Recombinant allergens: what needs to come next?. Where we are with natural allergens n All natural, mixes based largely on an unselective extraction of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.
Advertisements

Regulatory Considerations for the Safety Assessment of Live Biotherapeutic Products in Clinical Trials Cara Fiore, Ph D US Food and Drug Administration.
Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
Laboratory of Immunobiochemistry Site Visit
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development IND Regulatory.
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the main consumer watchdog for numerous products: Drugs and biologics (prescription.
Clinical Review Process: An FDA Perspective Karen Midthun, M.D. Deputy Director of Medicine Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA April 15,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Regulatory and Industry Requirements for Botanical Drug Products Prof. Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D Department of Pharmaceutics KLE University.
What Do Toxicologists Do?
Special Topics in IND Regulation
Pharmaceutical Development and Review Process Rev. 10/21/2014 APGO Interaction with Industry: A Medical Student Guide.
1. Within a few years, more than half of newly approved medicines will be biopharmaceuticals. To ensure safety and efficacy, the FDA created a daunting.
U of Arizona Innovation Conference 20 September 2011 Marlene E. Haffner, MD, MPH Haffner Associates, LLC.
Cellular Therapies for Cardiac Diseases – FDA Preclinical Perspective Richard D. McFarland Ph.D., M.D. CBER/OCTGT/DCEPT BRMAC # 37 March 18-19, 2004.
Why Vaccines Are Important for Children
Investigational New Drug Application 21 CFR Part 312 A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
Processing and Product Quality Issues Keith Wonnacott Ph.D. Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies E BC R Moving from Investigational to Licensed.
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Fecal Microbiota for Transplantation
Mrs. Brandi Robinson Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation Center for Veterinary Medicine Regulating Animal Drugs.
INVESTIGATIONAL DRUG SERVICES IN THE HOSPITAL Sheree Miller, Pharm.D. University of Washington Medical Center
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development IND Case Studies.
Good Clinical Practice GCP
Stages of drug development
Allergen regulation in the future : what will be the place for recombinant allergens ? Jacqueline DAYAN-KENIGSBERG European Academy of Allergology and.
What is an IND? Keith Wonnacott, Ph.D.
Eureka Pre-Clinical Investigation Animal toxicology Animal pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamics Clinical Investigation Phase I Safety and pharmacology Phase.
Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research The Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Web Seminar Series presents:
Ensuring Product Quality in Gene Transfer Clinical Trials
FDA Regulation of Bacterial Vaccines
DHHS/NIH/NIAID/DAIDS September 8, 2004 ADDRESSING THE INFORMATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF REGULATORY AGENCIES IN INTERNATIONAL VACCINE DEVELOPMENT STUART Z.
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the main consumer watchdog for numerous products: Drugs and biologics (prescription.
1 Safety Pharmacology for Oncology Pharmaceuticals at CDER John K. Leighton Associate Director for Pharmacology CDER/OND/OODP.
Stefan Franzén Introduction to clinical trials.
A substance used in the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of a disease or as a component of a medication A substance used in the diagnosis, treatment,
Laboratory of Immunobiochemistry site visit Jay E. Slater, MD FDA/CBER/OVRR/DBPAP June 29, 2006.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Animal Models for Porcine Xenotransplantation Products Intended to Treat Type 1 Diabetes or Acute Liver Failure CTGTAC #47 May 14, 2009.
Drug Submissions: Review Process Agnes V. Klein, MD Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate February, 2003 www/hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut.
Exploratory IND Studies
Biomedical Research Objective 2 Biomedical Research Methods.
CHEE DRUG PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT u Drug ä agent intended for use in the diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, cure, or prevention of disease in man or animals.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Lab of Immunoregulation Berkower Lab Weiss Lab -- Angelo Spadaccini -- Russell Vassell -- Yisheng Ni -- Yong He -- Yisheng Ni -- Yong He –Hong Chen --
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
CLINICAL TRIALS IN NEW DRUG DEVELOPMENT Michael A Ross,M.D. President CPL Inc.
Biosimilars Where Are We Now? Where Are We Going? Sheldon Bradshaw January 24, 2008.
1/33.  What is INDA ?  Types of INDAs  Objectives of INDAs  Format & Contents of an INDA  IND Safety reports  IND Annual Reports  IND Review Process.
The New Drug Development Process (www. fda. gov/cder/handbook/develop
History of Pediatric Labeling
Implementation of the CTD: CBER’S Perspective May 8, 2001 Joan Wilmarth Blair, M.A. International Affairs Advisor CBER/FDA May 8, 2001 Joan Wilmarth Blair,
Chief, Gene Therapy Branch
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
A substance used in the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of a disease or as a component of a medication recognized or defined by the U.S. Food, Drug,
1 Considerations for Licensure of Next Generation Smallpox Vaccines Timothy Nelle, PhD Team Leader, Division of Vaccines and Related Applications Office.
BIOTECHNOLOGY A Review. What is biotechnology? Any technological application that uses biological systems, living organisms or derivatives thereof, to.
FDA DRUG APPROVAL FDA’s Lengthy Drug Approval Process in Twelve Steps Overview of the FDA Drug Approval Process Drug Developed June 13, 2016 | Emilia Varrone.
Drug Development Process Stages involved in Regulating Drugs
Regulatory– Terms & Definitions רגולציה - מונחים והגדרות
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
Introduction and Definitions
The Lifecycle of Pharmaceutical products
Suzanne M. Sensabaugh, MS, MBA
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Objective 2 Biomedical Research Methods
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
Presentation transcript:

