Geoscience Laser Altimeter System Aerosol and Cloud Observations by the GLAS Polar Orbiting Lidar Instrument NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center Launched.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lidar observations of mixed-phase clouds Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Ewan OConnor & Mukunda Dev Behera University of Reading UK Overview Enhanced.
Advertisements

Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Long-term monitoring of the tropospheric aerosol vertical structure and optical properties by active and passive remote- sensing at Ny-Aalesund, Svalbard.
ESTO Advanced Component Technology 11/17/03 Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations GSFC CO 2 Science and Sounder.
A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
Studying the Physical Properties of the Atmosphere using LIDAR technique Dinh Van Trung and Nguyen Thanh Binh, Nguyen Dai Hung, Dao Duy Thang, Bui Van.
CALIPSO and LITE data for space-based DWL design and Data utility studies: Research plans G. D. Emmitt Simpson Weather Associates D. Winker and Y. Hu (LaRC)
Lecture 12 Content LIDAR 4/15/2017 GEM 3366.
Calibration Scenarios for PICASSO-CENA J. A. REAGAN, X. WANG, H. FANG University of Arizona, ECE Dept., Bldg. 104, Tucson, AZ MARY T. OSBORN SAIC,
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
The ICESat-2 Mission: Laser altimetry of ice, clouds and land elevation T. Markus, T. Neumann NASA Goddard Space Flight Center W. Abdalati Earth Science.
Working group on space-based winds January 27-30, 2009 Destin, FL Sara C. Tucker, Wm. Alan Brewer, Scott Sandberg, Mike Hardesty CIRES, University of Colorado.
Fusion of SeaWIFS and TOMS Satellite Data with Surface Observations and Topographic Data During Extreme Aerosol Events Stefan Falke and Rudolf Husar Center.
Measured parameters: particle backscatter at 355 and 532 nm, particle extinction at 355 nm, lidar ratio at 355 nm, particle depolarization at 355 nm, atmospheric.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
Figure 2.10 IPCC Working Group I (2007) Clouds and Radiation Through a Soda Straw.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
Gloudemans 1, J. de Laat 1,2, C. Dijkstra 1, H. Schrijver 1, I. Aben 1, G. vd Werf 3, M. Krol 1,4 Interannual variability of CO and its relation to long-range.
1 CALIPSO Status and Plans Dave Winker Winds Working Group, June 2009, Wintergreen, VA.
The Arctic Climate Paquita Zuidema, RSMAS/MPO, MSC 118, Feb, 29, 2008.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
Using GPS data to study the tropical tropopause Bill Randel National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado “You can observe a lot by just watching”
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
NARVAL South Lutz Hirsch, Friedhelm Jansen Sensor Synergy While Radars and Lidars provide excellent spatial resolution but only ambiguous information on.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen.
B.-M. Sinnhuber, Remote Sensing I, University of Bremen, Summer 2007 Remote Sensing I Active Remote Sensing Summer 2007 Björn-Martin Sinnhuber Room NW1.
Mike Newchurch 1, Shi Kuang 1, John Burris 2, Steve Johnson 3, Stephanie Long 1 1 University of Alabama in Huntsville, 2 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center,
New Products from combined MODIS/AIRS Jun Li, Chian-Yi Liu, Allen Huang, Xuebao Wu, and Liam Gumley Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite.
Introduction Invisible clouds in this study mean super-thin clouds which cannot be detected by MODIS but are classified as clouds by CALIPSO. These sub-visual.
Measurement Example III Figure 6 presents the ozone and aerosol variations under a light-aerosol sky condition. The intensity and structure of aerosol.
Wu Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) New York.
Spaceborne 3D Imaging Lidar John J. Degnan Geoscience Technology Office, Code Code 900 Instrument and Mission Initiative Review March 13, 2002.
Status of CFLOS study using CALIPSO data G. D. Emmitt, D. Winker and S. Greco WG SBLW Destin, FL January 27-30, 2009.
Optical properties Satellite observation ? T,H 2 O… From dust microphysical properties to dust hyperspectral infrared remote sensing Clémence Pierangelo.
LASE Measurements During IHOP Edward V. Browell, Syed Ismail, Richard A. Ferrare, Susan A Kooi, Anthony Notari, and Carolyn F. Butler NASA Langley Research.
Regional Modeling of Antarctic Clouds Keith M. Hines 1 and David H. Bromwich 1,2 1 Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar Research Center The Ohio State University.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
NASA ESTO ATIP Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations 12/12/01 NASA Goddard - Laser Remote Sensing Branch 1 James B. Abshire,
OMPS Products Applications Craig Long NOAA/NWS/NCEP Climate Prediction Center SUOMI NPP SDR Product Review -- 23/24 October NCWCP Auditorium.
Synergy of MODIS Deep Blue and Operational Aerosol Products with MISR and SeaWiFS N. Christina Hsu and S.-C. Tsay, M. D. King, M.-J. Jeong NASA Goddard.
Introduction 1. Advantages and difficulties related to the use of optical data 2. Aerosol retrieval and comparison methodology 3. Results of the comparison.
Use of Solar Reflectance Hyperspectral Data for Cloud Base Retrieval Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Washington D.C, USA Outline " Physical basis for.
Measurement Example III Figure 6 presents the ozone and aerosol variations under a light-aerosol sky condition. The intensity and structure of aerosol.
1 Volatile Exchange on Mars Maria T. Zuber MIT David E. Smith NASA/GSFC 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging Poznan, Poland 13 October 2008 NASA/MRO/HiRISE.
CLOUD PHYSICS LIDAR for GOES-R Matthew McGill / Goddard Space Flight Center April 8, 2015.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 Modelled & Observed Atmospheric Radiation Balance during the West African Dry Season. Sean Milton, Glenn Greed, Malcolm Brooks,
Evaluation of T511(1°) clouds Simpson Weather Associates 7 June 2007 NCEP OSSE meeting.
A new method for first-principles calibration
Research and Discover 2003 ICESat Precise Elevation Data Over the Antarctic Megadunes Tom Daigle: NASA/University of New Hampshire Research and Discover.
NASA Goddard - Laser Remote Sensing Branch 1/16/02 JBA 1 3/12/02 NASA/GSFC - Laser Remote Sensing Branch 1 Mars Orbital Lidar Small Orbital Planetary Lidar.
CO 2 an important driver for climate change. Currently only approximately half of the CO 2 produced by man can be accounted for in the atmosphere and oceans,
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corporation -
A Brief Overview of CO Satellite Products Originally Presented at NASA Remote Sensing Training California Air Resources Board December , 2011 ARSET.
Overview of HARLIE Measurement Capabilities David Miller 1, Geary Schwemmer 2, Sangwoo Lee 1, Tom Wilkerson 3 1 Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
Satellite Remote Sensing of the Air Quality Health Index Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar, Lok Lamsal, Dalhousie University.
Cloud Physics Lidar on the Global Hawk HS3 Science Team Meeting May 7-9, 2013 Matthew McGill / GSFC Dennis Hlavka / SSAI Andrew Kupchock/ SSAI Steve Palm.
number Typical aerosol size distribution area volume
Large Eddy Simulations of Entrainment and Inversion Structure Alison Fowler (MRes Physics of Earth and Atmosphere) Supervisor: Ian Brooks Entrainment Zone.
Assessment of Upper atmospheric plume models using Calipso Satellites and Environmental Assessment and Forecasting Chowdhury Nazmi, Yonghua Wu, Barry Gross,
PADMA ALEKHYA V V L, SURAJ REDDY R, RAJASHEKAR G & JHA C S
Clouds, shear and the simulation of hybrid wind lidar
Regional Radiation Center (RRC) II (Asia)
Using A-train observations to evaluate clouds in CAM
LiDAR Range (R) recorded as R = c * t/2 Unaffected by clouds above
Diurnal Variation of Nitrogen Dioxide
Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Satellite
CALIPSO First-Light Observations – All 3 Lidar Channels
Presentation transcript:

