Jixie Zhang For g2p Collaboration Hall A Collabortion Meeting, June 2012 Status Update G2P(E08-027)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K. Slifer, UNH JLab Readiness Review for the E Collaboration E May 6, 2011.
Advertisements

Low Q 2 Measurement of g 2 and the LT Spin Polarizability A. Camsonne, J. P. Chen Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Karl J. Slifer University.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
The Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 : A Measurement of the Extended GDH Integral Vincent Sulkosky (for the JLab Hall A Collaboration)
Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For MENU 2010 May 31, Williamsburg.
Spin Structure in the Resonance Region Sarah K. Phillips The University of New Hampshire Chiral Dynamics 2009, Bern, Switzerland July 7, 2009 For the CLAS.
The Lamb shift in hydrogen and muonic hydrogen and the proton charge radius Savely Karshenboim Pulkovo Observatory (ГАО РАН) (St. Petersburg) & Max-Planck-Institut.
Richard Lindgren - UVa Cole Smith - UVa Khem Chirapatimol - Chiang Mai University E04- Status Report Precision Measurements of π 0 Electroproduction near.
Jin Huang & Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Boson 2010 Workshop Sept 20, JLab.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuterium and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li November 3, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Min Huang Duke University, TUNL On Behalf of the E g2p collaboration Hall A Analysis Workshop, 12/12/12.
Karl Slifer University of New Hampshire Jefferson Lab User Group Meeting 6/5/2012.
K. Slifer, UNH g2p & the LT Spin Polarizability for the E Collaboration E June 9, 2011.
K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 1  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation.
Does a nucleon appears different when inside a nucleus ? Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory Postdoctoral Research Symposium September 11-12,
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction: Polarisation Transfer & Cross-Section Measurements.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Polarimetry of Proton Beams at RHIC A.Bazilevsky Summer Students Lectures June 17, 2010.
HRSMC, A Geant4 Simulation for HRS Jixie Zhang CREX Collaboration Meeting April 2014 Jixie Zhang1April 2014.
S PIN A SYMMETRIES ON THE N UCLEON E XPERIMENT ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Experiment Nuclear Physics Group Meeting Hampton University May 11, 2009.
Jin Huang M.I.T. Hall A Analysis Workshop Dec 14, JLab.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 10 th, 2012.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10, JLab.
Precision Measurement of R L and R T of Quasi-Elastic Electron Scattering In the Momentum Transfer Range 0.55GeV/c≤|q|≤1.0GeV/c* Yan Xinhu Department of.
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
EMC effect in few-body nuclei at large x Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory Elba X Workshop Electron-Nucleus Scattering X June 23-27, 2008.
G E p -2γ experiment and the new JLab Hall-C Focal Plane Polarimeter Mehdi Meziane The College of William & Mary - APS Meeting April 14, On behalf.
A Measurement of Two-Photon Exchange in Unpolarized Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering John Arrington and James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne.
Nucleon Polarizabilities: Theory and Experiments
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Overview of Jefferson Lab’s Spin Physics Programme Stephen Bültmann - ODU RHIC/AGS Users Meeting, June 2007 Introduction Experimental Setup Asymmetry Measurement.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
Nilanga Liyanage University of Virginia For Jefferson Lab Hall A, CLAS and RSS Collaborations.
Polarisation transfer in hyperon photoproduction near threshold Tom Jude D I Glazier, D P Watts The University of Edinburgh.
Ibrahim H. Albayrak, Hampton University Group Meeting Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 13 th, 2013 E97-110:
Run Coordnator Report 2012/04/ /04/10 Jixie Zhang
QED, Lamb shift, `proton charge radius puzzle' etc. Savely Karshenboim Pulkovo Observatory (ГАО РАН) (St. Petersburg) & Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation 
The EG4 Experiment: A Low Q 2 Determination of the GDH Integral Sarah K. Phillips The University of New Hampshire JLab Users Group Meeting June 9, 2009.
New Measurement of the EMC effect for Light Nuclei and Global Study of the A-Dependence Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory ECT 2008 Workshop.
Nucleon spin physics with CLAS at Jlab Fifth International Conference on PERSPECTIVES IN HADRONIC PHYSICS Particle-Nucleus and Nucleus-Nucleus Scattering.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology The 7 th International Workshop on Chiral Dynamics August 10 th, 2012 Newport News, VA.
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Spin Structure with JLab 6 and 12 GeV Jian-ping Chen ( 陈剑平 ), Jefferson Lab, USA 4 th Hadron Workshop / KITPC Program, Beijing, China, July, 2012  Introduction.
Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.
Double spin asymmetry measurement from SANE-HMS data at Jefferson Lab Hoyoung Kang For SANE collaboration Seoul National University DIS /04/23.
Physics Goals & Overview K. Slifer, UNH April 18, 2011 E08-027/007 Collaboration meeting.
Moments and Structure Functions at Low Q 2 Rolf Ent, DIS Formalism - F 2 Moments: Old Analysis (R “Guess”…) - E L/T Separation  F 2, F 1,
HADRON 2009, FloridaAnar Rustamov, GSI Darmstadt, Germany 1 Inclusive meson production at 3.5 GeV pp collisions with the HADES spectrometer Anar Rustamov.
Overview of Onsite Progress Jian-ping Chen g 2 p /G ep Collabroation Meeting.
Hall A Collaboration Meeting Slide 0 Measurements of Target Single-Spin Asymmetries in QE 3 He ↑ (e, e’) Update of QE A y (E05-015) experiment.
CLAS Collaboration at Jefferson Lab Deuteron Spin Structure function g 1 at low Q 2 from EG4 Experiment Krishna P. Adhikari, Sebastian E. Kuhn Old Dominion.
Understanding the 3 He Nuclei: Asymmetry Measurements in Quasi- Elastic Ge Jin University of Virginia For the E Collaboration.
Pb-Parity and Septum Update Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 12/05/2008 Thanks to Robert Michaels, Kent Pachke, Krishna Kumar, Dustin McNulty.
The College of William and Mary Charlottesville, October 9, 2008
Precision Measurement of the Electroproduction of p0 Near Threshold:
JLab Spin Experiments Completed/on-going:
Neutron (e,e’π±) Target Single-Spin Asymmetry in Semi-inclusive DIS on a Transversely Polarized 3He Target - Kalyan Allada, Chiranjib Dutta, Mitra Shabestari,
University of New Hampshire Nuclear & Particle Physics Group
The np -> d p0 reaction measured with g11 data
Parity – Violating Neutron Density Measurements : PREX, C-REX
Measurement of Parity-Violation in the N→△ Transition During Qweak
Presentation transcript:

