution specifies that there should be a certain number of Board.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
1 Ensuring the Future of the Arthur W. Page Society Value Proposition Operations and Organization June 10, 2010 Maril MacDonald Dave Samson.
Guidelines and Process. AIAA TCM Membership Selection Guidelines (page 1 of 2) A formal education in both the technical (engineering and/or science) and.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
1 Summary of TAC Procedures May 5, Revision of TAC Procedures Project began in October 2004 to incorporate the Commercial Operations Subcommittee.
A Proposal for the Merger of Edinburgh’s Telford College, Jewel and Esk College and Stevenson College Edinburgh to create Edinburgh College “Creating opportunities.
Sauder Unlimited presents… Corporate Development 101 Corey Wong President of BizTech ( )
Pre-College Members and Clubs Status Report and Recommendations FY14 BOD4 Update A Joint Presentation from the Outreach Committee and Membership Committee.
FY12 Programs & Services Assessment 11 October 2011.
Ethics Committee Update Jonna Gerken & Virginia Counts November 4 th, 2012.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Master Plan Updates February 2015 Salem, Oregon
NSGC Liaison Orientation Welcome!
IEEE MILESTONES PROGRAM
Recommendations from the DOW
Developing charter and covenants
AESS Board of Governors Meeting Outgoing VP Conferences
Reliability Assessment Committee
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Industry Relations Strategic Planning
Generate more input for strategic themes
Alamo Chapter Air Force Association
AESS Board of Governors Meeting
Request for MAC Approval December 1, 2015
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Co-sponsorship Process Briefing to Technical Activities Committee 1 September 2015

Background Tasking from Institute Development Committee in January 2015  Form a working group to study co-sponsorship and make a recommendation on a strategy/policy Working Group  Anthony Bartens, YPC  Tom Duerr, TAC  Tom Irvine, Staff  Mark Maurice, IAC  Dave McGrath, TAC  Nicola Sarzi-Amade, RSAC  Megan Scheidt, Staff  Mary Snitch, PPC Working group has completed assessment and has developed new co-sponsorship process 2

Working Group Activities Agreed to the following tenets  Be selective about co-sponsorship  Align with strategic plan  AIAA adds/gains value/prominence from co- sponsorship, not just use of logo  Define and uphold the AIAA brand Process focused on managing bottom-up requests, not top-down selected arrangements or activities 3

Working Group Activities (continued) Developed “why and what” questions about co-sponsorship opportunities  In relation to strategic plan  To add more rigor to the assessment  To account for co-sponsorship in both directions (AIAA co-sponsorship of other events, co-sponsorship of AIAA events by other organizations) Sample questions  What value could AIAA derive from co-sponsorship of other events?  What is our strategic, Institute-wide approach to engagement with other organizations?  What should be the relationship between AIAA national and Sections in terms of establishing co-sponsorships?  What is our strategic, Institute-wide approach to engagement with other organizations? Individually went through exercise of answering questions Developed proposed policies and process to achieve desired outcomes 4

Working Group Activities (continued) Policy on Co-Sponsorship of non-AIAA Events  AIAA is the world’s leading professional society in the field of aerospace science, engineering, and operations. We are a service organization focused on creating tangible value for our individual and corporate members. AIAA will consider nominations for co-sponsorship for events hosted by like-minded organizations where such events enhance our strategic objectives and are framed in terms of a long-term partnership. 5

Working Group Activities (continued) Policy on Co-Sponsorship for AIAA Events  AIAA is the world’s leading professional society in the field of aerospace science, engineering, and operations. We are a service organization focused on creating tangible value for our individual and corporate members. AIAA welcomes like-minded organizations to co-sponsor AIAA event where such an arrangement will enhance AIAA strategic objectives and is framed in terms of a long-term partnership. 6

Working Group Activities (continued) Drafted charter for Co-sponsorship Review Committee (CRC)  Purpose: To review, assess, and decide on requests for co-sponsorship. This includes both when AIAA co-sponsors another organization’s event and when another organization co-sponsors an AIAA event. Developed request forms Conducted test case of process and validated process met co- sponsorship working group’s tenets  Be selective about co-sponsorship  Align with strategic plan  AIAA adds/gains value/prominence from co-sponsorship, not just use of logo  Define and uphold the AIAA brand Defined how co-sponsored events will be promoted to AIAA community Addressed outstanding question of co-sponsorship of section events 7

New Co-sponsorship Process 8

Next Steps Brief and request for IDC to endorse new process Brief and request for BoD to endorse new process Appropriate Vice Presidents to identify members of Co- sponsorship Review Committee (CRC)  Vice Presidents of International, Membership, Public Policy, and Technical to name representative from their respective committees (IAC, RSAC, PPC, TAC) to CRC Identify Staff Liaison to CRC CRC appointed and given orientation on process New process put in effect starting 1 October 2015  Existing co-sponsored conferences will be grandfathered 9

BACK-UP SLIDES

New Co-sponsorship Process Proposer Submits Request Form  Form includes information from organization requesting co-sponsorship or entity suggesting other organization co-sponsor of AIAA event. Info includes: –Target audience/expected attendance –Value of co-sponsorship to both organizations –Desired support/participation from AIAA or other organization »Framed against the Supporter, Partner, Co-organizer categories –Event logistics –AIAA champion/member involved in event organization 12

New Co-sponsorship Process (continued) Staff Liaison Completes Assessment Form  Staff liaison to CRC works with appropriate resources to develop SWOT for co-sponsorship arrangement  Staff liaison makes recommendation to CRC about the co-sponsorship CRC Makes Decision about Request  CRC decides whether to endorse or reverse staff recommendation Staff Liaison Responds to Organizing Entity  If AIAA will support the event, CRC staff liaison, or designee, gathers details about event from organizing entity and develops plan to achieve strategic outcomes  Co-sponsorship benefits, deliverables, and expectations will be formalized in an agreement between AIAA and the co-sponsoring entity 13

Current Co-sponsorship Reference in Constitution 7.3 U.S. and International Technical Meetings All Institute sponsored and co-sponsored national technical meetings shall be approved by the Technical Activities Committee. All international technical meetings shall be jointly approved by the Technical Activities and International Activities Committees. The Board shall promptly be apprised of such approvals. 14