Family and Child Support Services Breakout Session 3 Building and Reforming Child Care Systems Bishkek, 12-14 May 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mandates of Statutory Services and Case Management
Advertisements

Community based services for children at risk in Albania dAdA.
Child Protection Units
Child Welfare Reform in Albania Marieta Zaçe Deputy Minister of Labor, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Albania Sofia 3-6 July 2007.
Costing of services Findings from the questionnaire for social services, finances and budgets, as part of the Assessment of the reform of the child care.
Roadmap for Future Reforms Serbia Ljiljana Lucic, State Secretary, Ministry of Labor and Social Policy Sofia, July 2007.
What have we learned about reforms in child protection? Vesna Bosnjak.
What have we learned about reforms in child protection? Vesna Bosnjak.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Importance of community-based services for persons with disabilities: Availability and quality International frame June 2012,Belgrade Dr.Vasilka.
PUENTE IN THE CARIBBEAN
The Draft SEN Code of Practice November What the Code is Nine chapters Statutory guidance on duties, policies and procedures relating to Part 3.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Breakout session 1 Reforming local level statutory services Chairperson: Ms. Irina Malancuic, International Expert on child care system reform, Moldova.
The purpose of this Unit is to enable individuals to develop the key principles, values and attitude which are central to high quality care practice Key.
Social Inclusion of Children with Disabilities – Russian Federation Joanna Rogers, UNICEF September 2011.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
RE-DIRECTING RESOURCES AND STIMULATING DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY BASED SERVICES – THE CASE OF SERBIA.
Experiences and lessons learned from developing family based substitute care, including foster care, in Belarus National Centre of Adoption of the Ministry.
The introduction of social workers in the primary health care system and its impact on the reduction of baby abandonment in Kazakhstan 10 September 2014,
ONE STEP FURTHER WHAT WE CAN LEARN FROM DI IN BULGARIA AND HOW TO DEVELOP PREVENTIVE SERVICES IN COOPERATION WITH MUNICIPALITIES RADOSTINA PANEVA SOS CHILDREN`S.
CHILD WELFARE REFORMS: HOW?
Control environment and control activities. Day II Session III and IV.
THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN WELFARE MIX MODEL CREATION Best Practice Model Social Center "Home of colors"
1 The Sectoral Operational Programme for Human Resources Development Managing Authority for Sectoral Operational Programme for Human Resources Development.
Jelena Pešić The Republic Institute for Social Protection Belgrade, 2013.
Outcomes of Public Health
Draft Code of Practice – General Consultation / Implementation Sue Woodgate.
Transition from Regulatory to Market-Based Systems of Higher Education Maureen McLaughlin World Bank June 6, 2006.
Belgrade, 24 April 2015 Sabrina Ferraina Senior Policy Officer
Identify the institutions which have a stake in the
Vision and regional perspectives for child care system reforms in CEE/CIS International conference “Commitment, Partnership and Action” Moldova November.
Recap’ session. Rules of Jeopardy Social Protection Floor Initiative Each round, the team selects a representative The representative chooses a number.
Getting Connected: Can the ACA Improve Access to Health Care in Rural Communities? Russell Senate Office Building October 13, 2010 Clint MacKinney, MD,
REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR, FAMILY AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS LONG - TERM CARE INSURANCE THE CASE OF SLOVENIA November 2012.
PUENTE PROGRAM – BETWEEN THE FAMILY AND THEIR RIGHTS October, 2009.
Development with Disabled Network Mainstreaming Disability into Community Governance System Asitha Weweldeniya, Weweldenige, Development with Disabled.
Bochum, June 2013 Luk Zelderloo Secretary General EASPD
SOCIAL INCLUSION PROJECT EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND 2007 – 2013 MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL POLICY HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME INVESTS.
Financing and planning of resources in the best interest of the child in the child care system Zhumazhan Zhukenov Chairperson of the Child Rights Protection.
1 …. Ministry of Social Protection, Family and Child Republic of Moldova European High Level Conference of the Council of Europe "Protecting and promoting.
Joint Reviews of Local Authority Social Services JOINT REVIEW OF SALFORD COUNCIL 17 th June 2003.
Donor Coordination Forum 16 October, key challenges Poverty Social exclusion Functional gaps and system weaknesses in social services.
AUTHOR : George Bogdanov Institution: Social activities and Practises Institute (SAPI) Alternatives to Institutional Care.
De-institutionalization & social inclusion Lessons learned, remaining challenges and steps to accelerate the reform in CEE/CIS.
DIRECT PAYMENTS THE MIDDLESBROUGH EXPERIENCE. What is a Direct Payment? The Community Care (Direct Payments) Act 1996 gives Local Authority Social Services.
Redistribution of Resources in the Process of De-institutionalization Halyna Postoliuk Director of “Hope & Homes for Children” in Ukraine Chisinau November.
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
LIFELONG GUIDANCE SYSTEMS: COMMON EUROPEAN REFERENCE TOOLS ELGPN PEER LEARNING ACTIVITY WP2 Prague April 2008 Dr John McCarthy, Director International.
Search wearelumos.org. Lumos model for deinstitutionalisation: improving the lives of marginalised children Forum on Investing in Young.
Priority policy directions for Ministry of Labour, Social Protection and Family.
Diversity and continuum of services at community level T.Colin, Chisinau, November 24-26, 2009.
Investing in Children’s services - Improving outcomes across Europe 26 November 2015, Paris, ChildONEurope seminar esn-eu.org.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Strategy on creation of the system for continuous professional training of staff employed in social assistance system (for ) draft Ministry of.
Progress of child care system reform By: Ms. Anna Nordenmark Severinsson, Child Protection Specialist, UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS in Armenia, Belarus,
C4A-MD Program: transforming social care for persons with mental disabilities Ludmila Malcoci, PHD KHSIMA Executive Director Ministry of Labor, Social.
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health Knowledge for welfare and healthKyiv March 22, Round Table on Discussion of the Project.
1 Ministry of Social Protection, Family and Child 27 th September 2007.
How to improve the availability and quality of community-based services? Zagreb,23 November 2010 Dr.Vasilka Dimoska Specialist in social medicine and health.
The reorganization of Centre for Social Welfare and Social Welfare Reform in Serbia Prof dr. Nevenka Zegarac Department of Social Work and Social Policy.
REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR, FAMILY AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS LONG - TERM CARE INSURANCE THE CASE OF SLOVENIA November 2012.
1 Microinsurance as a tool to extend Social protection Strengths and weaknesses Future perspectives Valérie Schmitt Diabaté Aly Cissé ILO / STEP, october.
SEN MEETING FOR PARENTS Intentions To explain current arrangements for supporting children and young people with Special Educational Needs and.
Project “Transition policy trends in indigenous, rural and border communities” May Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru.
The Care Inspectorate Karen Anderson Director of Operations (Planning, Assurance and Public Reporting)
SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING AND RESULTS SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING.
UN system in the KYRGYZ REPUBLIC
Diana Chiriacescu HISEE, Belgrade, June 15th 2006
European experiences in transition from institutional to community-based settings Sabrina Ferraina, Policy Manager (EASPD)
Presentation transcript:

