The donor’s future role in the child’s life MCK Fertility Centre Views of candidate parents & donors A. Brewaeys, M. Brewaeys E. de Reus

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Abortion Part Four.
Advertisements

Chapter 7 Marriage Relationships
Pargas Health Care and Red Cross Hedda Mattson (Nurse) Ann-Sofie Nyberg-Ölander (Child psychologist) Mira Karlsson (Psychologist trainee & Volunteer in.
Childbearing Intentions and Attitudes Towards Children among Childless Sexual-Minority and Heterosexual Men and Women. Nola du Toit Department of Sociology.
LGBT Families Research Issues And Important Questions.
Towards an ideal of gender equity? Simon Lapierre, Ph.D. School of Social Work McGill University, Montreal Child protection.
Intimate Relationships and Communication
An introduction to Child Protection and Safeguarding
Projekt „Regenbogenfamilien“ Dr. Elke Jansen Gay and lesbian family planning in Germany – options and constraints – Dr. Elke Jansen Manager of the project.
Chapter 7 Marriage, Intimacy, Expectations, and the Fully Functioning Person.
To use picture clues, a media clip and a quote from the Qur’an to understand Muslims attitudes to infertility treatments.
The family in Norwegian society Anne Skevik Grødem, NOVA – Norwegian Social Research.
The Self-Concept.
Chapter 11 Parents and Children Over the Life Course.
Disclosure, family communication context, and child outcomes after infertility treatment Martha A. Rueter, PhD a, Jennifer Connor, PhD b, Lauri Pasch c,
1 Developing relationships with culturally and linguistically diverse families. by Fay Hadley Project Manager Lady Gowrie Child Centre, Sydney.
Surrogacysurrogacy VAHID F MD
Chapter 7: Work and Retirement
TEMPLATE DESIGN © SEMEN DONORS WHO ARE OPEN TO CONTACT WITH THEIR OFFSPRING Wendy Kramer*, Ken Daniels**, Maria Perez.
Copyright McGraw-Hill, Inc Human Sexuality: Diversity in Contemporary America, 7th Edition.
TITLE: WHAT ARE THE ISSUES IN BIOETHICS TODAY? LO: IDENTIFY ISSUES OF CONCERN IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY.
To Parent or Not to Parent
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2004 Chapter Nine Sexual Orientation Diversity.
"Just Another Form of Giving Back": Motivations, Awareness, and Attitudes of Potential Oocyte Donors at Orientation Lindsay B. Gezinski, PhD, MA, MSW Sharvari.
Donor-insemination in SMCG/MCK between 1977 and 2003 (Leiden Clinic)
Sexual Orientations.
Rights and Responsibilities in Healthy Relationships Module E: Lesson 2 Grade 12 Active, Healthy Lifestyles.
Grade 12 Family Studies Choosing to Parent. The Childfree Alternative Historically, being childless and married was stigmatized. Are you sick? Is there.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Being Single Preview.
Unifying science, education and service to transform lives Module 6 Families of Origin and Families of Choice A Provider’s Introduction to Substance Abuse.
Chapter 15 Families. Chapter Outline Defining the Family Comparing Kinship Systems Sociological Theory and Families Diversity Among Contemporary American.
Remarriage A growing way of life Divorced people as a group are not against marriage In general, men tend to remarry more frequently and more quickly than.
Adele Menniti and Maura Misiti CNR Irpps - Institute for Population Research and Social Policies Fertility Preferences and Intentions : Some Results from.
2007 Family Talk About Drinking Study. Introduction The 2007 Family Talk Study was conducted by Data Development Worldwide among those individuals who.
Human Sexuality Final Project Utah vs. German beliefs Christina Randle Cathy Carey FHS 2450 July 19, 2012.
Chapter 9 Sexual Orientations. A Continuum of Sexual Orientations Primary erotic, psychological, emotional, and social orientation –Homosexual Orientation.
PARAPHRASED FROM: EGALE CANADA & GAY AND LESBIAN EDUCATORS OF B.C. Myth Busters – Lesbian, Gay, Bi-, Trans. – Intersexed & Questioning Peoples.
The process of recruiting an egg donor Linda Henderson Sister Regional Fertility Centre 3 rd October 2015.
1 III Cloning. 2 Robertson’s Project Robertson considers human cloning from the point where Pence left us: with a program of cloning that is safe and.
Grand Challenge Seminar Reproduction. Births by Mother’s Age
TITLE: WHAT ARE THE ISSUES IN BIOETHICS TODAY? (CONT’D) LO: IDENTIFY ISSUES OF CONCERN IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY.
Adoption. jackman-on-adoption-in-australia-its-almost-like-they- try-to-put-you-off
EXPLORING MARRIAGES AND FAMILY, 2ND EDITION Karen Seccombe
Egg donation is the process by which a woman provides one or several eggs (ova, oocytes) for purposes.
Families Chapter 5. Healthy Families Lasting relationships must be based on mutual caring, trust, and support. If the relationships with family members.
Chapter 7 Marriage Relationships. Chapter Sections 7-1 Individual Motivations for Marriage 7-2 Societal Functions of Marriage 7-3 Marriage as a Commitment.
A STRENGTHS/ASSET BASED APPROACH TO SERVICE DEVELOPMENT TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES FOR CHILDREN YOUNG PEOPLE AND THEIR FAMILIES 22 ND JANUARY 2010.
MY ADVOCACY JOURNEY FINAL FOR TEL 410: LEADERSHIP & ADVOCACY IN EDUCATION BY CATHERYN CALDERON.
Gay and Lesbian Families A short study in family diversity.
Views on Infertility, Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) and Social Egg Freezing in the European Union An Opinion Poll conducted by for.
Advances in Fertilization
Cohabitation: Sliding vs. deciding
Chapter 9: Adjusting to Marriage
Who’s in Charge: Self-Directed Supports
TÉKPONON JIKUAGOU ORIENTATION (DAY 3)
Cohabitation effect Sliding vs. deciding
Chapter 10 Planning Children and Contraception
Chapter 9: Adjusting to Marriage
Bell Ringer #1 Get out a textbook, turn to page 124.
Section 1: RECOGNITION Module 6: Dynamics of family violence
Gay and Lesbian Parenting
Racism.
Being a parent/carer: Would having a baby change my life
Research Issues And Important Questions
Identifying Your Priorities
Learning Objectives for Students:
Chapter 3 The Decision to parent.
The family in Norwegian society
Presentation transcript:

The donor’s future role in the child’s life MCK Fertility Centre Views of candidate parents & donors A. Brewaeys, M. Brewaeys E. de Reus

Questions under investigation MCK Fertility Centre 1. Parents’ and donors’ desire for non identifying information 2. Parents’ intention to inform child 3. Parents’ and donors’ views on:  The child’s right to know its donor origin  Chance child wants to meet donor  Acceptance of future meeting between child and donor  Donor’s future role in child’s life

Materials and Methods MCK Fertility Centre Self developed questionnaire (response rate: 96%) Population  Donors 47  Heterosexual couples 77  Lesbian couples105  Single women 80

Demographic characteristics candidate parents MCK Fertility Centre Age in yearsEducation mean (SD)% with at least college level ______________________________________________________ He couples32 (4.8)54% Le couples33 (3.8)63% Single women37 (2.4)68% ____________________________________________

Donor characteristics MCK Fertility Centre Age in years 37 (SD: 7.3) Education (%)73 (with at least college level) Sexual orientation (%) heterosexual : 93 Marital status (%) single: 54 Children (%) no: 73 Child wish (%) no: 42 yes: 34 yes later: 24

Motivations to donate (%) MCK Fertility Centre Helping infertile people95 Creating offspring61 Some kind of fatherhood24 Validate own fertility12 Financial reimbursement 5

What do candidate parents want to know about the donor (%) MCK Fertility Centre No information 8 _________________________________ Personality characteristics28 Life circumstances21 Physical characteristics16 Number of children born10 Professional activity 9 Motivation donor 8

