European Socio-economic Classification: Operational Rules David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Social Classification: The Making of the NS-SEC David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex
Advertisements

ESRC Methods Festival Resources to Analyse Occupations and Social Class: The NS-SEC David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of.
Status of work on the International Classification of Status in Employment David Hunter ILO Department of Statistics Meeting of the Expert Group on International.
Labour Statistics: Issues In Integrating Labour's Dual Roles of Input to Production and Social Resource Berkeley Hill, Federico Perali, Cristina Salvioni.
Class and Poverty: Cross-sectional and Dynamic Analysis of Income Poverty and Life-style Deprivation Dorothy Watson, Christopher T. Whelan and Bertrand.
EPUNet Conference Barcelona, 8-9 May 2006 EPUNet Conference Barcelona, 8-9 May 2006.
Characteristics of the first jobs of recent school leavers in Serbia and Ukraine Irena Kogan MZES, University of Mannheim.
UPDATE ON PROGRESS WITH ISCO AND INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF STATUS IN EMPLOYMENT Expert Group on International Economic and Social Classifications.
Highlights on the Integrated Labour Force Survey (ILFS), 2006 Outline i.Background information ii.Objectives iii.Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM)
Overview of the International classification of occupations (ISCO) A case for Uganda Ssennono vincent.
United Nations Statistics Division Overview. Overview  Of the many classifications in the Family, five reference classifications will be discussed at.
Some comments on ESEC outline of the talk Theoretical aspects, objectives : what we agree on, what we suggest Measurement issues Coding ISCO Additional.
ISCO88, ISCO08 and ESeC Regional Meeting, 9 December 2005 Presentation of Hungary.
USE OF LITHUANIAN CLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPATIONS ISCO 88, ISCO 2008 and the Development of the ESeC Regional Meeting, Oslo, 7 June 2005 Violeta Skamarociene.
Work Package 11 Using ESEC based on ECHP to examine class differences in Persistent Poverty, Deprivation and Economic Vulnerability.
Validating ESeC using Round 1 of the European Social Survey ESeC Validation Conference, Lisbon, January 2006 Eric Harrison & David Rose ISER, University.
Central Statistical Office ZIMBABWE DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF 2004 LFS Lovemore Sungano Ziswa.
Measuring Social Class
ISCO-08 - Current Status and plans to support implementation David Hunter Department of Statistics International Labour Office United Nations Expert Group.
Developing a European Socio-economic Classification: Why, What and How David Rose & Eric Harrison Institute for Social and Economic.
Employment-related social quality indicators in Taiwan Presenter: Yun-Tung Wang (Max) Assistant Professor in National Taiwan University Social Work Department.
A European Socio-economic Classification: How we got here and where we are going David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex.
Using EseC to look across and within classes Workshop on Application of ESeC Lake Bled, June 2006 Eric Harrison & David Rose ISER, University of.
The Application of ESEC to Harmonized European Data: Introducing the Statistical Compendium Rhys Davies and Peter Elias.
Gender Statistics in the Labour Market Angela Me UNECE Statistics Division.
1 ISCO USE IN CYPRUS. 2 ISCO 58 in the 1960´s ISCO 68 in the 1970´s & 1980´s ISCO 88 in the 1990´s ISCO 88.COM since 2000.
Operationalising and Validating ESEC Information Requirements and Potential Data Sources.
European Socio-Economic Classification Validation Conference Portuguese Statistical Office Lisbon, January 2006.
E. O. TAWIAH LIBERIA NATIONAL SEMINAR ON CENSUS DATA ANALYSIS, MONROVIA, LIBERIA, DECEMBER 2011 LECTURE PRESENTATION ON ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYMENT AND.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Economic Characteristics in the Census Questionnaire Angela Me, Chief Social and Demographic.
© Federal Statistical Office of Germany, Labour Market Indicators on Quality of Employment Availability, relevance and recommendations from the German.
