Department of Sustainable Development and Construction DCA 145-005 Application to Amend Cell Tower Regulations – Temporary Towers and Height Restrictions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 22, 2008 Board Called Public Hearing on BZA #SE , March 6, 2008 APPLICANT: T-Mobile, LLC.
Advertisements

Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
2007 Council Directive “Review and make decision on a proposed sign ordinance.” Use the 1990 draft sign ordinance as a starting point.
Zoning Ordinance Update Planning Commission February 25, 2015.
BCC Worksession Ch.31.5 Sign Code Amendments Zoning Division January 6, 2015.
Implementing State Density Bonus Law in Berkeley November 13, 2014 City of Berkeley Planning & Development Department.
City Council Meeting January 18, Background  Staff receiving increasing number of inquiries regarding installation of wireless telecommunications.
BCC DISCUSSION ITEM Proposed Amendment to Hickman Billboard Agreement of August 14, 2000 June 18, 2013.
BCC WORK SESSION OVERVIEW OF ORANGE COUNTY SIGN CODE (PART II) SEPTEMBER 24, 2013.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 5, 2010.
Opposition to Proposed Building Height Variance in Case No. VA
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 19, 2008.
Telecommunications Law 1. 2 Summary of Proposed Amendments To Scarsdale Zoning Code PRESENTED BY: Joseph Van Eaton.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
City of Gloucester Wind Turbine Siting. Background Prior to May 17, 2007 – Wind Energy Conversion Devices – Special Permitted in any district by ZBA –
Wakulla County Board of County Commissioners August 18, 2008 Workshop Off-Premise Sign Existing Regulations & Proposed Changes Workshop Off-Premise Sign.
Streamlined Environmental Requirements for Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and Small Cells.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009.
WEST BERKELEY PROJECT Master Use Permits (MUP) May 15, 2012 Response to Concerns & Issues.
A 1,240 Acre Master Development Plan Proposal, West of Willcox, AZ. Cochise County Board of Supervisors August 23, 2011 Docket MDP / Z
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 11, 2011.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
The new VicSmart process and provisions. What is VicSmart? VicSmart is a fast planning permit process A decision is expected to be made in 10 days All.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 9, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 23, 2009.
Tall Structures Towers and Wind energy systems. What we do now. a.CUP for large towers and sites solely dedicated to towers under the definition of “public.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 24, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 22, 2009.
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 3, 2014.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Proposed Amendments to Cell Tower Regulations - Notification Requirements and Form District Standards.
SITE. ZOM CPA ZOM R-1B R-1A PD A A.
LOCATIONAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA FOR UTILITY SCALE PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR FACILITIES.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
Economic Incentive Plan Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing March 6, 2012.
National League of Cities Increasing Wireless Communications Services for Your Residents Congressional and FCC Action on Mandatory Wireless Facilities.
Downtown District Zone Permitted Use Table And Nonconforming Uses.
Downtown Development Review The Review Process and Preserving Downtown Character.
Community Development Department City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) & Zoning Map Amendments City Council (2nd Reading) May 6, 2014.
Community Development Department City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) & Zoning Map Amendments Planning & Land Development Regulation Board.
Redevelopment in the Resort Housing District To the Sanibel- Captiva Chamber of Commerce Nov. 29, 2011 Prepared by: Planning Department.
Workforce Housing Pilot Program and Economic Incentive Plan Update Board of County Commissioners August 25, 2009.
Permit Process & Application Guide
Rezoning Application # Use Permit # Use Permit # City Council May 14, Tide Mill Lane Communications Tower & Tree Farm.
ITEM 6.a AT GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE City Council – August 25, 2009.
ITEM 6.B ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT AT CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 25, 2009.
Community Input Meeting #4 July 8 & 9, Agenda City Staff & Project Team Why we are here Project overview Summary of previous community meetings.
1 Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department March 31, 2009 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE UPDATES.
Planning and Neighborhoods Committee of Council BRIEFING ON THE DOWNTOWN DENSITY BONUS PRO GRAM May 18, 2015.
AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.01CA3-05 January 17, 2006 City-initiated Code Amendment.
Planning & Community Development Interim Development Process to Implement the General Plan Land Use Element City Council July 11, 2016.
May 14, Planning Commission Planning Commission May 14, 2015.
Providence Saint John’s Health Center
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities in the Public Road Right-of-Way
Zoning Ordinance Update Study
Proposed Zoning Ordinance
Economic Development & Housing Committee August 21, 2017
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Appeal: Time Extension for Variance # East Walnut Street
Consideration of Action Re: Commercial Cannabis Businesses
Amendments to Palm Coast Apartment Planned Unit Development Agreement
Cell Tower Ordinance Update
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Board of County Commissioners