Jixie Zhang For g2p Collaboration Hall A Collabortion Meeting, June 2012 Status Update G2P(E08-027)

Inclusive Scattering 2 additional structure functions Needed for polarized cross section (compared with unpoloarized one). Inclusive Polarized Cross Section:

How to get g 2 ? −− Need to measure inclusive polarized cross section differences !!! (through absolute cross section and asymetry)

E Experiment Proton g2 Structure Function Primary Motivation Measure the proton g 2 structure function at low or moderate Q 2 (for the 1 st time). This will help to clarify several puzzles: Test the Burkhardt-Cottingham sum rule at low Q 2. Extract the generalized longitudinal-transverse spin polarizability  LT, allows to test Chiral Perturbation Theory (  PT) Hydrogen HyperFine Splitting : Lack of knowledge of g 2 at low Q 2 is one of the leading uncertainties. Proton Charge Radius : One of the leading uncertainties in extraction of from  H Lamb shift. Jixie Zhang4

Local Dump Septum Major New Installation in Hall A Purpose: Transverse target field Low beam current Low Q 2

Jixie Zhang6 The Septum magnet Only 2 pairs of coils ( ) turns was used in PREX Added 3 rd pair of coils: (can bend 2.82 GeV particles when run at 950A). 2 one-inch iron shims were added to each side, one on the top and the other at the bottom, to bend 2.89 GeV particles when run at 950 GeV. Left septum connected to HKS power supply (thanks to Hall-C)and right septum to BigBite power supply. Right septum short grounded after 3 weeks of runing and repaired as turns of top coils, down coils were not changed 2 weeks later, right septum short grounded again and the top coils were repaired to be coils.