A European Socio-economic Classification: How we got here and where we are going More David Rose & Eric Harrison Institute.
The European Socio-economic Classification: A Summary and Explanation ESeC Validation Conference, Lisbon, January 2006 David Rose & Eric Harrison ISER.
Economic characteristics UNECE Task Force on economic and educational characteristics Geneva
A European Socio-economic Classification: How we got here and where we are going More David Rose & Eric Harrison Institute.
LFS Training Dataset Alexander Mack GESIS – Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences DwB-Training Course on EU‐LFS, September 2014, Ljubljana.
European Socio-economic Classification: Finalising the Matrix David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex.
Economic characteristics: Main changes to chapter CES 6 th Meeting: Experts on Population & Housing Censuses September 2014, Geneva, Switzerland.
Validation studies : project using French data Assessing the consistency of ESeC with theoretical framework “à la Goldthorpe” Pointing out using ISCO as.
WS Population Census 2004 UNECE Statistical Division METHODS USED TO COLLECT INFORMATION ON ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS IN THE ECE 2000 ROUND OF POPULATION.
Panel discussion: Q2a A.S. Young ILO Bureau of Statistics.
Developing a European Socio-economic Classification: Why, What and How David Rose & Eric Harrison Institute for Social and Economic.
Structure of the Hungarian population in employment by ESeC Based on LFS and Census 2001 Elizabeth Lindner Hungarian Central Statistical Office.
Women with small children in Russia: types of employment and labor market behavior strategies Anna Sukhova State University.
Application of ESeC in Estonian Social Surveys based on EU-SILC and LFS data Merle Paats Leading Statistician from the Social Statistics Department, Estonia.
Core variables in Estonian social surveys Merle Paats Statistics Estonia.
Session 5: International Standard Classification of Status in Employment, 1993 (ICSE-93) David Hunter International Labour Office Department of Statistics.
1 Labour Data in the Agricultural Census Roundtable Meeting on Programme for the 2010 Round of Censuses of Agriculture Budapest, Hungary, November,
The European Socio-economic Classification: A Programme of Statistical Co-operation and Harmonisation Workshop on Application of ESeC Bled, June
Measuring work and economic activity Workshop Title Location and Date.
Can the state set decent standards for gender equality? Jill Rubery European Work and Employment Research Centre Manchester Business School University.
ESSnet on the harmonisation and implementation of a European socio- economic classification Workpackage 2 – Expertise of the basic variables ___________________.
EMPLOYMENT “Creating better employment opportunities for women and men to ensure that they have decent incomes and jobs” ACTRAV - ITC.
European Socio-Economic Classification: A Validation Exercise Figen Deviren Office for National Statistics.
MEDSTAT Regional Workshop on Statistics of Informal Work   Paris, July 2017 Data sources for producing statistics on the informal economy Household.
Statistical definitions of informal economy Informal employment
Mapping National Definitions of Informal Employment to International Statistical Standards G.Raveendran.
Statistics on the informal employment & employment in the informal sector: From questions to derived variables Tite Habiyakare, Senior Statistician, ILO.
Tite Habiyakare, Senior Statistician
Compiled by Elizabeth Lindner, Miklós Lakatos – HCSO
Resolution concerning statistics of Work, Employment & labour underutilization
Tite Habiyakare, Senior Statistician,
David Hunter Representing the ILO Department of Statistics
Concepts of industry, occupation and status in employment - Overview
LAMAS Working Group June 2015
Workshop on the data collection of occupational data
Sylvain Jouhette WORKSHOP ON THE DATA COLLECTION OF OCCUPATIONAL DATA Luxembourg, 28 November 2008 ESeC: European Socio-economic.
Item 2.5 – European Socio-economic classification (ESeC)
WG ILC Nucleus variables.
European Socioeconomic Groups (ESeG) Agenda point 8
Presentation transcript:

