Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC Status - Baseline Design 250 250 Gev e+ e- Linear Collider Energy 250 Gev x 250 Gev Length 11 + 11 km.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P5 Review Fermilab Feb 1 Americas Slide 1 P5 ILC Review - Americas Region Report ART ProgramART Program –FY08 status –FY09 proposal ILC Construction Project.
Advertisements

M. Ross Project Advisory Committee Review 13 December, 2012 KEK Main Linac Layout – Two variants for two different types of sites GDE PAC Review.
Nick Walker KEK-DESY meeting 7 th March 2005.
Report from the GDE director Barry Barish Snowmass 14-Aug-05.
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish ILC Industrial Forum Japan 28-June-05.
Damping Rings Baseline Lattice Choice ILC DR Technical Baseline Review Frascati, July 7, 2011 Mark Palmer Cornell University.
View from the NSF: Later Years J. Whitmore (EPP-PNA) M. Pripstein (LHC) M. Goldberg, J. Reidy (EPP) LEPP – CLEO CESR Symposium at Cornell, May 31, 2008.
The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish EPP2010 Cornell University 2-Aug-05.
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Reduced Bunch Number 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
US Cavities Status and Plan Mark Champion 01 October 2009.
Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07.
2011 Damping Rings Lattice Evaluation Mark Palmer Cornell University March 8, 2011.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Global Design Effort U.S. ILC Cost Translation R. Stanek, et al. Vic Kuchler 1/26/07.
Global Design Effort Americas Region Efforts and Resources Mike Harrison GDE.
14-Feb-08 HEPAP Global Design Effort 1 Navigating the Bumpy Road to the ILC Barry Barish GDE Workshop - Sendai 3-March-08.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
R&D, Collaborations and Closeout Fulvia Pilat MEIC Collaboration Meeting March
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
1-Feb-08 P5 Global Design Effort 1 GDE - ILC Barry Barish P5 Meeting - Fermilab 1-Feb-08.
RDR Report Writing Nan Phinney SLAC. 7/20/06 VLCW06 Global Design Effort 2 GLC Report Working model is the 2003 GLC Report ch 4-7
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
ILC – Recent progress & Path to Technical Design Report Brian Foster (Hamburg/DESY/Oxford & GDE) Plenary ECFA CERN 25/11/11.
Global Design Effort 1 Possible Minimum Machine Studies of Central Region for 2009 Reference, ILC Minimum Machine Study Proposal V1, January 2009 ILC-EDMS.
DESY_ILCW07 Global Design Effort-CF&S 1 Beam Delivery System & Interaction Region Fred Asiri CF&S Point of Contact.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
CLIC cost estimate Hans-H. Braun, CLIC-GDE meeting, February 8, 2008  Cost model goals  Methodology  Cost distribution  Future improvements.
1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central Injector complex.
BCD Status: Strengths and Weaknesses Tor Raubenheimer.
Summary of TDR Cost Reviews at KILC-12 G. Dugan KILC-12 4/26/12.
CLIC main activities and goals for 2018 Design and Implementation studies: CDR status: not optimized except at 3 TeV and not adjusted for Higgs discovery,
MCTF 8/17/06 A. Bross MTA Activities and Plans MCTF August 17, 2006 A. Bross.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
The fourth Baseline Technical Review (BTR) - Conventional Facilities and Siting March 2012 All changes made to the CFS 2007 Reference Design during.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
Global design effort DOE meeting 8/10/06 Global design effort Americas 1 FY07 DOE ILC Budget recommendations G. Dugan ILC-GDE/Cornell University GDE Americas.
ILC Test Facility at New Muon Lab (NML) S. Nagaitsev Fermilab April 16, 2007.
US LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP) Background  Proposed in 2003 to coordinate efforts at US labs related to the LHC accelerator (as opposed to.
International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory in the 5 Year Plan A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009.
International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 9/13/2006 Americas Regional Team FY08-09 Planning Meeting 1 1/11 ILC-Americas FY08-09.
1 The ILC Control Work Packages. ILC Control System Work Packages GDE Oct Who We Are Collaboration loosely formed at Snowmass which included SLAC,
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
DR Layout Description ILC DR Technical Baseline Review Frascati, July 7, 2011 Mark Palmer Cornell University.
28-Jan-08 SiD Workshop Global Design Effort 1 ILC Status Impacts of US/UK Budget Actions Replan for GDE Technical Design Phase Barry Barish SiD Workshop.
General remarks: I am impressed with the quantity and quality of the work presented here and the functioning of the organization. I thank ILC and FNAL.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto th ATF2 Project Meeting Accelerator Design and Integration – New Baseline Proposal for ILC – ‘Strawman Baseline.
24-July-10 ICHEP-10 Paris Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10 ILC Global Design Effort.
SLAC and ILC Jonathan Dorfan, Director LCFOA, SLAC May 1, 2006 Particle & Particle Astrophysics.
The ILC Outlook Barry Barish HEP 2005 Joint ECFA-EPS Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Americas Regional Planning Exercises Tor Raubenheimer SLAC Beijing GDE Meeting February 4 th 2007.
Eric Prebys, Fermilab Program Director, LARP July 10, 2012.
P5 Potential US Accelerator Collaboration with the ILC-in-Japan Mike Harrison Mike Harrison.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
Fermilab-India Agreements and Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Project-X, International Collaboration Coodinator Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia,
Global design effort Americas 1 FY08-09 ILC-Americas planning G. Dugan ILC-Americas Planning meeting SLAC Sept. 13, 2006.
ILC Global Design Effort
Electron Source Configuration
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
ILC - Global Design Effort
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
Presentation transcript:

