Project Site Description Area – 2,30,327 m 2 Global Position – Between N 19 0 02’20” to N19 0 02’71” and E 72 0 89’50” to E72 0 90’80” Elevation – +14.5m.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Classification systems in slope stability analysis
Advertisements

ROCK SLOPE ENGINEERING
SINTEF Petroleum Research The strength of fractured rock Erling Fjær SINTEF Petroleum Research 1.
Team J: Naadirah Custis, Deion Floyd
Samrat Mohanty, PhD, PE, Senior Engineer, Agapito Associates, Inc
Design Parameters.
EEG 608 ROCK ENGINEERING II.
STABILITY ANALYSIS IN PRESENCE OF WATER Pore pressures Rainfall Steady state flow and transient flow.
FACTORS AFFECTING SLOPE FAILURE Introduction Sr. No Name of the parameters and properties Details 1Geological DiscontinuitiesFault, Joint, bedding plane,
OUTLINE Engineering Properties of Rock Formations 1- Rock Material and Rock Mass Concept 2- Rock Material Properties 3- Rock Mass Properties 4- Investigation.
1.3: Fresh Water Flows Underground Groundwater: Water held underground Permeable: A substance that liquids can flow through. Ex: coffee filter, soil,
ME 388 – Applied Instrumentation Laboratory Fatigue Lab.
EVALUATION OF COUPLED SHEAR-FLOW BEHAVIOR OF SINGLE ROCK JOINTS R. Saho, Y. Jiang, Y.Tanabashi, B.Li Graduate School of science and technology Nagasaki.
Sensitivities in rock mass properties A DEM insight Cédric Lambert (*) & John Read (**) (*) University of Canterbury, New Zealand (**) CSIRO - Earth Science.
SAMPLE IMAGE Shale Gas Development: Integrated Approach Hemant Kumar Dixit Mumbai, India 18 January-2013.
D2011 Project CEA-IRSN Results Alain MILLARD, Frédéric DELERUYELLE Wakkanai, Japan, October 20-23, 2008 Task A - STEPS 0/1.
ROCK MASS CLASSIFICATIONS
SCT Operations Investigation into Abnormal Subsidence above a Longwall Panel in the Southern Coalfield, Australia Winton Gale Managing Director SCT Operations.
Task #8: Hydraulic interaction rock/bentonite Objectives: Scientific understanding of the exchange of water across the bentonite-rock interface. Better.
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ENGINEERING BY KARTHIVELU.
Analyses of tunnel stability under dynamic loads Behdeen Oraee; Navid Hosseini; Kazem Oraee 1.
LAGUNA at Fréjus LAGUNA/LAGUNA-LBNO General Meeting March 3 th -5 th, 2011, CERN Eng. Francesco Amberg.
Evaluation of a bedrock aquitard for regional- and local-scale groundwater flow Kenneth R. Bradbury, Madeline B. Gotkowitz, and David J. Hart Wisconsin.
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department Glassy Carbon Tests at HiRadMat 14 March 2014 C. Garion2 Outline: Introduction Context: Transparent.
Lead Technology Task 6.2 Materials for mechanical pump for HLM reactors M. Tarantino – ENEA Work Package Meeting – ENEA Bologna, November 17th, 2010.
John N. Dougherty, PG Lisa Campbell, PG EPA Region 2, New York City
- D TR ADPE / A © FORCE shale seminar 18 &19 Sept Stavanger Stress determination and pore pressure measurements performed at the Meuse/Haute-Marne.
Induced Slip on a Large-Scale Frictional Discontinuity: Coupled Flow and Geomechanics Antonio Bobet Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Virginia Tech,
Tunnel Engineering for Indian Railways
Subsurface drainage – Investigations
LCWS2013 (Asian Region) CFS 12th November Experimental Hall 3D deformation analysis Asian Region Design CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.
