Effective spending of climate finance: Exercise – Developing an M&E framework for adaptation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRM Working Group FAO Rome
Advertisements

M.M.M. Aheeyar Hector Kobbekaduwa Agararian Research and Training Institute, Colombo- Sri Lanka Building Capacities at Ground Level in the Context of Climate.
INTRODUCTION Organogram of DoF My role In the Department of Forestry
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Green Recovery And Reconstruction: Training Toolkit For Humanitarian Aid Project Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Session 2: Environmental Monitoring.
Cross-cutting M&E functions in MENARID MENARID Knowledge Exchange workshop 24th to 28th of March, Hammamet, Tunisia 1.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Climate change and Environmental Degradation Risk and Adaptation assessment Step 5 adaptation options.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
Impact evaluation of Climate Change interventions Dr Virinder Sharma, DFID India.
Including the Productive Poor in Agricultural Development Escaping Poverty Traps: Connecting the Chronically Poor to Economic Growth Cheryl Morden Director,
Key Elements of Legislation For Disaster Risk Reduction Second Meeting of Asian Advisory Group of Parliamentarians for DRR 5-7 February, 2014, Vientiane,
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
Africa Adaptation Programme Republic of Mauritius Informed decision-making for Climate Change adaptation Activities and lessons learned in Mauritius 15.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change in Multiple Regions & Sectors UNFCCC Workshop Bonn 9 June 2003.
Evaluating FAO Work in Emergencies Protecting Household Food Security and Livelihoods.
Addressing methodological challenges: measuring resilience + international coherence Juliet Field Climate and Environment Dept.
NIGERIA Developing CSA within the NAIP while reinforcing inter-sectoral consistency: progress, bottlenecks and support needs With technical facilitation.
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
Review of the Operational Policies and Guidelines: key issues from a civil society perspective Sven Harmeling, Germanwatch Held.
Workshop on RISKS AND IMPACTS ON FLOOD FROM EXTREME EVENTS IN ASEAN COUNTRIES Bali, August 5 th 2015.
Assessing vulnerability: linking livelihoods & climate Gina Ziervogel, Emma Archer & Anna Taylor.
Enver AKSOY, MSc Head of Strategy Development Board of MoFAL Policy approaches of Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock to pasture management in.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
PARTNERSHIPS IN SUPPORT OF CAADP Progress Report Brief Progress Report AUC Page 1 of 14.
Country CBA Project :Sri Lanka A study to economically evaluate possible adaptation measures for climate vulnerabilities in paddy and Other Field Crops.
Midterm Review of Agriculture and Food Security Sector June 2009, Baghdad.
Climate change and Environmental Degradation Risk and Adaptation assessment Step 3 select adaptation options  understanding adaptation  evaluate alternatives.
Reflection and roadmap: CFR assessment and roadmap development.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Climate Financing: Stakeholder Mapping. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F.
Climate policy mapping and analysis. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F +49.
Exercise: Project prioritisation. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F
Climate Public Expenditures and Institutional Review (CPEIR) Quiz.
Exercise: Accreditation of a National Implementing Entity.
Exercise: Pros and Cons of National Climate Funds.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Transparent spending of climate finance: Tracking and coding CCA/CCM finance.
Stakeholders and institutions. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F
Analysis of climate finance policy instruments. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T
International climate finance governance: role play.
Deeping Skill in Working with Logical Frameworks Examples.
Private sector case study analysis This Training Material was developed by adelphi with financial support from GIZ as part of the CF Ready Program on behalf.
Analysis of private sector stakeholders. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F.
Key Components of a successful Proposal OAS / IACML Workshop on Technical Assistance. San José, Costa Rica May 8, 2007 By: José Luis Alvarez R. Consultant.
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction ,
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
SBSTA’s five-year Work Program on the scientific, technical and socio-economic aspects of impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change Presentation.
IADB REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE June 25-26, Presented by : Ronald Jackson, Director General, ODPEM, Jamaica.
Viet Nam SREX NGOs contribution Presentation to CCWG Dang Thu Phuong (Challenge to Change) Phan Manh Tuan (freelancer) 1 August 2013.
Climate Smart Agriculture to Foster Food Production by Dyborn Chibonga, NASFAM CEO Prepared for WFO Annual General Assembly in Livingstone, Zambia -
Poverty - Environment Linkages Uganda’s Case By D.N Byarugaba Commissioner for Forestry.
A Presentation to the 2017 GEO Work Programme Symposium,
Honduras’ experience on NAP
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Climate Change Elements of the SADC Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP)
Japan-Caribbean Climate Change Partnership
NAGARKOT… Reward for the early birds.
MAIN FINDINGS OF NEEDS ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Local Government Climate Change Support Program 2016
Overview of this module
Module IV.3 NAP Implementation Trainer: [Name]
Module 0.1 Participants introduction / Preliminary stocktaking Trainer: [Name] Note to trainer:   During the NAP country-level training, the participants.
Module V.2 NAP as a living document Trainer: [Name]
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
Four-step approach (2) Identify adaptation options
Gender mainstreaming in environmental
Climate Change Elements of the SADC Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP)
Government of Nepal Ministry of Agriculture & Livestock Development
Presentation transcript:

Effective spending of climate finance: Exercise – Developing an M&E framework for adaptation

2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F E I Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH CF Ready Program Godesberger Allee Bonn/Germany T F E I Dennis Tänzler E T Dorit Lehr E T tise/html/3041.html Any content written by named authors do not necessarily reflect the views of adelphi nor GIZ nor of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. Although the authors take all possible care to ensure the correctness of published information, no warranty can be accepted regarding the correctness, accuracy, reliability and completeness of the content of this information. August 2014

3 Terms of Use This Training Material was developed by adelphi with financial support from GIZ’s CF Ready Program on behalf of the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany If you would like to adapt this presentation to your needs, please respect the following terms of use: The imprint is mandatory. It may neither be altered nor removed from the presentation and should always be printed out as part of the presentation, if applicable. The German Cooperation, GIZ and adelphi logo must not be moved or removed. No other logos or further information may be placed in the footer area. If you wish to add your own content please indicate in the respective slides that the respective content has been added and that it was not part of the original version provided by the authors mentioned in the imprint. If you would like to make substantial changes to the content of this presentation or have other questions regarding the material, please contact or

4 What you can expect to learn from this exercise  Get an understanding of :  the different impact levels (output, outcome, impact) and how they are intertwined;  the concept of indicators to track the delivery of results of specific adaptation measures.

5  Overview of IPCC frameworks for adaptation  Introduction to the concepts of the results chain and indicators  Introduction to the exercise  Reflection and next steps Agenda

6 Overview of IPCC frameworks for adaptation

7 The vulnerability function (IPCC 2001) Exposure Sensitivity Potential Impact Adaptive Capacity Vulnerability to wheather and climate induced hazards such as drought, heavy rain falls etc. of a system (e.g. eco-system, watershed, household, village, city, country) to wheather and climate induced hazards potential or capability of a system to adjust to climate variability and extremes

8 Baseline development Develop impact chain from vulnerability functions for impact groups Step1: Identify relevant exposure factors (weather and climate) for the selected impacts. Step 2: Identify natural, physical or land-management related factors which make an area or a group of people sensitive towards an impact. Step 3: Identify political, social, economic and cultural factors which contribute to a high or low adaptive capacity.