European Socio-economic Classification: Operational Rules David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex

Operationalising ESeC: Information Required 1)economic activity situation 2)occupation 3)industry 4)status in employment 5)supervisory duties 6)size of establishment 7)length of current unemployment spell 8)ever worked 9)child under 15 or full-time student 10)permanently sick and disabled 11)in national service 12)looking after home 13)household reference person 14)sector – private/public and 15)type of pension received. The following variables may be involved in the derivation of SEGs and classes. All of these variables can be derived from other harmonised variables (see Ostby et al 2000), except for household reference person (HRP). However, many existing national surveys and censuses do measure HRP, but not in a standard or harmonised way.

Occupation For the most part occupation is measured either by (4-digit) ISCO88(COM) or by a national occupational classification similar to it. France is exceptional in this regard, but has developed a Table des Correspondances between the Catégories Socioprofessionnelles (CSP) and ISCO88(COM). ISCO88(COM) is a core variable for the Eurostat harmonisation programme and so is the obvious measure of occupation to use for ESeC.

Status in employment All SECs distinguish between employers, the self- employed (own account workers) and employees. In the EU context, we may need to add the category of family worker. The EU harmonised variable is ICSE-93.

ICSE-93 1.Employees 2.Employers 3.Own account workers 4.Members of producers’ co-operatives 5.Contributing family workers 6.Workers not classifiable by status

Labour market position It is necessary to distinguish more than activity status. Our theoretical model requires us to discriminate between employers by size, the self- employed, and between managers (and by size of enterprise or preferably managerial level), supervisors and other employees. Managerial status will be dependent on allocation to Major Group 1 of ISCO88(COM). Thus, labour market position involves a combination of ICSE-93, enterprise size and supervisory status.

Number of employees The size cut-off for enterprise size in the non- agricultural sector varies across the national SECs. Since ISCO88(COM) is the harmonised occupational classification, then the simple rule for ESeC would be that employed by ISCO for managers and employers – 1-9 and 10+. We suggest, however, 1-9, and 50+.

Farm size Most countries do not use this variable. Of those that do, area in hectares is the common measure to distinguish small, medium and large farms, but member states differ in terms of what is meant by ‘small’, ‘medium’ and ‘large’. Simplest solution is to put farmers with any F/T employees in Class 1 and the rest in Class 5.

Working hours and casual employment Casual employment and the related issue of a minimum number of working hours to qualify individuals for inclusion in the ESeC at the individual level. 30+ hours = Full time employment All in paid employment included in individual level ESeC If 2+ jobs, privilege greatest hours

Classification rules for the individual level of ESeC The ‘other unemployed’ in SEG 01, unpaid family workers in SEG 02, national service personnel in SEG 03 and the inactive SEGs do not immediately collapse to any class. Rather, individuals in these groups are (re-) allocated to the group of their ‘career typical’ (usually last ‘main’) job or to their household class.

Students The classification of full-time students: Students may be treated as a class, but normally excluded from individual ESeC F/T Students identified in SEGs

Other active and inactive SEGs Classify to last main (‘career typical’) job except for Unpaid family workers and F/T students who should be classified to HRP

Managers Managerial level operationalized through org size rule but size allowed to over-ride OUG.

Public and private sectors The outline classification does not attempt to make distinctions between SEGs or class positions by sector. If it were thought necessary to distinguish between groups in the public and private sectors, an appropriate control variable could be introduced into analyses. However, any ISCO-88 (COM) OUG that is wholly or mainly in either sector will necessarily have employment relations for employees that reflect any sectoral differences that may exist.

Public and private sectors Not to be included in matrix but possible importance to be assessed in validation studies.

Household level rules The household level of this classification would work in a similar way, except that the ESeC class position (level 1) would be allocated through a household class measure. In this case, those in SEGs and 00 would be allocated to their household class. Equally, those allocated to SEGs would take on the ESeC values of their household.

Household reference person Usually a given, i.e. part of survey design But if occupational data on all HH members is available, use dominance rules

Information requirements for sub-samples (1) StatusReference periodInformation required In employmentLast 7 daysCurrent economic activity Occupation (ISCO-88 (COM) OUG Industry (farm/non-farm) Status in employment (ICSE-93) Supervisory duties (Yes/No) Establishment size (local unit) UnemployedLast 7 daysCurrent economic activity Length of unemployment spell Last main jobEconomic activity Occupation (ISCO-88 (COM) OUG Industry (farm/non-farm) Status in employment (ICSE-93) Supervisory duties (Yes/No) Establishment size (local unit) National serviceLast 7 daysCurrent economic activity Last main jobEconomic activity Occupation (ISCO-88 (COM) OUG Industry (farm/non-farm) Status in employment (ICSE-93) Supervisory duties (Yes/No) Establishment size (local unit) Sick and disabledLast 7 daysCurrent economic activity Last main jobEconomic activity Occupation (ISCO-88 (COM) OUG Industry (farm/non-farm) Status in employment (ICSE-93) Supervisory duties (Yes/No) Establishment size (local unit)

Information requirements for sub-samples (continued) StatusReference periodInformation required Looking after homeLast 7 daysCurrent economic activity Last main jobEconomic activity Occupation (ISCO-88 (COM) OUG Industry (farm/non-farm) Status in employment (ICSE-93) Supervisory duties (Yes/No) Establishment size (local unit) RetiredLast 7 daysCurrent economic activity Last main jobEconomic activity Occupation (ISCO-88 (COM) OUG Industry (farm/non-farm) Status in employment (ICSE-93) Supervisory duties (Yes/No) Establishment size (local unit) FT Student/childLast 7 daysCurrent economic activity/age HRPLast 7 days 1 Economic activity Occupation (ISCO-88 (COM) OUG Industry (farm/non-farm) Status in employment (ICSE-93) Supervisory duties (Yes/No) Establishment size (local unit) Never workedEver worked? No. Note: Or last main job. HRP’s data will be required for any survey/census that requires ESeC at the household level