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC Status - Baseline Design Gev e+ e- Linear Collider Energy 250 Gev x 250 Gev Length km # of RF units 560 # of cryomodules1680 # of 9-cell cavities Detectors push-pull 2e34 peak luminosity 5 Hz rep rate, > 6000 bunches per cycle IP spots sizes:  x 350 – 620 nm;  y 3.5 – 9.0 nm

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC Status– Alternate designs The concept is to investigate the removal of conservative features of the design to save money and/or simplify the design: Single tunnel Low loss waveguide power distribution potentially allows the rf sources to be placed on the surface and spaced ~ 1km apart. Reliability concerns which largely determined the second tunnel concept thus negated. Also reduces tunnel cooling requirements. Personnel safety remains an issue Shallow site central campus Bring the collision points, beam delivery system, and damping rings close to the surface Reduced beam power Compensate with brighter beams and/or collisions point optics. Simplifies rf sources, beam dumps, collimation systems etc…. + ……………. ?

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC Status - Global R&D Program What are the drivers for the global program ? Cost Risk –Main Linac RF systems (cavity gradient & yield, cryomodules, HLRF etc.. –Conventional construction/facilities Technical Risk –Electron cloud effects in the damping rings –Beam delivery system (small beams) Production Risk (industrial involvement) –Technology transfer –Volume production cavity gradient MV/m Cost

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC status - R&D planning We are currently planning a ~4 year R&D phase which results in a Project Proposal by 2012 RF unit system test –3 CM + beam RF unit system test –3 CM + beam –KEK and Fermilab Complete the technical design and R&D needed for project proposal ( some exceptions) Complete the technical design and R&D needed for project proposal ( some exceptions) –Documented design –Complete and reliable cost roll up Project plan developed by consensus Project plan developed by consensus –Cryomodule Global Manufacturing Scenario –Siting Plan or Process –Project Implementation Plan What won’t be done:- Detailed Engineering DesignDetailed Engineering Design – (final engineering, drawings, industry, etc) will follow before construction. Global CM industrial plant constructionGlobal CM industrial plant construction

