Deinstitutionalization and developing Community Based services International overview Zsolt Bugarszki, PhD.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Hijacked Language and Disability Policy ENIL- European Network on Independent Living Kapka Panayotova – Member of the Board.

Advertisements

The Open Method of Coordination as an example of policy learning at the European Level Six Countries Programme Stockholm May 2006 Peder Christensen.

Mainstreaming disability in Policies for Social Inclusion Isilda Shima Ricardo Rodrigues ANED ANNUAL MEETING 2008.

System-wide issues in child care reform Clare OBrien, Consultant For UNICEF 2 nd Child Protection Forum Bishkek, 12 May 2009.

Multi-level governance in EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler VI EU-China High-Level Seminar On Regional Policy Multi-level Governance And Support.

Workshop 4: Using the EU Structural Funds to support Independent Living Ines Bulic European Network on Independent Living Strasbourg Freedom Drive, 9 Sept.

Importance of community-based services for persons with disabilities: Availability and quality International frame June 2012,Belgrade Dr.Vasilka.

Dorotea Daniele, Facilitator. The members Polish Ministry of Regional Development ESF Council in Sweden Lombardy Region Ministry of Labour and Social.

The Voice of Carers Developing carer organisations across Europe Sebastian Fischer VOCAL - Voice of Carers Across Lothian Coalition of Carers in Scotland.

What Does it Take to Individualise Block Funded Budgets? Chris Taylor - England (1.) Use of these notes requires acknowledgement of both author and organization.

The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference.

Jean Pierre Wilken President CARe Europe Professor of Participation, Care and Support HU Utrecht University for Applied Sciences, Netherlands Tallinn,

Delegation of the European Commission Romania preparing for EU membership European Structural and Cohesion Funds.

Progress in PRS Implementation: The Republic of Serbia Presented by Ivana Aleksić, Team Manager Poverty Reduction Strategy Implementation Focal Point Deputy.

Co-funded by the PROGRESS Programme of the European Union Equinet AGM EU priorities on equality and non-discrimination and the contribution of equality.

THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5

THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5

The Salamanca Statement

How the European Social Fund can contribute to social enterprises? Workshop 7: Structural funds (ESF, ERDF) for social enterprises Strasbourg, 16 January.

Sectoral Social Dialogue Local and Regional Government Committee of Regions, EcoSoc Committee 23 April 2013.

ONE STEP FURTHER WHAT WE CAN LEARN FROM DI IN BULGARIA AND HOW TO DEVELOP PREVENTIVE SERVICES IN COOPERATION WITH MUNICIPALITIES RADOSTINA PANEVA SOS CHILDREN`S.

CENTRE FOR INCLUSION AND CITIZENSHIP TIM STAINTON CENTRE FOR INCLUSION AND CITIZENSHIP UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Lessons from the global experience.

Sirlis Sõmer Ministry of Social Affairs Disability Policy Challenges.

1 DEPARTMENT FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL INSURANCE Department for Social Inclusion.

1 “Need for a Flexible Labor Market in Bulgaria” Annual National Forum of the Bulgarian Association for Management and Development of the Human Resources.

Sustainable Mobility Towards an ETUC position. Past ETUC positions focus on Sus Mob Week For participative, fair company mobility plans ETUC encourages.

Closing Project Seminar 19 June 2014 Thon Hotel, Brussels.

1 FP6 into perspective. 2 Understanding the context and exploiting the opportunities FP6 into Perspective The European Union.

The Open Road A presentation by KARE outlining how services and supports have evolved to support persons with intellectual disabilities to have meaningful.

CBI - Ministry of Foreign Affairs CBI Centre for the Promotion of Imports from developing countries.

Equal Treatment of Disabled People in Employment ETUC - EDF JOINT CONFERENCE Thessaloniki, 2 March 2003.

Project Co-ordinator: Bernardo Bortolotti (Università di Torino and FEEM) Understanding Privatization Policy: Political Economy and Welfare Effects.

Building on a living lab in dementia care: A transnational multiple case study Research Session 3: Case studies in Living Lab application domains Diana.

Planning, contracting and funding services Phil Madden, EASPD February 2008, Belgrade.

Bochum, June 2013 Luk Zelderloo Secretary General EASPD

European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS

1 European Lifelong Guidance Policy Network National Guidance Forum of the Czech Republic Open Session Career Guidance Council in Lithuania Aleksandra.

1 …. Ministry of Social Protection, Family and Child Republic of Moldova European High Level Conference of the Council of Europe "Protecting and promoting.

Community Living: Moving from Concept to Reality? Camilla Parker, Disability & Human Rights Consultant Partner, Just Equality 3 rd May Just Equality:

Community-Driven Development: An Overview of Practice Community Development Strategies – how to prioritize, sequence and implement programs CommDev Workshop.

THE ROMA EDUCATION FUND. Can you believe it! Approximately 80% of Roma children in Romania do not attend preschool. While enrollment in primary education.

INTERMEDIATE BODY: AGENCY FOR SOCIAL ASSISTANCE HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME 2007 – 2013.

Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION MERI/ NCDTVET - PIU Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support Phare TVET RO RO2006/

© World Energy Council 2014 Energy Security in Focus: from Local to Global The Baltic States as the testing ground for more balanced energy policy Einari.

