A Plan for Publication of a Magnetic Cloud List As a Long-Term Database K. Marubashi 1, K.-S. Cho 1, K.-C. Coi 1,2, J.-H. Baek 1, and S.-H. Choi 1 1 Korea.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.

Advertisements

The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.

Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.

Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of CMEs’ Source Regions Yingna Su Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Collaborators: Adriaan van Ballegooijen,

A solar eruption driven by rapid sunspot rotation Guiping Ruan, Yao Chen, Shuo Wang, Hongqi Zhang, Gang Li, Ju Jing, Xing Li, Haiqing Xu, and Haimin Wang.

Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.

The Structure of Magnetic Clouds in the Inner Heliosphere: An Approach Through Grad-Shafranov Reconstruction Qiang Hu, Charlie J. Farrugia, V. Osherovich,

Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado CME.

Scale Size of Flux Ropes in the Solar Wind Cartwright, ML & Moldwin, MB IGPP/UCLA, Los Angeles, CA Background: The solar wind has long.

Magnetic Reconnection Across the HCS Mark Moldwin UM and Megan Cartwright UC-Berkeley Isradynamics April 2010 With thanks to Mark Linton at NRL Linton.

On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki

Episodic magnetic jets as the central engine of GRBs Feng Yuan With: Bing Zhang.

Valbona Kunkel June 18, 2013 Hvar, Croatia NEW THEORITICAL WORK ON FLUX ROPE MODEL AND PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC FIELD.

Solar Erupting Filaments and Magnetic Field Configurations of IP Magnetic Clouds Yuming Wang 1, 2 & Jie Zhang 1 (Presenting) 1 George Mason University.

I. U. Observatorio del Ebro, Universitat Ramon Llull Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Massachusets Lowell IRI/COST 296 WORKSHOP; July.

CAUSES AND LESSONS OF THE 20 NOVEMBER 2003 GEOMAGNETIC SUPERSTORM V.Grechnev, A.Uralov, G.Rudenko, I.Myshyakov, V.Fainshtein, Ya.Egorov, A.Afanasyev (Institute.

Observation of Equatorial Electrodynamics in Africa using AMBER Magnetometer Network Endawoke Yizengaw Institute for Scientific Research, Boston College,

Coronal Mass Ejections: from the Sun to the Earth Consuelo Cid Space Research Group-Space Weather University of Alcala.

Five Spacecraft Observations of Oppositely Directed Exhaust Jets from a Magnetic Reconnection X-line Extending > 4.3 x 10 6 km in the Solar Wind Gosling.

National report of LITHUANIA THE 4th BALTIC SURVEYORS FORUM, 2013, Ventspils, LATVIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic Institute of Vilnius Technical University.

STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.

Forecasting Super CME Disturbances 1.Super CMEs, such as the 2000 July 14, 2003 October 28, 2003 October 29, and 2006 December 13 full halo CMEs, generate.

Chromospheric diagnostics using RHESSI visibilities Marina Battaglia & Eduard Kontar.

Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.

Relationship Between Magnetic Clouds and Earth-Directed CMEs: Space Weather Research in Stanford Solar Group Xuepu Zhao The Second International Space.

Progenitors to Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejections: Filaments and Sigmoids David McKenzie, Robert Leamon Karen Wilson, Zhona Tang, Anthony Running Wolf.

Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.

Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.

The First Space-Weather Numerical Forecasting Model & Reconstruction of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao NAOC Oct.

1. Background2. Flux variation3. Polarity reversal4. Electron evolution5. Conclusions The role of coronal mass ejections in the solar cycle evolution of.

Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University

Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314,

Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)

Further investigations of the July 23, 2012 extremely rare CME: What if the rare CME was Earth-directed? C. M. Ngwira 1,2, A. Pulkkinen 2, P. Wintoft 3.

EGU General Assembly 2011 Occurrence Frequency of Interplanetary Magnetic Flux Ropes K. Marubashi, Y.-H. Kim, K.-S. Cho, Y.-D. Park, K.-C. Choi, S. Choi,

Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.

1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.

5 th European Space Weather Week, November 2008, Brussels Operational implementation of the SWIF model in DIAS system Tsagouri Ioanna Koutroumbas.

1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen

Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.

China National Report , Uppsala, Sweden China National Space Administration.

SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,

Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.

Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.

SUB-GROUP 1: Surface Solar Magnetic Fields  The central question: Can we infer the orientation of Bz of an ICME at 1 AU by focusing on the study of the.

Connecting Near-Sun CME flux Ropes to the 1-AU Flux Ropes using the Flare-CME Relationship N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama NASA/GSFC.

Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.

KASI Low atmospheric reconnections associated with an eruptive flare Yong-Jae Moon(1), Jongchul Chae(2), Young-Deuk Park(1) 1: Korea Astronomy and.

The Structure of the Pulsar Magnetosphere via Particle Simulation S. Shibata (1), T. Wada (2), S. Yuki (3), and M. Umizaki (3) (1)Department of Phys.Yamagata.

GEOEFFECTIVE INTERPLANETARY STRUCTURES: 1997 – 2001 A. N. Zhukov 1,2, V. Bothmer 3, A. V. Dmitriev 2, I. S. Veselovsky 2 1 Royal Observatory of Belgium.

Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,

What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ？ Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.

SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,

A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.

Plasma MHD Activity Observations via Magnetic Diagnostics Magnetic islands, statistical methods, magnetic diagnostics, tokamak operation.

1 P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; K. E. J. Huttunen, Y. Li, J. Luhmann, B. Lynch, UCB/SSL; Angelos Vourlidas & R. A. Howard, NRL;

Identification of Prominence Material in Magnetic Cloud Shuo Yao China University of Geosciences (Beijing) Co-authers: E. Marsch 2,

2. Method outline2. Method outline Equation of relative helicity (Berger 1985): - : the fourier transform of normal component of magnetic field on the.

Modulation of chorus wave intensity by ULF waves from Van Allen Probes Observation Lunjin Chen 1, Zhiyang Xia 1, Lei Dai 2 1 Physics Dept., The University.

Magnetic cloud erosion by magnetic reconnection

Magnetic Clouds: The Cylindrical Elliptic Approach

Miho Janvier (IAS) & Ben Lynch (UCB)

A New Methodology to Predict the Axial ICME Magnetic Field at 1 AU

Consequences of the Anomalous Expansion of CMEs in Solar Cycle 24

Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities

Introduction to “Standard” Flux-Rope Fitting

Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds

Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds

MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares

Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices

Presentation transcript:

A Plan for Publication of a Magnetic Cloud List As a Long-Term Database K. Marubashi 1, K.-S. Cho 1, K.-C. Coi 1,2, J.-H. Baek 1, and S.-H. Choi 1 1 Korea Astron. & Space Sci. Inst. (KASI) 2 Chungbuk National University BSS & IHY Workshop, Daejeon, Sept. 2009

Outline of Presentation 1. Introduction Why a new MC list is needed? 2. Some Examples A torus model: Advantages and Necessity 3. Overview of WEB Preparation 4. Summary: Results of a Survey of 1999 Data Comparison with Existing MC Lists

Schematics of Magnetic Cloud Globally: a loop of a flux rope Internal Structure: consisting of nested helices with changing pitch angles

Introduction 1. Importance of Magnetic Clouds (MCs) (1) Physical links to CMEs (2) Strong Bz to produce geomagnetic storms 2. Problems in Existing MC-Lists (1) Survey is still NOT satisfactory. (2) Some lists contain Non-MC events. 3. Our purpose and Advantage (1) To create the most reliable MC List (2) A torus model: a new tool for identifying MCs

Example 1: An MC explained ONLY by Torus Magnetic field: rotation > 300° In Principle, a cylinder Model CANNOT explain such large angle rotation.

Example 2: Deviation MC-axis from Filament? 12 May 1977 Eruption MC observed on 16 May (WIND)  NO This event is referred to in many papers, as evidence for rotation of MC axis during propagation. However, the MC-axis direction obtained by a torus-model fitting is found to be parallel to the neutral line. (See Next slide)

Our torus fitting gives MC direction consistent with the filament.

WEB Page Outlook Events (> 7 hours) are listed. The list consists of yearly table, for the cylinder and torus models, separately.

Result of Surveying 1999 Data Huttunen et al. (2005): 9 MCs (1 duration < 7hrs, 1 problematic selection) Lepping et al. (2006): 4 MCs (1 unsuccessful fitting) & 16 MC-like structures (7 MCs from our fitting) Lynch et al. (2005): 14 MCs (1 problematic selection, 1 unsuccessful fitting, 3 MC-like structures identified to be MCs) Present Survey: 23 MCs (13 MCs + 4 MC-like + 6 “new”)

Concluding Remarks We have confirmed the necessity for a new MC list. (1) The list we are preparing is unique in that fitting results with a torus model are included when necessary. (2) The WEB page is under construction, the schedule for making public possibly within 2009, at least partly. (3) It is more advisable to use the list with communication, because further refinement may be needed in some cases, unfortunately.

Thank you very much for your attention!

Super storm of November 20, 2003