The creation of the Canton Jura: Looking from the outside with a special focus on federalism and (republican) democracy A contribution for a Discussion.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Models of and problems of democracy

Advertisements

The Legitimacy of the parliament: an ongoing challenge, effort and process by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist, MP, PACE)

PRESIDENT PUTIN’S FEDERAL REFORMS Since 2000 – from ‘centered controlled federalism’ to ‘quasi federalism’(?) … the danger of the country disintegration.

Minority(s) representation and recognition through intensive participation in a Direct Democracy A presentation to the JEF&YES’ European Seminar “Majorities.

ATTITUDES TOWARDS DEMOCRACY UNDERSTANDING DEMOCRACY.

Is there a clash between the individual citizen and democracy? Keynote speech for the JMK/FES - Conference on “Values of Social Democracy yesterday, today.

Deliberation is the soul of Direct Democracy (DD) The design of the Referendum process determines the quality of DD - well designed it helps to contribute.

The role of parliamentarians in strengthening democracy The distribution of power is not a zero-sum-issue: Increasing citizens power makes representative.

Direct Democracy-Reform in the center of the making of the new constitution of Zurich by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) Director of the Scientific Institute.

Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005 Democracy in the United States Chapter 1 Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005.

Human Rights and Democracy: An ongoing and never ending individual and collective learning process An introduction to the Swiss Helsinki Committee Youth.

Germany and the European Union

Definitions and Models DEMOCRACY AND DEMOCRATIZATION.

Get a piece of construction paper And separate it into 3

Strengthening democracy by increasing citizen participation would catalyze ecological change The way individuals think about and act in nature reflects.

 starter activity In 2011, in the 5th ever referendum in UK politics, the electorate voted against a reform to the voting system. Read the article and.

The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy.

The philosophy of Direct Democracy - why we need it in order to democratize Democracy and what has been achieved so far in Europe Contribution to the seminar.

Direct Democracy in foreign policy: Switzerland and Europe A contribution to the 43rd Otago Foreign Policy School “Power to the People ? Public Participation.

The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy A presentation for southkorean.

Questions Q: Is it acceptable for the government to restrict one person’s liberty to protect the liberties of others? Q: Are citizens ever justified in.

Lessons from the history of the Swiss Democracy for the Making of a European Constitution Budapest Forum “Towards a More Democratic Europe” November 20.

European transnational campaigning - ‘citizens initiative’ in the new EU- treaty (Art.11.4) National Democracies & transnational structures + Democracies.

150 years of experiences with Direct Democracy Insights and lessons which might be learned from the national, regional and local level in Switzerland Workshop.

“ Ensuring the integrity of Elections”: A common effort ! Some thesis for deliberations to the OSCE Chairmanship Expert Seminar on Electoral Management.

The Principles of Fiscal Federalism in Switzerland

Federalism redefined Please define in one sentence, what European Federalism means to you.

The double crises of today’s democracies: Too indirect and too national - we need more direct and more transnational democracies An introduction to a debate.

Creating legitimacy and integrating diversity by empowering citizens The challenge of election law design for Democracy and Democracy building Workshop.

The quality of a referendum process depends from it’s design In order to create a dynamic relation between citizens and the political system (Direct) Democracy.

”E-Democracy” is only a tool we need - To overcome the double crises of Democracy we have to realize serious constitutional reforms which provides citizens.

The role of citizens, MP’s, Rule of law and Separation of Powers in strengthening democracy The distribution of power is not a zero-sum-issue: Increasing.

Direct Democracy as a opportunity for collective political learning The Swiss foreign policy as a ambivalent example An introduction to a debate at the.

Models of and problems of democracy International constitutional Law and democracy okt. 07 Inger-Johanne Sand.

Diversity and Integration as challenges for Democracy Ten hypothesis to be discussed concerning the question, if Switzerland and Hannah Arendt might be.

POLITICAL ORGANITATION AND THE STATE. 1. STATES AND POLITICAL SYSTEMS 1.1. States and nations 1.2. Democratic states 1.3. Non-democratic states.

History, culture, practise and design of Direct Democracy in Switzerland a short introduction from Andreas Gross (MP/Pol.Scientist/ADD)

“The role of political parties in electoral processes”: What parties might do to build and strengthen democracy Contribution to a workshop by Andreas Gross.

Speach about electoral systems at KTH, May 31, 2011 Jörgen Hermansson

Ways to Direct Citizen Participation in the political decision making of the European Union Some hypothesis and impulses from Andreas Gross, MP/Political.

Definitions, Principle, and Evolution DEMOCRACY AND DEMOCRATIZATION.

The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy.

POLITICS without POLITICIANS After a lifetime of political involvement Akiva Orr concluded that the only way to a real Democracy was to Abandon Power.

What Is Democracy? Why Democracy?. Democracy The word come from the Greek word demos meaning ‘the people’. The word come from the Greek word demos meaning.

Republic of Kenya and the Republic of South Africa.

Direct Democracy: The Swiss experience Dr. iur. Magdalena Forowicz.

What may inspire the EU from I&R experiences in Switzerland ? Some discussion points from Andreas Gross at the Meeting “Options and limits.