M p < W < 2 GeV 0.02 < Q 2 < 0.2 GeV 2 Reduced kinematics Kinematic Coverage Proposed kinematics

LT Spin Polarizability BC Sum Integral   data not taken Projected Results

Polarized Ammonia Target 5.01 T/ 140 GHz or 2.5 T/70 GHz operation Helmholtz superconduct magnet 1K 4 He evaporation refrigerator Cooling power: about 1 W Microwave Power >1W at 140 GHz Dynamic Nuclear Polarization of NH 3 Has performed remarkably well after target group transplanted the Hall B coil package NH 3 Carbon Dummy CH 2 Empty See Josh’s talk for details

courtesy Kalyan Allada and Chao Gu Measure the asymmetry of the elastic recoil proton Relative measurement of the product P B P T Non-magnetic: sampling set by the trigger threshold Very useful as an independent beam quality monitor. Third Arm

Jixie Zhang11  Goals:  About 1% uncertainty of scattering angle (require good accuracy of  tg (horizontal)  tg (vertical)  A few precision of momentum  NEW g2p “I vs P 0 ”setting of HRS Quads from SNAKE tuning and  NEW g2p optics matrix for online analysis based on SNAKE tuning.  Straight through calibration is closed to finish (good for no target field data only).  Strategy for data with the target field: Focus plane to target plane straight through reconstruction  linear project to sieve plane  sieve to target reconstruction (get matrix from simulation, will be calibrate with real data) Optics for g2p

Dp=-3.5% Before After Dp=+3.5%  tg vs  tg after calibration (no target field) Before After Dp=-3.5%Dp=+3.5% courtesy Min Huang

X at sieve Projected to Sieve Plane Dp=+3.5%  tg vs  tg after calibration (no target field) Before After Dp=+3.5% courtesy Min Huang Y at sieve

Initial perfect design: coils (top) & (bottom)  coils Left almost no change; Right septum is not symmetric in Y any more, top is ~ 6.3% lower than bottom After 2 nd repair: coils (top)  Field at the top of left septum top is about 1% smaller than that at the bottom, while ~10% at the right septum at 800A, (~12% at 950A) Left 800A, right scaled Special Situation for Right Septum After first broken: coils (top) & (bottom)

courtesy Min Huang Right septum: Right Septum field is no longer symmetric in vertical (y) Right HRS Optics Right septum:  tg vs  tg

courtesy Toby Badman VERY VERY PRELIMINARY! Asysmetry

We managed to accomplished most of our physics goals. This is the first time for the polarized amonia target system used in Hall-A. It worked very well. Average target polarization is about 30% at 2.5T and 75% at 5.0T target field.(See Josh’s talk for details). DAQ system was impoved to take data at 6~7 kHz with <30% deadtime (see Ryan’s talk for detail). Beamline diagnostics worked well in range nA. (See Pengjia’s talk for details). A transverse target field was added into the optics matrix for the first time, which make it really challenge. Will provide the definitive measurement of g 2 at low Q 2. Summary

Back up Jixie Zhang18

A few minor mechanical setbacks delayed the start of the experiment by 149 days Redesigned/Replaced/Repaired Polarized target magnet Chicane bellows Right Septa Magnet: fire Add shims to both Septa at last minute Local Dump Cooling Harp: wires broken... Thanks to all amazing supports!!! Reasons for delay

Polarizability : Integrals of g 1 and g 2 weighted by 1/Q 4 Zemach radius : Integral of G E G M weighted by 1/Q 2 Dominated by Kinematic region of E and E Jixie Zhang20

Proton g 2 data from SLAC Precision does not allow unambiguous HT extraction x2g2x2g2 Leading Twist Q 2 ≈ 5 GeV 2

Proton g 2 data from JLAB SANE Leading Twist Q 2 ≈ 3-6 GeV 2 Very Prelimitnary Stat Errors only x2g2x2g2

RSS Experiment (Spokesmen: Rondon and Jones) K.S., O. Rondon et al. PRL 105, (2010)  consistent with zero => low x HT are small in proton.  non-zero by 2.6  =>Significant HT at low x needed to satisfy Neutron BC sum rule. (proton) (neutron) Q 2 = 1.3 GeV 2

BC Sum Rule Spin Polarizability  LT Projected Results Jixie Zhang24

Contribution to Hyperfine Splitting Jixie Zhang25

The 5T magnet field distorts the scattering plane much more than initial simulations revealed, especially at low momentum Out of plane scattering angle Effect discovered by Jixie Zhang (Geant4). confirmed by Min Huang (Snake), John Lerose Jixie Zhang26

Spin Polarizabilities Major failure (>8  of  PT for neutron  LT. Need g 2 isospin separation to solve. this is the region we should start to be able to trust  PT Jixie Zhang27

H.Burkhardt and W.N. Cottingham Annals Phys. 56 (1970) 453. Assumptions: the virtual Compton scattering amplitude S 2 falls to zero faster than 1/x g 2 does not behave as (x) at x=0. R.L. Jaffe Comm. Nucl. Part. Phys. 19, 239 (1990) Discussion of possible causes of violations “If it holds for one Q 2 it holds for all” predicted to vanish for all Q 2 Burkhardt-Cottingham Sum Rule

