Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Copenhagen 22 May 2015 Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOER 2010: structure and approach. Structure of SOER 2010 A Exploratory assessment Global drivers Megatrends Uncertainties Long-term policy implications.
Advertisements

Towards the UKs MSFD Initial Assessment and Data Management M. Charlesworth (BODC)
Report on the activities of the Digital Soil Mapping Working Group Endre Dobos.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels 18 May 2010 Expectations towards the ESPON Programme from the Spanish Presidency perspective.
NRC Biodiversity EEA new Strategic Cycle Copenhagen, 27&28 October 2013 Ivone Pereira Martins, Head of Group, NSV1.
Research and Verification of Analytic Instruments for Assessment and Foresight of the Environmental Development Richard Filčák, Vladimír Benko, Ladislav.
Joint NFP/experts Seminar on Forward- looking Information in Environment Assessment Copenhagen, May 2008 FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES Anita Pirc Velkavrh.
EIONET workshop on Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation, EEA, Copenhagen, 20 June 2013 Objectives of the workshop and EEA activities on.
Department of Tourism Department of Tourism NTSS DRAFT REVIEW FRAMEWORK NTSF MEETING 17 SEPTEMBER 2014.
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
EEA draft annual work programmes 2016 and 2017 André Jol EEA Head of Group Climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation 9th EIONET workshop on.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounts: A Proposed Outline and Road Map Sixth Meeting of the UN Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
FAST-LAIN (Further Action on Sustainable Tourism – Learning Area Innovation Networks) Project Overview ACTION N °: /CIP/10/B/N04S00 T ITLE : Knowledge.
The Children’s Environment and Health Action Plan for Europe (CEHAPE) : The Role of Public Health Professionals Leda E. Nemer WHO European Centre for Environment.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.
The IUCN Programme Nature+ Proposal, May 2011.
Eionet NFP Meeting 28/29 September 2011 European Environment Agency.
Dr. Ágnes TÖTTŐS Migration Expert/ Ministry of Interior, Department of European Cooperation/ Hungary Tel:
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Economics and Environmental Monitoring.
NFP/EEA Working Group on Eionet priority data flows (EPDF) - Status and developments for water Beate Werner Eionet FW workshop Copenhagen, 18 – 19 June.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
FLIServices WHY-WHEN-WAY FORWARD Anita Pirc Velkavrh Strategic futures.
The European Environment State and Outlook 2015 (SOER 2015) SOER 2015 Coordination Group, European Environment Agency (EEA) BISE-CHM Expert Meeting -4.
ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris Eionet: Environment Information and Observation.
European Environment Agency EUROPE’S ENVIRONMENT Assessment of Assessments AoA Portal: AoA Contact:
Economic and Political Risk Evaluator World class economic and political risk expertise OXFORD ECONOMICS AND CONTROL RISKS.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Working sessions: Case example.
SOER 2015 Implementation Plan Presented at the 18 th EIONET Air Quality Meeting Dublin, October 2013 Bases on a presentation prepared by the SOER.
Linking global megatrends to regional topics Some reflections on experiences in the joint project.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Proposal Mapping Europes Environmental.
SOER 2015 Project Plan Meeting on Environmental Assessments 16-17April 2013 Integrated Environmental Assessments (Thomas Henrichs)
ETC/CCA Main activities June June 2015 Silvia Medri (CMCC) ETC/CCA Manager Eionet WS on CCIVA Copenhagen, June 2015 European Environment Agency.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch Incorporating Biodiversity into Trade-Related Integrated Assessments Presentation.
NFP/Eionet meeting, October 2014, EEA PAN NFP/Eionet coordination European Environment Agency (EEA) Key points and actions Bratislava, Slovakia,
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
1 Item 2.1.b of the agenda IT Governance in the ESS and related issues Renewal of mandates STNE Adam WROŃSKI Eurostat, Unit B5.
Expanding the knowledge base for policy implementation and long-term transitions Dr Hans Bruyninckx Executive Director, European Environment Agency (EEA)
Monitoring, reporting and evaluating climate change adaptation policies at national level in Europe - An overview of where we stand Stéphane Isoard, EEA.
The European Environment State and Outlook 2015 SOER 2015 Coordination Group, European Environment Agency (EEA) Implementation Plan NRC Biodiversity,
European Environment Agency EEA contributions One contact person nominated for each pilot Report pan-European data availability (doc and xls) has been.
D R I V I N G F O R R E S U L T S : S T R E N G T H E N I N G T H E S C I E N C E B A S I S A N D C A T A L Y T I C R O L E O F U N E P UNECE Working Group.
Eurostat I) Context & objectives of KIP INCA project Project owner is the Environment Knowledge Community (EKC) EKC is an EU inter-services group involving.
EEA and Eionet example on sharing comparable data and information David Stanners Adriana Gheorghe.
Transnational Working & Reporting Procedures. LP Seminar January 2013 Transnational Cooperation & Reporting Procedures I) Transnational cooperation: Definition.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
1 Austrian State of Environment report Process and experience Source: ??????
Global megatrends in Slovakia Milan Chrenko Directorate for Environmental Policy, EU Affairs and International Relations Ministry of Environment of the.
COOEXCEL TIPS Include clearly your contact details
SOER 2015 Implementation Plan Presented at the 18th EIONET Air Quality Meeting Dublin, October 2013 Presentation prepared by the SOER 2015 Coordination.
WP5 Uptake, Outreach and Interaction
Monitoring of sdgs indicators in the Russian federation
Swiss Cooperation with the EEA and within EIONET
Felix Reiterer-Motolinia, ICCS Consultant
14th MEETING OF WORKING GROUP F ON FLOODS Thursday 17 October 2013
Forum for Air quality Modelling FAIRMODE ew. eea
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
14th MEETING OF WORKING GROUP F ON FLOODS Thursday 17 October 2013
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Rail transport developments Agenda point 7.2
EEAs assessments of the status of Europe’s waters
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
WFD and Agriculture Activity under the CIS 2005/2006 Work Programme
UNEP / Division of Early Warning and Assessment (DEWA)
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Presentation transcript:

Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Copenhagen 22 May 2015 Division Economics and Environmental Monitoring Division «Mapping Europe’s Environmental Future»

2 Agenda 1.Project idea  Core issue  Output  Challenge  Documents 2.Project organisation  Role of Contractor / Core group / FLIS  Working principles  timeline 3.First discussion and input to methodology  Outlines Webinar 29 April 2015  Discussion

3 1.Project idea for each country now and in the future with focus on the environmental GMTs GMT8 Growing pressures on ecosystems GMT9 Increasingly severe consequences of climate changes GMT10 Increasing environmental pollution basis existing (!) information, data, models, expert judgement Core issue What are Global Megatrends’ impacts on Europe?

4 1. Project idea Easily understandable («mapping») Country specific documentation explaining results and methodology Final output (proposal)

5 1. Project idea Development of a methodology Applicable by all EIONET countries Pragmatic > use of existing techniques, material etc. Big question Is it possible to define a methodological approach that can be used by everyone and yet reflects potential GMT impact at the country level? Challenge

6 1. Project idea CH Proposal Mapping Europe’s Environmental Future Swiss presentation of project idea on FLIS-webinar on 29 April 2015 (2 co-referates by U. Lorenz and M. Havranek) Tender description elaborated documents ‘til now

7 ? Does this meet your needs ? Tour de table

8 2. Organisation Stage 1 A methodology has to be developed and agreed CH-funds external contractor supporting methodological development FLIS «Core Group» (4 - 5 other pilot countries) gives input and expertise for methodological development Stage 2 First testing results of method & further development of methodology Stage 3 EIONET FLIS group members and other NRC’s apply methodology e.g. through E3I initiative EEA/FLIS report

9 2. Organisation contractor – what is their role? Stage 1 & 2 responsible for the development of a methodological approach supported by the «Core Group» writes the final report describing methodology supports testing Stage 3 Refinement of methodology

10 Core group – what is its role? Stage 1 & 2 Giving inputs to contractor Active participation (review, exchange) Tests emerging methodology (1 meeting) Presents first results at NRC FLIS meeting Nov 2015 WHO?  5 countries motivated persons countries with experience but also: 1 representative without previous knowledge 2. Organisation