Recombinant allergens: what needs to come next?

Where we are with natural allergens n All natural, mixes based largely on an unselective extraction of source material Different diluentsDifferent diluents Varying potency and stabilityVarying potency and stability n Documented efficacy in the immunotherapy of allergic disease due to hymenoptera, ragweed, grass, cat, and dust mite allergen exposure

Where we are with natural allergens n Unitage for non-standardized products uninformative n Standardized products are controlled for potency and stability n Standardization is based on identity to US standard n Standardized products constitute a small minority of product number, but a greater percentage of product volume

Where we are with natural allergens n Allergenicity = immunogenicity = potency n Products may be used for diagnosis and immunotherapy (not all approved for both) n Production issues associated with certain products (e.g. precipitates)

Where we are with natural allergens - summary n A diverse group of products, many of which are of uncertain potency, but several of which are standardized and are of documented efficacy both for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic disease.

How can we improve the use of natural allergens? n Increase the number of standardized products Improve the standardization of some current products by improving the definition of the measured allergensImprove the standardization of some current products by improving the definition of the measured allergens n Increase purity standards selective extraction techniques, purificationselective extraction techniques, purification n Improve characterization methods

How can we improve the use of natural allergens? n Improve stability (glycerol, lyophilization, other) n Improve delivery systems n Better definition of indications n More consistent and rational applications

Where we are with recombinant allergens n Current: Potent research tools dissect immune responsesdissect immune responses modify immune responsesmodify immune responses study allergen structurestudy allergen structure determine structure-function relationshipsdetermine structure-function relationships generate novel productsgenerate novel products

Where we can be with recombinant allergens n Clinical opportunities (positive): Possible standardization toolsPossible standardization tools Allergenicity  immunogenicityAllergenicity  immunogenicity Greater purity and consistency of productGreater purity and consistency of product Greater product stability (both due to purity and engineering)Greater product stability (both due to purity and engineering) Improve delivery systems (in ways not possible using native proteins)Improve delivery systems (in ways not possible using native proteins)

Where we can be with recombinant allergens n Clinical opportunities (negative): Challenges to standardization (unique products with different biological features)Challenges to standardization (unique products with different biological features) Challenges to standardization (allergenicity  immunogenicity  potency))Challenges to standardization (allergenicity  immunogenicity  potency)) Indications will be very specificIndications will be very specific –IT products may be ineffective for diagnosis –Diagnostic products may be ineffective for IT –Usage may be population-specific

Where are we in the process? n Lab-based science n Clinical/financial interest n Preclinical safety and efficacy studies n Human studies Phase 1Phase 1 Phase 2Phase 2 Phase 3Phase 3 n Licensing n Post-licensing

How does the FDA decide? n The law Food Drug and Cosmetics Act of 1938 (FD&C Act)Food Drug and Cosmetics Act of 1938 (FD&C Act) –FDA Modernization Act of 1997 Public Health Service Act of 1944 (PHS Act)Public Health Service Act of 1944 (PHS Act) n The regulations Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) n The International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) n Guidance Documents

Guidance documents that apply to allergenic products n Guidance for Industry On the Content and Format of Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls Information and Establishment Description Information for an Allergenic Extract or Allergen Patch Test (1999) n Guidance for Industry: Testing Limits in Stability Protocols for Standardized Grass Pollen Extracts (2000) n Guidance for Reviewers: Potency Limits for Standardized Dust Mite and Grass Allergen Vaccines: A Revised Protocol (2000)