Geoscience Laser Altimeter System Aerosol and Cloud Observations by the GLAS Polar Orbiting Lidar Instrument NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center Launched – January 2003 Full Operations – September 2003 Ice, Cloud and Land Elevation Satellite

Surface Altimetry and Atmospheric Profiling Surface Altimetry – High Bandwidth, 10 cm, Strong Signals Atmospheric Profiling – Low Bandwidth, 30 m, Weak Signals >>>> Compatible System Requirements Surface Altimetry Requires Precise Cloud Clearing Atmospheric Retrieval Requires Surface Reflectance Measurement

GLAS Transmitter and Receiver Lasers: Three Diode Pumped Nd:YAG Units 40 Hz PRF 100 urad Beam Width 1064 nm - 65 mJ 532 nm - 36 mJ Receiver: One Meter Beryllium Mirror 1064 nm (main surface channel) Avalanche Photodiode Detector 1 gHz Surface Digitizer Channel 2 mHz Cloud Digitizer Channel 532 nm (high sensitivity atmospheric channel) 8 Geiger Mode Silicon APD Modules 2 mHz Photon Counting Channel

GLAS Measurement Components Solar Background Radiance at 1064 and 532 P = I   A S p = C b I Surface Return Pulse at 1064 nm E s =E o T e 2  A/r 2 = Cp  T e 2 (z o ) Surface Pulse Waveform Surface Pulse Reflectance Vertical Resolution – 15cm Signal Range to 300 m Atmospheric Profiles at 1064 and 532 nm S(z) = C E B(z) T e 2 (z) /r 2 Aerosol and Thin Cloud: 532 nm – GAPD Photon Counting Denser Cloud: 1064 nm – Analog APD Vertical Resolution – 75 m (20 m) Horizontal Resolution - ~ 175 m (500m) Signal Range --5 to 40 km

Ben Smith Univ. of Washington Crary Ice Rise Grounding line ROSS ICE SHELF SIPLE COAST ICE STREAMS SIPLE DOME West Antarctic - Siple Coast from ICESat

CLOUDS I’ve looked at clouds from both sides now…..