BC Sum Rule P N 3 He BC satisfied w/in errors for JLab Proton 2.8  violation seen in SLAC data 0<x<1 Mostly unmeasured BC satisfied w/in errors for Neutron BC satisfied w/in errors for 3 He

Spin Polarizabilities Major failure (>8  of  PT for neutron  LT Low Q 2 region is the one we should start to be able to trust  PT similar problem for proton  0 Jixie Zhang30

Spin Polarizabilities Neutron PRL 93: (2004) Heavy Baryon  PT Calculation Kao, Spitzenberg, Vanderhaeghen PRD 67:016001(2003) Relativistic Baryon  PT Bernard, Hemmert, Meissner PRD 67:076008(2003) Dramatic Failure of ChiPT

Plots courtesy of V. Sulkosky New Data on the Neutron Polarizabilities Large discrepency with  LT remains

Proton PLB672 12, 2009 Calculations also fail for proton  0 Proton  0

Proton LT Spin Polarizability No data yet on proton LT polarizability Kochelev & Oh. arxiv: (2011) Improves agreement with neutron, Neutron

nucleus ≈ Atom ≈ The finite size of the nucleus plays a small but significant role in atomic energy levels. Hydrogen HF Splitting Friar & Sick PLB (2003) Applications to Bound State Q.E.D.

Hydrogen HyperFine Splitting : Lack of knowledge of g 2 at low Q 2 is one of the leading uncertainties. Proton Charge Radius : One of the leading uncertainties in extraction of from  H Lamb shift. The finite size of the nucleon (QCD) plays a small but significant role in calculating atomic energy levels in QED. nucleus ≈ Atom ≈ Friar & Sick PLB (2003) Finite Size Effects

Inelastic Nazaryan,Carlson,Griffieon PRL (2006)  pol ≈ 1.3±0.3 ppm ppm Elastic piece larger but with similar uncertainty integral of g1 & F1 pretty well determined from F 2, g 1 JLab data  Z =-41.0±0.5ppm Hydrogen HF Splitting

Hydrogen Hyperfine Structure E Dominated by this region due to Q 2 weighting But, unknown in this region : MAID Model Simula Model Integrand of ¢ 2 So 100% error probably too optimistic E will provide first real constraint on  2 assuming CLAS model with 100% error

PSI measurement of the RMS proton radius Spectroscopic measurement of the energy splitting of the 2S 1/2 -2P 1/2 levels in muonic hydrogen (Lamb shift).

Proton Charge Radius from  P lamb shift disagrees with eP scattering result by about 6% I. Sick (Basel) : “What gives? I don’t know”. “Serious discrepency” [ELBA XI, Nature.com] C. Carlson (W&M) : “Something is missing, this is very clear.” [Nature.com] P. Mohr (NIST) : “would be quite revolutionary.” [L.A. Times.] B. Odom (N.Western) : “...very surprised to find strong disagreement.” [N.P.R.] J. Flowers (N.P.L.) “...could mean a complete rethink of QED”. [National Geographic] “...opens door for a theorist to come up with next [NY Times] theoretical leap, and claim their Nobel prize”. = ± fm Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen = ± fm World analysis of eP scattering = ± fm CODATA world average R. Pohl et.al Nature, July 2010 I. Sick PLB, 2003

Polarizability : Integrals of g 1 and g 2 weighted by 1/Q 4 Zemach radius : Integral of G E G M weighted by 1/Q 2 Dominated by Kinematic region of E and E08-007

E=2.2 GeV Left Arm Proton Elastic/N Q.E. Nitrogen Elastic Delta Resonance E-E’ (MeV) courtesy Ryan Zielinski Normalized Yields

Average Polarization >30% at 2.5 Tesla/70 GHz courtesy James Maxwell Target 2.5T

courtesy James Maxwell Average Polarization >75% at 5.0 Tesla/140 GHz Target 5T

Massive effort to commission new BPMs BCMs Harps Tungsten Calo to operate Hall a beam at < 100 nA courtesy Pengia Zhu Beamline Diagnostics

Acceptance effects becomes much more pronounced at low momentum E=1.7 GeV E=2.2 GeV courtesy Ryan Zielinski Normalized Yields

Asymmetries VERY VERY PRELIMINARY! E=2.2 GeV Elastic courtesy Toby Badman

VERY VERY PRELIMINARY!