Technology Integration Interview with Mr. Glen Brown Marilyn Baker & Rebecca Brewster Technology Integration Interview with Mr. Glen Brown Marilyn Baker.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Going PLACES Carteret Community Colleges Quality Enhancement Plan.
Advertisements

The Dell Intelligent Classroom™
Teaching and Learning Center Title V Impact Created a training classroom so that instructors may explore the newest technology available for them.
Technology and Media in Social Studies Essentials of Elementary Social Studies By Turner, Russell, Waters Copyright 2013.
HP Mobile Science Lab for Science and Engineering Students Ryerson University, Department of Physics Toronto, ON Canada Dr. M.Milner-Bolotin, Dr. T.Antimirova.
Chapter 1 What is listening?
Unleashing the Capabilities of Universities Through Information and Communication Technology by: JOSE Q. MACABALLUG, DTE.
Information Literacy Demonstration – Partnership of Faculty and Library Gergana Georgieva Information Literacy Librarian August 25, 2008.
LUSD 21st Century Technology PresentationPage 1 21 st Century Technology in the Classroom A Presentation to the Board of Education Prepared by Facilities.
Distance Education Podcasting with Special Education Students Spring 2009 Matt Dockery.
Chapter Three: Determining Program Components by David Agnew Arkansas State University.
SIMPLE STEPS FOR DEVELOPING LEADERS WITHIN THE LEAGUE TAPPING INTO OUR LEADERSHIP POTENTIAL NOW!
Assistive Technology: Enabling Dreams Video Assistive Technology Enabling Dreams - YouTube.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Lecture 3 Teaching Listening
Wiscasset High School Technology Integration. Key Components of Program Strengths Development of a Supportive Infrastructure – Director of Technology.
Using Core Vocabulary in Dynamic Display AAC Devices
Technology and Media in Social Studies. Looking Ahead What is technology? What are the various types of technologies that teachers can effectively utilize.
Changing mindsets: A traditional to a flipped classroom Elizabeth Wallace Middle Tennessee State University.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Standard V: Teacher.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Disruptive Innovation in K12 Education? Using Moodle to Create a Blending Learning Experience for Students.
KLA Maths Computer-based technologies in the Enhancing Student
The Daily 5 in Kindergarten A Guide For Parents. What is the Daily 5? A way of structuring reading instruction so that every student is engaged in meaningful.
1 Julia Da Silva- Beharry, August The goal of this final project is to disseminate key research findings and K-12 classroom application strategies.
Allows individuals with disabilities to improve and maximize their functional capabilities. Allows individuals with disabilities and the IEP team to select.
The goal of this final project is to disseminate key research findings and K-12 classroom application strategies. This is based upon the effectiveness.
Technology-Supported Literacy in the Classroom: Using Audiobooks and Digital Storytelling to Enhance Literacy Instruction Article by Kirsten Hett Slide.
Enhancing Teaching and Learning with Podcasts Mico e-Learning Workshop.
Technology, Digital Media, and Curriculum Integration
Teaching Students in Inclusive Settings. Getting Started Course Overview Discussion Posts and Rubrics Major Assignments Q & A Dr. Phyllis Schiffer-Simon.
“Change, or the pressure to change, is in the air in our educational systems. The effects touch everyone at all levels, from national governments to.
Interview with Justin Castile Henry County Schools Instructional Technology Specialist Anissa Andrews MEDT 8461 Diffusions of Innovations.
Gabi Witthaus & Ming Nie LLAS E-learning Symposium University of Southampton, 29 Jan 2010.
Lawrence R. Fine, M.Ed. Special Education Program Director Bi-County Collaborative.
“What’s wrong with education cannot be fixed with technology. No amount of technology will make a dent.” -Steve Jobs.
Analyze Design Develop AssessmentImplement Evaluate.
Project 3: Stakeholder Interview with Ashley Long Recent graduate of Heard County High School By Stephanie Hyatt and Penny Hood.
Guidelines and Policies for an Effective Online Learning Program: Meriden Public Schools 10/3/2011 Stewart,JEL
Bethune Middle School Technology Plan Presented by: William Carter E7801-Instructional Technology Planning and Management Dr. Regina Merriwether.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
A Work in Progress February 13, 2007 Whole Faculty Study Groups:
Faculty Perceptions of Readiness to Teach Online.
Redesigning Teacher Education from the Ground Up- A Collaborative Model Rene A. Middleton and Bonnie L. Prince.
Parent Guide to Using Lexile Scores Provided on the Georgia Milestones Individual Score Reports Using the Lexile Score to support the growth of your child’s.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Technology Interview by Carlene Bailey With BETSY HANSEN January 21, 2009.
Blue Ribbon Institute Reading, MA April 16-17, 2014
Learning Technologies Across Curriculum Mr. Michael Holmes Means, B. (2010). Technology and education change: Focus on student learning. *Journal of Research.
1 DUT e-Learning Project Pathfinders Review Symposium 5 March 2015.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT MODULE 2 Dr. Nicole Fitzhugh Professional School Counselor Berwyn Heights Elementary.
Interactive Multi-Media Projects & Problem-Based Learning Engaging Students in Their Learning.
TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY Focus Lesson Guided Instruction “I do it” “We do it” “You do it together” Collaborative Independent “You.
Winter Symposium January 20, Why are we here today? To discuss ways that we can take control of our future and make the outcomes we desire more.
Technology Interview by: LaTonya Greer Diffusion of Innovations-MEDT8461.
Classroom Guidance, November 2014
SKYPE FOR CLASSROOMS By Denise M.Walker EDUC 8841 : Diffusion and Integration Technology in Education Instructor:
UDL and Differentiation Methods Teaching in Today’s Classroom.
Numeracy at Neilston Primary School. Our Active Approach Children learn best when they are engaged! Increased motivation. Children are challenged appropriately.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Reading/ English Language Arts Curriculum of the Woodland Hills School District Presenter: Celeste Covington, Curriculum Coordinator *Information based.
The Importance and Benefits of Technology Integration in Our Classrooms JESSICA QUACKENBUSH DISTRICT EDUCATOR MEETING INDIVIDUAL STUDENT NEEDS WITH TECHNOLOGY-EDU620.
Olweus Parent Information
Literacy Update Board of Education October 11, 2016
Olweus Parent Information
Technology Integration Project.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
MEDT 8461 Project 1 The Interview
Interview with a Technology Education Teacher
Presentation transcript:

Technology Integration Interview with Mr. Glen Brown Marilyn Baker & Rebecca Brewster Technology Integration Interview with Mr. Glen Brown Marilyn Baker & Rebecca Brewster Diffusions of Innovations Diffusions of Innovations Dr. Huett Dr. Huett

Glen Brown Assistant Principal La Fayette High School Glen Brown Assistant Principal La Fayette High School

Q. What is your definition of technological literacy? A. Being able to function appropriately and effectively utilizing a myriad of technological resources.

Q. How is technology affecting the learning process? A. As this new generation of students has grown up with technology at every turn, they expect to be dazzled with up-to-date information and methods.

Q. When you hear the phrase “technology integration”, what does that mean to you? A. Using technology as the vehicle of curriculum.

Q. How should technology be used in education? A. However possible. From LCD tv announcements, to podcasts, to multimedia presentation (first by teachers, then by students), to on- line components to classroom instruction, to text message contacts with parents...an expanding infrastructure already exists and must be tapped by educators.

Q. How do you identify the “key players” in the technology integration process and get them “on board” to accomplish these goals? A. The key players are the instructors and students. The goal is to have them buy into more significant gains in student performance when curriculum is coupled with technology. To maximize benefits and resources, you begin the integration process with a few highly- motivated and able-bodied instructors. As the reverberations of their impact is felt throughout the institution, more and more key players will see the fruits of success and buy in will be automatic.

Q. What principles should guide your approach for integrating technology into instruction? A. The size of the impact potential and continuous usage by a variety of key players. Get it in the hands of those who will use it, then let them redeliver to their peers as interest increases.

Q. When can you expect technology to be effective? A. Anytime it is used with your key players.

Q. What are some obstacles you have encountered when trying to integrate technology? A. Money. Money. Money. Never force it on faculty. Allow everyone some exposure to it, then focus on those that want to use it and let them generate excitement starting with their circles.

Q. Do you have a technology success story? A. Yes. The acquisition, training, and utilization of SMART Boards and eLearning (via Moodle). We had nothing. We got a lot. We trained those who got it. We rolled it out and ran with it.

Q. What makes the differences between successful technology integration and a failed attempt? A. Success is getting it and using it continuously. Failure is not getting it or, worse, getting it and not using it. Technology alone will not enhance student achievement. Technology acts as a catalyst in augmenting student interest, therefore increasing the benefits of student achievement when stacked with sound instructional practices.