Presentation transcript:

Department of Sustainable Development and Construction DCA Application to Amend Cell Tower Regulations – Temporary Towers and Height Restrictions Economic Development Committee September 8, 2015

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Background On February 6, 2015, an applicant submitted an application and fees to modify tower/antenna for cellular communication use regulations Add temporary cellular units Allow Council to waive residential proximity slope restrictions via SUP Adopt language for modifications in order to comply with FCC Zoning Ordinance Committee (ZOC) discussed the item 3 times in March and April On April 16, 2015 ZOC recommended approval of the amendments On May 21, 2015 City Plan Commission (CPC) recommended approval

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Current Regulations 3 types of cellular communication technologies: 1.Mounted cellular antenna means a cellular antenna that is attached to an existing structure 2.Monopole cellular tower means a single pole structure that supports a platform and cellular antennas 3.Other cellular communication tower/antenna means any cellular communication tower or antenna that is part of a cellular system authorized by the Federal Communications Commission, but that is not covered by the above definitions

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Current Regulations All types of tower/antenna for cellular communication use are allowed in all districts by right or by SUP. o Mounted antennas are allowed by right  residential districts when on a nonresidential structure and in all nonresidential districts. o Monopole towers are allowed  by SUP in all residential districts and in NO(A) and NS(A)  in less intense nonresidential districts (i.e. LO(A), MO(A), GO(A), MU, MC, CR, and RR) monopoles are allowed by right below specified heights, and by SUP when they exceed specified heights.  by right in more intense nonresidential districts (i.e. commercial, industrial, and central area districts). o “Other” types are allowed  by right in more intense nonresidential (i.e. GO(A), CS, industrial, and central area) districts and  by SUP in residential districts and some less intense nonresidential (i.e. NO(A), LO(A), MO(A), retail, mixed use, and MC) districts.

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Mounted Antennas Current Regulations

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Mounted Antennas Current Regulations

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Monopole Cellular Tower Current Regulations

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Monopole Cellular Tower Current Regulations

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Other Antennas and Monopole Cellular Tower Current Regulations

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Other Cellular Communication Tower/Antenna Current Regulations

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Residential Proximity Slope (RPS) Current Regulations All types of tower/antenna for cellular communication use are a utility and are not restricted by zoning districts’ maximum structure height However, they must comply with residential proximity slope (RPS) Council may waive the RPS if a specific use permit (SUP) is required. The board of adjustment (BDA) may grant a variance to height if it finds that the land has a restrictive size, shape, or slope that would prevent commensurate development. This is often a difficult standard to prove for a monopole tower.

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Residential Proximity Slope (RPS) Current Regulations Residential Proximity Slope (RPS) is a plane projected upward and outward from every site of origination (e.g. R, D, TH Districts). Site of origination begins at the property lines of low density residentially zoned properties (e.g. R, D, TH Districts). If any portion of a structure is over 26 feet in height, that portion may not be located above a residential proximity slope

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, 2015 Zoning CategoryAngle of ProjectionExtent CH, MF-1, MF-1(A), MF-2, and MF-2(A) 45° (1 to 1 slope)Terminates at a horizontal distance of 50 feet from the site of origination. Current Regulations Residential Proximity Slope (RPS) MF-2(A) MU-2 50’ 13

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, 2015 Zoning CategoryAngle of ProjectionExtent R, R(A), D, D(A), TH, and TH(A)18.4° (1 to 3 slope)Infinite. Current Regulations Residential Proximity Slope (RPS) R-7.5(A) MU-2 26’ 14

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Applicant Requested Amendments 1.Create “Temporary Cellular Units” – Add new type to tower/antenna technologies to allow interim cellular service when an existing tower/antenna is damaged or destroyed. 2.Waive Residential Proximity Slope (RPS) Restrictions – Allow Council to waive residential proximity slope (RPS) height restrictions with a specific use permit (SUP) instead of granting a variance by the Board of Adjustment (BDA). 3.Tower/Antenna Modifications – Adopt language to refer to FCC requirements to allow repairs, replacement, or extensions of existing tower/antennas.