What do donors want to know about candidate parents (%) MCK Fertility Centre No information10 ________________________________ Number of children born88 Life circumstances (family type)21 Personality / Physical characteristics 5

Parents´ attitudes towards telling (%) MCK Fertility Centre Intention to tell? YesDon´t know / later ___________________________________________ He couples8812 Le couples92 8 Single women93 7 ___________________________________________

How difficult is telling? (%) MCK Fertility Centre not difficultrather difficult difficult ______________________________________________ He couples Le couples Single women ______________________________________________

Most frequently expected difficulties are MCK Fertility Centre  At what age do I tell what kind of story?  When is the child ready to understand?  Would telling harm the child?  Would telling change the relationship between the non- genetic parent and the child?

Child´s right to know donor´s identity(%) MCK Fertility Centre AgreePartly agree Disagree _____________________________________________ He couples Le couples Single women _____________________________________________ Donors100-- _____________________________________________

Chance (informed) child wants to meet donor (%) MCK Fertility Centre 50%Don’t know _______________________________________________ He couples Le couples Single women57124 _______________________________________________ Donors _______________________________________________

Views on future meeting donor-child MCK Fertility Centre What would you think about a future meeting between your child and the donor ? (%) rather not would not mindwould want to ___________________________________________________________ He couples Le couples Single women ______________________________________________ Donors ____________________________________________________________________________

Views on donor’s future role in child’s life candidate parents (%) MCK Fertility Centre “what do you expect about the donor’s role in the child’s life?” He Les Single _________________________________________________________ None Provider of information of certain characteristics Person with whom child builds up a relationship4520 Don’t know / depends on child8616 ___________________________________________________________

Views on donor’s future role in child’s life donors (%) MCK Fertility Centre “What do you expect about your role in the child’s life?” None15 Provider of information of certain characteristics51 Person with whom child builds up a relationship34

Summary Results show a great diversity of opinions and feelings  Between groups  Within groups An overlook on data along following lines:  The answers to our main study questions  Interesting differences between groups  Clinical implications Medisch Centrum Kinderwens

Most striking findings: parents’ & donors’ desire for information Majority of the parents would have liked some donor information  He couples the least  Most requested:  personality characteristics (intelligence) Donors less interested They mainly want know the number of children born out of their donation. MCK Fertility Centre

Clinical implications Should fertility clinics reconsider their policy ?  What about giving candidate parents the opportunity to receive donor information?  What about giving them the opportunity to make their own donor choice? Medisch Centrum Kinderwens

Most striking findings telling child MCK Fertility Centre Majority intends to inform child A respectable number finds it “rather difficult” to tell Difficulties: Which story at what age ? Impact on family relationships and welfare child? Clinical implications Need to develop written materials and counseling programs that provide tools and help for DI parents in their proces of telling

Most striking findings future contact child-donor MCK Fertility Centre Right to know donor’s identity?  Half He couples  Majority Le couples & S mothers  All donors Half of all groups: the chance of a future meeting >50. The majority: no objection against a meeting The donor’s future role?  None : He couples: 49%,  Provider of information : Le couples & single mothers 50%  Relationship with child : Single mothers 20% & Donors 34%

Heterosexual couples Ambivalence and uncertainty in their answers. This is reflected in :  Their difficulties to tell  No full commitment to the law: some question the child’s right to know the donor’s identity  Ambivalence about a future meeting donor-child Need to develop group counseling programs for candidate parents and for parents with children Medisch Centrum Kinderwens

Single mothers Most open to donor contact in future 20% would like their child to have an emotional relationship with donor Does absence of a partner increases donor expectations? Risk child will grow up with donor expectations that might never be fulfilled Counseling should address these issues Medisch Centrum Kinderwens

Donors  Profile: mean age 37 highly educated 50% single 73% no children & 58 % child wish  Helping the infertile major motive but… creating offspring 61% some kind of fatherhood 24%  All under scribe the child’s right to know donor’s identity  34% would want to built up a relationship with the child. MCK Fertility Centre