9 Baseline development Development of adaptation measures: Example: land degradation, erosion and landslides Erratic but intensive precipitation events Deforestation Unsuitable cultivation of steep slopes Land degradation Erosion and landslides Knowledge of farmers on proper land management Vulnerability of village farmers to land degradation, erosion & landslides Exposure Sensitivity Impact Adaptive Capacity Afforestation with indegenous species Plant suitable crops High dependency on natural resources Provide skills training to diversify farmer incomes Awareness raising & training on land management Adaptation Measures:

10 Assessing and managing the risks of Climate Change (IPCC 2014) IPCC, 2014 (p. 3): report/ar5/wg2/ar5_wgII_spm_en.pdfhttp:// report/ar5/wg2/ar5_wgII_spm_en.pdf

11 Assessing and managing the risks of Climate Change (IPCC 2014) Vulnerability Hazard Risk Exposure Example: Communities located at flood- prone river bank Community settling at the river bank, living in shanty houses Number of houses and people and the time they spent in the flood- prone area Frequent floods Loss of lives and assets of community due to floods

12 Assessing and managing the risks of Climate Change (IPCC 2014) Vulnerability Hazard Risk Exposure Potential adaptation measures: Communities located at flood- prone river bank Improve houses to sustain floods, educate community members to recognise early signs of flooding Relocate community from the river bank to another area Build flood breaks or establish early- warning system Measures result in reduction of probability of occurence and negative impacts

13 Introduction to the concepts of the results chain and indicators

14 The results chain  … demonstrates the logical order of the expected results related to an adaptation measure, including the direct output of the activity, the expected short- or mid-term outcome and the desired long-term effects (impact).  Example: ActivityOutputOutcomeImpact Proposed adaptation measure, e.g. Flood management in South State Direct results, e.g. Operational flood warning systems for up to 35 municipalities linked to the provincial system Desired short- or medium-term effects, e.g. Improved protection for priority flood- prone areas Long-term effects, e.g. Sustainable and inclusive socio- economic growth in flood-prone areas of South State Results Chain

15 Indicator definition An indicator…  is a quantitative or qualitative factor that provides a simple and reliable means to measure achievement, to reflect the changes connected to an intervention, or to help assess the performance of a development actor. (DAC Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation, OECD/DAC 2002)

16 Introduction to the exercise

17 Exercise – M&E framework for adaptation Setting You are part of the adaptation department within the Ministry of Environment of CLIFland. Together with your colleagues you are working on an adaptation proposal to be submitted to the Adaptation Fund (AF). As part of the proposal you are required to develop an M&E framework for the proposed adaptation measures. While the results chain has already been prepared by your colleagues, it is your task to identify suitable output and outcome indicators, to suggest appropriate means of verification and to formulate risks and assumptions.

18 Exercise – M&E framework for adaptation Now it is your turn to do the exercise!  Break up in groups of 4 people  Follow the instructions of the step-by-step guide which you will find in the hand-out Step 1: Make yourself acquainted with the project information provided Step 2: Identify suitable outcome and output indicators Step 3: Define means of verification Step 4: Finally, assess risks and make assumptions

19 Exercise – M&E framework for adaptation Step 2: Identify suitable outcome and output indicators (cells B1 + B1.1) Outcome 1Indicator A1 Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable farm families in minor irrigated and rain fed areas B1 Output 1.1 Indicator A1.1 Develop home garden-based agro forestry systems in target divisions to diversify livelihoods and build households’ adaptive capacity to climate change B1.1 Output 1.2Indicator A1.2 Identify and promote climate-resilient alternative income sources such as livestock, perennial cash crops and inland fisheries B1.2

20 Exercise – M&E framework for adaptation Step 2: Identify suitable outcome and output indicators Use the list of standard/core indicators provided by the Adaptation Fund

21 Exercise – M&E framework for adaptation Step 3: Define means of verification Outcome 1IndicatorMeans of Verification A1 Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable farm families in minor irrigated and rain fed areas B1C1 Output 1.1 IndicatorMeans of Verification A1.1 Develop home garden-based agro forestry systems in target divisions to diversify livelihoods and build households’ adaptive capacity to climate change B1.1C1.1 Output 1.2IndicatorMeans of Verification A1.2 Identify and promote climate-resilient alternative income sources such as livestock, perennial cash crops and inland fisheries B1.2C1.2

22 Exercise – M&E framework for adaptation Step 3: Define means of verification Use the list of exemplary means of verification but be sure to think beyond the listed options: Project evaluations: semi-annual and annual reports, mid-term and terminal evaluation; Monitoring programmes, GIS data, aerial photos; Interviews with relevant officials; and Information from experts and/or the public; etc. Surveys; Field monitoring reports; Meeting minutes.