Family and Child Support Services Breakout Session 3 Building and Reforming Child Care Systems Bishkek, May 2009

Focus on Development of Human Capital and Resources General prevention of vulnerability (education, health care, income, employment, housing, guarantees of human rights fulfillment for all) Entire system is geared towards empowerment, social inclusion and focused on reaching the most vulnerable Provision of safety nets in situations of crisis, including social security and cash benefits

Services for children and families at risk Statutory Services (non-delegable government functions that decide on eligibility for services and funds to be used, assess the needs, plan, refer to services, monitor outcomes) - case management - gate keeping Family Substitute Services (provision of out-home care for children without parents or whose best interest it is to be separated, temporarily or permanently, form parents) - adoption - kinship care - foster care - small group home - small institutions Family Support Services (all families, including the above)

Examples of Family Support Services: Day care centers, extended day care, head-start services Family outreach (respite services, wrap- around services, personal assistants for disabled) Psycho-social support services (counseling, self-support groups, hotlines, diversion mechanisms) Legal support (representation, mediation)

What are “qualitative” and "equitable”” FS Services? See Quality as the quality of outcomes –Objective measures of service outcomes (independence, self-reliance, healthy lifestyles…, as per Plan) See Equity as equal quality of outcomes –No statistically significant differences among different groups on outcome indicators –No statistically significant differences among in-group and out-group social cohesion and social distance

Who can provide FS services? State - services founded/organized by national, regional, local government authorities - new services provided by former residential institutions NGOs and private service providers - accredited and contracted by the government (national or local) to provide specialized services

What needs to be assured? Quality standards (safety, skills and competences of staff, content of service…) Licensing Accreditation Inspection (standards are TOOLS for inspection!!!) Professional support and training for service providers both, for state and non-state providers

Why do we highlight the need for “diversity” and “continuum” of services? The central role of social services is to fight poverty and social exclusion (prevent separation/disintegration of families) In order to do so, social services have to be accessible to those who need them and to cover the wide range of needs for all population, at all ages; Therefore, the respect of the so called “4 A’s” in the social services field is crucial:

Key requirements in social services field Available – development of the services spectrum, sustainability, continuity, well geographically distributed Affordable – everybody can benefit from the services at a reasonable cost. Accessible – community-based, mainstreamed and/or specialized services, gate keeping mechanisms, Accountable – financial and organizational transparency/ good governance Choice – person with disabilities have the right to accessible information, and a framework that provide a possibility to choose and define his/her individual project Qualitative – person centered services, monitoring mechanisms, standards and principles 9

What about the money? It is more expensive and less effective to invest in institutions, but… Transitional costs are significant and necessary All services should have guaranteed financial sources (local, national level) Redistribution of funds on the government level is also possible Some new solutions can be introduced without significant addition in costs Cost should be calculated per capita rather than per establishment

From Pilot Projects to System Political commitment Technical knowledge PLAN !!! Synchronization of actions and various sectors within the system Joint effort (all relevant ministries – no single ministry can do it alone) Coordination, implementation monitoring - from the highest level (who has the “power” over ministries? local authorities? Institutions?)

What effect at policy level? New procedures and planning “tools” –Revision of the gate keeping system ; –Maps of needs and services; –Data collection, coherent information system at national level etc. New types of services to be designed and regulated by law, especially for the “transitional phases”; ex. early detection centres, day centres, mobile teams, vocational training, mediation for employment, supported housing etc. New types of qualifications and functions (ex. support teachers, mediators etc.); which means articulated policies between various ministries

What effect at local level? A stronger visibility of users and user’s interests and needs; Recognition of the role of NGOs in introducing new types of services (flexibility, multi-disciplinary, person-centered) A regulatory framework allowing municipalities to use their resources for the local needs; –(Sub) contracting and funding procedures –Decentralization –Statistical and planning tools at local level; Needs-driven policy at local level