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Temporary Cellular Units Applicant’s Problem Statement If an existing tower/antenna is damaged or destroyed, the replacement must meet the zoning regulations for a permanent tower/antenna. o Tall structures in locations to support cellular technology may not be available for mounted cellular antennas. o Other antennas often require SUP (3-4 month process) and immediate cellular service is needed to serve the public.

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, 2015 Add new type of tower/antenna called a “temporary cellular unit”. o To allow temporary cellular service when an existing tower/antenna is damaged or destroyed.  By right in all residential and nonresidential districts.  Allowed for one year.  May be granted an additional two six month extensions, if an application for an SUP or a Planned Development District is filed.  Must obtain a certificate of occupancy (CO).  Must be removed:  upon the completion or expiration of a permit to construct a permanent tower/antenna or  expiration of the temporary cellular unit Certificate of Occupancy (CO). 17 Temporary Cellular Units CPC Proposed Amendment

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Temporary Cellular Units Proposed Amendment o Height restrictions  Residential proximity slope does not apply  Lightning rods are excluded in height calculations  If multiple pole structures are erected, limited to the height of existing antennas  Height restrictions for a single pole structure:  If the height of the existing tower/antenna to be removed is less than the maximum structure height of the district, the maximum structure height may extend an additional ten feet in height for each existing operator above one, not to exceed the maximum structure height of the district.  If the height of the existing tower/antenna to be removed is equal to or exceeds the maximum structure height of the district, the maximum height of the temporary cellular unit may not exceed the height of the existing mounted cellular antennas to be removed.

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, 2015 Height restrictions for a single pole structure: 19 Temporary Cellular Units Proposed Amendment 135’ max height of district (MU-2) 3 mounted antennas to be removed; 80’ height 20’

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, 2015 Height restrictions for a single pole structure: 20 Temporary Cellular Units Proposed Amendment (continued) 36’ max height of district Height of mounted antenna(s) to be removed 50’

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, 2015 RPS Restrictions Applicant Problem Statement Example Monopoles are allowed by right in CR when less than 65’ tall. RPS Remedy: Appeal to Board of Adjustments (BDA) May be difficult to prove hardship of land to BDA (restrictive size, shape, or slope) 21 50’ R-7.5(A) CR 26’

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, 2015 RPS Restrictions Applicant Problem Statement Example Monopoles are allowed by SUP in CR when 65’ tall or more. RPS Remedy: Council may waive RPS with SUP Less difficult standard to prove. Can be approved through SUP process ’ R-7.5(A) CR 26’

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, 2015 Allow Council to consider waiving the residential proximity slope (RPS) height restrictions through a specific use permit (SUP). 23 RPS Restrictions CPC Proposed Amendment

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Tower/Antenna Modifications Applicant’s Problem Statement In October 2014, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued the Wireless Infrastructure Report and Order which requires municipalities to adopt regulations that would allow for existing cellular systems to make modifications that did not “substantially modify” the “tower or base station”.

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Tower/Antenna Modifications CPC Proposed Amendment Adopt language to track FCC language to allow for modifications to existing towers/antennas in o use regulations, o maximum building height, and o nonconforming uses and structures

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Next Steps Schedule for City Council Agenda

City Council Economic Development Committee – September 8, Appendix Proposed language to comply with FCC requirements: “An application or amendment for an SUP or Planned Development District that would otherwise be required is not required for a modification to an existing towers/antennas or its base station unless the modification substantially changes the physical dimensions of the existing [type of tower/antenna for cellular communication technology] or its base station. A modification substantially changes the physical dimensions of an existing [type of tower/antenna for cellular communication technology] or its base station if it meets any of the criteria listed in 47 C.F.R. § (b)(7).”