Common European Guidelines and Toolkit on the use of European Union Funds for the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care Ines Bulic, UN.

Role-play on EU decision-making. The European Union: 500 million people – 28 countries Member states of the European Union Candidate and potential candidate.

De-institutionalisation in the EU context DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, European Commission Egbert Holthuis, Head of Unit, Finland, Latvia,

DEINSTITUTIONALISATION IN LATVIA EXPERIENCES AND NATIONAL STRATEGY Tallin

Employment and Income Program Supports for People with Disabilities in Canada: Scaling-up promising practices Remarks to the Centre for Research on Work.

HELPS PROJECT Housing and Home-care for the Elderly and vulnerable people and Local Partnership Strategies in Central European cities Štěpánka Pfeiferová.

User Led Organisations (ULOs)

The European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care Claire Champeix, Coordinator European Expert Group on the Transition.

Ms. Podpeskar International Politics THE EUROPEAN UNION.

EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Third progress report on cohesion 17 May 2005 Towards a new partnership for growth, jobs and cohesion.

Three key players The European Parliament - voice of the people Jerzy Buzek, President of of the European Parliament The council of Ministers - voice of.

European Disability Strategy Disability Strategy Adopted EC - November main areas key actions / each area to meet general objectives.

Mainstreaming horizontal principle Prevention of discrimination based on disability and accessibility

Commission européenne EU Employment Strategy for people with Disabilities Final Conference Conversion Strasbourg, 21 Sept Egbert Holthuis European.

Health Sector Managing Authority Ministry of Health Page 1 Health Sector Managing Authority Ministry of Health June 2013 Mental Health.

Directorate of Teacher Education and Specialized services- Zambia

Agnes Turnpenny – Gabor Petri – Julie Beadle-Brown

SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SOCIAL SERVICES SECTOR IN EUROPE

European Structural and Investment Funds

Guidance on ensuring the respect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the implementation of ESI Funds.

Anne-Charlott Callerstig & Renate Wielpütz

Drawing lessons from the past and suggestions for the future

Role-play on EU decision-making

State of play of OP negotiations

European experiences in transition from institutional to community-based settings Sabrina Ferraina, Policy Manager (EASPD)

EUREGIO III STAKEHOLDER EVENT VENICE, FEBRUARY 2010

Presentation transcript:

Deinstitutionalization and developing Community Based services International overview Zsolt Bugarszki, PhD

Methodology August-November 2015 Policy and document analysis Interviews Focus groups In 7 countries and in 4 regions of Estonia

Methodology Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania The Netherlands United Kingdom Sweden

Definitions and references United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Guidelines of the European Expert Group

UN Monitoring Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The Committee is a body of 18 independent experts which monitors implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Policy framework

Institution vs. community based care

The first wave of Deinstitutionalization Sweden 1993 – group of group homes, segregated disability blocks The Netherlands – parallel system Hungary – planning 150 beds new institutions in 2009 Romania – modernising and renovating existing large institutions Slovakia – investing 200 million euros into large institutions

UN Monitoring committee’s Concluding Observations “The Committee is concerned that across the European Union persons with disabilities, especially persons with intellectual and/or psychosocial disabilities still live in institutions rather than in local communities. It further notes that in spite of changes in regulations, in different Member States the ESI Funds continue being used for maintenance of residential institutions rather than for development of support services for persons with disabilities in local communities.”

The second wave of Deinstitutionalization New attitude of the European Commission for the period: Structural Funds regulations include an explicit reference to the transition from institutional care to community living Only those actions that help to establish the conditions for independent living should be supported by the EU. Any measure contributing to further institutionalisation of disabled people or the elderly should not be supported by ESI Funds.

The second wave of Deinstitutionalization New strategy for Deinstitutionalization in Slovakia and Hungary National Plan in Czech Republic for the period of Relevant reduce of hospital beds and institution beds in the Netherlands Second turn of deinstitutionalization in Sweden

Developing community based services Shared responsibilities Centralization (Hungary) vs. decentralization (Czech Republic, Netherlands, Sweden) Local stakeholders vs. large service providers Regulation, protocolization vs. flexible and responsive services PR and communication of Deinstitutionalization

Developing community based services Service provision Strong evidences about the effectiveness of community based services (UK, Sweden, Netherlands) But community services are not cheaper alternatives to hospital/institution based solutions Community resources, community participation vs. traditional welfare solutions Local responsibility – local flexibility

Level of social expenditures

Developing community based services Financial structure Sustainable local governments Co-finance system (health vs social services, centralized vs. local services) Tailored balance, instead of schematic solutions Well targeted direct payment and personal budgeting schemes

Developing community based services Employment Strong tradition of sheltered workplaces (Hungary, Romania, Czech Republic) Promising tendencies to emphasise more integral solutions (supported employment, social enterprises, vocational rehabilitation, job coaching) Estonian employment policies belong to this second group but there are uncertainties around Work Ability reform and incentives, programs for companies are far from ideal.

Developing community based services User involvement Sweden – co-determination. Users have strong influence on the support and services they receive UK – Recovery orientation, user led services, peer support workers Netherlands – strong emphasis on community resources (eestvedaja) Person centred vs. service centred solutions Supported decisions making, personal budgeting, user involvement