Virtual Reference: Trends on International, National, and State Levels Anthony S. Chow, PhD –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Advertisements

Training Principles Train the Trainers Montreal February 2010.
Grant Seeker Survey 2009 Report of Findings. 2 Survey Respondents The electronic survey was sent to all grant recipients , and declined applicants.
HOWARD UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Strategic Planning Retreat, 2005.
Evaluation of NCknows, a Statewide Collaborative Chat Reference Service: What Users and Others Told Us Charles R. McClure, Francis Eppes Professor, and.
“A Voyage to Excellence” College Connections Grant The Higher Education Coordinating Board Wednesday, September 22, 2009.
NCknows Evaluation Overview Jeffrey Pomerantz, Lili Luo School of Information & Library Science UNC Chapel Tapping the vast reservoir of.
Case Study Team 9. 2 Mission Statement The aim is to support teaching and researching of all students and faculty through the provision of relevant information,
EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program.
WELCOME! We will begin our webinar at the top of the hour As you log on, do not be surprised if you don’t hear anyone else; participants are placed on.
San Jose State University’s Martin Luther King, Jr. Library Patricia Chan Natalie Kahn Melinda Vogel Summer, 2013.
Texas’ Public Preservation Survey Results February 26, 2010.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
The Alabama Digital Preservation Network (ADPNet) A statewide private LOCKSS network Aaron Trehub, Auburn University Libraries NDIIPP Partners Meeting.
SLIDE 1 Innovations Conference March SLIDE 2 The National Lone Star Report Aligning Technology with Student Success.
Information Commons 8 March Institutional Objectives and the Information Commons UWF Strategic Plan: Goal 1 Promote programs and activities, and.
What is a Usable Library Website? Results from a Nationwide Study Anthony Chow, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Michelle Bridges, Patricia Commander, Amy Figley,
Tom Clareson Society of Florida Archivists Annual Meeting May 13, 2015.
IEEE Strategic Research Online l l Environmental Scan l 2005 IEEE Member Survey l 2004 Member Segmentation.
Partnerships for the Future 1 Our Relationship and Our Future: The Role of State Associations Florida Regional Councils Association Sheri Coven Director.
Haldimand County Public Library Board 2001 Municipal amalgamation Why do a Strategic Plan? concentration of resources on key areas ability to deal with.
The online bachelor’s degree completion program in Early Childhood & Family Studies is the first undergraduate online program at the University of Washington.
Do it pro bono. Competitor/Collaborator Analysis Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Competitor/Collaborator.
Research Cyberinfrastructure Alliance Working in partnership to enable computationally intensive, innovative, interdisciplinary research for the 21 st.
Strengthening Our Collective Impact: Developing A Strategic Plan for CMHA National Conference Workshop Materials Kelowna, British Columbia September, 2011.
THE FUTURE OF THE ARVADA CENTER FOR THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES.
2011 SAA Annual Meeting Genya O’Gara SPECIAL COLLECTIONS RESEARCH CENTER Engaged! Innovative Engagement and Outreach and Its Assessment.
Ontario Online Inter-ministerial Public Library Discussion Forum January 29, 2014 Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities Strategic Policy and.
An Evaluation of SLIS Student Satisfaction and its Global Impacts Christina Hoffman, MLS Dr. Samantha Hastings, Interim Dean The University of North Texas.
Open Forum Educational Master Plan (EMP) Toyon Room June 4, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Service Learner Orientation Giving Them Direction.
Slides from a workshop at the annual conference of the American Theological Library Association, New Orleans, June 2014 TD Lincoln.
1 California’s Family Place Library Program Bessie Condos, Gerry Maginnity, California State Library Kathleen Deerr, National Coordinator, Family Place.
Education and Outreach Goals Increase Audience Awareness Facilitate Audience Engagement Along a User-Contributor Continuum Support Audience Needs.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Kelli Ham, Consumer Health Coordinator National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Pacific Southwest Region.
1 ACLA: An Overview and 2010 Proposed Budget. Topics to be Covered Overview of ACLA Program Services Outreach Services 2009 Focus 2010 Agenda and Budget.
Comprehensive Evaluation of Al-Quds Open University Kathleen Matheos, PhD Ramallah May 21, 2007.
Standard Five NWCCU Workshop on Institutional Self-Study Hilton Seattle Airport & Conference Center Seattle, WA February 1 – 2, 2007.
NCknows: Goals and Dreams. Goals This project will enable staff from public and academic libraries to cooperate in provision of virtual reference service.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
NCknows Challenges “There is only one little problem, of course. We are not on the Web, or we are not on it in any kind of a meaningful way. That position.
The Make-Over of Strategý The Make-Over of Strategý Accentuating the Positive Musette France McKelvey Library Director, Interim Shaw University 1.
Together We Grow North Carolina Early Intervention Services EISAS Parent Survey: Assessment of Early Intervention Service Provider Quality Presenters:
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
By Anita N. Jennings.   Demographic Changes  Impact of Technology  Education  Access to Information  Social Media Drivers to Change.
The Jewish Fund Grantee and Applicant Perception Survey May Joe Gaglio Principal Deloitte & Touche LLP.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
Strategic Planning Forum: What has the Core Committee been doing? March 11 & 12, 2009.
COLLABORATION & INNOVATION A NEW LSTA GRANT PROGRAM Hosted by the STATE LIBRARY OF NORTH CAROLINA.
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
ATP Meeting September 18, Overview Key components of the 2016 Plan Public Participation Plan Discussion.
Developing, Funding, and Managing University Centers Presentation by Doug Day Deputy Director for Policy Studies Illinois Board of Higher Education SHEEO.
1 of 20 Designing a Responsive e-Learning Infrastructure Systemic Change in Higher Education Anthony S. Chow, PhD Rebecca A. Croxton, MLIS The University.
A worldwide library cooperative OCLC Online Computer Library Center QuestionPoint and 24/7 Reference Update Vivien Cook Regional Account Manager OCLC PICA.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
MOBIUS CHAT REFERENCE TASK FORCE DECEMBER 2014 – MAY 2015 Jeannette E. Pierce University of Missouri, Columbia June 8, 2016.
A Strategic Plan for the Library Presenters: [group names redacted] Whitni Watkins (Students in the SJSU MLIS Program) April 20, 2012.
Practical Library Assessment Stephen Spohn. About me Academic libraries University of Maryland - George Mason University - Northern Essex Community.
Evaluation of a Chat Reference Service from the User’s Perspective
CBP Strategic Communications Plan
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Designing a Responsive e-Learning Infrastructure
Simon Pawley Market Research, Oxford University Press
Statewide A&OER Efforts of Libraries
SSarah The Value of Scholarly Communications Programming: Perspectives from Three Settings Sarah Beaubien • Scholarly Communications.
Trends on International, National, and State Levels
Presentation transcript:

Virtual Reference: Trends on International, National, and State Levels Anthony S. Chow, PhD – Rebecca A. Croxton, MLIS Strategic Performance Systems

Project Overview ● Five-month study funded by the State Library of North Carolina in 2014 ● Two Guiding Goals: 1. Identify & evaluate other statewide reference service models 2. Provide recommendations to the State Library for future operation of its statewide reference service - NCKnows.

NCknows Overview & Performance ● NCknows: North Carolina’s statewide virtual reference service ( th year) ● Administration: NCLive – formely State Library of North Carolina with help from a committee of librarians and directors from NC libraries ● Staffing: Academic and public librarians from across North Carolina ● Hours: 24/7 (except Sat/Sun Midnight - 8 AM) ● Usage: Continues to grow annually (160% increase from to 28,016 transactions/year) ● Users: 2011 to % from academic libraries, 23.5% public libraries, 22% from NCLive, NCknows, NCpedia, K-12, and unknown. ● Operating Costs: $163,000 to operate NCknows in ● Funding: LSTA grant awarded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services.

● Participants: 340 participants provided input in a statewide study of NCknows and nationwide and international study of virtual references ● Data Collection Methods & Sources: ○ Literature Review (22 relevant studies identified) ○ Environmental scan of all 50 states ○ Interviews (n=5) ○ Focus Groups (n=4) ○ Surveys (n=6) Mixed Methods Study Design

Goal 1: Identify & evaluate other models for statewide reference services

Goal 1 Data Sources Literature Review - 22 articles selected for review regarding statewide virtual reference services funding models, staffing models, and current trends relating to virtual reference. Nationwide Analysis - Examination of 50 States, 2 Canadian Provinces, and UK with regard to statewide / collaborative services offered by these entities.

National & International Trends Prevalence: 30% of states in the U.S. provide statewide virtual reference services Number of statewide services in decline - participating libraries choosing to provide their own local support Funding: LSTA funding only Consortia funding only Combination - LSTA & Consortia Staffing Models: < 24/7 w/ collaborative partner volunteers 24/7 w/ collaborative partner volunteers during business hours / outsourced after hrs Management Models: 27.8% managed by State Libraries 22.2% managed by consortia 22.2% managed by public library 22.2% managed by a private company Usage Patterns (# transactions/year) 22.2%: < 10, % : 10, , % : 20, , %: > 40,000 NCknows: 29,708 transactions in 2013 Service Hours: 77.22% offer 24/7

1. offered by most virtual reference services. 2. NCknows staffing model is prevalent model. 3. Four predominant management models (managed by state library, consortium, private company, or public library 4. LSTA & Consortia funding predominant funding models 5. Local support & desire to serve local library patrons biggest issue for statewide VRS Key Findings - Goal 1 Goal 1: Identification and Evaluation of Other Models for Statewide Virtual Services

Goal 2: Recommendations future operational models for NCknows.