FROM GLAS QUICK LOOK WEB SITE: GLOBAL ORBIT LIDAR VIEWS OF CLOUD AND AEROSOL DISTRIBUTION

GLAS Data Visualization for October 3, 2003

GLAS Observed Backscatter Cross Section and Layer Heights Data Product Example (gla07,08, 09)

km Latent Heat Flux Sensible Heat Flux ECMWF PBLGLAS PBL Validation of Global Circulation Models (GCM’s) Detailed Comparison of GLAS And European Center Weather Forecast Model Boundary Layer Heights Cloud Fraction

Cloud Layer Count Distribution All clouds 01 Oct. – 15 Nov % 31% 17% Global cloudiness is 69% Single layers account for 64% of cloudy cases Attenuation causes layer numbers to be undercounted Shape of distribution is typical

Maximum cloud height km PSC Maximum cloud height in each cell over the observation period. Some features: warm pool; tropical central Africa; Carribbean; western coasts of the continents. Line plot shows the zonal maximum cloud height; note polar stratospheric clouds. 01 Oct. – 15 Nov. 2003

Zonal Cloud Top Frequency 01 Oct. – 15 Nov AM and PM PMAM 0.5 km vertical bins Top shows results from all observations Two lower images show the comparison between the AM and PM observations. Differences are the increase in the convective influence in the PM, with a lessening of the influence of the low clouds.

GLAS/MODIS Cloud Fraction Comparison October, 2003 GLAS, PM MODIS,AQUA Percent Cloud fraction, zonal GLAS MODIS Features in the expected locations. High cloud fraction the the ITCZ and north and south circumpolar regions. Low cloud fraction in deserts. GLAS finds significantly more cloudiness in the deserts regions. Zonal cloud fraction display shows excellent agreement between the two instruments except in the polar regions.

GLAS/MODIS Average Cloud Top Pressure Comparison October, 2003 GLAS, PMMODIS,AQUA Zonal cloud top pressure GLAS MODIS hPa GLAS results show higher clouds GLAS finds geometrical cloud top; MODIS finds thermal cloud top Other factors such as sampling differences are needed to explain large difference

Aerosols

Dust of the Sahara

GLAS Aerosol Optical Thickness GLAS MODIS October, 2003 GLAS, PMMODIS,AQUA OD Qualitative agreement in location of many persistent features GLAS misses transient features such as California fire because of sampling. GLAS retrieves generally lower OD because of a low bias in extinction to backscatter ratio.

Global Aerosol and Boundary Layer Height First Mapping of the Global Aerosol and Pollution Capping Inversion ‘Boundary Layer’ Height Model Output from European Center Forecast Model GLAS Measurement of the Height of the Planetary Boundary Layer – October 2003

Geoscience Laser Altimeter System Application to Aerosol Transport Models J. Spinhirne /GSFC January 2004 GLAS 532 nm Data Naval Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System

Observe backscatter cross sections below (1/m-sr) for aerosol transport Observe backscatter cross sections up to for dense aerosol events Observe backscatter cross sections over six orders of magnitude including clouds GLOBE GLOBE - Global Backscatter Experiment Definition of Space Lidar Requirements Menzies, Tratt, Spinhirne and Hlavka - JGR 2002.

South Africa Smoke Aerosol

Breon et al., GRL in press, 2005

Global lidar data are a fundamentally new measurement from space for global aerosol and cloud cover. GLAS data results have fully validated the science, technology and observation strategy and meet the objective of profiling all radiatively significant cloud and aerosol layers. GLAS Data products are in open release to the science community. Quick look and data visualization: Full Data Access: GLAS STATUS GLAS Observation Periods Observation Period Laser532 nm 1064 nm Feb 20 – Mar Sep 25 – Nov Feb 17 – Mar May 18 – Jun Oct 03 – Nov None Excellent Excellent - Good Excellent Excellent - Good Fair (Night Only) Poor (Night Only) Fair Excellent Laser Diode Failure Laser Contamination Severe Contamination Laser Doubler Failure 2005: Feb. 20 – Mar. 25 May 18 – June 22