11 FLIS group – what is its role? Stage 1 & 2 Following development on FLIS platform through «diary» / interim reports Participation in methodological discussions, input via FLIS platform and regular meetings Stage 3 Application of method (voluntary…) Long-term process: contribution to an EEA report e.g. through E3I process (→ E3I) 2. Organisation

12 E3I Global Megatrends analysis & implications

13 E3I Global Megatrends analysis & implications  Work through cross-NRC expert group  1-2 country workshops in 2015, more in 2016?  Pilot workshop in Slovakia (May 2015)  Country workshops to:  To present and discuss SOER 2015 Assessment of Global megatrends (GMT)  To discuss countries’ approaches to assessment of GMT implications at the national level  To discuss possible methodological approach(es) (Swiss methodology?) towards the assessment of GMTs implications at the national level  Cross-NRC expert meeting for relevant NRCs (November 2015, back to back with NRC FLIS)  Summary of the results - a study/technical report/fiches to feed to SOER 2020 (?)

14 working principles Any idea will be considered Aim to develop an output that is useful and used FLIS user / country led method development, knowledge co-creation Open to other NRCs (NRC climate, water…), e.g. through E3I workshops (but also more formally?) All levels of knowledge and expertise welcome: the project seeks to encourage learning by doing and capacity building Development through testing and refinement 2. Organisation

15 timeline Stage 1 & 2 May/June: Collecting initial inputs on methodology Aug/Sept: First testing phase with Core Group Sept: Workshop Core Group Nov: NRC FLIS presentation ‘state of art’ – recommendations for further procedure Output Stage 1 & 2 Joint report of the European Environment Agency EEA and the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN). 2. Organisation

16 timeline Stage 3 To be discussed Output Stage 3 EEA & FLIS report 2. Organisation

17 3. First input to methodology

18 Webinar 29 April 2015 – Co-referates : some outlines Define the goal of the project carefully Do start with a reference point (e.g. environmental goal) when starting trend analysis Causal – Loop Models are an important feature regarding trends. Develop it around the reference point What is the definition of a GMT (composition, single event, summary of single factors)? How do we link it to a system? Is a GMT a driving force by itself or are subtrends driving forces What does downscaling mean (e.g. scales) ? Use categories like exposure, sensitivity, vulnerability and potential impact 3. First input about methodology

19 Benchmark Delimitation towards risk discussion ? Oversimplification ? Focus on qualitative assessment Use 7th EAP for targets Disaggregate GMTs into sub-trends GMTs & complexity & composition Scales ? Key variables indicators connections

20 ?

21 Who would like to join the Core Group ? the one million dollar question …

22

23 Additional material

24 Owen first steps … Looking for targets (reference point) derived from 7th EAP Definition of GMT8-10 from SEI-Milieu Consortium 2010 ‘Splitting’ of GMT8-10 into ‘Subtrends’ (single event, composition, ?) from SEI-Milieu Consortium 2010

25 Case studies Impact assessment of global megatrends Ullrich Lorenz & Hördur Haraldsson; February 2014 Some words on GMTs Fuzzy system boundaries of GMTs (it is not clear what exactly moves where) If a question is clearly formulated, it is much easier to understand what is moving and where GMT presentation requires careful attention of what is compared to what GMT are articifical behaviour – looking closer one has to ask which of the trends’ details are causing the impact Currently it is unclear how exactly GMTs are connected or even causally related

26 Some words on GMTs There are factors that are pushing and pulling and acting as driving forces within and between different megatrends. Once identified these common drivers might be the connectors between the GMTs Scales between GMTs are not harmonised. Each GMT is different.

27 «Mapping GMTs», Hördur Haraldsson, SE

28 In the meantime … EEA Annual Work Programme 2016 Draft for consultation 15 April 2015 SA2.3 Megatrends and Transitions - expected output «First results of pilot studies of co-created information with EIONET NRCs FLIS i.e. impacts of Global megatrends at national level and horizon scanning trends»