Data Registry to support HIPAA standards The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Title II - Subtitle F Administrative Simplification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Database Planning, Design, and Administration
Advertisements

1 Sep 15Fall 05 Standards in Medical Informatics Standards Nomenclature Terminologies Vocabularies.
Presented by Elena Chan, UCSF Pharm.D. Candidate Tiffany Jew, USC Pharm.D. Candidate March 14, 2007 P HARMACEUTICAL C ONSULTANTS, I NC. P RO P HARMA HIPAA.
1 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 IS&C Expo October 16 & 17, 2002 John Wagner Governor’s Office of Technology.
Spatial Data Infrastructure: Concepts and Components Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 6, 2006.
HIPAA: Privacy, Security, and HITECH, Oh My! Presented by Stephanie L. Ganucheau, Special Assistant Attorney General.
HIPAA Administrative Simplification Final Rule for Transactions Code Sets Stanley Nachimson
TM The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Safeguarding Health Information in Research and Public Health Practice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Beverly A.
1 Operating Rules Status NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards December 3, 2010 Updated on enhancements to Operating Rules for Eligibility and Claim Status.
United Nations Statistics Division Principles and concepts of classifications.
Management Information Systems, Sixth Edition
Dr Gordon Russell, Napier University Unit Data Dictionary 1 Data Dictionary Unit 5.3.
United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK) Metadata Registry Project Glenn M. Sperle Health Care Financing Administration May.
Security Controls – What Works
1 Consolidated Health Informatics “CHI” HIPAA Summit March 9, 2004.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall, Experiencing MIS, David Kroenke
1 IBM SanFrancisco Product Evaluation Negotiated Option Presentation By Les Beckford May 2001.
1 Workshop on Metadata Interoperability for Electronic Records Management November 15, 2001 Archives II, College Park, MD.
Lecture Nine Database Planning, Design, and Administration
LEVERAGING THE ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT Louise Edmonds Senior Manager Information Management ACT Health.
WHAT'S AHEAD? Kathy Whitmire Dale Gibson February 15, 2011 HIPAA 5010, ICD-10, ACO's, VBP, HIGLAS, PECOS.
Future of MDR - ISO/IEC Metadata Registries (MDR) Larry Fitzwater, SC 32 WG 2 Convener Computer Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May.
Assistive Technology Clinical Outcomes Research Management System (AT-CORMS) Tool Utilizing the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) Cognitive.
Database System Concepts and Architecture Lecture # 3 22 June 2012 National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences.
Common Data Elements and Metadata: Their Roles in Integrating Public Health Surveillance and Information Systems Ron Fichtner, Chief, Prevention Informatics.
Database System Development Lifecycle © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005.
Overview of the Database Development Process
Chapter 1: The Database Environment and Development Process
1 Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group The Vision Toward Testing Ontology Tools in High Priority Health IT Applications October 5, 2005.
CSC271 Database Systems Lecture # 4.
State of Iowa Enterprise HIPAA Compliance
Copyright © 2013 Curt Hill The Zachman Framework What is it all about?
Standards Categories February 24, 2006 HITSP Inventory of Standards Inventories Committee Edits.
United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK) A Data Registry Project 17 February 1999 Open Forum on METADATA REGISTRIES.
NCVHS and the Standards, Implementation Specifications and Operating Rules for Claim Attachments Walter G. Suarez, MD, MPH Director, Health IT Strategy.
Chapter 7: Database Systems Succeeding with Technology: Second Edition.
Betsy L. Humphreys Betsy L. Humphreys ~ National Library of Medicine National Institutes of.
Metadata Registries Workshop April 15, 1998 Slide 1 of 20 ANSI X Douglas D. Mann Stewardship Naming & Identification Classification.
Utilizing the CMS Security Risk Assessment Tool Liz Hansen, PCMH CEC, ICD-10 PMC Special Consultant, GA-HITEC Member Manager, GaHIN
The United States Health Information Knowledgebase: Federal/State Initiatives An AHRQ Research Project J. Michael Fitzmaurice, PhD, AHRQ Robin Barnes,
Component 11/Unit 8b Data Dictionary Understanding and Development.
1/26/2004TCSS545A Isabelle Bichindaritz1 Database Management Systems Design Methodology.
1 Consolidated Health Informatics Public Health Data Standards Consortium March 17, 2004.
AHRQ-USHIK: Best Practices & Lessons Learned HIT Standards Committee Vocabulary Task Force J. Michael Fitzmaurice Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
S&I Integration with NIEM (DRAFT) Standards Development Support June 8, 2011.
HIPAA Transactions Testing Update Kepa Zubeldia, M.D. September 13, 2004.
NHII 03 Standards and Vocabulary Group A CG Chute Mayo Clinic CG Chute Mayo Clinic This presentation does not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S.
PSO Common Formats for Patient Safety Event Reporting AHRQ Annual Conference 2008 William B Munier, MD, MBA 7 September 2008.
SDC JE What is a Data Registry? v A place to keep facts about characteristics of data that are necessary to clearly describe, inventory,
Standard Unique Health Identifier for Health Care Providers April 9, th Annual HIPAA Summit Gail Kocher Highmark.
Shawn Jones INDUS Corporation January 18, 2000 Open Forum on Metadata Registries Santa Fe, NM SDC JE-2029.
Tutorial on XML Tag and Schema Registration in an ISO/IEC Metadata Registry Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries Tuesday, January 21, 2003; 4:45-5:30.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup HIE Trust Framework: HIE Trust Framework: Essential Components for Trust April 21, 2010 David Lansky, Chair Farzad.
Proposed Preliminary Statewide Full Service Partnership Classification System BASED ON STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK THIS REPORT IS THE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OVERSIGHT.
Systems, Data and HIPAA from a Medicaid Perspective Rick Friedman, Director Division of State Systems Center for Medicare and Medicaid US Dept Health &
Improving the Population’s Health Through Standards National Center for Health Statistics 2002 Data Users Conference July 16, 2002 Data Policy and Standards.
Cyberinfrastructure Overview of Demos Townsville, AU 28 – 31 March 2006 CREON/GLEON.
Design Evaluation Overview Introduction Model for Interface Design Evaluation Types of Evaluation –Conceptual Design –Usability –Learning Outcome.
AHRQ’s US Health Information Knowledgebase Health Information Technology Standards Panel J. Michael Fitzmaurice, Ph.D. Agency for Healthcare Research and.
eHealth Standards and Profiles in Action for Europe and Beyond
Component 11 Configuring EHRs
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
Chapter 2 Database Environment.
Health Ingenuity Exchange - HingX
HingX Project Overview
Metadata The metadata contains
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
Converging HIPAA Transaction Requirements
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
Australian and New Zealand Metadata Working Group
Presentation transcript:

Data Registry to support HIPAA standards The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Title II - Subtitle F Administrative Simplification

Overview of HIPAA Provisions Secretary of HHS must adopt standards for electronic health care transactions, unique health identifiers, code sets, security, and privacy All health plans, clearinghouses, and those providers who choose to conduct these transactions electronically are required to implement these standards

HIPAA Data Needs Catalogue and harmonize data elements and coordinating version control across multiple independent organizations e.g. X12, HL7, NUCC, NCPDP, ADA, HCFA, etc. Support for HIPAA functional users (Payers, Clinical, Public Health, Research, etc) and their application developers Support data sharing with cross-system and cross-organization descriptions of common units of data

HIPAA Data Needs Assist users of shared data to have a common understanding of a unit of data’s meaning, representation, and identification Provide multiple access paths to metadata, such as high level model, programs, agreements (transaction sets, implementation guides, etc.), or data collections (core data set, attachments, identifier systems, etc.)

Needs are not unique to HIPAA Global information needs require understanding and interchange of data over broader areas then every before Data dictionaries have provided proprietary, localized, and application system specific data specifications

...nor are the solutions International data registry standards have been established for registration and management of shareable data Data registries based on international standards are continually being implemented Multiple organizations are actively beginning to harmonize their standards based data registries

Organizing and relating HIPAA data Perspective Focus What (Data) Objectives/ Scope (Policy Admin.) Business Model (Regulation Admin.) System Model (Designer) Technology Model (Builder) Detailed Representations (Subcontractor) Functioning System (Functional User) Information Subject Areas Object Relationship Models Logical Data Models Database Architecture Data Acquisition Components Databases, Data, and Information DATA DICTIONARY SCOPE DATA REGISTRY SCOPE Actual data Physical Implementation Code Implementation Guides/Code Sets NPRM for HIPAA P.L (HIPAA Law) Data element representations, data types, naming, field lengths, etc Database schemas, File specifications, etc. Data concepts, data elements, definitions, contexts, names, etc. Requiring SDO transactions, SDO code sets, etc. Specification of transaction set/implementation guides, code sets, identifiers, etc. Physical Implementation Specification Zachman Framework copyright -John A. Zachman, Zachman International

Participants - Data Registry Prototype DHHS DoD EPA VA AIHW

Purpose - Data Registry Prototype Capture information about data elements View based upon criteria Analysis comparisons of same or similar data concepts – –names – –definitions – –allowable values (code sets) – –format and size

Purpose - Data Registry Prototype Data Registry development – –utilize coalition products – –obtain hardware/software operating environment – –participate in coalition product enhancement Data Registry operation – –content administration – –establish access methods and link to content

Scope - Data Registry Prototype Apply ISO data representation standards to selected data from – –X enrollment implementation guide – –NCPDP enrollment subset – –NCVHS Core data elements Map data elements to high level information model (Australian National Health Information Model)

High level models enhance data exploration Party role Party characteristics Person Group Organization Legal entity Org sub-unit Party relationship Person role Organization role Service provider Service recipient Advocate Service provider Service funder Person characteristics Demographic labor Lifestyle Education Social Legal etc State of Wellbeing Physical Mental Functional Social Economic Cultural etc Organizational characteristics The benefit of a high level model is that it provides a consensus-developed conceptual framework into which specific data elements can be mapped without requiring consensus on the specific characteristics of each element mapped to it.

Scope - Data Registry Prototype Construct and populate relational database to contain metadata which is both scaleable and extensible Develop web-based access tool to allow dynamic selectable viewing based upon – –elements associated to a concept showing source – –side-by-side comparison of selected elements

Cost Estimate - Data Registry Prototype Assumptions – –1 FTE = $150,000 – –Data registry server housed where sufficient internet access exist, therefore, no additional costs estimated for connection to internet Costs – –Hardware/Software (OS, DB, Web)100,000 – –Develop Data Registry150,000 (4 FTEs / 3 months) – –Load prototype data 150,000 (3 FTEs / 4 months) – –Computer Operation for Data Registry 75,000 (1 FTE for 6 months) Total475,000

Benefits Exposure of HIPAA data specifications to multiple audiences in a standardized manner Easier to find and reuse data specifications Easier to recognize similarities and differences Promotes common understanding Content administered close to functional areas Ability to link to other authoritative sources