The BYU Idaho Self-Study Overall Characteristics 200 page maximum 200 page maximum Abundant use of graphical displays Abundant use of graphical displays.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Plan SIP February 2011.
Advertisements

Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
The BYU Idaho Self-Study Overall Characteristics 200 page maximum 200 page maximum Abundant use of graphical displays Abundant use of graphical displays.
Teaching, Learning, and Assessing Peggy Maki Senior Scholar, Assessing for Learning AAHE
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
Faith Maina Ph.D. (SUNY Oswego) Kefa Otiso Ph.D. (Bowling Green) Francis Koti Ph.D. (Northern Alabama)
Critical Appraisal Dr Samira Alsenany Dr SA 2012 Dr Samira alsenany.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
1 Southern Connecticut State University Graduate Council Academic Standards Committee Procedures for Southern Connecticut State University.
Program Management n KSPE 4250 n Ch 2. Vision Statement n A concise statement that describes the ideal state to which the organization aspires. u Include.
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) Standard One Institutional Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness Task Force Members Juanita.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
The who, what, where, why, when, and how of writing end-of-the-year reports Sarah Todd Director of Institutional Research and Assessment Presentation to.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT Kansas State Department of Education Portfolios Definitions Advantages and Disadvantages Specific Steps Examples Try it!
Creating a Teaching/Professional Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
Student Services Program Review Plan. Overview Develop/Review Mission, Purpose, Vision and Values Create Strategic Academic Development Plan (5 year plan)
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Standard 1 The institution’s mission and goals define the institution The institution’s mission and goals define the institution …evaluation proceeds.
Needs Analysis Session Scottish Community Development Centre November 2007.
Portfolios.
Developing Effective Posters Mary Gallant SPH 685 March 6, 2015.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Program Review In Student Affairs Office of the Vice President Division of Student Affairs Virginia Tech
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Organizing Your Information
1 Technical Communication A Reader-Centred Approach First Canadian Edition Paul V. Anderson Kerry Surman
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
University of Central Florida Assessment Toolkit for Academic, Student and Enrollment Services Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Dr. Ron Atwell Dr. Paula Krist Dr.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
College of Education Graduate Programs
Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
“Developing an Exemplary Self-Study”.  1. Effective organization and implementation  2. Comprehensive Assessment  3. Documenting Compliance  4. Compilation.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Multi-grade Workshop Improving teaching and learning IPPN Conference 2008.
Strategies For Making Assessment Meaningful and Manageable
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Dr. Ron Atwell Ms. Kathleen Connelly
Strategic Planning.
Presentation transcript:

The BYU Idaho Self-Study Overall Characteristics 200 page maximum 200 page maximum Abundant use of graphical displays Abundant use of graphical displays Thoroughly proofread Thoroughly proofread A comprehensive index A comprehensive index Uniform voice Uniform voice Liberal references to external documents Liberal references to external documents

Document Layout Style guide Style guide 2 columns 2 columns Serif font Serif font White space White space Section numbering Section numbering (Make it easy for readers to access and use the document) The BYU Idaho Self-Study

Organizational Structure Mapped to standards at highest level Mapped to standards at highest level Organization Organization Description (methods, evidence) Description (methods, evidence) Analysis & Appraisal Analysis & Appraisal »Conclusions (strengths, weaknesses) »Actions (solutions, plans) The BYU Idaho Self-Study

Instructions to Working Groups 1. Keep things simple 2.Back up what you say 3.Think structure, process, and outcome 4.Find meaningful comparisons 5.Seek multiple perspectives 6.Be improvement minded 7.No surprises 8.Follow the content guidelines The BYU Idaho Self-Study

SELF STUDY Unit Self Studies Studies & Reports Exhibits & Docs The BYU Idaho Self-Study

1. Follow an overall structure such as: Description (20%) Description (20%) Analysis and appraisal (50%) Analysis and appraisal (50%) Action (30%) Action (30%) The BYU Idaho Self-Study

2. Foster analysis and action through use of templates and specific guidelines. Sample unit self-study template Central aims (1 page) Central aims (1 page) Description of unit (1-2 pages) Description of unit (1-2 pages) Significant changes (1-2 pages) Significant changes (1-2 pages) Analysis and appraisal (8-10 pages) Analysis and appraisal (8-10 pages) The BYU Idaho Self-Study

3.Pose questions that require analysis and conclusions rather than description. Ask for evidence. Sample questions To what extent is your unit meeting accreditation standards? To what extent is your unit meeting accreditation standards? To what extent is your unit accomplishing its stated central aims? To what extent is your unit accomplishing its stated central aims? What is the quality of your students and their achievement? What is the quality of your students and their achievement? What do you consider to be the major strengths and weaknesses of your department? What do you consider to be the major strengths and weaknesses of your department? The BYU Idaho Self-Study

4. Find meaningful comparisons. Evaluation usually implies comparison with something. Do your best to tie your data to some comparative anchor such as (a) purposes and desired outcomes, (b) past performance levels, (c) established benchmarks/standards, (d) how well other departments in this or other peer institutions are doing, or (e) standardized tests. The BYU Idaho Self-Study

5. As for specific actions taken to address weaknesses and describe the improvement (or not) that resulted. 6. Tell your story by weaving all of these data, pieces of evidence, conclusions, and actions into a coherent statement that clearly shows who you are. The BYU Idaho Self-Study

Standard 3.B.1 Standard 3.B.1 “The institution systematically identifies the characteristics of its student population and students’ learning and special needs. The institution makes provision for meeting those identified needs, emphasizing students’ achievement of their educational goals.” -- Handbook, p. 51 The BYU Idaho Self-Study

The original submission During the annual Stewardship Review process, departments assess their ability to meet the needs of students as well as achieve their departmental mission and objectives, through the use of several assessment techniques. Most of these assessment tools take the form of student surveys, student focus groups, and individual student interviews. The purpose of this exercise is to identify the needs of students and ways in which the department can change to better meet those needs. The appropriate data is shared with respective university departments. Based on departmental and institutional data, changes are made in the departmental objectives, policies, procedures, and processes and documented through the annual Stewardship Review process. The BYU Idaho Self-Study

The rewrite: How what we do leads to action and improvement We continually monitor changing demographics and this has led to new initiatives for our: We continually monitor changing demographics and this has led to new initiatives for our: Summer students (enhanced summer programs) Summer students (enhanced summer programs) Upper division students (changed curfew) Upper division students (changed curfew) Married students (new housing) Married students (new housing) We conduct annual stewardship reviews to help us act on the assessment of student satisfaction. We conduct annual stewardship reviews to help us act on the assessment of student satisfaction. Available computers in library Available computers in library Enhancement of advising Enhancement of advising The BYU Idaho Self-Study

Data analysis/synthesis 3. Establish benchmarks What are your criteria for success?