Advocacy: ACTIVE SUPPORT OF A CAUSEAdvocacy: ACTIVE SUPPORT OF A CAUSE –how citizen involvement can influence the lawmaking process. In our democracy,

The political system of Switzerland: ”Built and driven by the society and the sub-national societies” 7 hypothesis as a contribution to the Training program.

Defining Political Culture. Political Culture – the collection of political beliefs, values, practices, and institutions that the government is based.

The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy in a Parliamentary Democracy by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist/Director Atelier for Direct Democracy.

The Role of the Political Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist/Director Atelier for Direct Democracy.

Legislative Branch (Congress)

Competence Sharing in a Federal State

AP Government & Politics

Political representation and democracy

Principles of Government

Political Cooperation

The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy and engine for Nation building

Legitimacy deficit and Direct democracy: Bulgaria and the EU The design determines the quality of DD - a good design focuses on deliberation, participation.

Legislative Branch (Congress)

Shaping Society Together

The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy A presentation for Dutch MP’s.

The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy: Role and Responsibility of the Parliamentary majority and opposition in policy making by Andreas Gross, Dr.h.c.

Challenges of the Democratisation of Democracy from the ECI to local Direct Democracy- “in a non-successful 3rd wave democracy” by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)

Professional Training Programme for Officials from Afghanistan

by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)

by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)

Contribution to a workshop by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)

The freedom potentials of Direct Democracy (DD) might still be improved - by more and better DD, not less DD ! DD as a modern achievement and an important.

Presentation transcript:

The creation of the Canton Jura: Looking from the outside with a special focus on federalism and (republican) democracy A contribution for a Discussion with Representatives from Nepal by Andreas Gross (Zurich/St.Ursanne) Director of the Scientific Institute for Direct Democracy in St.Ursanne (JU), Swiss MP & Leader of the Socialdemocats in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Delémont, 22 nd of October

The creation of the Canton Jura shows you the structure, quality and citizen orientated notion of Federalism and (Direct) Democracy   A way to produce political legitimacy and make difficult decisions also accepted by those citizens who disagree   A way to solve political conflicts in a non- violent way and in way which produces as less non-satisfied citizens as possible

Federalism and (Direct) Democracy are sister-concepts of the parental idea to share political power as much as possible   “Horizontally” between the Confed. and the Cantons and within the Cantons between it’s regions and districts   “Vertically” between the citizens and the citizens have the last word in conflictual decisions how this concept should be applied

The (republican) core idea of Freedom and Democracy: All those who are concerned by a decision should be directly or indirectly part of the decision making process ! Life is not a destiny ! Everybody should have the right, the capacity and the opportunity to act on his and her life together with others.

Historical experiences who contributed to the implementation and acceptance of these republican concepts: Partially in old (pre-revolutionary, pre-1789-) Switzerland, but particularly after 1789 it was always the Swiss society - the Swiss “People”, who constructed the « State » and the political institutions: Down up - not upside down ! One reason why a International Super (Aristocratic) Power Conference’s decision like the one in Vienna 1815 against the will of the concerned was hard to be digested in the Jura !

Footprints of Republican Federalism and (Direct) Democracy in the Making of the Kt. Jura:   1950 the BE Cant. Gov. tried to satisfy the Jurass. opposition by upgrading the Region in the BE- Constitution   1957/59 The RJ lost a Popular (Initiative) Vote to ammend the BE Constitution   : The BE Gov,Parl +People agreed to organise “Separation Plebiscites” which left the decision to those concerned - a procedure had to be put in the BE-Constit., which had to be approved by the 2 chamb. of the Swiss P. !   1974/1975: The new Canton and it’s borders were decided by people’s votes on the regional, district’s and communal level!   1976/1977: The Jurass People elected a Constit.Assembly, approved their draft and the Swiss People and Cantons approved the new Canton and it’s Constitution !

Federal and (Direct) Democratic principles in the process of “solving” the Jura-Conflict:   Every citizen has the right to propose changes in the Constitution !   The Constitution defines who has when and for what how much power - when you want to change these power arrangements you have to change the constitution !   The Constitution is the common “Referee” for all “players”: It’s the common focus of the Government, the Parliament, the JU-MP’s and the citizens in the different regions.   In order to change the constitution you have to convince the majority of all citizens - also those in the less concerned regions !   This convincing-process opens the opportunity for communicative collective learning processes !   By inviting all citizens to participate in the decision making process you integrate them by sharing the responsibility and you activate on the same way the highest source of political legitimacy: the People itself !

In a Democracy Major Conflicts are hardly “solved” “for ever”: Every “solution” is temporal and you may come back to it at any time   Although the divisions of the Jura are not new and have pre-1815 and pre-1974 analogies, the “Institutionalization” of this kind of cantonal separation is a disadvantage of the way the Conflict was “solved” in the 1970’s.   In this sense the “South”, the Bernese half of the Jura may wants to get a new chance to decide upon it’s belonging: - Stay a Region in Bern - Join the Canton of Jura - Form together with the Northern part a new “Semi-Canton”: Linked and separated n the same time ! The decision(s) will be made by all the different people(s) in different Referenda themselves !!!