23 Exercise – M&E framework for adaptation Step 4: Assess risks and make assumptions Outcome 1IndicatorMeans of VerificationRisks and assumptions A1 Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable farm families in minor irrigated and rain fed areas B1C1D1 Output 1.1 IndicatorMeans of VerificationRisks and assumptions A1.1 Develop home garden-based agro forestry systems in target divisions to diversify livelihoods and build households’ adaptive capacity to climate change B1.1C1.1D1.1 Output 1.2IndicatorMeans of VerificationRisks and assumptions A1.2 Identify and promote climate-resilient alternative income sources such as livestock, perennial cash crops and inland fisheries B1.2C1.2D1.2

24 Exercise – M&E framework for adaptation Step 4: Assess risks and make assumptions Review four dimensions of risks and assumptions: Financial and economic: Could financial or economic risks jeopardize the sustainability of planned project/programme outcomes? What is the likelihood of financial and economic resources being available once the AF grant ends? Socio-political: Could social or political risks jeopardize the sustainability of planned project outcomes? Is there sufficient public/ stakeholder awareness to support the project’s long-term objectives? Institutional framework and governance: Do the legal frameworks, policies, and governance structures within which the project operates pose risks that may jeopardize the sustainability of project benefits? Environmental: Could environmental risks jeopardize the sustainability of project/programme outcomes?

25 Exercise – Real Case Solution Real Case Solution: Adaptation Fund Proposal 2013: Addressing Climate Change Impact on Marginalised Agricultural Communities Living in the Mahaweli River Basin of Sri Lanka

26 Exercise – Real Case Solution Outcome 1Indicator Means of Verification Risks and assumptions Diversified and strengthened livelihoods and sources of income for vulnerable farm families in minor irrigated and rain fed areas Percentage of target households with sustained climate resilient livelihoods No. of women with new sources of income Field monitoring reports End of project survey Selected livelihood options are complimentary to state and other development interventions in the identified divisions Access to financing and markets for better livelihood targeting Abstract of Adaptation Fund Proposal, Sri Lanka 2013:

27 Exercise – Real Case Solution Output 1.1 IndicatorMeans of VerificationRisks and assumptions Develop home garden- based agro forestry systems in target divisions to diversify livelihoods and build households’ adaptive capacity to climate change No. of diversified home gardens created through project intervention Value of food and income generated through diversified home gardens Village level data sheets maintained by Farmer Organizations Field monitoring reports by Agriculture Extension Officers Community interest and investment in developing and maintaining home- gardens Active marketing chains for home garden produce (raw and processed food, spices, fuel, wood and medicinal herbs) readily available at community level Abstract of Adaptation Fund Proposal, Sri Lanka 2013:

28 Exercise – Real Case Solution Abstract of Adaptation Fund Proposal, Sri Lanka 2013: Output 1.2IndicatorMeans of VerificationRisks and assumptions Identify and promote climate-resilient alternative income sources such as livestock, perennial cash crops and inland fisheries No. and type of alternative livelihood assets created No. of women who participated in livelihood training Report on market chain analysis Division level monitoring committee reports/ meeting minutes Community willingness to take up alternative livelihoods Level of interest in local service delivery to encourage and follow up on livelihood diversification

29 Reflection and next steps

30 M&E framework for adaptation - Reflection What did you learn from this exercise? What challenges did you face in developing the results chain and defining the respective indicators on the output, outcome and impact level? How is your institution/country currently dealing with the monitoring and evaluation of adaptation measures?

31 M&E framework for adaptation– Next Steps Checklist to get CLIF Ready According to what you learnt from this exercise you could … Check with your institution about existing experiences with results-based monitoring for adaptation. Check with your institution/ country about the expenditures of monitoring and evaluation measures for adaptation.