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas Americas Region - FY08 Status The FY08 omnibus spending bill capped US DOE FY08 ART funding at $15M (SRF $5M). Since we were 3 months into the fiscal year with a $60M CR guidance this was tantamount to a ‘cease work’ for the balance of FY08. NSF Cornell support was minimally impacted.The FY08 omnibus spending bill capped US DOE FY08 ART funding at $15M (SRF $5M). Since we were 3 months into the fiscal year with a $60M CR guidance this was tantamount to a ‘cease work’ for the balance of FY08. NSF Cornell support was minimally impacted. All spending was halted ~ 1 Jan and a count of funds remaining at the labs indicated an unobligated balance of ~ $2.5M under the cap. A skeleton program continues in FY08.All spending was halted ~ 1 Jan and a count of funds remaining at the labs indicated an unobligated balance of ~ $2.5M under the cap. A skeleton program continues in FY08. –GDE Common Fund ($400K) –GDE Collaboration management (4 FTE’s: Barish, Ross, Harrison, Carwardine) + some travel for meetings –CESR TA support ($1m) –‘Keep alive’ SRF program (~$1.5M) There is some level of ‘generic’ support through the FY08 base programThere is some level of ‘generic’ support through the FY08 base program

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas US ILC Program – P5 advisory committee ( selected quotes ) If the optimum initial energy proves to be at or below approximately 500 GeV, then the International Linear Collider is the most mature option with a construction start possible in the next decade. The cost and scale of a lepton collider mean that it would be an international project, with the cost shared by many nations. – International negotiations will determine the siting; the host will be assured of scientific leadership at the energy frontier. International negotiations will determine the siting; the host will be assured of scientific leadership at the energy frontier. A requirement for initial energy much higher than the ILC’s 500 GeV will mean considering other collider technologies A requirement for initial energy much higher than the ILC’s 500 GeV will mean considering other collider technologies Whatever the technology of a future lepton collider, and wherever it is located, the US should plan to play a major role. The panel recommends for the near future a broad accelerator and detector R&D program for lepton colliders that includes continued R&D on ILC at roughly the proposed FY2009 level in support of the international effort. This will ensure a significant role for the US even if the ILC is built overseas.

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas Americas Region - FY09 Program The FY09 presidents budget shows US ILC at $35.3M (The House & Senate consistent with this)The FY09 presidents budget shows US ILC at $35.3M (The House & Senate consistent with this) The out year assumption is constant level of effort for the next several yearsThe out year assumption is constant level of effort for the next several years No detailed US ILC multi-year program yet but it is conceptually compatible with the new GDE R&D plan.No detailed US ILC multi-year program yet but it is conceptually compatible with the new GDE R&D plan. Strategic goals for ART -> – Preserve collaborative commitment to the GDE –Provide contributions to the ILC R&D program which are unique to the US –Support a value engineering effort in the medium term –Maintain US program in ILC SRF R&D – Project X synergy (SRF, HLRF, LLRF, accelerator physics)

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ART DOE FY09 Funding by System Program Element$M% GDE & Lab Management Electron Source Damping Rings Beam Delivery Accelerator Physics Global systems RF Technology (SRF + systems) Conventional Facilities Contingency

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas Americas Region ILC Program - major elements (2009 – 2012) Cavities & Cryomodules – Fermilab (ANL, JLAB, Cornell)Cavities & Cryomodules – Fermilab (ANL, JLAB, Cornell) RF Systems – SLACRF Systems – SLAC Damping rings electron cloud – Cornell (DOE & NSF)Damping rings electron cloud – Cornell (DOE & NSF) Beam delivery systems/Detector Interface – SLAC (BNL)Beam delivery systems/Detector Interface – SLAC (BNL)

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC Key Technologies – cavities & cryomodules StatusStatus –Maintain US presence in the GDE SRF program but no out year ramp up. –No industrialization (tech transfer only). –Consistent with 2012 systems tests (joint goal between ART & Fermilab). –Gradient program at JLAB & Cornell (+ANL/Fermilab) –Cryomodule prototyping at Fermilab (cryomodule engineering, cryomodule parts, testing etc….. $25M over 4 yrs) –Note: cryomodule development assumes some Fermilab infrastructure –Global Plug compatibility