FOLD, FAULT, AND JOINT GROUP 5 FOLD FOLDS ARE WAVE-LIKE IN SHAPE AND VARY ENORMOUSLY IN SIZE. THE TERM FOLD IS USED IN GEOLOGY WHEN ONE OR A STACK OF.
1 4 Geology and Groundwater Introduction –Geology complexities are reflected in hydrogeology –Geology is the basis for any groundwater investigation Topics.
Casing Integrity in Hydrate Bearing Sediments Reem Freij-Ayoub, Principal Research Engineer CESRE Wealth from Oceans.
1 SGES 1302 INTRODUCTION TO EARTH SYSTEM LECTURE 7: Geological Structures: Joints & Faults.
Pre-Excavation Rock Evaluation 1)Goal- Excavate the largest possible safe and stable detector chamber 2) Procedure a) measure characteristics of the rock.
1 Naruki Wakabayashi Shimizu Corporation Tokyo Japan Study on the Jointed Rock Mass for the Excavation of Hyper-KAMIOKANDE Cavern at Kamioka Mine NNN07.
How Faulting Keeps Crust Strong? J. Townend & M.D. Zoback, 2000 Geology.
Faults as fluid flow barriers and their role in trapping hydrocarbons Grp 2.
DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources.
Lecture 7 Mechanical Properties of Rocks
CIVIL ENGINEERING. Civil engineering work includes: dams embankments motorways bridges buildings cuttings quarries tunnels mines All these need to take.
-Kazem Oraee (Prof) - Arash Goodarzi (Eng) - Nikzad Oraee-Mirzamani (Phd) -Parham Khajehpour (Eng) 34th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining.
Interpretation of Rock Properties
Numerical analysis of Concrete Face Rockfill Dams based on Lade’s model and gradient plasticity P. Dakoulas, E. Stavrotheodorou, A. Giannakopoulos University.
What’s seismology about? Seismology is the study of the generation, propagation and recording of elastic waves in the Earth (and other celestial bodies)
February 13-15, 2006 Hydromechanical modeling of fractured crystalline reservoirs hydraulically stimulated S. Gentier*, X. Rachez**, A. Blaisonneau*,
SITE INVESTIGATION.
Soil Physics David Zumr room: b608 Lecture (and seminar) notes will be available: -
Candidate: Chhatra B. Basnet Main Supervisor: Dr. Krishna K. Panthi (Department of Geology and Mineral Resources Engineering) Applicability of Unlined/Shotcrete.
Groundwater movement Objective To be able to calculate the hydraulic conductivity of a sample given measurements from a permeameter To be able to evaluate.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
ANT11 Presentation, October, 10-13, 2011 David Vardiman Project Engineer Geotechnical Design and Excavation 1 Sanford Lab at Homestake, Lead, SD 4850L.
LAGUNA Design of a pan- European Infrastructure for Large Apparatus studying Grand Unification and Neutrino Astrophysics Guido Nuijten.
Hkkjr dksfdax dksy fyfeVsM
Breakout analysis using Fullbore Formation MicroImager images
Lecturer: Dr. Frederick Owusu-Nimo
Marcell Lux, hydrogeologist engineer
WATER TANKS.
Heat underground creates pressure which forces hot water upwards.
Ground Water Revised 12/16/09.
by A. Belaidi, D. A. Bonter, C. Slightam, and R. C. Trice
1.3: Fresh Water Flows Underground
Department of Civil Engineering
CHAPTER THREE DISCONTINUITIES
Ground Water Revised 12/16/09.
Stability Analysis for the Back Slope of Power House Bhasmey HEP-Case Study Author- Hemlata Gupta 04th Dec /10/2018 Numerical Modelling of slope.
Scott McFarlane & Richard Merifield
Presentation transcript:

Project Site Description Area – 2,30,327 m 2 Global Position – Between N ’20” to N ’71” and E ’50” to E ’80” Elevation – +14.5m to +71m m.s.l. Rainfall – 2211 mm annual Temperature – Min C Dec.; Max C May Nearest Rly. Stn. – Kurla, 10 km

Project Site Description

Geological Investigations and results Regional Geology

Geological Investigations and results Testing at site

Geological Investigations and results Testing at site Hole No.Total no. of Joints observed Joints as per inclination Spacing. of Joints (m) <50 o >70 o BH BH BH BH-4 30 NIL0.40 BH BH BH BH

Geological Investigations and results Testing at site

Geological Investigations and results Testing at site

Geological Investigations and results Testing at site

Geological Investigations and results Testing at site

Geological Investigations and results Testing at site

Geological Investigations and results Testing at site - Result

Geo-mechanical Investigations and results In-situ Stress Regime (i) High stress Zone ‘1’ (Depth from surface 30-35m)  v = 0.028*depth, MPa ≈ 1.0 MPa, Dipping vertically downward  H = 4.8 MPa, Strike direction N1230E±300  h = 2.2 MPa, Strike direction N2130E±300 (ii) High stress zone ‘2’ (Depth from surface 50-60m)  v = 0.028*depth, MPa ≈ 1.7 MPa, Dipping vertically downward  H = 18.7 MPa, Strike direction N720E±300  h = 9.7 MPa, Strike direction N1520E±300 (iii) General stress profile  v = 0.028*depth, MPa Dipping vertically downward  H = 0.11*depth, MPa, Strike direction N1260E±300  h = (0.024*depth ) MPa, Strike direction N2160E±300

Geo-mechanical Investigations and results In-situ Stress Regime

Geo-mechanical Investigations and results Physico-mechanical properties Basic physico- mechanical parameters Samples borehole numbers Samples depth range from surface Parameters value range Mean value of the parameters Remarks Density, , kg/m 3 B1, B2, BH3, BH4 5.5m to 54.5m2.67 to kg/m 3 Young’s modulus (static), E, GPa BH1, BH2, BH3, BH8 25.5m to 65.5m5.7 to GPaHigher values below -30m m.s.l. Poisson’s ratio (static),  BH1, BH2, BH3, BH8 25.5m to 65.5m0.19 to Young’s modulus (Dyn.), E dyn, GPa BH1around 47m53 to GPa Poisson’s ratio, (Dyn.),  dyn BH1around 47m0.25 to Uniaxial Comp. Strength, UCS, MPa BH1, BH2, BH3, BH8 28.2m to 65.5m17.7 to MPaHigher values below -30m m.s.l. P-Wave velocity, V p, km/sec. BH1around 47m4.58 to km/sec. S-Wave velocity, V s, km/sec. BH1around 47m2.70 to km/sec. Fracture toughness, K IC, MPa/m 0.5 BH1around 47m1.96 to MPa/m 0.5

Geo-mechanical Investigations and results Rock Mass Characterization ParameterParameter valuesParameter ratings Remark Strength, intact rock MPa4-7Rock strength greater than 75 MPa below -30m m.s.l. will result into rating near to 6. RQD Based on volumetric joint count, RQD surrounding caverns level expected at 95% and will result in the rating of 20. Spacing, discont.0.35m to 2.5m10-20Expected joint spacing at the proposed caverns level is 0.6m to 2.0m resulting into the rating of 15. Condition of discontinuities Joint aperture less than 1mm to tight joints with rough, planar walls with no infillings Based on core drilling and permeability measurements. Ground waterDamp to completely dry10-15Based on core drilling and geo-hydrological studies at Calico site. Complete dry rock mass conditions expected for surrounding the caverns housing resulting into the rating of 15. Adjustment for joint orientation w.r.t. drivage direction. Fair to very favourable(-5)- 0 Adjusted RMR61-92“Good”- “Very good” rock mass conditions. Average RMR of 86 (very good rock mass conditions) is expected to surround the proposed caverns level.

Geo-mechanical Investigations and results Rock Mass Characterization Parametervalueremark RQD100-79Good to excellent quality cores Jn1-12Massive to three joints sets + random Jr1.5-3Rough or irregular, planar to irregular, undulating joint sets Ja0.75-1Unaltered joint walls, surface staining only to tightly healed joint walls. Jw1Dry SRF1Medium stress Q10-300“Good”- “Ext. Good"

Geo-mechanical Investigations and results Prediction of Ground Conditions

Geo-mechanical Investigations and results Prediction of Ground Conditions

Geo-hydrological Investigations and results Permeability test-no.MDLdV/dPP hyd Perm., Kkfkf mmm 3 /PaMPa  darcy m/s · · · · · · low pressure build-up · · · · · · · ·

Geo-hydrological Investigations and results Aquifer

Geo-hydrological Investigations and results Aquifer

Geo-hydrological Investigations and results Ground water flow

Geo-hydrological Investigations and results Geo-hydrology results

Conclusions of the Study Calico Plot is an ideal site for crude oil storage at caverns top at -55m m.s.l. Finished products can also be stored in the underground. Caverns of 24m width and 24m to 40m height can safely be constructed at the site. The site offers for a simple water curtain system operative from the surface to enhance hydraulic containment. Caverns at Calico will pioneer the refinery business in India for sustainable growth under constraints of congested urban sprawl.