Guidance documents that apply specifically to recombinant products n (ICH) Quality of Biotechnology Products: Analysis of the Expression Construct in Cells Used for Production of R-DNA Derived Protein Products (1995) n (FDA) Guidance for Industry: Submission of Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information for a Therapeutic Recombinant DNA-Derived Product or a Monoclonal Antibody Product for In-Vivo Use (1996) n (ICH) Viral Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology Products Derived from Cell Lines of Human or Animal Origin (1997) n (FDA) Guidance for Industry: Content and Format of Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls Information and Establishment Description Information for a Vaccine or Related Product (1999)

How to get there from here n Make a product that is safe and effectiveis safe and effective can be manufactured consistentlycan be manufactured consistently n Follow current Good Manufacturing Practices n Do the necessary studies

How to get there from here n Preclinical studies Product specific – efficacy, mechanism; choice of modelProduct specific – efficacy, mechanism; choice of model ToxicologyToxicology

How to get there from here n IND submission To show that the product is safe and effectiveTo show that the product is safe and effective To support the labeled indications and dosingTo support the labeled indications and dosing

IND process n Investigational New Drug n Section 262 of the PHS Act n Section 505 of the FD&C Act n

n FDA’s objectives in reviewing an IND: to assure the safety and rights of subjectsto assure the safety and rights of subjects in Phase 2 and 3, to help assure that the quality of the scientific evaluation of drugs is adequate to permit an evaluation of the drug’s effectiveness and safety (21 CFR (a))in Phase 2 and 3, to help assure that the quality of the scientific evaluation of drugs is adequate to permit an evaluation of the drug’s effectiveness and safety (21 CFR (a))

IND - Phase 1 n initial introduction into humans n dose ranging n closely monitored n safety n activity

Reasons for “hold” on Phase 1 study n unreasonable and significant risk of illness or injury n clinical investigator is not qualified n Investigator’s Brochure is misleading, erroneous or materially incomplete n insufficient information to assess risk

IND - Phase 2 n controlled clinical trials n effectiveness (preliminary) n closely monitored n relatively small numbers (100’s)

IND - Phase 3 n evaluate efficacy n larger studies (100’s ’s) n controlled n pivotal

Reasons for “hold” on Phase 2/3 study n All the Phase 1 reasons unreasonable and significant risk of illness or injuryunreasonable and significant risk of illness or injury clinical investigator is not qualifiedclinical investigator is not qualified Investigator’s Brochure is misleading, erroneous or materially incompleteInvestigator’s Brochure is misleading, erroneous or materially incomplete insufficient information to assess riskinsufficient information to assess risk n protocol or plan is deficient in design to meet its stated objectives

IND process n Protects human subjects safetysafety civil rightscivil rights n Improves the science rigorous study designrigorous study design n Facilitates product approval design previeweddesign previewed

How to get there from here n General hurdles for new allergens Biological justificationBiological justification Manufacturing practicesManufacturing practices –Lot to lot consistency Good potency assayGood potency assay –if you can’t measure it, how can you study it? Study powerStudy power

Study power n The study needs to be of adequate size to support the stated study objectives n The failure to demonstrate a difference is not sufficient to demonstrate equivalence  = 0.05;  = 0.2  = 0.05;  = 0.2

How to get there from here n Specific hurdles for new recombinant allergens character and stability of gene constructcharacter and stability of gene construct if cell line is used, the cell line needs to be extensively tested for absence of adventitious agents (such as retroviruses, EBV, SV40)if cell line is used, the cell line needs to be extensively tested for absence of adventitious agents (such as retroviruses, EBV, SV40) fermentation/growth media/growth conditionsfermentation/growth media/growth conditions purificationpurification characterization/proof of structurecharacterization/proof of structure

How to get there from here n More specific hurdles for new recombinant allergens study design must target the appropriate patient population (may be different from the natural counterpart)study design must target the appropriate patient population (may be different from the natural counterpart) indications must be carefully considered prior to study design (may be different from the natural counterpart)indications must be carefully considered prior to study design (may be different from the natural counterpart)

How to get there from here n Unitage will have to be biological unless purity is assuredpurity is assured correlation of biological activity to mass unitage is constantcorrelation of biological activity to mass unitage is constant stability of biological activity is assured under conditions under which the product will be shipped, stored and usedstability of biological activity is assured under conditions under which the product will be shipped, stored and used

But it has been done before... n Antihemophilic factor n Coagulation Factor VIIa n Coagulation factor IX n Etanercept n Epoetin alfa n Filgrastim n Hepatitis B vaccine n Infliximab n Interferon alfacon-1 n Oprelvekin n Palivizumab n Sargramostim n Trastuzumab n Pegfilgrastim n Peginterferon alfa-2b n Alemtuzumab n Anakinra n Darbepoetin alfa n Drotrecogin alfa

Resources n n AAAAI Future Immunomodulation Initiative n pre-IND meeting