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC Key Technologies – RF systems Next generation hardware under development (SLAC)Next generation hardware under development (SLAC) –Solid state modulator, sheet beam permanent magnet klystron, tunable distribution system

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC Key Technologies – Cryogenics & Conventional Facilities Key Technologies but less R&D-like:Key Technologies but less R&D-like: –ILC cryogenic system similar in scale to the LHC currently ‘cold’ at CERN (27km at 1.8K). We will obviously learn a great deal in the next several years from full operations. LHC Sector1/2 status as of yesterday:- The arc has been electrically qualified during the week and the DC cables are now being connected to the current leads of both DFBAs. The QPS tests and the power converters unlocking will follow next week from Tuesday with the aim of starting the powering tests on Friday. The problem with the level gauges of the stand alone magnets in the long straight sections are being solved and once the last boil-off tests are analyzed they will go through ELQA next week. Finally, the DFBX of point 2L, after the installation of the heaters and temperature sensors, will be delivered for the ELQA next Tuesday. The one in point 1R will be ready in about two weeks.LHC Sector1/2 status as of yesterday:- The arc has been electrically qualified during the week and the DC cables are now being connected to the current leads of both DFBAs. The QPS tests and the power converters unlocking will follow next week from Tuesday with the aim of starting the powering tests on Friday. The problem with the level gauges of the stand alone magnets in the long straight sections are being solved and once the last boil-off tests are analyzed they will go through ELQA next week. Finally, the DFBX of point 2L, after the installation of the heaters and temperature sensors, will be delivered for the ELQA next Tuesday. The one in point 1R will be ready in about two weeks. –CFS issues involve design choices more than anything

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC Key Technologies – High Accuracy Instrumentation Mostly this work is based on the GDE beam test facilities.Mostly this work is based on the GDE beam test facilities. –The ATF2 (Accelerator Test Facility at KEK in Japan) facility is concerned with demonstrating very precise beam position measurements in a facsimile of the collision region. Beam stabilizing feedback systems, beam spot instrumentation measurements systems, precise collimation and eventually vibration and mechanical controls. This work involves a global collaboration not just the US. –CESR TA (Cornell) is utilizing specialized vacuum components and instrumentation in an R&D program of beam dynamics associated with unwanted electrons and very bright beams

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC Key Technologies – High Availability systems High Availability power supplies: M+1 redundant power modules Redundant regulators 38 power supply units delivered to KEK for ATF2 ART Controls was all but brought to a stand-still by the FY08 budget Key expertise has been lost to other programs

Mike Harrison LCFOA meeting July 08 Americas ILC Status - Summary The FY08 omnibus spending bill resulted in an immediate cessation of most of the Americas region efforts.The FY08 omnibus spending bill resulted in an immediate cessation of most of the Americas region efforts. The ART planning assumptions have changed significantly in the past 12 months. The recent US & UK funding decisions result in a more R&D like (less –engineering like) phase for the next few years.The ART planning assumptions have changed significantly in the past 12 months. The recent US & UK funding decisions result in a more R&D like (less –engineering like) phase for the next few years. The ILC budget is $35.3M in FY09 appropriationsThe ILC budget is $35.3M in FY09 appropriations The proposed US Program is well aligned with the GDE R&D program as well as the national and lab based programs.The proposed US Program is well aligned with the GDE R&D program as well as the national and lab based programs. We (GDE) are aiming to have a project proposal ready on the ~2012 timescaleWe (GDE) are aiming to have a project proposal ready on the ~2012 timescale A continuing resolution in FY09 is (of course) based on the FY08 funding and will prove difficultA continuing resolution in FY09 is (of course) based on the FY08 funding and will prove difficult