Goal 2 Data Sources Interviews (n=5) - Directors of NCknows, NCLive, Florida’s statewide virtual reference, and Durham County Library Systems Resource & Finance Officer Focus Groups (n=4) State Library of NC Staff (n=3) NCknows staff (n=5) Academic Library Directors (n=10), Public LIbrary Directors (n=5). ●Surveys (n=6) ○National survey of State Library VRS (n=33) ○Patron survey (n=73) ○NCknows staff survey (n=88) ○NCknows staff follow-up survey (n=38) ○Library administrator survey (n=18) ○NCknows transaction log survey (n=840) NCknows,

Stakeholder Perceptions “This service allows me to complete my research at all hours of the day. It helps me attain by education goals in a timely manner.” - North Carolina Library Patron, August 2014 Patrons (n=73): 1. Want to see virtual reference continue (M=6.8 out of 7) 2. Are satisfied with NCknows (M=6.6) 3. Find it relevant to their needs (M=6.5) 4. Find it is efficient (M=6.4) and easy-to- use (M=6.4) 5. Use NCknows primarily for: -Reference questions (80%) -Factual questions (43%) -Technology support (14%) -Classroom support (14%)

Stakeholder Perceptions “ Patrons are often amazed at how much they can get from the service and delighted to have access beyond the library's base hours. My library's patrons are delighted at the idea of remote, all-hours assistance.”(NCknows staff, August 2014) Staff (n=88): ●Staff, volunteer, & after hours staff would like to see NCknows continue (M=6.4 out of 7) ●Feel it is an important part of patron’s library experience (M=6.2) ●Feel it is relevant for meeting patron needs (M=6.1) ●90% feel virtual reference will increase in the future. ●CONVENIENCE is the number one word to describe NCknows

Stakeholder Perceptions Having access to virtual reference help is very needed by smaller universities whose staff may not have the expertise to answer questions in some of the specialized fields. (Library Administrator, August 2014) Library Administrators (n=18): ●Believe virtual reference is an important part of of a library patron’s experience and would like to see the service continue (M=6.4 out of 7) ●Believe virtual reference is relevant to providing patron services (M=5.9) ●Are satisfied with NCknows (M=5.7).

North Carolina - Statewide Trends Academic Libraries make up the largest patron user base (59%).

North Carolina - Statewide Trends Four year colleges and public libraries represent the largest usage of NCknows by institution type. Note: The top 17 of 158 library users account for 76% of all transactions.

North Carolina - Statewide Trends Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays are the busiest days of the week for NCknows. Sat. is the slowest day.

North Carolina - Statewide Trends Busiest time of day is 10:00 AM - 4:00 PM.

At UNC-Charlotte’s Atkins Library, patrons wishing to chat live with a librarian after regular business hours are automatically directed to an NCknows pop-up chat window.UNC-Charlotte’s Atkins Library

At Wake Tech Community College, Ask NCknows is available 24/7.Wake Tech Community College

● NCknows is a valued service by users, librarians, and library administration. ● NCknows has high return-on-investment and social-value. ● North Carolina libraries have expressed a commitment to collaborate and partner with another to help provide a mutually beneficial service that will enable all libraries to provide 24/7 virtual reference services for their patrons. ● Of the 158 libraries that use NCknows, a small number of academic and public libraries represent the majority of all transactions. ● Business hours during the business week are show time. Key Findings - Goal 2 Goal 2: Provide recommendations for future operation of NCKnows.

Strengths ● Valued service by Stakeholders ● High ROI ● 12 years of continued service ● Strong usage from participating libraries ● High number of transactions based on national comparisons ● Strong core and tradition of volunteer service Opportunities ● Increased cooperation among libraries to help create new funding model and partnership ● Increased marketing and outreach ● Increased usage and support for patrons state- wide ● Provide increased suite of services ● Increased quality and consistency of support Weaknesses ● Marketing ● Tension between local support demands and cooperative, state-wide service ● Information sharing between libraries and specific library-specific policies ● Consistent funding and staffing Threats ● Reduction of LSTA funding ● Reduction of hours of support ● Increased cost for participating libraries ● Dissolution of NCknows virtual reference service NCknows - SWOT Analysis

1. Work to continue supporting the NCknows virtual reference service as a collaborative partnership between the State Library and a consortium of North Carolina libraries. 2. The State Library should consider remaining as a supporting and management partner to Ncknows because of strategic importance. 3. The State Library may consider taking the lead in creating a consortium of the state’s libraries to help support and maintain funding for the NCknows service. 4. Future service hours, technologies, and software used should be dictated by the specific, to-be-identified goals as agreed upon by the state’s libraries that participate in the future. Recommendations Four recommendations based upon study findings.

Questions & Comments? For more information, please contact ● Dr. Anthony Chow - Becky Croxton - Download slides at